[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16036945#comment-16036945 ] Casey Stella commented on METRON-950: - Nope, I just forgot to close it. > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16036942#comment-16036942 ] Kristopher Kane commented on METRON-950: Looking to do the same for an internal project on Storm 1.0.x. I see https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 was merged 20 days ago. Is this JIRA pending any work? > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16012534#comment-16012534 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16012501#comment-16012501 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user justinleet commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 Same here, +1. Thanks a lot for the contribution, this makes a big difference. > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16012497#comment-16012497 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 +1. Data flowed through to ES as expected, and I was able to spin up pcap. Along with @justinleet having tested the other topologies, I'm happy with the results. Great work @cestella! > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16012379#comment-16012379 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user cestella commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 @ctramnitz While we don't really test on 1.1 yet, this shouldn't have an impact on the topologies running there. > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16012376#comment-16012376 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- GitHub user cestella reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 METRON-950: Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 ## Contributor Comments There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP repo. I will point out that the storm-kafka-client in 1.1 does rely on `Time.nanoTime()`, a method call that was introduced in 1.1. To get around this, I've created the `metron-storm-kafka-override` with a backported implementation of the `Time` class. This will be removed when we migrate to Storm 1.1. Normally, I would hold off this change until we take the effort to migrate to 1.1 properly, but the combination of empirical evidence (I saw it go an order of magnitude slower in 1.0.1 vs 1.1) and wide ranging change for Storm 1.1 makes me err on the side of getting this in faster. It should help make every topology faster, but is in particular absolutely required to get sensible throughput in the pcap topology. ## Pull Request Checklist Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Metron. Please refer to our [Development Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61332235) for the complete guide to follow for contributions. Please refer also to our [Build Verification Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds?show-miniview) for complete smoke testing guides. In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you follow these guidelines and ask you to double check the following: ### For all changes: - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? If not one needs to be created at [Metron Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel). - [x] Does your PR title start with METRON- where is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character. - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically master)? ### For code changes: - [x] Have you included steps to reproduce the behavior or problem that is being changed or addressed? - [x] Have you included steps or a guide to how the change may be verified and tested manually? - [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests and checks have been executed in the root incubating-metron folder via: ``` mvn -q clean integration-test install && build_utils/verify_licenses.sh ``` - [x] Have you written or updated unit tests and or integration tests to verify your changes? - [x] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? - [ ] Have you verified the basic functionality of the build by building and running locally with Vagrant full-dev environment or the equivalent? ### For documentation related changes: - [x] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered by building and verifying the site-book? If not then run the following commands and the verify changes via `site-book/target/site/index.html`: ``` cd site-book mvn site ``` Note: Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible. It is also recommended that [travis-ci](https://travis-ci.org) is set up for your personal repository such that your branches are built there before submitting a pull request. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/cestella/incubator-metron storm_kafka_spout_11 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #584 commit a4cdfdcaaf15c8c60749a103d38b55e77703c2d5 Author: cstella Date: 2017-05-12T15:59:18Z Upgrading spout to 1.1 for performance. commit 7ef320d3d80324d2322943a7b95354f0ef6c3852 Author: cstella Date: 2017-05-12T16:09:57Z Travis drama. commit 284c6452d08bc050fe8b1c66e5c85e4a95804cad Author: cstella Date: 2017-05-12T18:09:05Z Update commit 4246c36d7fdb94505d789c3
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16012375#comment-16012375 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user cestella closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16012291#comment-16012291 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user justinleet commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 I ran up the main topologies last night and everything seemed to correlate correctly and ran without issue. Hadn't run up pcap yet, but it look like @mmiklavc is working on validating it. Given that it's the same spout throughout, I'm not convinced it's necessary to retread it. Anybody disagree? > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011955#comment-16011955 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user ctramnitz commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 Does this change have any impact on using Storm 1.1 (i.e. from HDP 2.6)? > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011499#comment-16011499 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 @nickwallen Yeah, that's where I landed. Looking in our pcap helper class, I see the following. ``` public static MetronEthernetDecoder createDecoder() { MetronEthernetDecoder ethernetDecoder = new MetronEthernetDecoder(); IpDecoder ipDecoder = new IpDecoder(); ethernetDecoder.register(EthernetType.IPV4, ipDecoder); return ethernetDecoder; } ``` > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011492#comment-16011492 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user nickwallen commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 Does `pcap_inspector` only print out for TCP packets? The first 5 of those are all UDP based (NTP & DNS). > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011487#comment-16011487 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 When I spin this up in full dev, half the records don't output with the pcap_inspector. I'm running: `pycapa --producer --interface eth0 --kafka-broker node1:6667 --kafka-topic pcap --max-packets 10` And I get 10 records, as expected. /usr/metron/0.4.0/bin/pcap_inspector.sh -i /apps/metron/pcap/pcap_pcap_1494886095377022000_0_pcap-7-1494887672 ``` TS: May 15, 2017 10:08:15 PM UTC TS: May 15, 2017 10:08:17 PM UTC TS: May 15, 2017 10:08:17 PM UTC TS: May 15, 2017 10:08:20 PM UTC TS: May 15, 2017 10:08:20 PM UTC TS: May 15, 2017 10:08:22 PM UTC,ip_src_addr: 10.0.2.2,ip_src_port: 58390,ip_dst_addr: 10.0.2.15,ip_dst_port: 22,protocol: 6 TS: May 15, 2017 10:08:22 PM UTC,ip_src_addr: 10.0.2.15,ip_src_port: 22,ip_dst_addr: 10.0.2.2,ip_dst_port: 58390,protocol: 6 TS: May 15, 2017 10:08:25 PM UTC,ip_src_addr: 10.0.2.2,ip_src_port: 58390,ip_dst_addr: 10.0.2.15,ip_dst_port: 22,protocol: 6 TS: May 15, 2017 10:08:25 PM UTC,ip_src_addr: 10.0.2.15,ip_src_port: 22,ip_dst_addr: 10.0.2.2,ip_dst_port: 58390,protocol: 6 TS: May 15, 2017 10:08:27 PM UTC,ip_src_addr: 10.0.2.2,ip_src_port: 58390,ip_dst_addr: 10.0.2.15,ip_dst_port: 22,protocol: 6 ``` Wireshark seems to be OK. ![image](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/658443/26083299/29d5c0fe-3992-11e7-8139-ed9e103c4384.png) I'm looking into this and will update as I have more info. > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011227#comment-16011227 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584#discussion_r116584769 --- Diff: metron-platform/metron-storm-kafka-override/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/internal/Timer.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ +package org.apache.storm.kafka.spout.internal; + +import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; +import org.apache.storm.utils.Time; + +public class Timer { + private final long delay; + private final long period; + private final TimeUnit timeUnit; + private final long periodNanos; + private long start; + + public Timer(long delay, long period, TimeUnit timeUnit) { +this.delay = delay; +this.period = period; +this.timeUnit = timeUnit; +this.periodNanos = timeUnit.toNanos(period); +this.start = System.nanoTime() + timeUnit.toNanos(delay); + } + + public long period() { +return this.period; + } + + public long delay() { +return this.delay; + } + + public TimeUnit getTimeUnit() { +return this.timeUnit; + } + + public boolean isExpiredResetOnTrue() { --- End diff -- Ok, done, added test. > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011191#comment-16011191 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584#discussion_r116581475 --- Diff: metron-platform/metron-storm-kafka-override/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/internal/Timer.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ +package org.apache.storm.kafka.spout.internal; + +import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; +import org.apache.storm.utils.Time; + +public class Timer { + private final long delay; + private final long period; + private final TimeUnit timeUnit; + private final long periodNanos; + private long start; + + public Timer(long delay, long period, TimeUnit timeUnit) { +this.delay = delay; +this.period = period; +this.timeUnit = timeUnit; +this.periodNanos = timeUnit.toNanos(period); +this.start = System.nanoTime() + timeUnit.toNanos(delay); + } + + public long period() { +return this.period; + } + + public long delay() { +return this.delay; + } + + public TimeUnit getTimeUnit() { +return this.timeUnit; + } + + public boolean isExpiredResetOnTrue() { --- End diff -- It is precisely the 1.1.0 version of the code with the exception of calling `System.nanoTime` instead of `Time.nanoTime` (see [here](https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/a4afacd9617d620f50cf026fc599821f7ac25c79/external/storm-kafka-client/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/internal/Timer.java) ). It should be noted that `Time.nanoTime` calls `System.nanoTime` (see [here](https://github.com/apache/storm/blob/a4afacd9617d620f50cf026fc599821f7ac25c79/storm-client/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/utils/Time.java#L162) ) in a production scenario (i.e. non-simulation). > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011182#comment-16011182 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 OK, works for me > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011179#comment-16011179 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user cestella commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 @mmiklavc it is. To give guarantees beyond that, would require us to shade and relocate the `metron-kafka-spout` project, which I did not want to do without some good justification. > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011181#comment-16011181 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584#discussion_r116579916 --- Diff: metron-platform/metron-storm-kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/storm/kafka/flux/SimpleStormKafkaBuilder.java --- @@ -202,31 +240,4 @@ public String getTopic() { return new StormKafkaSpout<>(builder); } - private static Map modifyKafkaProps(Map props, String zkQuorum) { -try { - if(!props.containsKey(KafkaSpoutConfig.Consumer.BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS)) { -//this isn't a putIfAbsent because I only want to pull the brokers from zk if it's absent. -List brokers = KafkaUtils.INSTANCE.getBrokersFromZookeeper(zkQuorum); -props.put(KafkaSpoutConfig.Consumer.BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS, Joiner.on(",").join(brokers)); - } - props.putIfAbsent(KafkaSpoutConfig.Consumer.KEY_DESERIALIZER, ByteArrayDeserializer.class.getName()); - props.putIfAbsent(KafkaSpoutConfig.Consumer.VALUE_DESERIALIZER, ByteArrayDeserializer.class.getName()); - -} catch (Exception e) { - throw new IllegalStateException("Unable to retrieve brokers from zookeeper: " + e.getMessage(), e); -} -return props; - } - - private static KafkaSpoutTuplesBuilder createTuplesBuilder(List config, String topic) { -TupleBuilder tb = new TupleBuilder(topic, FieldsConfiguration.toList(config)); -return new KafkaSpoutTuplesBuilderNamedTopics.Builder<>(tb).build(); - } - - - private static KafkaSpoutStreams createStreams(List config, String topic) { -final Fields fields = FieldsConfiguration.getFields(FieldsConfiguration.toList(config)); -return new KafkaSpoutStreamsNamedTopics.Builder(fields, STREAM, new String[] { topic} ).build(); --- End diff -- Yep > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011171#comment-16011171 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 @cestella How are we guaranteeing our version of Timer is included over the 1.1 version? Is this purely dependency ordering with the Maven Shade plugin? > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011164#comment-16011164 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user mmiklavc commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584 Just to clarify for others looking at this, there is a `Timer` class in `storm-kafka-client-1.1.0` which depends on a `Time` class (no 'r') in storm-core. In 1.0.3, the main version of Storm we depend on, there is no `nanoTime()` method. This was introduced in 1.1. @cestella is handling this via the temporary module `metron-storm-kafka-override` via `System.nanoTime()`. We're only recommending upgrading the client currently because, first and foremost, it provides the desired performance improvements, and second the impact is significantly less than upgrading the whole of Storm. > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011128#comment-16011128 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584#discussion_r116574125 --- Diff: metron-platform/metron-storm-kafka-override/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/internal/Timer.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ +package org.apache.storm.kafka.spout.internal; + +import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; +import org.apache.storm.utils.Time; + +public class Timer { + private final long delay; + private final long period; + private final TimeUnit timeUnit; + private final long periodNanos; + private long start; + + public Timer(long delay, long period, TimeUnit timeUnit) { +this.delay = delay; +this.period = period; +this.timeUnit = timeUnit; +this.periodNanos = timeUnit.toNanos(period); +this.start = System.nanoTime() + timeUnit.toNanos(delay); + } + + public long period() { +return this.period; + } + + public long delay() { +return this.delay; + } + + public TimeUnit getTimeUnit() { +return this.timeUnit; + } + + public boolean isExpiredResetOnTrue() { --- End diff -- That's a good catch. It'd be nice to have that tested. > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011127#comment-16011127 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584#discussion_r116574075 --- Diff: metron-platform/metron-storm-kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/storm/kafka/flux/SimpleStormKafkaBuilder.java --- @@ -165,13 +177,39 @@ public SimpleStormKafkaBuilder( Map kafkaProps , List fieldsConfiguration ) { -super( modifyKafkaProps(kafkaProps, zkQuorum) - , createStreams(fieldsConfiguration, topic) - , createTuplesBuilder(fieldsConfiguration, topic) - ); +super( getBootstrapServers(zkQuorum, kafkaProps) + , createDeserializer(Optional.ofNullable((String)kafkaProps.get(ConsumerConfig.KEY_DESERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG)), DEFAULT_DESERIALIZER) + , createDeserializer(Optional.ofNullable((String)kafkaProps.get(ConsumerConfig.VALUE_DESERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG)), DEFAULT_DESERIALIZER) + , topic +); +setProp(kafkaProps); +setRecordTranslator(new SpoutRecordTranslator<>(FieldsConfiguration.toList(fieldsConfiguration))); this.topic = topic; } + private static Class> createDeserializer( Optional deserializerClass --- End diff -- I'm not super keen on passing in possibly null values around. I rather like the notion of passing in that something is optional in the type signature. > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011124#comment-16011124 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user cestella commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584#discussion_r116573877 --- Diff: pom.xml --- @@ -106,7 +122,7 @@ but I justify it by noting that this should be able to be removed when we migrate to Storm 1.1.x, which properly supports Kafka 0.10.x. --> - 1.0.1.2.5.0.0-1245 +1.1.0 --- End diff -- yeah, good idea > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011089#comment-16011089 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584#discussion_r116568707 --- Diff: pom.xml --- @@ -106,7 +122,7 @@ but I justify it by noting that this should be able to be removed when we migrate to Storm 1.1.x, which properly supports Kafka 0.10.x. --> - 1.0.1.2.5.0.0-1245 +1.1.0 --- End diff -- Couldn't the whole block above this be dropped/edited? It's pure HDP profile now, right? Or better yet, replaced with an explanation of the new 1.1.0 + Timer explanation. > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011087#comment-16011087 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584#discussion_r116564604 --- Diff: metron-platform/metron-storm-kafka-override/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/kafka/spout/internal/Timer.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +/** + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one + * or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file + * distributed with this work for additional information + * regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance + * with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ +package org.apache.storm.kafka.spout.internal; + +import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; +import org.apache.storm.utils.Time; + +public class Timer { + private final long delay; + private final long period; + private final TimeUnit timeUnit; + private final long periodNanos; + private long start; + + public Timer(long delay, long period, TimeUnit timeUnit) { +this.delay = delay; +this.period = period; +this.timeUnit = timeUnit; +this.periodNanos = timeUnit.toNanos(period); +this.start = System.nanoTime() + timeUnit.toNanos(delay); + } + + public long period() { +return this.period; + } + + public long delay() { +return this.delay; + } + + public TimeUnit getTimeUnit() { +return this.timeUnit; + } + + public boolean isExpiredResetOnTrue() { --- End diff -- I'm not sure how complicated the original implementation is vs this one. Could we grab any unit tests on the original Timer and make sure that this Timer meets the same expectations? > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011086#comment-16011086 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584#discussion_r116566613 --- Diff: metron-platform/metron-storm-kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/storm/kafka/flux/SimpleStormKafkaBuilder.java --- @@ -202,31 +240,4 @@ public String getTopic() { return new StormKafkaSpout<>(builder); } - private static Map modifyKafkaProps(Map props, String zkQuorum) { -try { - if(!props.containsKey(KafkaSpoutConfig.Consumer.BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS)) { -//this isn't a putIfAbsent because I only want to pull the brokers from zk if it's absent. -List brokers = KafkaUtils.INSTANCE.getBrokersFromZookeeper(zkQuorum); -props.put(KafkaSpoutConfig.Consumer.BOOTSTRAP_SERVERS, Joiner.on(",").join(brokers)); - } - props.putIfAbsent(KafkaSpoutConfig.Consumer.KEY_DESERIALIZER, ByteArrayDeserializer.class.getName()); - props.putIfAbsent(KafkaSpoutConfig.Consumer.VALUE_DESERIALIZER, ByteArrayDeserializer.class.getName()); - -} catch (Exception e) { - throw new IllegalStateException("Unable to retrieve brokers from zookeeper: " + e.getMessage(), e); -} -return props; - } - - private static KafkaSpoutTuplesBuilder createTuplesBuilder(List config, String topic) { -TupleBuilder tb = new TupleBuilder(topic, FieldsConfiguration.toList(config)); -return new KafkaSpoutTuplesBuilderNamedTopics.Builder<>(tb).build(); - } - - - private static KafkaSpoutStreams createStreams(List config, String topic) { -final Fields fields = FieldsConfiguration.getFields(FieldsConfiguration.toList(config)); -return new KafkaSpoutStreamsNamedTopics.Builder(fields, STREAM, new String[] { topic} ).build(); --- End diff -- STREAM isn't used anymore, right? Can we kill the field (and no, I can't comment on the field because it's not technically part of the diff, sigh). > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16011088#comment-16011088 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user justinleet commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/metron/pull/584#discussion_r116567399 --- Diff: metron-platform/metron-storm-kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/metron/storm/kafka/flux/SimpleStormKafkaBuilder.java --- @@ -165,13 +177,39 @@ public SimpleStormKafkaBuilder( Map kafkaProps , List fieldsConfiguration ) { -super( modifyKafkaProps(kafkaProps, zkQuorum) - , createStreams(fieldsConfiguration, topic) - , createTuplesBuilder(fieldsConfiguration, topic) - ); +super( getBootstrapServers(zkQuorum, kafkaProps) + , createDeserializer(Optional.ofNullable((String)kafkaProps.get(ConsumerConfig.KEY_DESERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG)), DEFAULT_DESERIALIZER) + , createDeserializer(Optional.ofNullable((String)kafkaProps.get(ConsumerConfig.VALUE_DESERIALIZER_CLASS_CONFIG)), DEFAULT_DESERIALIZER) + , topic +); +setProp(kafkaProps); +setRecordTranslator(new SpoutRecordTranslator<>(FieldsConfiguration.toList(fieldsConfiguration))); this.topic = topic; } + private static Class> createDeserializer( Optional deserializerClass --- End diff -- This is nitpicky, so don't feel obligated to fix it, but couldn't this method just take a (possibly null) String, and wrap it in the Optional itself? It seems pointless to make the caller wrap it when it's just as easy for the function itself to handle null. > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16008574#comment-16008574 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- Github user cestella commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/584 The test plan for this should be mainly a smoke test..make sure data flows through the default topologies in full dev. > Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 > - > > Key: METRON-950 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950 > Project: Metron > Issue Type: Improvement >Reporter: Casey Stella >Assignee: Casey Stella > > There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput > is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. > This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP > repo. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.15#6346)
[jira] [Commented] (METRON-950) Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16008569#comment-16008569 ] ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-950: --- GitHub user cestella opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/584 METRON-950: Migrate storm-kafka-client to 1.1 ## Contributor Comments There are MAJOR performance issues with the storm-kafka-client. Throughput is roughly an order of magnitude faster in the 1.1.0 version vs the 1.0.3. This also removes the requirement for the non-HDP profile to rely on the HDP repo. I will point out that the storm-kafka-client in 1.1 does rely on `Time.nanoTime()`, a method call that was introduced in 1.1. To get around this, I've created the `metron-storm-kafka-override` with a backported implementation of the `Time` class. This will be removed when we migrate to Storm 1.1. Normally, I would hold off this change until we take the effort to migrate to 1.1 properly, but the combination of empirical evidence (I saw it go an order of magnitude slower in 1.0.1 vs 1.1) and wide ranging change for Storm 1.1 makes me err on the side of getting this in faster. It should help make every topology faster, but is in particular absolutely required to get sensible throughput in the pcap topology. ## Pull Request Checklist Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Metron. Please refer to our [Development Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=61332235) for the complete guide to follow for contributions. Please refer also to our [Build Verification Guidelines](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/METRON/Verifying+Builds?show-miniview) for complete smoke testing guides. In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you follow these guidelines and ask you to double check the following: ### For all changes: - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? If not one needs to be created at [Metron Jira](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON/?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.jira-projects-plugin:summary-panel). - [x] Does your PR title start with METRON- where is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character. - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically master)? ### For code changes: - [x] Have you included steps to reproduce the behavior or problem that is being changed or addressed? - [x] Have you included steps or a guide to how the change may be verified and tested manually? - [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests and checks have been executed in the root incubating-metron folder via: ``` mvn -q clean integration-test install && build_utils/verify_licenses.sh ``` - [x] Have you written or updated unit tests and or integration tests to verify your changes? - [x] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? - [ ] Have you verified the basic functionality of the build by building and running locally with Vagrant full-dev environment or the equivalent? ### For documentation related changes: - [x] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered by building and verifying the site-book? If not then run the following commands and the verify changes via `site-book/target/site/index.html`: ``` cd site-book mvn site ``` Note: Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible. It is also recommended that [travis-ci](https://travis-ci.org) is set up for your personal repository such that your branches are built there before submitting a pull request. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/cestella/incubator-metron storm_kafka_spout_11 Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/584.patch To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch with (at least) the following in the commit message: This closes #584 commit a4cdfdcaaf15c8c60749a103d38b55e77703c2d5 Author: cstella Date: 2017-05-12T15:59:18Z Upgrading spout to 1.1 for performance. commit 7ef320d3d80324d2322943a7b95354f0ef6c3852 Author: cstella Date: 2017-05-12T16:09:57Z Travis drama. commit 284c6452d08bc050fe8b1c66e5c85e4a95804cad Author: cstella Date: 2017-05-12T18:09:05Z Update > Mig