[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2018-09-25 Thread Dmitriy Govorukhin (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16626999#comment-16626999
 ] 

Dmitriy Govorukhin commented on IGNITE-1678:


[~NIzhikov] I think no, moved to 2.8.

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Dmitriy Govorukhin
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.7
>
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2016-12-15 10-50-22.png
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2018-09-21 Thread Nikolay Izhikov (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16623497#comment-16623497
 ] 

Nikolay Izhikov commented on IGNITE-1678:
-

[~DmitriyGovorukhin] Do we have a chance to resolve this ticket until the code 
freeze of 2.7?

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Dmitriy Govorukhin
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.7
>
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2016-12-15 10-50-22.png
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2018-08-28 Thread ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16595480#comment-16595480
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on IGNITE-1678:


GitHub user DmitriyGovorukhin opened a pull request:

https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4637

IGNITE-1678 IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance



You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

$ git pull https://github.com/gridgain/apache-ignite ignite-1678

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/4637.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

This closes #4637


commit ed9c2d27cdac5e65fe1689a4583678b9cbd1b3d1
Author: Dmitriy Govorukhin 
Date:   2018-08-26T07:35:01Z

IGNITE-1678 add percentage for atomic seq reservation in config + interfaces

commit cbfe5932a4b1230bb1aac8075004eea73479e7b2
Author: Dmitriy Govorukhin 
Date:   2018-08-26T07:53:47Z

IGNITE-1678 add percentage as parameter for atomic seq

commit 4a1d0c244fe015c7aaee7861857e84f05b985fc2
Author: Dmitriy Govorukhin 
Date:   2018-08-26T09:31:07Z

IGNITE-1678 add new test + small test updates

commit 839f43adf80a04e4a2778983560031592a20a89e
Author: Dmitriy Govorukhin 
Date:   2018-08-26T11:45:49Z

IGNITE-1678 first implementation (fully not working)

commit bd46569fc1e1f65709ac7a838f9b76d4df5c39d9
Author: Dmitriy Govorukhin 
Date:   2018-08-26T17:36:22Z

IGNITE-1678 minor test fix

commit 62bc2c94601d15a3eb3c939313ae88fbb81ca0fb
Author: Dmitriy Govorukhin 
Date:   2018-08-26T18:29:52Z

IGNITE-1678 fix config for chaining

commit 2d2627056ca288d95c68934286c0e80e66b4ca4e
Author: Dmitriy Govorukhin 
Date:   2018-08-26T18:48:07Z

IGNITE-1678 set default reservation percentage as 100

commit cf9a98f938f740c226b71ad73e734ac1834d97fe
Author: Dmitriy Govorukhin 
Date:   2018-08-27T10:44:39Z

IGNITE-1678 minor assert added + fix NPE

commit 0415064f4dbbfb3bea6d359467af1525af235b68
Author: Dmitriy Govorukhin 
Date:   2018-08-28T08:36:57Z

IGNITE-1678 rework reservation, add reservation context

commit 589297a406421a72254f949a1b0cb19cf14b9a26
Author: Dmitriy Govorukhin 
Date:   2018-08-28T09:42:21Z

IGNITE-1678 test refactoring

commit 4cdaf252de5526c19ba8672ac10819e9a983e1a1
Author: Dmitriy Govorukhin 
Date:   2018-08-28T16:50:00Z

Merge branch 'master' into ignite-1678

commit 7d1cf05c37867aab1a6496a97cf6ffc4727c8501
Author: Dmitriy Govorukhin 
Date:   2018-08-28T19:14:35Z

IGNITE-1678 add benchmarks




> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Dmitriy Govorukhin
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.7
>
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2016-12-15 10-50-22.png
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2018-06-06 Thread Alexey Goncharuk (JIRA)


[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16503143#comment-16503143
 ] 

Alexey Goncharuk commented on IGNITE-1678:
--

[~DmitriyGovorukhin] can you please pull master to your PR so we can re-run 
benchmarks?

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Dmitriy Govorukhin
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.6
>
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2016-12-15 10-50-22.png
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2018-04-23 Thread Dmitriy Govorukhin (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16448220#comment-16448220
 ] 

Dmitriy Govorukhin commented on IGNITE-1678:


[~dpavlov] Issue still in patch state, I guess we must review again it and 
re-run benchmarks.

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Dmitriy Govorukhin
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.6
>
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2016-12-15 10-50-22.png
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2018-04-23 Thread Dmitriy Pavlov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16448109#comment-16448109
 ] 

Dmitriy Pavlov commented on IGNITE-1678:


[~DmitriyGovorukhin] [~agoncharuk], is this issue still actual? Coulld we move 
it to resolved or to open?

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Dmitriy Govorukhin
>Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.6
>
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2016-12-15 10-50-22.png
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2017-09-28 Thread Vladimir Ozerov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16184137#comment-16184137
 ] 

Vladimir Ozerov commented on IGNITE-1678:
-

Moved to 2.4 due to inactivity.

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Dmitriy Govorukhin
> Fix For: 2.4
>
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2016-12-15 10-50-22.png
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2016-12-14 Thread Dmitriy Govorukhin (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15750704#comment-15750704
 ] 

Dmitriy Govorukhin commented on IGNITE-1678:


I got the following results, see attach. 

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Dmitriy Govorukhin
> Fix For: 2.0
>
> Attachments: Screenshot from 2016-12-15 10-50-22.png
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2016-09-14 Thread Dmitriy Govorukhin (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15490389#comment-15490389
 ] 

Dmitriy Govorukhin commented on IGNITE-1678:


Unfortunately i get worse performance time. Master branch 1,038,823.05 op/sec, 
my branch 893 212.52 op/sec. I try to find problem and fix it.

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Dmitriy Govorukhin
> Fix For: 1.8
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2016-09-14 Thread Semen Boikov (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15489733#comment-15489733
 ] 

Semen Boikov commented on IGNITE-1678:
--

Dmitry,

New tests added in this branch fail for me locally. Do they work for you? Do 
you have link to TeamCity run (if you did not check TeamCity please do it)?

Thanks

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Dmitriy Govorukhin
> Fix For: 1.8
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2016-09-13 Thread Dmitriy Govorukhin (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15487453#comment-15487453
 ] 

Dmitriy Govorukhin commented on IGNITE-1678:


Hi [~sboikov], I corrected comments, move all code in one branch 
(ignite-1678-2). Also added benchmark. 

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Dmitriy Govorukhin
> Fix For: 1.8
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2016-09-13 Thread Dmitriy Govorukhin (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15486737#comment-15486737
 ] 

Dmitriy Govorukhin commented on IGNITE-1678:


I got it, fix it soon. 

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Dmitriy Govorukhin
> Fix For: 1.8
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2016-09-08 Thread Dmitriy Govorukhin (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15473807#comment-15473807
 ] 

Dmitriy Govorukhin commented on IGNITE-1678:


[~sboikov]] I commit the changes, added small fixes, please look it.

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Dmitriy Govorukhin
> Fix For: 1.8
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2015-11-11 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15000979#comment-15000979
 ] 

Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-1678:
--

Fixed some bugs in implementation. Now all tests pass.

Benchmarking status
- I benchmarked old and new implementation only on local machine (3 clients, 2 
servers)
- Current benchmark results show direct dependency between 
atomicSequenceReserveSize and op/sec. Look like only number of transactions 
cache op-s have meaning. Need to check it with many phisicale machines
- Need to solve with default percentage value.

Left:
- Add tests on new reserevePercetage paramether
- Create runners of GridCachePartitionedAtomicSequenceMultiThreadedTest in 
another modes: replicated, transactional
- Benchmark with many phisicale machines

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Artem Shutak
> Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2015-11-10 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14999277#comment-14999277
 ] 

Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-1678:
--

Upd. 

The issue (using of internal transactions) was in running background task on 
system-poll. But system pool is used for cache operations. Use public pool 
instead of system pool now.

Added tests. Start benchmarking: benchmarked with different percentages and 
with different atomicSequenceReserveSize.

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Artem Shutak
> Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-1678) IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance

2015-11-09 Thread Artem Shutak (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14997222#comment-14997222
 ] 

Artem Shutak commented on IGNITE-1678:
--

Finished with an implementation.

Working on tests: improve old tests and add new tests.

In process of testing faced with an issue related to using of internal 
transactions and dead-lock after. Will investigate.

> IgniteAtomicSequence: make following reservations in advance
> 
>
> Key: IGNITE-1678
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-1678
> Project: Ignite
>  Issue Type: Improvement
>  Components: data structures
>Affects Versions: ignite-1.4
>Reporter: Denis Magda
>Assignee: Artem Shutak
> Fix For: 1.6
>
>
> In current implementation a new reservation is made when the current local 
> sequence boundary is exceeded.
> In cases when there are many nodes that use the same atomic sequence there 
> can be a situation when all the nodes start doing a new reservation at the 
> same time. This can lead to performance drops.
> As a performance optimization it makes sense to start reserving new sequence 
> slot in advance (in background), like when around 80% of current reservation 
> has already been used. Probably we should add a special parameter to 
> {{AtomicConfiguration}} that will manage such behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)