[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-10794) MVCC: RemoveAll is broken on unstable topology
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16740383#comment-16740383
]
Igor Seliverstov commented on IGNITE-10794:
---
Merged to master.
> MVCC: RemoveAll is broken on unstable topology
> --
>
> Key: IGNITE-10794
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10794
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: mvcc
>Reporter: Andrew Mashenkov
>Assignee: Andrew Mashenkov
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: Hanging, mvcc_stabilization_stage_1, transaction
> Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> Enlist batch holds key and values in arrays structures. This implies that
> keys and vals arrays sizes should be equals.
> Also, we have an optimization and do not save 'null' vals for 'remove'
> operation.
> This invariant can become broken on removeAll operation for 2 entries
> belonging to partitions in different states (moving and owning). For the
> first one, it's 'mvcc history' will be added to 'vals' array, but nothing
> will be added for the second one.
> Reproducer IgniteCacheEntryProcessorNodeJoinTest.testEntryProcessorNodeLeave
> See stacktrace:
> {noformat}
> java.lang.AssertionError:
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture$Batch.add(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:1156)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.addToBatch(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:705)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.processEntry(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:650)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.continueLoop(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:533)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.init(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:362)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.enlistLocal(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:531)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.sendBatch(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:426)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.sendNextBatches(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:173)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.map(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:149)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.mapOnTopology(GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:342)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.init(GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:257)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.updateAsync(GridNearTxLocal.java:2074)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.mvccRemoveAllAsync0(GridNearTxLocal.java:1951)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.removeAllAsync0(GridNearTxLocal.java:1670)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.removeAllAsync(GridNearTxLocal.java:550)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-10794) MVCC: RemoveAll is broken on unstable topology
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16738326#comment-16738326
]
Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-10794:
{panel:title=--> Run :: All: Possible
Blockers|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#F7D6C1}
{color:#d04437}ZooKeeper (Discovery) 3{color} [[tests 0 TIMEOUT , Exit Code
|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=2635928]]
* GridEventConsumeSelfTest.testStopByCallback (last started)
{panel}
[TeamCity *--> Run :: All*
Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=2635932&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunAll]
> MVCC: RemoveAll is broken on unstable topology
> --
>
> Key: IGNITE-10794
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10794
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: mvcc
>Reporter: Andrew Mashenkov
>Assignee: Andrew Mashenkov
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: Hanging, mvcc_stabilization_stage_1, transaction
> Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> Enlist batch holds key and values in arrays structures. This implies that
> keys and vals arrays sizes should be equals.
> Also, we have an optimization and do not save 'null' vals for 'remove'
> operation.
> This invariant can become broken on removeAll operation for 2 entries
> belonging to partitions in different states (moving and owning). For the
> first one, it's 'mvcc history' will be added to 'vals' array, but nothing
> will be added for the second one.
> Reproducer IgniteCacheEntryProcessorNodeJoinTest.testEntryProcessorNodeLeave
> See stacktrace:
> {noformat}
> java.lang.AssertionError:
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture$Batch.add(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:1156)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.addToBatch(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:705)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.processEntry(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:650)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.continueLoop(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:533)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.init(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:362)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.enlistLocal(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:531)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.sendBatch(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:426)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.sendNextBatches(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:173)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.map(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:149)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.mapOnTopology(GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:342)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.init(GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:257)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.updateAsync(GridNearTxLocal.java:2074)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.mvccRemoveAllAsync0(GridNearTxLocal.java:1951)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.removeAllAsync0(GridNearTxLocal.java:1670)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.removeAllAsync(GridNearTxLocal.java:550)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-10794) MVCC: RemoveAll is broken on unstable topology
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16728395#comment-16728395
]
Ignite TC Bot commented on IGNITE-10794:
{panel:title=-> Run :: IntelliJ IDEA Inspections: No blockers
found!|borderStyle=dashed|borderColor=#ccc|titleBGColor=#D6F7C1}{panel}
[TeamCity *-> Run :: IntelliJ IDEA Inspections*
Results|https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewLog.html?buildId=2635108&buildTypeId=IgniteTests24Java8_RunIntelliJIdeaInspections]
> MVCC: RemoveAll is broken on unstable topology
> --
>
> Key: IGNITE-10794
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-10794
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: mvcc
>Reporter: Andrew Mashenkov
>Assignee: Andrew Mashenkov
>Priority: Critical
> Labels: Hanging, mvcc_stabilization_stage_1, transaction
>
> Enlist batch holds key and values in arrays structures. This implies that
> keys and vals arrays sizes should be equals.
> Also, we have an optimization and do not save 'null' vals for 'remove'
> operation.
> This invariant can become broken on removeAll operation for 2 entries
> belonging to partitions in different states (moving and owning). For the
> first one, it's 'mvcc history' will be added to 'vals' array, but nothing
> will be added for the second one.
> Reproducer IgniteCacheEntryProcessorNodeJoinTest.testEntryProcessorNodeLeave
> See stacktrace:
> {noformat}
> java.lang.AssertionError:
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture$Batch.add(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:1156)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.addToBatch(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:705)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.processEntry(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:650)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.continueLoop(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:533)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.init(GridDhtTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:362)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.enlistLocal(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:531)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.sendBatch(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:426)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.sendNextBatches(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:173)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxEnlistFuture.map(GridNearTxEnlistFuture.java:149)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.mapOnTopology(GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:342)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.init(GridNearTxAbstractEnlistFuture.java:257)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.updateAsync(GridNearTxLocal.java:2074)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.mvccRemoveAllAsync0(GridNearTxLocal.java:1951)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.removeAllAsync0(GridNearTxLocal.java:1670)
> at
> org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.near.GridNearTxLocal.removeAllAsync(GridNearTxLocal.java:550)
> {noformat}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
