[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-17220) YCSB benchmark run for ignite2 vs ignite3
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17567105#comment-17567105 ] Alexander Belyak commented on IGNITE-17220: --- Evgeny, I ran YCSB benchmark twice for each setup: all set of ycsb operations and insert only. On 1 and 3 node cluster. For Ignite 2 and Ignite 3. And just left here the "Throughput (requests/second)" summary results. Just read the table line by line (3 node, all operations, 2 test run → 13 op/sec, for example) > YCSB benchmark run for ignite2 vs ignite3 > - > > Key: IGNITE-17220 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17220 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task >Reporter: Kirill Gusakov >Assignee: Alexander Belyak >Priority: Major > Labels: ignite-3 > Attachments: 1node_ign2.zip, 3node_ign2.zip, results.zip > > > For further investigation of ignite3 performance issues, we need to run the > following benchmarks to compare ignite2 vs ignite3 performance: > * Usual ycsb benchmark with mixed load patterns > * Insert-only ycsb benchmark > For ignite2 and ignite3 in the following configurations: > * 3 ignite nodes setup (so, table must have 1 partition and 3 replicas) > * 1 ignite node setup (so, table must have 1 partitoin and 1 replica) > Also, please provide: > * Hardware configuration of the environment, where benchmark was executed > * JFRs for every node in every run. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-17220) YCSB benchmark run for ignite2 vs ignite3
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17566838#comment-17566838 ] Alexander Belyak commented on IGNITE-17220: --- |3 node|All ops|1|2753| | | |2|2719| | |Insert only|1|3190| | | |2|3207| |1 node|All ops|1|3752| | | |2|3772| | |Insert only|1|4123| | | |2|4064| Results for Ignite2 on the same server set. > YCSB benchmark run for ignite2 vs ignite3 > - > > Key: IGNITE-17220 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17220 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task >Reporter: Kirill Gusakov >Assignee: Alexander Belyak >Priority: Major > Labels: ignite-3 > Attachments: results.zip > > > For further investigation of ignite3 performance issues, we need to run the > following benchmarks to compare ignite2 vs ignite3 performance: > * Usual ycsb benchmark with mixed load patterns > * Insert-only ycsb benchmark > For ignite2 and ignite3 in the following configurations: > * 3 ignite nodes setup (so, table must have 1 partition and 3 replicas) > * 1 ignite node setup (so, table must have 1 partitoin and 1 replica) > Also, please provide: > * Hardware configuration of the environment, where benchmark was executed > * JFRs for every node in every run. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-17220) YCSB benchmark run for ignite2 vs ignite3
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17566649#comment-17566649 ] Evgeny Stanilovsky commented on IGNITE-17220: - Sorry but i can`t understand this table results ... > YCSB benchmark run for ignite2 vs ignite3 > - > > Key: IGNITE-17220 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17220 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task >Reporter: Kirill Gusakov >Assignee: Alexander Belyak >Priority: Major > Labels: ignite-3 > Attachments: results.zip > > > For further investigation of ignite3 performance issues, we need to run the > following benchmarks to compare ignite2 vs ignite3 performance: > * Usual ycsb benchmark with mixed load patterns > * Insert-only ycsb benchmark > For ignite2 and ignite3 in the following configurations: > * 3 ignite nodes setup (so, table must have 1 partition and 3 replicas) > * 1 ignite node setup (so, table must have 1 partitoin and 1 replica) > Also, please provide: > * Hardware configuration of the environment, where benchmark was executed > * JFRs for every node in every run. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (IGNITE-17220) YCSB benchmark run for ignite2 vs ignite3
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17220?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17565056#comment-17565056 ] Alexander Belyak commented on IGNITE-17220: --- I ran out test on Ignite3 master, java11openjdk in docker, centos and get the following results: |3 node|all ops|1|13| | | |2|13| | |insert|1|234| | | |2|173| |1 node|all ops|1|8| | | |2|8| | |insert|1|202| | | |2|181| Used 4 servers (for each server node and an additional one for the benchbase client): 2x Xeon E5-2609v4 16vCPU, 96GB, 2.4Tb SSD RAID0. Start 3 nodes with the default config (only with all 3 nodes ip specified in config), activate cluster with --meta-storage-node= and do all 4 benchbase tests (via the first node in jdbc string). Then I ran clear single node cluster and repeat tests for it. All logs and JFR in attachment. > YCSB benchmark run for ignite2 vs ignite3 > - > > Key: IGNITE-17220 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-17220 > Project: Ignite > Issue Type: Task >Reporter: Kirill Gusakov >Assignee: Alexander Belyak >Priority: Major > Labels: ignite-3 > > For further investigation of ignite3 performance issues, we need to run the > following benchmarks to compare ignite2 vs ignite3 performance: > * Usual ycsb benchmark with mixed load patterns > * Insert-only ycsb benchmark > For ignite2 and ignite3 in the following configurations: > * 3 ignite nodes setup (so, table must have 1 partition and 3 replicas) > * 1 ignite node setup (so, table must have 1 partitoin and 1 replica) > Also, please provide: > * Hardware configuration of the environment, where benchmark was executed > * JFRs for every node in every run. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
