[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20554) "WALs outstanding" message from CleanerChore is noisy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-20554:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.5.0)
> "WALs outstanding" message from CleanerChore is noisy
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-20554
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20554
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0, 1.3.3, 2.0.1, 1.4.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20554.patch
>
>
> WARN level "WALs outstanding" from CleanerChore should be DEBUG and are not
> always correct.
> I left a cluster configured for ITBLL (retaining all WALs for post hoc
> analysis) and in the morning found the master log full of "WALs outstanding"
> warnings from CleanerChore.
> Should this really be a warning?
> {quote}
> 2018-05-09 16:42:03,893 WARN
> [node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_2] cleaner.CleanerChore:
> WALs outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/oldWALs
> {quote}
> If someone has configured really long WAL retention then having WALs in
> oldWALs will be normal.
> Also, it seems the warning is sometimes incorrect.
> {quote}
> 2018-05-09 16:42:24,751 WARN
> [node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_1] cleaner.CleanerChore:
> WALs outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/archive
> {quote}
> There are no WALs under archive/.
> Even at DEBUG level, if it is not correct, then it can lead an operator to be
> concerned about nothing, so better to just remove it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20554) "WALs outstanding" message from CleanerChore is noisy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-20554:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.3.3
> "WALs outstanding" message from CleanerChore is noisy
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-20554
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20554
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0, 1.5.0, 1.3.3, 2.0.1, 1.4.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20554.patch
>
>
> WARN level "WALs outstanding" from CleanerChore should be DEBUG and are not
> always correct.
> I left a cluster configured for ITBLL (retaining all WALs for post hoc
> analysis) and in the morning found the master log full of "WALs outstanding"
> warnings from CleanerChore.
> Should this really be a warning?
> {quote}
> 2018-05-09 16:42:03,893 WARN
> [node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_2] cleaner.CleanerChore:
> WALs outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/oldWALs
> {quote}
> If someone has configured really long WAL retention then having WALs in
> oldWALs will be normal.
> Also, it seems the warning is sometimes incorrect.
> {quote}
> 2018-05-09 16:42:24,751 WARN
> [node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_1] cleaner.CleanerChore:
> WALs outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/archive
> {quote}
> There are no WALs under archive/.
> Even at DEBUG level, if it is not correct, then it can lead an operator to be
> concerned about nothing, so better to just remove it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20554) "WALs outstanding" message from CleanerChore is noisy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-20554:
---
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available)
Pushed to branch-1.4 and up
> "WALs outstanding" message from CleanerChore is noisy
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-20554
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20554
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0, 1.5.0, 2.0.1, 1.4.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20554.patch
>
>
> WARN level "WALs outstanding" from CleanerChore should be DEBUG and are not
> always correct.
> I left a cluster configured for ITBLL (retaining all WALs for post hoc
> analysis) and in the morning found the master log full of "WALs outstanding"
> warnings from CleanerChore.
> Should this really be a warning?
> {quote}
> 2018-05-09 16:42:03,893 WARN
> [node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_2] cleaner.CleanerChore:
> WALs outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/oldWALs
> {quote}
> If someone has configured really long WAL retention then having WALs in
> oldWALs will be normal.
> Also, it seems the warning is sometimes incorrect.
> {quote}
> 2018-05-09 16:42:24,751 WARN
> [node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_1] cleaner.CleanerChore:
> WALs outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/archive
> {quote}
> There are no WALs under archive/.
> Even at DEBUG level, if it is not correct, then it can lead an operator to be
> concerned about nothing, so better to just remove it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20554) "WALs outstanding" message from CleanerChore is noisy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-20554:
---
Status: Patch Available (was: Open)
> "WALs outstanding" message from CleanerChore is noisy
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-20554
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20554
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0, 1.5.0, 2.0.1, 1.4.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20554.patch
>
>
> WARN level "WALs outstanding" from CleanerChore should be DEBUG and are not
> always correct.
> I left a cluster configured for ITBLL (retaining all WALs for post hoc
> analysis) and in the morning found the master log full of "WALs outstanding"
> warnings from CleanerChore.
> Should this really be a warning?
> {quote}
> 2018-05-09 16:42:03,893 WARN
> [node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_2] cleaner.CleanerChore:
> WALs outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/oldWALs
> {quote}
> If someone has configured really long WAL retention then having WALs in
> oldWALs will be normal.
> Also, it seems the warning is sometimes incorrect.
> {quote}
> 2018-05-09 16:42:24,751 WARN
> [node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_1] cleaner.CleanerChore:
> WALs outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/archive
> {quote}
> There are no WALs under archive/.
> Even at DEBUG level, if it is not correct, then it can lead an operator to be
> concerned about nothing, so better to just remove it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20554) "WALs outstanding" message from CleanerChore is noisy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-20554:
---
Attachment: HBASE-20554.patch
> "WALs outstanding" message from CleanerChore is noisy
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-20554
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20554
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>Assignee: Andrew Purtell
>Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.1.0, 1.5.0, 2.0.1, 1.4.5
>
> Attachments: HBASE-20554.patch
>
>
> WARN level "WALs outstanding" from CleanerChore should be DEBUG and are not
> always correct.
> I left a cluster configured for ITBLL (retaining all WALs for post hoc
> analysis) and in the morning found the master log full of "WALs outstanding"
> warnings from CleanerChore.
> Should this really be a warning?
> {quote}
> 2018-05-09 16:42:03,893 WARN
> [node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_2] cleaner.CleanerChore:
> WALs outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/oldWALs
> {quote}
> If someone has configured really long WAL retention then having WALs in
> oldWALs will be normal.
> Also, it seems the warning is sometimes incorrect.
> {quote}
> 2018-05-09 16:42:24,751 WARN
> [node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_1] cleaner.CleanerChore:
> WALs outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/archive
> {quote}
> There are no WALs under archive/.
> Even at DEBUG level, if it is not correct, then it can lead an operator to be
> concerned about nothing, so better to just remove it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-20554) "WALs outstanding" message from CleanerChore is noisy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Purtell updated HBASE-20554:
---
Description:
WARN level "WALs outstanding" from CleanerChore should be DEBUG and are not
always correct.
I left a cluster configured for ITBLL (retaining all WALs for post hoc
analysis) and in the morning found the master log full of "WALs outstanding"
warnings from CleanerChore.
Should this really be a warning? Perhaps better logged at DEBUG level.
{quote}
2018-05-09 16:42:03,893 WARN
[node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_2] cleaner.CleanerChore: WALs
outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/oldWALs
{quote}
If someone has configured really long WAL retention then having WALs in oldWALs
will be normal.
Also, it seems the warning is sometimes incorrect.
{quote}
2018-05-09 16:42:24,751 WARN
[node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_1] cleaner.CleanerChore: WALs
outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/archive
{quote}
There are no WALs under archive/.
Even at DEBUG level, if it is not correct, then it can lead an operator to be
concerned about nothing, so better to just remove it.
was:
WARN level "WALs outstanding" from CleanerChore should be DEBUG and are not
always correct.
I left a cluster configured for ITBLL (retaining all WALs for post hoc
analysis) and in the morning found the master log full of "WALs outstanding"
warnings from CleanerChore.
Should this really be a warning? Perhaps better logged at DEBUG level.
{quote}
2018-05-09 16:42:03,893 WARN
[node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_2] cleaner.CleanerChore: WALs
outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/oldWALs
If someone has configured really long WAL retention then having WALs in oldWALs
will be normal.
Also, it seems the warning is sometimes incorrect.
{quote}
2018-05-09 16:42:24,751 WARN
[node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_1] cleaner.CleanerChore: WALs
outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/archive
{quote}
There are no WALs under archive/.
Even at DEBUG level, if it is not correct, then it can lead an operator to be
concerned about nothing, so better to just remove it.
> "WALs outstanding" message from CleanerChore is noisy
> -
>
> Key: HBASE-20554
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-20554
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Andrew Purtell
>Priority: Minor
>
> WARN level "WALs outstanding" from CleanerChore should be DEBUG and are not
> always correct.
> I left a cluster configured for ITBLL (retaining all WALs for post hoc
> analysis) and in the morning found the master log full of "WALs outstanding"
> warnings from CleanerChore.
> Should this really be a warning? Perhaps better logged at DEBUG level.
> {quote}
> 2018-05-09 16:42:03,893 WARN
> [node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_2] cleaner.CleanerChore:
> WALs outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/oldWALs
> {quote}
> If someone has configured really long WAL retention then having WALs in
> oldWALs will be normal.
> Also, it seems the warning is sometimes incorrect.
> {quote}
> 2018-05-09 16:42:24,751 WARN
> [node-1.cluster,16000,1525851521469_ChoreService_1] cleaner.CleanerChore:
> WALs outstanding under hdfs://node-1.cluster/hbase/archive
> {quote}
> There are no WALs under archive/.
> Even at DEBUG level, if it is not correct, then it can lead an operator to be
> concerned about nothing, so better to just remove it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
