[jira] [Commented] (KUDU-582) Send TS specific errors back to the client when the client is supposed to take specific actions, such as trying another replica

2018-02-16 Thread Grant Henke (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16367480#comment-16367480
 ] 

Grant Henke commented on KUDU-582:
--

Should this still be open?

> Send TS specific errors back to the client when the client is supposed to 
> take specific actions, such as trying another replica
> ---
>
> Key: KUDU-582
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-582
> Project: Kudu
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: client, consensus, tserver
>Affects Versions: M4.5
>Reporter: David Alves
>Priority: Critical
>
> Right now we're sending umbrella statuses that the client is supposed to 
> interpret as a command that it should failover to another replica. This is 
> misusing statuses but it's also a problem in that we're likely (or will 
> likely) sending the same statuses (illegal state and abort) in places where 
> we don't mean the client to failover.
> This should be treated holistically in both clients and in the server 
> components.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)


[jira] [Commented] (KUDU-582) Send TS specific errors back to the client when the client is supposed to take specific actions, such as trying another replica

2017-08-25 Thread Jean-Daniel Cryans (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16142224#comment-16142224
 ] 

Jean-Daniel Cryans commented on KUDU-582:
-

Hey [~dr-alves], what should we do with this jira? It feels ancient and not 
that well defined. Should we close?

> Send TS specific errors back to the client when the client is supposed to 
> take specific actions, such as trying another replica
> ---
>
> Key: KUDU-582
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KUDU-582
> Project: Kudu
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: client, consensus, tserver
>Affects Versions: M4.5
>Reporter: David Alves
>Priority: Critical
>
> Right now we're sending umbrella statuses that the client is supposed to 
> interpret as a command that it should failover to another replica. This is 
> misusing statuses but it's also a problem in that we're likely (or will 
> likely) sending the same statuses (illegal state and abort) in places where 
> we don't mean the client to failover.
> This should be treated holistically in both clients and in the server 
> components.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)