[jira] Commented: (CONTINUUM-814) change ContinuumActionSupport to ContinuumConfigurationInterceptor

2006-08-14 Thread Carlos Sanchez (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-814?page=comments#action_72353 
] 

Carlos Sanchez commented on CONTINUUM-814:
--

I don't see this approach working, configuration action must need an 
administrator role and it's a security hole to let it through the first time

Also why move the jsps into /jsp? I understand the admin ones under admin but 
not the other ones.

 change ContinuumActionSupport to ContinuumConfigurationInterceptor
 --

 Key: CONTINUUM-814
 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-814
 Project: Continuum
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Web interface
Reporter: Jesse McConnell
 Attachments: configuration-interceptor.patch


 a bit ago I submitted a patch in CONTINUUM-810 that added a 
 ContinuumActionSupport class that leveraged the prepare interceptor to always 
 call a prepare() method checking if the continuum configuration was 
 initialized and if it wasn't to redirect to configuration.
 well shortly after that brett pointed me at how he had solved it in mrm so I 
 figured I would just back out that previous patch and redo it his way..
 that is what this patch does, makes the continuum configuration checking 
 match that of mrm.
 as a byproduct of this the xwork.xml file now has multiple packages and 
 namespaces in it, so I took the oppurtunity to move all of the jsps into 
 src/main/webapp/jsp and the configuration ones into src/main/webapp/jsp/admin
 this is largely cosmetic but it cleans up the -webapp module in ide's and I 
 was in the xwork.xml file anyway.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] Commented: (CONTINUUM-814) change ContinuumActionSupport to ContinuumConfigurationInterceptor

2006-08-14 Thread Jesse McConnell (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-814?page=comments#action_72355 
] 

Jesse McConnell commented on CONTINUUM-814:
---

1) yes, that is a problem...how is mrm solving that then?  looks like it does 
the same displaying of configuration if its not setup initially.

2) that was mostly just to get them out of the webapp directory so it displays 
nicer with in an ide, so you can hide all the jsp's easily...mrm's are all 
under src/main/webapp/WEB-INF/jsp 

 change ContinuumActionSupport to ContinuumConfigurationInterceptor
 --

 Key: CONTINUUM-814
 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-814
 Project: Continuum
  Issue Type: Improvement
  Components: Web interface
Reporter: Jesse McConnell
 Attachments: configuration-interceptor.patch


 a bit ago I submitted a patch in CONTINUUM-810 that added a 
 ContinuumActionSupport class that leveraged the prepare interceptor to always 
 call a prepare() method checking if the continuum configuration was 
 initialized and if it wasn't to redirect to configuration.
 well shortly after that brett pointed me at how he had solved it in mrm so I 
 figured I would just back out that previous patch and redo it his way..
 that is what this patch does, makes the continuum configuration checking 
 match that of mrm.
 as a byproduct of this the xwork.xml file now has multiple packages and 
 namespaces in it, so I took the oppurtunity to move all of the jsps into 
 src/main/webapp/jsp and the configuration ones into src/main/webapp/jsp/admin
 this is largely cosmetic but it cleans up the -webapp module in ide's and I 
 was in the xwork.xml file anyway.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira