[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-6419) The 'master/teardown' endpoint should support tearing down 'unregistered_frameworks'.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15824796#comment-15824796 ] Adam B commented on MESOS-6419: --- [~neilc], [~vinodkone] I removed the 1.1.1 TargetVersion, since I doubt we'll backport this much code. Since all those patches have already landed in master, is there anything else we need to do for Mesos 1.2? If not, let's resolve this ticket. > The 'master/teardown' endpoint should support tearing down > 'unregistered_frameworks'. > - > > Key: MESOS-6419 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6419 > Project: Mesos > Issue Type: Bug > Components: master >Affects Versions: 0.26.2, 0.27.3, 0.28.2, 1.0.1 >Reporter: Gilbert Song >Assignee: Neil Conway >Priority: Critical > Labels: endpoint, master > Fix For: 1.2.0 > > > This issue is exposed from > [MESOS-6400](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6400). When a user > is trying to tear down an 'unregistered_framework' from the 'master/teardown' > endpoint, a bad request will be returned: `No framework found with specified > ID`. > Ideally, we should support tearing down an unregistered framework, since > those frameworks may occur due to network partition, then all the orphan > tasks still occupy the resources. It would be a nightmare if a user has to > wait until the unregistered framework to get those resources back. > This may be the initial implementation: > https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/bb8375975e92ee722befb478ddc3b2541d1ccaa9 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-6419) The 'master/teardown' endpoint should support tearing down 'unregistered_frameworks'.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15782055#comment-15782055 ] Adam B commented on MESOS-6419: --- [~neilc], [~vinodkone], now that this has landed in master, let's add the commit log to the comments here and set the fixVersion = 1.2.0 Seems like too large of a change to "backport" to 1.1.1, so we could even resolve the ticket if we're all done. > The 'master/teardown' endpoint should support tearing down > 'unregistered_frameworks'. > - > > Key: MESOS-6419 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6419 > Project: Mesos > Issue Type: Bug > Components: master >Affects Versions: 0.26.2, 0.27.3, 0.28.2, 1.0.1 >Reporter: Gilbert Song >Assignee: Neil Conway >Priority: Critical > Labels: endpoint, master > > This issue is exposed from > [MESOS-6400](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6400). When a user > is trying to tear down an 'unregistered_framework' from the 'master/teardown' > endpoint, a bad request will be returned: `No framework found with specified > ID`. > Ideally, we should support tearing down an unregistered framework, since > those frameworks may occur due to network partition, then all the orphan > tasks still occupy the resources. It would be a nightmare if a user has to > wait until the unregistered framework to get those resources back. > This may be the initial implementation: > https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/bb8375975e92ee722befb478ddc3b2541d1ccaa9 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-6419) The 'master/teardown' endpoint should support tearing down 'unregistered_frameworks'.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15770145#comment-15770145 ] Alexander Rukletsov commented on MESOS-6419: [~neilc], [~vinodkone]: Do you still want it in 1.1.1? > The 'master/teardown' endpoint should support tearing down > 'unregistered_frameworks'. > - > > Key: MESOS-6419 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6419 > Project: Mesos > Issue Type: Bug > Components: master >Affects Versions: 0.26.2, 0.27.3, 0.28.2, 1.0.1 >Reporter: Gilbert Song >Assignee: Neil Conway >Priority: Critical > Labels: endpoint, master > > This issue is exposed from > [MESOS-6400](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6400). When a user > is trying to tear down an 'unregistered_framework' from the 'master/teardown' > endpoint, a bad request will be returned: `No framework found with specified > ID`. > Ideally, we should support tearing down an unregistered framework, since > those frameworks may occur due to network partition, then all the orphan > tasks still occupy the resources. It would be a nightmare if a user has to > wait until the unregistered framework to get those resources back. > This may be the initial implementation: > https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/bb8375975e92ee722befb478ddc3b2541d1ccaa9 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-6419) The 'master/teardown' endpoint should support tearing down 'unregistered_frameworks'.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15676992#comment-15676992 ] Neil Conway commented on MESOS-6419: [~adam-mesos] -- I've been working on this for a while; should have RRs up today. However, the approach we decided to take involved a pretty significant change to how we represent "recovered" frameworks that haven't re-registered after master failover (current diff: "24 files changed, 1278 insertions(+), 584 deletions(-)") If we want to backpatch to 1.1.1, it would be possible to develop a minimal fix to just enable teardown to work for unregistered frameworks. > The 'master/teardown' endpoint should support tearing down > 'unregistered_frameworks'. > - > > Key: MESOS-6419 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6419 > Project: Mesos > Issue Type: Bug > Components: master >Affects Versions: 0.26.2, 0.27.3, 0.28.2, 1.0.1 >Reporter: Gilbert Song >Assignee: Neil Conway >Priority: Critical > Labels: endpoint, master > > This issue is exposed from > [MESOS-6400](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6400). When a user > is trying to tear down an 'unregistered_framework' from the 'master/teardown' > endpoint, a bad request will be returned: `No framework found with specified > ID`. > Ideally, we should support tearing down an unregistered framework, since > those frameworks may occur due to network partition, then all the orphan > tasks still occupy the resources. It would be a nightmare if a user has to > wait until the unregistered framework to get those resources back. > This may be the initial implementation: > https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/bb8375975e92ee722befb478ddc3b2541d1ccaa9 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (MESOS-6419) The 'master/teardown' endpoint should support tearing down 'unregistered_frameworks'.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15676302#comment-15676302 ] Adam B commented on MESOS-6419: --- [~neilc], are you planning on working on this soon (for 1.1.1)? We have customers running into this in production. > The 'master/teardown' endpoint should support tearing down > 'unregistered_frameworks'. > - > > Key: MESOS-6419 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6419 > Project: Mesos > Issue Type: Bug > Components: master >Affects Versions: 0.26.2, 0.27.3, 0.28.2, 1.0.1 >Reporter: Gilbert Song >Assignee: Neil Conway >Priority: Critical > Labels: endpoint, master > > This issue is exposed from > [MESOS-6400](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-6400). When a user > is trying to tear down an 'unregistered_framework' from the 'master/teardown' > endpoint, a bad request will be returned: `No framework found with specified > ID`. > Ideally, we should support tearing down an unregistered framework, since > those frameworks may occur due to network partition, then all the orphan > tasks still occupy the resources. It would be a nightmare if a user has to > wait until the unregistered framework to get those resources back. > This may be the initial implementation: > https://github.com/apache/mesos/commit/bb8375975e92ee722befb478ddc3b2541d1ccaa9 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
