[GitHub] [nifi-minifi] GCHQ-NiFi commented on issue #167: MINIFI-424: Centralise Bootstrap config

2019-09-11 Thread GitBox
GCHQ-NiFi commented on issue #167: MINIFI-424: Centralise Bootstrap config
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/167#issuecomment-530295586
 
 
   @gruselglatz - No, this pull request just simplifies the transformConfigFile 
function.
   If this is merged in, it'll be easier to override flow settings using the 
bootstrap.conf (like the C2 SSL override). I've got a fix for the C2 SSL ready 
to go, it just relies on this pull request to get merged in first.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services


[GitHub] [nifi-minifi] GCHQ-NiFi commented on issue #167: MINIFI-424: Centralise Bootstrap config

2019-09-02 Thread GitBox
GCHQ-NiFi commented on issue #167: MINIFI-424: Centralise Bootstrap config
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/167#issuecomment-527208530
 
 
   @apiri Do you mind reviewing and seeing whether this is a better way of 
managing config transformation? Happy to make changes as needed!
   Going forward, we have other ideas which could take advantage of this - like 
passing in a boolean through the bootstrap.conf to hard code all processor 
SSL-Contexts to the minifi SSL config set in the bootstrap. We've had problems 
using SSL contexts when driving minifi with c2. As the nifi uses it's own SSL, 
this gets pulled across into minifi - which points to the wrong SSL details and 
can't start.


This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services