[jira] [Commented] (MPLUGIN-510) update plugin system requirements history structure
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17830209#comment-17830209 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on MPLUGIN-510: hboutemy merged PR #274: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-tools/pull/274 > update plugin system requirements history structure > --- > > Key: MPLUGIN-510 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-510 > Project: Maven Plugin Tools > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Plugin Reporting Plugin >Affects Versions: 3.11.0 >Reporter: Herve Boutemy >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.12.0 > > > in MPLUGIN-400, we added the feature with a list of versions of the plugin, > associated to Maven and JDK prerequisite > https://maven.apache.org/plugin-tools-archives/plugin-tools-3.7.0/maven-plugin-report-plugin/report-mojo.html#requirementshistories > => started to use for example: > [https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-assembly-plugin-3.6.0/plugin-info.html] > this lead to questions: should we fill each and every past version? Or should > we group by common prerequisites, showing only ranges? > Tested the range approach: > [https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-assembly-plugin-LATEST/plugin-info.html] > the range approach looks good: minimum lines (vs listing every version), > clear choice for users (choose the latest in the range, or pick any > intermediate one) > now, we need to rework the m-p-p configuration to replace "version" with > "from" + "to", instead of hijacking the "version" field to store a String > "from x to y" -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (MPLUGIN-510) update plugin system requirements history structure
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17830118#comment-17830118 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on MPLUGIN-510: hboutemy opened a new pull request, #274: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-tools/pull/274 instead of listing a long list of plugin releases, each on their own row, even if they share same system requirements, they are now grouped in a single row marked "from x to y" > update plugin system requirements history structure > --- > > Key: MPLUGIN-510 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-510 > Project: Maven Plugin Tools > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Plugin Reporting Plugin >Affects Versions: 3.11.0 >Reporter: Herve Boutemy >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.12.0 > > > in MPLUGIN-400, we added the feature with a list of versions of the plugin, > associated to Maven and JDK prerequisite > https://maven.apache.org/plugin-tools-archives/plugin-tools-3.7.0/maven-plugin-report-plugin/report-mojo.html#requirementshistories > => started to use for example: > [https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-assembly-plugin-3.6.0/plugin-info.html] > this lead to questions: should we fill each and every past version? Or should > we group by common prerequisites, showing only ranges? > Tested the range approach: > [https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-assembly-plugin-LATEST/plugin-info.html] > the range approach looks good: minimum lines (vs listing every version), > clear choice for users (choose the latest in the range, or pick any > intermediate one) > now, we need to rework the m-p-p configuration to replace "version" with > "from" + "to", instead of hijacking the "version" field to store a String > "from x to y" -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (MPLUGIN-510) update plugin system requirements history structure
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820583#comment-17820583 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on MPLUGIN-510: hboutemy closed pull request #263: [MPLUGIN-510] move requirement detection code URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-tools/pull/263 > update plugin system requirements history structure > --- > > Key: MPLUGIN-510 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-510 > Project: Maven Plugin Tools > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Plugin Plugin >Affects Versions: 3.11.0 >Reporter: Herve Boutemy >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.12.0 > > > in MPLUGIN-400, we added the feature with a list of versions of the plugin, > associated to Maven and JDK prerequisite > https://maven.apache.org/plugin-tools-archives/plugin-tools-3.7.0/maven-plugin-report-plugin/report-mojo.html#requirementshistories > => started to use for example: > [https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-assembly-plugin-3.6.0/plugin-info.html] > this lead to questions: should we fill each and every past version? Or should > we group by common prerequisites, showing only ranges? > Tested the range approach: > [https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-assembly-plugin-LATEST/plugin-info.html] > the range approach looks good: minimum lines (vs listing every version), > clear choice for users (choose the latest in the range, or pick any > intermediate one) > now, we need to rework the m-p-p configuration to replace "version" with > "from" + "to", instead of hijacking the "version" field to store a String > "from x to y" -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)
[jira] [Commented] (MPLUGIN-510) update plugin system requirements history structure
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17820555#comment-17820555 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on MPLUGIN-510: hboutemy opened a new pull request, #263: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven-plugin-tools/pull/263 (no comment) > update plugin system requirements history structure > --- > > Key: MPLUGIN-510 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MPLUGIN-510 > Project: Maven Plugin Tools > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Plugin Plugin >Affects Versions: 3.11.0 >Reporter: Herve Boutemy >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.12.0 > > > in MPLUGIN-400, we added the feature with a list of versions of the plugin, > associated to Maven and JDK prerequisite > https://maven.apache.org/plugin-tools-archives/plugin-tools-3.7.0/maven-plugin-report-plugin/report-mojo.html#requirementshistories > => started to use for example: > [https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-assembly-plugin-3.6.0/plugin-info.html] > this lead to questions: should we fill each and every past version? Or should > we group by common prerequisites, showing only ranges? > Tested the range approach: > [https://maven.apache.org/plugins-archives/maven-assembly-plugin-LATEST/plugin-info.html] > the range approach looks good: minimum lines (vs listing every version), > clear choice for users (choose the latest in the range, or pick any > intermediate one) > now, we need to rework the m-p-p configuration to replace "version" with > "from" + "to", instead of hijacking the "version" field to store a String > "from x to y" -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.20.10#820010)