[jira] [Updated] (HIVE-26320) Incorrect case evaluation for Parquet based table
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] ASF GitHub Bot updated HIVE-26320: -- Labels: pull-request-available (was: ) > Incorrect case evaluation for Parquet based table > - > > Key: HIVE-26320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26320 > Project: Hive > Issue Type: Bug > Components: HiveServer2, Query Planning >Affects Versions: 4.0.0-alpha-1 >Reporter: Chiran Ravani >Assignee: John Sherman >Priority: Major > Labels: pull-request-available > Time Spent: 10m > Remaining Estimate: 0h > > Query involving case statement with two or more conditions leads to incorrect > result for tables with parquet format, The problem is not observed with ORC > or TextFile. > *Steps to reproduce*: > {code:java} > create external table case_test_parquet(kob varchar(2),enhanced_type_code > int) stored as parquet; > insert into case_test_parquet values('BB',18),('BC',18),('AB',18); > select case when ( >(kob='BB' and enhanced_type_code='18') >or (kob='BC' and enhanced_type_code='18') > ) > then 1 > else 0 > end as logic_check > from case_test_parquet; > {code} > Result: > {code} > 0 > 0 > 0 > {code} > Expected result: > {code} > 1 > 1 > 0 > {code} > The problem does not appear when setting hive.optimize.point.lookup=false. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Updated] (HIVE-26320) Incorrect case evaluation for Parquet based table
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chiran Ravani updated HIVE-26320: - Issue Type: Bug (was: Improvement) > Incorrect case evaluation for Parquet based table > - > > Key: HIVE-26320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26320 > Project: Hive > Issue Type: Bug > Components: HiveServer2, Query Planning >Affects Versions: 4.0.0-alpha-1 >Reporter: Chiran Ravani >Priority: Major > > Query involving case statement with two or more conditions leads to incorrect > result for tables with parquet format, The problem is not observed with ORC > or TextFile. > *Steps to reproduce*: > {code:java} > create external table case_test_parquet(kob varchar(2),enhanced_type_code > int) stored as parquet; > insert into case_test_parquet values('BB',18),('BC',18),('AB',18); > select case when ( >(kob='BB' and enhanced_type_code='18') >or (kob='BC' and enhanced_type_code='18') > ) > then 1 > else 0 > end as logic_check > from case_test_parquet; > {code} > Result: > {code} > 0 > 0 > 0 > {code} > Expected result: > {code} > 1 > 1 > 0 > {code} > The problem does not appear when setting hive.optimize.point.lookup=false. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.7#820007)
[jira] [Updated] (HIVE-26320) Incorrect case evaluation for Parquet based table
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chiran Ravani updated HIVE-26320: - Summary: Incorrect case evaluation for Parquet based table (was: Incorrect case evaluation for Parquet based table.) > Incorrect case evaluation for Parquet based table > - > > Key: HIVE-26320 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-26320 > Project: Hive > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: HiveServer2, Query Planning >Affects Versions: 4.0.0-alpha-1 >Reporter: Chiran Ravani >Priority: Major > > Query involving case statement with two or more conditions leads to incorrect > result for tables with parquet format, The problem is not observed with ORC > or TextFile. > *Steps to reproduce*: > {code:java} > create external table case_test_parquet(kob varchar(2),enhanced_type_code > int) stored as parquet; > insert into case_test_parquet values('BB',18),('BC',18),('AB',18); > select case when ( >(kob='BB' and enhanced_type_code='18') >or (kob='BC' and enhanced_type_code='18') > ) > then 1 > else 0 > end as logic_check > from case_test_parquet; > {code} > Result: > {code} > 0 > 0 > 0 > {code} > Expected result: > {code} > 1 > 1 > 0 > {code} > The problem does not appear when setting hive.optimize.point.lookup=false. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.7#820007)