[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15054825#comment-15054825
]
James DeFelice commented on MESOS-4086:
---
I left this comment in the design doc too, related to the logging module API
call that's invoked per-executor creation:
{quote}
I'd like to see the executor labels passed in here so that frameworks can
advertise additional metadata for logging modules to take advantage of. for
example, one or more LOGDIRSx=... vars could instruct the logging module to
monitor additional directories in the sandbox for log files.
{quote}
> Containerizer logging modularization
>
>
> Key: MESOS-4086
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-4086
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Epic
> Components: containerization, modules
>Reporter: Joseph Wu
>Assignee: Joseph Wu
> Labels: logging, mesosphere
>
> Executors and tasks are configured (via the various containerizers) to write
> their output (stdout/stderr) to files ("stdout" and "stderr") on an agent's
> disk.
> Unlike Master/Agent logs, executor/task logs are not attached to any formal
> logging system, like {{glog}}. As such, there is significant scope for
> improvement.
> By introducing a module for logging, we can provide a common/programmatic way
> to access and manage executor/task logs. Modules could implement additional
> sinks for logs, such as:
> * to the sandbox (the status quo),
> * to syslog,
> * to journald
> This would also provide the hooks to deal with logging related problems, such
> as:
> * the (current) lack of log rotation,
> * searching through executor/task logs (i.e. via aggregation)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)