[jira] (MCHANGES-325) RestJiraDownloader doesn't process issueType

2013-12-27 Thread Marshall Schor (JIRA)

 [ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marshall Schor updated MCHANGES-325:


Comment: was deleted

(was: Patch that fixes this issue)

> RestJiraDownloader doesn't process issueType
> 
>
> Key: MCHANGES-325
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-325
> Project: Maven Changes Plugin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: jira
>Affects Versions: 2.9
>Reporter: Marshall Schor
> Attachments: patch-without-debug-msgs.txt
>
>
> The RestJiraDownloader receives as one of the many fields, the issuetype, but 
> ignores it.  So, although the docs suggest you can have the "Type" field as a 
> display option, and a sort option (see: 
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin/examples/customizing-jira-report.html
>  scroll to selecting columns), this in fact fails for 2.9 version.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] (MCHANGES-325) RestJiraDownloader doesn't process issueType

2013-12-27 Thread Marshall Schor (JIRA)

 [ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marshall Schor updated MCHANGES-325:


Attachment: patch-without-debug-msgs.txt

Reattaching patch without debug messages

> RestJiraDownloader doesn't process issueType
> 
>
> Key: MCHANGES-325
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-325
> Project: Maven Changes Plugin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: jira
>Affects Versions: 2.9
>Reporter: Marshall Schor
> Attachments: patch-without-debug-msgs.txt
>
>
> The RestJiraDownloader receives as one of the many fields, the issuetype, but 
> ignores it.  So, although the docs suggest you can have the "Type" field as a 
> display option, and a sort option (see: 
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin/examples/customizing-jira-report.html
>  scroll to selecting columns), this in fact fails for 2.9 version.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] (MCHANGES-325) RestJiraDownloader doesn't process issueType

2013-12-27 Thread Marshall Schor (JIRA)

 [ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marshall Schor updated MCHANGES-325:


Attachment: (was: patch.txt)

> RestJiraDownloader doesn't process issueType
> 
>
> Key: MCHANGES-325
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-325
> Project: Maven Changes Plugin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: jira
>Affects Versions: 2.9
>Reporter: Marshall Schor
>
> The RestJiraDownloader receives as one of the many fields, the issuetype, but 
> ignores it.  So, although the docs suggest you can have the "Type" field as a 
> display option, and a sort option (see: 
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin/examples/customizing-jira-report.html
>  scroll to selecting columns), this in fact fails for 2.9 version.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] (MCHANGES-325) RestJiraDownloader doesn't process issueType

2013-12-27 Thread Marshall Schor (JIRA)

 [ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Marshall Schor updated MCHANGES-325:


Attachment: patch.txt

Patch that fixes this issue

> RestJiraDownloader doesn't process issueType
> 
>
> Key: MCHANGES-325
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-325
> Project: Maven Changes Plugin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: jira
>Affects Versions: 2.9
>Reporter: Marshall Schor
> Attachments: patch.txt
>
>
> The RestJiraDownloader receives as one of the many fields, the issuetype, but 
> ignores it.  So, although the docs suggest you can have the "Type" field as a 
> display option, and a sort option (see: 
> http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin/examples/customizing-jira-report.html
>  scroll to selecting columns), this in fact fails for 2.9 version.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] (MSITE-691) Aggregator pom with child parent not handled

2013-12-27 Thread Ivan C (JIRA)

[ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=337882#comment-337882
 ] 

Ivan C edited comment on MSITE-691 at 12/27/13 4:19 PM:


I am having exactly the same issue with a somewhat similar setup: aggregator 
does not extend the parent, and the parent and children directories are at the 
level of the aggregator pom, no extra layer in between.

I would like to see a good example of how to setup site generation with this 
type of project layout or something similar.

  was (Author: osobrujo):
I am having exactly the same issue with a somewhat similar setup: 
aggregator does not extend the parent, but layout is the same.

I would like to see a good example of how to setup site generation with this 
type of project layout.
  
> Aggregator pom with child parent not handled
> 
>
> Key: MSITE-691
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-691
> Project: Maven Site Plugin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: multi module
>Affects Versions: 3.3
>Reporter: Stephen Colebourne
> Attachments: OG-Platform.zip
>
>
> The attached zip demonstrates a project where the parent is an aggregator 
> only pom and the children include the parent:
> {code}
> platform
> - pom.xml  (aggregator only)
> - projects
>   - parent
> - pom.xml  (parent for the child project)
>   - child
> - pom.xml
> {code}
> Running the zip file with "mvn clean test site" will build incorrect 
> hyperlinks.
> The top left hyperlinks, added by the site plugin, are defined as 
> "parent/index.html" and "child/child/index.html". I consider the former to be 
> correct, but not the latter.
> In addition, the navigation links produce both a link to the parent (under 
> the "Parent Project" heading), and a second link to the parent under the 
> "Modules" heading. This seems unnecessary, and in fact does not work in 
> design terms, see below. (It appears that separate aggregator and parent pom 
> projects are not really supported in design terms)
> The child projects also contain the wrong link to the parent (under "Parent 
> Projects" in the navigation area). They create a link as 
> "../../parent/index.html". This will be one ".." too far, as the 
> "distributionManagement.site.url" definition removes the extra level.
> Finally, the site of the parent pom does not contain a "Parent projects" link 
> in the navigation area. That would make sense if there was no aggregator 
> project, but does not make sense here from a website pint of view.
> What I would expect is the following staged website:
> {code}
> target
> - staging
>   - index.html  (links to child projects, including parent)
>   - parent 
> - index.html  (link back to aggregator)
>   - child
> - index.html  (link back to aggregator, link to parent: 
> "../parent/index.html")
> {code}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] (MSITE-691) Aggregator pom with child parent not handled

2013-12-27 Thread Ivan C (JIRA)

[ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-691?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=337882#comment-337882
 ] 

Ivan C commented on MSITE-691:
--

I am having exactly the same issue with a somewhat similar setup: aggregator 
does not extend the parent, but layout is the same.

I would like to see a good example of how to setup site generation with this 
type of project layout.

> Aggregator pom with child parent not handled
> 
>
> Key: MSITE-691
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MSITE-691
> Project: Maven Site Plugin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: multi module
>Affects Versions: 3.3
>Reporter: Stephen Colebourne
> Attachments: OG-Platform.zip
>
>
> The attached zip demonstrates a project where the parent is an aggregator 
> only pom and the children include the parent:
> {code}
> platform
> - pom.xml  (aggregator only)
> - projects
>   - parent
> - pom.xml  (parent for the child project)
>   - child
> - pom.xml
> {code}
> Running the zip file with "mvn clean test site" will build incorrect 
> hyperlinks.
> The top left hyperlinks, added by the site plugin, are defined as 
> "parent/index.html" and "child/child/index.html". I consider the former to be 
> correct, but not the latter.
> In addition, the navigation links produce both a link to the parent (under 
> the "Parent Project" heading), and a second link to the parent under the 
> "Modules" heading. This seems unnecessary, and in fact does not work in 
> design terms, see below. (It appears that separate aggregator and parent pom 
> projects are not really supported in design terms)
> The child projects also contain the wrong link to the parent (under "Parent 
> Projects" in the navigation area). They create a link as 
> "../../parent/index.html". This will be one ".." too far, as the 
> "distributionManagement.site.url" definition removes the extra level.
> Finally, the site of the parent pom does not contain a "Parent projects" link 
> in the navigation area. That would make sense if there was no aggregator 
> project, but does not make sense here from a website pint of view.
> What I would expect is the following staged website:
> {code}
> target
> - staging
>   - index.html  (links to child projects, including parent)
>   - parent 
> - index.html  (link back to aggregator)
>   - child
> - index.html  (link back to aggregator, link to parent: 
> "../parent/index.html")
> {code}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] (MCHANGES-325) RestJiraDownloader doesn't process issueType

2013-12-27 Thread Marshall Schor (JIRA)
Marshall Schor created MCHANGES-325:
---

 Summary: RestJiraDownloader doesn't process issueType
 Key: MCHANGES-325
 URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MCHANGES-325
 Project: Maven Changes Plugin
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: jira
Affects Versions: 2.9
Reporter: Marshall Schor


The RestJiraDownloader receives as one of the many fields, the issuetype, but 
ignores it.  So, although the docs suggest you can have the "Type" field as a 
display option, and a sort option (see: 
http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-changes-plugin/examples/customizing-jira-report.html
 scroll to selecting columns), this in fact fails for 2.9 version.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] (MASSEMBLY-658) Assembly fails for multi-module project if webstart-maven-plugin is in use

2013-12-27 Thread Tony Chemit (JIRA)

 [ 
https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-658?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Tony Chemit closed MASSEMBLY-658.
-

   Resolution: Won't Fix
Fix Version/s: 2.5
 Assignee: Tony Chemit

You are just using the *jnlp-inline* mojo which is an aggregator mojo, so does 
not match with your needs.

Just use instead the *jnlp-single* mojo instead to make your example works.

> Assembly fails for multi-module project if webstart-maven-plugin is in use
> --
>
> Key: MASSEMBLY-658
> URL: https://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-658
> Project: Maven Assembly Plugin
>  Issue Type: Bug
>  Components: dependencySet
>Affects Versions: 2.4
> Environment: Apache Maven 3.0.5 
> (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19 13:51: 
> 28+) 
> Maven home: C:\dev\apache-maven-3.0.5\bin\.. 
> Java version: 1.6.0_45, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc. 
> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_45\jre 
> Default locale: en_GB, platform encoding: Cp1252 
> OS name: "windows 7", version: "6.1", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>Reporter: Robin Roos
>Assignee: Tony Chemit
> Fix For: 2.5
>
> Attachments: npe-war-assebmbly.zip, output.log
>
>
> The mvn invocation I used is:
> mvn clean package
> I attach a simple test case of a multi-module project. If the acme-jnlp 
> module is commented out in the parent POM then the project builds 
> successfully. If the acme-jnlp module is not commented out, then the assembly 
> of acme-dist fails because of a NullPointerException.
> acme-dist and acme-war to not rely on the artifacts generated by acme-jnlp. 
> The mere fact that the plugin is executed causes the later module assembly to 
> fail.
> Modules have the following purposes:
> acme-parent: parent project which contains the module
> acme-jnlp: create JNLP and ZIP files not used by any other modules
> acme-war: create a .WAR file
> acme-dist: use assembly plugin to create a .ZIP containing the .WAR
> acme-deploy: holds dependencies to other modules, but does nothing else

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira