[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6399) MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and RegionServerDynamicMetrics

2012-09-07 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-6399:
-

Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved  (was: Patch Available)

Committed to trunk by Ted a while back.  Resolving.

 MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and 
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics
 -

 Key: HBASE-6399
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6399
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: metrics
Affects Versions: 0.94.0
Reporter: chunhui shen
Assignee: chunhui shen
Priority: Critical
 Fix For: 0.96.0

 Attachments: HBASE-6399.patch, HBASE-6399v2.patch, HBASE-6399v3.patch


 In hadoop-metrics.properties, GangliaContext is optional metrics context, I 
 think we will use ganglia to monitor hbase cluster generally.
 However, I find a serious problem:
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics will generate lots of rrd file because we would 
 move region or create/delete table. 
 Especially if table is created everyday in some applications, there are much 
 more and more rrd files in Gmetad Server. It will make Gmetad Server 
 corrupted.
 IMO, MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and 
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6399) MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and RegionServerDynamicMetrics

2012-08-01 Thread chunhui shen (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chunhui shen updated HBASE-6399:


Issue Type: Improvement  (was: Bug)

 MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and 
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics
 -

 Key: HBASE-6399
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6399
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: metrics
Affects Versions: 0.94.0
Reporter: chunhui shen
Assignee: chunhui shen
Priority: Critical
 Fix For: 0.96.0

 Attachments: HBASE-6399.patch, HBASE-6399v2.patch, HBASE-6399v3.patch


 In hadoop-metrics.properties, GangliaContext is optional metrics context, I 
 think we will use ganglia to monitor hbase cluster generally.
 However, I find a serious problem:
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics will generate lots of rrd file because we would 
 move region or create/delete table. 
 Especially if table is created everyday in some applications, there are much 
 more and more rrd files in Gmetad Server. It will make Gmetad Server 
 corrupted.
 IMO, MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and 
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6399) MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and RegionServerDynamicMetrics

2012-07-19 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-6399:
-

Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

Thanks Chunhui.  Looks good to me.  Passing by hadoopqa.

 MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and 
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics
 -

 Key: HBASE-6399
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6399
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: metrics
Affects Versions: 0.94.0
Reporter: chunhui shen
Assignee: chunhui shen
Priority: Critical
 Fix For: 0.96.0, 0.94.2

 Attachments: HBASE-6399.patch, HBASE-6399v2.patch, HBASE-6399v3.patch


 In hadoop-metrics.properties, GangliaContext is optional metrics context, I 
 think we will use ganglia to monitor hbase cluster generally.
 However, I find a serious problem:
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics will generate lots of rrd file because we would 
 move region or create/delete table. 
 Especially if table is created everyday in some applications, there are much 
 more and more rrd files in Gmetad Server. It will make Gmetad Server 
 corrupted.
 IMO, MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and 
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6399) MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and RegionServerDynamicMetrics

2012-07-19 Thread stack (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

stack updated HBASE-6399:
-

Fix Version/s: (was: 0.94.2)

Marking fix for 0.96, not 0.94, because of Elliott comment above.

 MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and 
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics
 -

 Key: HBASE-6399
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6399
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: metrics
Affects Versions: 0.94.0
Reporter: chunhui shen
Assignee: chunhui shen
Priority: Critical
 Fix For: 0.96.0

 Attachments: HBASE-6399.patch, HBASE-6399v2.patch, HBASE-6399v3.patch


 In hadoop-metrics.properties, GangliaContext is optional metrics context, I 
 think we will use ganglia to monitor hbase cluster generally.
 However, I find a serious problem:
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics will generate lots of rrd file because we would 
 move region or create/delete table. 
 Especially if table is created everyday in some applications, there are much 
 more and more rrd files in Gmetad Server. It will make Gmetad Server 
 corrupted.
 IMO, MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and 
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6399) MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and RegionServerDynamicMetrics

2012-07-18 Thread chunhui shen (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

chunhui shen updated HBASE-6399:


Attachment: HBASE-6399v3.patch

Adding comments in the properties file as Stack suggested

 MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and 
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics
 -

 Key: HBASE-6399
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6399
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: metrics
Affects Versions: 0.94.0
Reporter: chunhui shen
Assignee: chunhui shen
Priority: Critical
 Fix For: 0.96.0, 0.94.2

 Attachments: HBASE-6399.patch, HBASE-6399v2.patch, HBASE-6399v3.patch


 In hadoop-metrics.properties, GangliaContext is optional metrics context, I 
 think we will use ganglia to monitor hbase cluster generally.
 However, I find a serious problem:
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics will generate lots of rrd file because we would 
 move region or create/delete table. 
 Especially if table is created everyday in some applications, there are much 
 more and more rrd files in Gmetad Server. It will make Gmetad Server 
 corrupted.
 IMO, MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and 
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] [Updated] (HBASE-6399) MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and RegionServerDynamicMetrics

2012-07-17 Thread Zhihong Ted Yu (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Zhihong Ted Yu updated HBASE-6399:
--

Hadoop Flags: Reviewed
 Summary: MetricsContext should be different between 
RegionServerMetrics and RegionServerDynamicMetrics  (was: MetricsContext be 
different between RegionServerMetrics and RegionServerDynamicMetrics)

 MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and 
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics
 -

 Key: HBASE-6399
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-6399
 Project: HBase
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: metrics
Affects Versions: 0.94.0
Reporter: chunhui shen
Assignee: chunhui shen
Priority: Critical
 Fix For: 0.96.0, 0.94.2

 Attachments: HBASE-6399.patch, HBASE-6399v2.patch


 In hadoop-metrics.properties, GangliaContext is optional metrics context, I 
 think we will use ganglia to monitor hbase cluster generally.
 However, I find a serious problem:
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics will generate lots of rrd file because we would 
 move region or create/delete table. 
 Especially if table is created everyday in some applications, there are much 
 more and more rrd files in Gmetad Server. It will make Gmetad Server 
 corrupted.
 IMO, MetricsContext should be different between RegionServerMetrics and 
 RegionServerDynamicMetrics

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira