[jira] Commented: (MNGECLIPSE-106) Dependency Resolver and PDE conflicts

2006-06-21 Thread Scott Cytacki (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGECLIPSE-106?page=comments#action_67837 
] 

Scott Cytacki commented on MNGECLIPSE-106:
--

I've found a way to have a maven project double as a eclipse plugin.  I don't 
know if this solves your particular problem but it is mostly working for me.   
My main problem is that I have two types of dependencies: 
1. Those that are available as both maven artifacts and plugins.
2. Those that are only available as maven artifacts.

If a project has dependencies of type 1.  Then it is easy, simply choose 
between the maven classpath container and the plugin classpath container.  
Remove one of them.   Even if you remove the plugin classpath container, the 
plugin project can still be used by other plugin projects and it can still be 
used in a testing eclipse application.

If a project has dependencies of type 2, then make  a second plugin project 
that contains those maven dependencies.  So lets say the project you are 
working with is called:  MyPlugin.   It has maven deps on jug and xstream.  If 
you add jug and xtream to the MyPlugin plugin classpath you will get conflicts. 
  So instead make a new plugin project called MyPluginDeps, and add jug and 
xstream to this project.  Now change the MyPlugin manifest.mf so it depends on 
MyPluginDeps.  

Now the MyPlugin project will build with either the maven classpath container 
or the plugin classpath container.  

This isn't the perfect solution:
1. the dependencies need to be updated in two places.  
2. if the dependencies are not the same you might have different jars at 
runtime than at compile time.

The way I'm managing the dependencies right now is to use the maven 
assembly:assembly goal with the descriptorId set to jar-with-dependencies  
This creates a single jar that contains all dependencies combined into one jar. 
 I then copy this jar into the MyPluginDeps project.  

 Dependency Resolver and PDE conflicts
 -

  Key: MNGECLIPSE-106
  URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGECLIPSE-106
  Project: Maven 2.x Extension for Eclipse
 Type: Improvement

   Components: Dependency Resolver
  Environment: Eclipse PDE
 Reporter: Dimitry Voytenko
 Assignee: Eugene Kuleshov
  Attachments: sample-plugins.zip


 All tests have been done using the solution provided in the 
 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGECLIPSE-59. This solution works very well, 
 but there're specifics when using it in the PDE (Plugin Development) 
 environment.
 Attached are sample plugins that demonstrate the issue (tested under Eclipse 
 3.1.2). Unpack sample-plugins.zip and import projects in the workspace. Patch 
 from MNGECLIPSE-59 should be applied. Rebuild both projects. Build of 
 com.example.plugins.main should fail with an error:
Build path contains duplicate entry: 'com.example.plugins.component' for 
 project com.example.plugins.main
 The problem occures b/c of conflict b/w PDE classpath container and Maven2 
 classpath container. They both contain com.example.plugins.component 
 project.
 PDE's classpath container is defined in the org.eclipse.pde.core plugin as an 
 org.eclipse.pde.core.requiredPlugins extension. It uses META-INF/MANIFEST.MF 
 file as a source. MANIFEST.MF is basically an OSGI manifest that lists all 
 dependent bundles in the form:
Require-Bundle: org.eclipse.core.runtime, ...
 with optionally specified version and transiting information.
 Both manifest and PDE container are very essential for the PDE work. It's not 
 clear if they can be properly extended to avoid conflicts. 
 If such a way can be found, it is important to keep in mind the similarities 
 and differences b/w Maven and PDE dependency management:
 a) PDE dependencies have flags optional and re-exported. By default 
 dependencies are required and non-transient. The optional property can be 
 modeled via Maven'2 optional dependency. The re-exported property basically 
 makes the dependency transient. I'm not sure if all of these states can be 
 modelled via Maven's scope.
 b) Version management is different. PDE allows to specify dependency on the 
 latest found version of a plugin (if version parameters is specified then it 
 should be greater or equal). In Eclipse 3.2 it's actually possible to specify 
 both borders, i.e. version no earlier than 2.0.0 and no later than 3.0.0.
 c) MANIFEST.MF is a deployable file. It's used at runtime to build the 
 classloader graph.
 If it's not possible to extend PDE to source it from the Maven's 
 configuration a temporary solution could be to exclude a dependent project 
 from the Maven container if it can be found elsewhere in the classpath. The 
 possible issue here: if it's possible to get the access from Maven container 
 to the content of the other containers.
 Cooperation with Eclipse team would probably help here as this would also 
 benefit them in the long run.

-- 
This message is 

[jira] Commented: (MNGECLIPSE-106) Dependency Resolver and PDE conflicts

2006-05-16 Thread Jacob Robertson (JIRA)
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGECLIPSE-106?page=comments#action_65450 
] 

Jacob Robertson commented on MNGECLIPSE-106:


+1 from my company
- this is a critical issue for us, and will be a deal breaker for some of our 
teams, because we cannot develop PDE projects while using the m2eclipse tool as 
it stands right now.

 Dependency Resolver and PDE conflicts
 -

  Key: MNGECLIPSE-106
  URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGECLIPSE-106
  Project: Maven 2.x Extension for Eclipse
 Type: Improvement

   Components: Dependency Resolver
  Environment: Eclipse PDE
 Reporter: Dimitry Voytenko
 Assignee: Eugene Kuleshov
  Attachments: sample-plugins.zip


 All tests have been done using the solution provided in the 
 http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNGECLIPSE-59. This solution works very well, 
 but there're specifics when using it in the PDE (Plugin Development) 
 environment.
 Attached are sample plugins that demonstrate the issue (tested under Eclipse 
 3.1.2). Unpack sample-plugins.zip and import projects in the workspace. Patch 
 from MNGECLIPSE-59 should be applied. Rebuild both projects. Build of 
 com.example.plugins.main should fail with an error:
Build path contains duplicate entry: 'com.example.plugins.component' for 
 project com.example.plugins.main
 The problem occures b/c of conflict b/w PDE classpath container and Maven2 
 classpath container. They both contain com.example.plugins.component 
 project.
 PDE's classpath container is defined in the org.eclipse.pde.core plugin as an 
 org.eclipse.pde.core.requiredPlugins extension. It uses META-INF/MANIFEST.MF 
 file as a source. MANIFEST.MF is basically an OSGI manifest that lists all 
 dependent bundles in the form:
Require-Bundle: org.eclipse.core.runtime, ...
 with optionally specified version and transiting information.
 Both manifest and PDE container are very essential for the PDE work. It's not 
 clear if they can be properly extended to avoid conflicts. 
 If such a way can be found, it is important to keep in mind the similarities 
 and differences b/w Maven and PDE dependency management:
 a) PDE dependencies have flags optional and re-exported. By default 
 dependencies are required and non-transient. The optional property can be 
 modeled via Maven'2 optional dependency. The re-exported property basically 
 makes the dependency transient. I'm not sure if all of these states can be 
 modelled via Maven's scope.
 b) Version management is different. PDE allows to specify dependency on the 
 latest found version of a plugin (if version parameters is specified then it 
 should be greater or equal). In Eclipse 3.2 it's actually possible to specify 
 both borders, i.e. version no earlier than 2.0.0 and no later than 3.0.0.
 c) MANIFEST.MF is a deployable file. It's used at runtime to build the 
 classloader graph.
 If it's not possible to extend PDE to source it from the Maven's 
 configuration a temporary solution could be to exclude a dependent project 
 from the Maven container if it can be found elsewhere in the classpath. The 
 possible issue here: if it's possible to get the access from Maven container 
 to the content of the other containers.
 Cooperation with Eclipse team would probably help here as this would also 
 benefit them in the long run.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira