[jira] [Commented] (MSHADE-145) Site not generated correctly when overriding dependencyReducedPomLocation with relocation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17331669#comment-17331669 ] Alexander Kriegisch commented on MSHADE-145: Besides, I agree with [~awhitford] that the build directory should be the default for the DRP. Otherwise we need a custom Maven Clean action plus specific entried in {{.gitignore}} in order to have a fairly clean project without warnings of newly added XML files, maybe accidentally committing them to the SCM. Even if that does not happen, it is simply annoying. > Site not generated correctly when overriding dependencyReducedPomLocation > with relocation > - > > Key: MSHADE-145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-145 > Project: Maven Shade Plugin > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.0 > Environment: Windows XP, Java 6 Update 24, Maven 3.0.4 >Reporter: Anthony Whitford >Priority: Major > Attachments: shade-site-bug.zip > > > My release failed because the project uses the {{maven-shade-plugin}} and it > generated a {{dependency-reduced-pom.xml}} in the {{basedir}}, so the release > plugin complains that there are local, uncommitted modifications. > To get my release working, I overrode the {{dependencyReducedPomLocation}} > configuration parameter to place it in {{project.build.directory}}: > {code:xml} > > > ${project.build.directory}/dependency-reduced-pom.xml > ... > > {code} > My release worked, but then I noticed that this had a nasty side effect: my > site was not generated properly! > The project has {{src\site}} with a {{site.xml}} and APT pages. Those were > no longer generated... I have no idea how one thing is connected to the > other, but I did prove it by creating a sample application that illustrates > the problem. > Note that the problem seems to a combination of at least 2 things: > * {{dependencyReducedPomLocation}} > * {{relocations}} > In other words, if you comment out the {{dependencyReducedPomLocation}} or > the {{relocations}}, you can see the site being generated correctly. But if > you have these, then the site will NOT generate properly. > To be clear, the site generation is incorrect if you don't see the menu > layout like: > * About > ** Introduction > ** Usage > * Project Documentation > * Project Information > A broken site, you will notice that the About menu and Usage page do not > exist, for example. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (MSHADE-145) Site not generated correctly when overriding dependencyReducedPomLocation with relocation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17331667#comment-17331667 ] Alexander Kriegisch commented on MSHADE-145: Because I want to use {{${project.build.directory}/dependency-reduced-pom.xml}} in my own project and did not notice any issues with it, I became curious, trying to reproduce this problem the documentation is still warning about in Maven Shade 3.2.4. I wondered if it was an issue with older plugin or Maven versions. So I downloaded the sample project attached here and tried to reproduce it, running on Java 8 and compiling with Java 8 source/target. Findings: * Maven 3.0.x is no longer working because it wants to download using HTTP, but Maven Central needs HTTPS nowadays. * Next, I tried Maven 3.1.1. Because of [this problem|https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/AetherClassNotFound], I upgraded to Maven Shade 2.1 and Maven Site 3.3, as recommended. * The next problem was with site generation because it could not find a class, requiring me to specify a version for Project Info Reports (PIP). I chose 2.7, which was released about the same time as Site 3.3. * There again, I had problems with HTTP instead of HTTPS download, this time inside Site 3.3, so I upgraded to Maven 3.2.3 which was said to have fixed HTTPS-related download problems. * Finally, I could run `mvn clean install site`, but did not see any issues with site generation. Maybe the reproducer project was inadequate in the first place, but I do not think so. Maybe the changes necessary to run this ancient setup with the oldest versions of Maven and used plugins necessary to build in 2021. * I even checked with Maven Antrun, if the base directory was changed using the setting for the dependency-reduced POM (DRP) location: {code:xml} [basedir] ${basedir} [project.basedir] ${project.basedir} {code} * Next, I upgraded to my usual setting: Maven 3.6.3 - not the latest, but still a pretty much recent version - and also upgraded to Shade 3.2.4, Site 3.9.1 and PIP 3.1.1. Again, no issues with a changed base directory. *Conclusion:* Either this problem does not exist anymore in all but ancient setups and the issue can be closed, also removing the warning from the {{dependencyReducedPomLocation}} property help text, or we need another reproducer project from someone who is still suffering from this problem. > Site not generated correctly when overriding dependencyReducedPomLocation > with relocation > - > > Key: MSHADE-145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-145 > Project: Maven Shade Plugin > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.0 > Environment: Windows XP, Java 6 Update 24, Maven 3.0.4 >Reporter: Anthony Whitford >Priority: Major > Attachments: shade-site-bug.zip > > > My release failed because the project uses the {{maven-shade-plugin}} and it > generated a {{dependency-reduced-pom.xml}} in the {{basedir}}, so the release > plugin complains that there are local, uncommitted modifications. > To get my release working, I overrode the {{dependencyReducedPomLocation}} > configuration parameter to place it in {{project.build.directory}}: > {code:xml} > > > ${project.build.directory}/dependency-reduced-pom.xml > ... > > {code} > My release worked, but then I noticed that this had a nasty side effect: my > site was not generated properly! > The project has {{src\site}} with a {{site.xml}} and APT pages. Those were > no longer generated... I have no idea how one thing is connected to the > other, but I did prove it by creating a sample application that illustrates > the problem. > Note that the problem seems to a combination of at least 2 things: > * {{dependencyReducedPomLocation}} > * {{relocations}} > In other words, if you comment out the {{dependencyReducedPomLocation}} or > the {{relocations}}, you can see the site being generated correctly. But if > you have these, then the site will NOT generate properly. > To be clear, the site generation is incorrect if you don't see the menu > layout like: > * About > ** Introduction > ** Usage > * Project Documentation > * Project Information > A broken site, you will notice that the About menu and Usage page do not > exist, for example. -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005)
[jira] [Commented] (MSHADE-145) Site not generated correctly when overriding dependencyReducedPomLocation with relocation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16394380#comment-16394380 ] Anthony Whitford commented on MSHADE-145: - I think this is still valid. > Site not generated correctly when overriding dependencyReducedPomLocation > with relocation > - > > Key: MSHADE-145 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MSHADE-145 > Project: Maven Shade Plugin > Issue Type: Bug >Affects Versions: 2.0 > Environment: Windows XP, Java 6 Update 24, Maven 3.0.4 >Reporter: Anthony Whitford >Priority: Major > Attachments: shade-site-bug.zip > > > My release failed because the project uses the {{maven-shade-plugin}} and it > generated a {{dependency-reduced-pom.xml}} in the {{basedir}}, so the release > plugin complains that there are local, uncommitted modifications. > To get my release working, I overrode the {{dependencyReducedPomLocation}} > configuration parameter to place it in {{project.build.directory}}: > {code:xml} > > > ${project.build.directory}/dependency-reduced-pom.xml > ... > > {code} > My release worked, but then I noticed that this had a nasty side effect: my > site was not generated properly! > The project has {{src\site}} with a {{site.xml}} and APT pages. Those were > no longer generated... I have no idea how one thing is connected to the > other, but I did prove it by creating a sample application that illustrates > the problem. > Note that the problem seems to a combination of at least 2 things: > * {{dependencyReducedPomLocation}} > * {{relocations}} > In other words, if you comment out the {{dependencyReducedPomLocation}} or > the {{relocations}}, you can see the site being generated correctly. But if > you have these, then the site will NOT generate properly. > To be clear, the site generation is incorrect if you don't see the menu > layout like: > * About > ** Introduction > ** Usage > * Project Documentation > * Project Information > A broken site, you will notice that the About menu and Usage page do not > exist, for example. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)