[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5901) Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HBASE-5901: --- Attachment: hbase-5901.txt This patch dropped cumulative CPU usage by about 10% for a million-record insert. > Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests > --- > > Key: HBASE-5901 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, performance >Affects Versions: 0.96.0 >Reporter: Todd Lipcon >Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hbase-5901.txt > > > The current implementation of multi actions uses repeated "NameBytesPair"s > for the contents of multi actions. Instead, we should introduce a union type > protobuf for the valid actions. This makes the RPCs smaller since they don't > need to carry class names, and makes deserialization faster since it can > avoid some copying and reflection. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5901) Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HBASE-5901: --- Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests > --- > > Key: HBASE-5901 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, performance >Affects Versions: 0.96.0 >Reporter: Todd Lipcon >Assignee: Todd Lipcon > Attachments: hbase-5901.txt > > > The current implementation of multi actions uses repeated "NameBytesPair"s > for the contents of multi actions. Instead, we should introduce a union type > protobuf for the valid actions. This makes the RPCs smaller since they don't > need to carry class names, and makes deserialization faster since it can > avoid some copying and reflection. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5901) Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-5901: - Priority: Critical (was: Major) +1 Nice. > Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests > --- > > Key: HBASE-5901 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, performance >Affects Versions: 0.96.0 >Reporter: Todd Lipcon >Assignee: Todd Lipcon >Priority: Critical > Attachments: hbase-5901.txt > > > The current implementation of multi actions uses repeated "NameBytesPair"s > for the contents of multi actions. Instead, we should introduce a union type > protobuf for the valid actions. This makes the RPCs smaller since they don't > need to carry class names, and makes deserialization faster since it can > avoid some copying and reflection. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5901) Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HBASE-5901: --- Attachment: hbase-5901.txt Patch rebased against trunk (something else conflicted with it) > Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests > --- > > Key: HBASE-5901 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, performance >Affects Versions: 0.96.0 >Reporter: Todd Lipcon >Assignee: Todd Lipcon >Priority: Critical > Attachments: hbase-5901.txt, hbase-5901.txt > > > The current implementation of multi actions uses repeated "NameBytesPair"s > for the contents of multi actions. Instead, we should introduce a union type > protobuf for the valid actions. This makes the RPCs smaller since they don't > need to carry class names, and makes deserialization faster since it can > avoid some copying and reflection. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5901) Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-5901: - Status: Open (was: Patch Available) Retrying. I tried the failing tests local and they pass for me. > Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests > --- > > Key: HBASE-5901 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, performance >Affects Versions: 0.96.0 >Reporter: Todd Lipcon >Assignee: Todd Lipcon >Priority: Critical > Attachments: hbase-5901.txt, hbase-5901.txt, hbase-5901.txt > > > The current implementation of multi actions uses repeated "NameBytesPair"s > for the contents of multi actions. Instead, we should introduce a union type > protobuf for the valid actions. This makes the RPCs smaller since they don't > need to carry class names, and makes deserialization faster since it can > avoid some copying and reflection. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5901) Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-5901: - Attachment: hbase-5901.txt > Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests > --- > > Key: HBASE-5901 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, performance >Affects Versions: 0.96.0 >Reporter: Todd Lipcon >Assignee: Todd Lipcon >Priority: Critical > Attachments: hbase-5901.txt, hbase-5901.txt, hbase-5901.txt > > > The current implementation of multi actions uses repeated "NameBytesPair"s > for the contents of multi actions. Instead, we should introduce a union type > protobuf for the valid actions. This makes the RPCs smaller since they don't > need to carry class names, and makes deserialization faster since it can > avoid some copying and reflection. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5901) Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] stack updated HBASE-5901: - Status: Patch Available (was: Open) > Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests > --- > > Key: HBASE-5901 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, performance >Affects Versions: 0.96.0 >Reporter: Todd Lipcon >Assignee: Todd Lipcon >Priority: Critical > Attachments: hbase-5901.txt, hbase-5901.txt, hbase-5901.txt > > > The current implementation of multi actions uses repeated "NameBytesPair"s > for the contents of multi actions. Instead, we should introduce a union type > protobuf for the valid actions. This makes the RPCs smaller since they don't > need to carry class names, and makes deserialization faster since it can > avoid some copying and reflection. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-5901) Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Todd Lipcon updated HBASE-5901: --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.96.0 Hadoop Flags: Reviewed Status: Resolved (was: Patch Available) > Use union type protobufs instead of class/byte pairs for multi requests > --- > > Key: HBASE-5901 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5901 > Project: HBase > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: ipc, performance >Affects Versions: 0.96.0 >Reporter: Todd Lipcon >Assignee: Todd Lipcon >Priority: Critical > Fix For: 0.96.0 > > Attachments: hbase-5901.txt, hbase-5901.txt, hbase-5901.txt > > > The current implementation of multi actions uses repeated "NameBytesPair"s > for the contents of multi actions. Instead, we should introduce a union type > protobuf for the valid actions. This makes the RPCs smaller since they don't > need to carry class names, and makes deserialization faster since it can > avoid some copying and reflection. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
