[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker commented on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion
kamyker commented on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/26#issuecomment-559297610 Then same definition as AWS has: `public async Task Main(Stream stream)` That's probably even faster than string as Stream can be directly assigned to HttpResponse.Body This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] rabbah commented on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion
rabbah commented on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/26#issuecomment-559295710 Indeed - that would be cleaner. It would be nicer if the output was also a stream/symmetric. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker commented on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion
kamyker commented on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/26#issuecomment-559295328 I guess HttpRequest is not needed just body of it - HttpRequest.InputStream `public async Task Main(Stream request)` This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] rabbah commented on issue #25: Async task
rabbah commented on issue #25: Async task URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/25#issuecomment-559288316 @shawnallen85 I approved the PR but please update the change logs to remove "future" release which hasn't happened yet. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] rabbah commented on a change in pull request #25: Async task
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #25: Async task URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/25#discussion_r351538987 ## File path: core/dotnet2.2/CHANGELOG.md ## @@ -23,3 +23,15 @@ ## 1.13 Changes: - Initial release + +## 1.14 Review comment: @shawnallen85 we need to remove these change notes until there is an actual release of the runtime. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] rabbah commented on a change in pull request #25: Async task
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #25: Async task URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/25#discussion_r351539211 ## File path: core/dotnet3.0/CHANGELOG.md ## @@ -23,3 +23,12 @@ ## 1.14 (next Apache release) Review comment: same - it's better to wait until the actual release vote. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] rabbah commented on issue #25: Async task
rabbah commented on issue #25: Async task URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/25#issuecomment-559287860 Thanks @kamyker! This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker commented on issue #25: Async task
kamyker commented on issue #25: Async task URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/25#issuecomment-559287136 Looks good This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] rabbah commented on a change in pull request #25: Async task
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #25: Async task URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/25#discussion_r351535064 ## File path: core/dotnet2.2/CHANGELOG.md ## @@ -23,3 +23,15 @@ ## 1.13 Changes: - Initial release + +## 1.14 +Changes: +- Support for async methods. Example: + +```csharp +public async Task MainAsync(JObject args) +{ +await Task.Delay(10); // Just do a delay to have an async/await process occur. +return (args); Review comment: that's how much `c#` i know :) This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] rabbah commented on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion
rabbah commented on issue #26: Raw requests to skip JObject conversion URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/26#issuecomment-559283977 In general the downside of this approach is breaking the openwhisk json in/json out abstraction. Worse directly exposing the http request object while performant breaks the "serverless" abstraction. It would be better to pass in a streamable buffer for i/o. We have moved toward something similar with a piped approach for function i/o. You can certainly do this with a custom dotnet runtime. I think this would be worthwhile to also raise on the Apache OpenWhisk dev list. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker commented on a change in pull request #25: Async task
kamyker commented on a change in pull request #25: Async task URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/25#discussion_r351534538 ## File path: core/dotnet2.2/CHANGELOG.md ## @@ -23,3 +23,15 @@ ## 1.13 Changes: - Initial release + +## 1.14 +Changes: +- Support for async methods. Example: + +```csharp +public async Task MainAsync(JObject args) +{ +await Task.Delay(10); // Just do a delay to have an async/await process occur. +return (args); Review comment: no, no, Task.Run is only used in sync methods This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] rabbah commented on issue #22: Add async/await support
rabbah commented on issue #22: Add async/await support URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/22#issuecomment-559283354 @kamyker are you able to review this PR https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/25 which adds async support? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] rabbah commented on a change in pull request #25: Async task
rabbah commented on a change in pull request #25: Async task URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/25#discussion_r351533784 ## File path: core/dotnet2.2/CHANGELOG.md ## @@ -23,3 +23,15 @@ ## 1.13 Changes: - Initial release + +## 1.14 +Changes: +- Support for async methods. Example: + +```csharp +public async Task MainAsync(JObject args) +{ +await Task.Delay(10); // Just do a delay to have an async/await process occur. +return (args); Review comment: shouldn't there be a Task.run somewhere for the awaitable method? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk] rabbah commented on issue #4593: Change ContainerPool buffer processing
rabbah commented on issue #4593: Change ContainerPool buffer processing URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4593#issuecomment-559282377 I've gone through this change once. I think it's sound but want to make a second pass. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker edited a comment on issue #22: Add async/await support
kamyker edited a comment on issue #22: Add async/await support URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/22#issuecomment-559230796 Btw if someone needs async before this feature is available (for ex. in IBM) it's possible to instead: `var result = await SomeAsyncFunc();` do: `var result = SomeAsyncFunc().GetAwaiter().GetResult();` Not very efficient as it will use new thread and can prob deadlock in very high usage scenarios but fine in my use case. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker edited a comment on issue #22: Add async/await support
kamyker edited a comment on issue #22: Add async/await support URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/22#issuecomment-559230796 Btw if someone needs async before this feature is available (for ex. in IBM) it's possible to instead: `var result = await SomeAsyncFunc();` do: `var result = SomeAsyncFunc().GetAwaiter().GetResult();` Not very efficient as it will use new thread and can prob deadlock in very high usage scenarios but I fine in my use case. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet] kamyker commented on issue #22: Add async/await support
kamyker commented on issue #22: Add async/await support URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/22#issuecomment-559230796 Btw if someone needs async before this feature is available (for ex. in IBM) it's possible to instead: `var result = await SomeAsyncFunc();` do: `var result = SomeAsyncFunc().GetAwaiter().GetResult();` Not very efficient as it will use new thread and can prob deadlock in very high usage scenarios. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk] markusthoemmes commented on issue #4736: Update pureconfig to version 0.11.1.
markusthoemmes commented on issue #4736: Update pureconfig to version 0.11.1. URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736#issuecomment-559139635 @chetanmeh finally did it! This is ready to review now. I'll update the PR against the mesos actor to only bump to 0.11 as well. 0.12 is a different beast entirely. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk] codecov-io edited a comment on issue #4736: Update pureconfig to version 0.11.1.
codecov-io edited a comment on issue #4736: Update pureconfig to version 0.11.1. URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736#issuecomment-559129805 # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=h1) Report > Merging [#4736](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=desc) into [master](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/commit/0f8ee7d9a400da61cbafce77b393678d22c179df?src=pr=desc) will **decrease** coverage by `5.31%`. > The diff coverage is `n/a`. [![Impacted file tree graph](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/graphs/tree.svg?width=650=l0YmsiSAso=150=pr)](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=tree) ```diff @@Coverage Diff@@ ## master #4736 +/- ## = - Coverage 83.61% 78.3% -5.32% = Files 198 198 Lines88308830 Branches 619 611 -8 = - Hits 73836914 -469 - Misses 14471916 +469 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=tree) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [...che/openwhisk/core/yarn/YARNContainerFactory.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUveWFybi9ZQVJOQ29udGFpbmVyRmFjdG9yeS5zY2FsYQ==) | `87.5% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...pache/openwhisk/core/entity/ConcurrencyLimit.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvZW50aXR5L0NvbmN1cnJlbmN5TGltaXQuc2NhbGE=) | `94.11% <ø> (+5.88%)` | :arrow_up: | | [...org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/MemoryLimit.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvZW50aXR5L01lbW9yeUxpbWl0LnNjYWxh) | `93.75% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...openwhisk/common/tracing/OpenTracingProvider.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvbW1vbi90cmFjaW5nL09wZW5UcmFjaW5nUHJvdmlkZXIuc2NhbGE=) | `21.15% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...whisk/connector/kafka/KafkaConsumerConnector.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2Nvbm5lY3Rvci9rYWZrYS9LYWZrYUNvbnN1bWVyQ29ubmVjdG9yLnNjYWxh) | `59.15% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...abase/ArtifactWithFileStorageActivationStore.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvZGF0YWJhc2UvQXJ0aWZhY3RXaXRoRmlsZVN0b3JhZ2VBY3RpdmF0aW9uU3RvcmUuc2NhbGE=) | `91.66% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...a/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/TimeLimit.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvZW50aXR5L1RpbWVMaW1pdC5zY2FsYQ==) | `95.65% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...sk/core/containerpool/logging/SplunkLogStore.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvY29udGFpbmVycG9vbC9sb2dnaW5nL1NwbHVua0xvZ1N0b3JlLnNjYWxh) | `84.61% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [.../containerpool/logging/ElasticSearchLogStore.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvY29udGFpbmVycG9vbC9sb2dnaW5nL0VsYXN0aWNTZWFyY2hMb2dTdG9yZS5zY2FsYQ==) | `96.15% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...e/loadBalancer/ShardingContainerPoolBalancer.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29yZS9jb250cm9sbGVyL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvbG9hZEJhbGFuY2VyL1NoYXJkaW5nQ29udGFpbmVyUG9vbEJhbGFuY2VyLnNjYWxh) | `88.7% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | ... and [83 more](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree-more) | | -- [Continue to review full report at Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=continue). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=footer). Last update [0f8ee7d...140aa24](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=lastupdated). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments).
[GitHub] [openwhisk] codecov-io commented on issue #4736: Update pureconfig to version 0.11.1.
codecov-io commented on issue #4736: Update pureconfig to version 0.11.1. URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736#issuecomment-559129805 # [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=h1) Report > Merging [#4736](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=desc) into [master](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/commit/0f8ee7d9a400da61cbafce77b393678d22c179df?src=pr=desc) will **decrease** coverage by `5.31%`. > The diff coverage is `n/a`. [![Impacted file tree graph](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/graphs/tree.svg?width=650=l0YmsiSAso=150=pr)](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=tree) ```diff @@Coverage Diff@@ ## master #4736 +/- ## = - Coverage 83.61% 78.3% -5.32% = Files 198 198 Lines88308830 Branches 619 611 -8 = - Hits 73836914 -469 - Misses 14471916 +469 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=tree) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [...che/openwhisk/core/yarn/YARNContainerFactory.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUveWFybi9ZQVJOQ29udGFpbmVyRmFjdG9yeS5zY2FsYQ==) | `87.5% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...pache/openwhisk/core/entity/ConcurrencyLimit.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvZW50aXR5L0NvbmN1cnJlbmN5TGltaXQuc2NhbGE=) | `94.11% <ø> (+5.88%)` | :arrow_up: | | [...org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/MemoryLimit.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvZW50aXR5L01lbW9yeUxpbWl0LnNjYWxh) | `93.75% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...openwhisk/common/tracing/OpenTracingProvider.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvbW1vbi90cmFjaW5nL09wZW5UcmFjaW5nUHJvdmlkZXIuc2NhbGE=) | `21.15% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...whisk/connector/kafka/KafkaConsumerConnector.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2Nvbm5lY3Rvci9rYWZrYS9LYWZrYUNvbnN1bWVyQ29ubmVjdG9yLnNjYWxh) | `59.15% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...abase/ArtifactWithFileStorageActivationStore.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvZGF0YWJhc2UvQXJ0aWZhY3RXaXRoRmlsZVN0b3JhZ2VBY3RpdmF0aW9uU3RvcmUuc2NhbGE=) | `91.66% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...a/org/apache/openwhisk/core/entity/TimeLimit.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvZW50aXR5L1RpbWVMaW1pdC5zY2FsYQ==) | `95.65% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...sk/core/containerpool/logging/SplunkLogStore.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvY29udGFpbmVycG9vbC9sb2dnaW5nL1NwbHVua0xvZ1N0b3JlLnNjYWxh) | `84.61% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [.../containerpool/logging/ElasticSearchLogStore.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29tbW9uL3NjYWxhL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvY29udGFpbmVycG9vbC9sb2dnaW5nL0VsYXN0aWNTZWFyY2hMb2dTdG9yZS5zY2FsYQ==) | `96.15% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | [...e/loadBalancer/ShardingContainerPoolBalancer.scala](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree#diff-Y29yZS9jb250cm9sbGVyL3NyYy9tYWluL3NjYWxhL29yZy9hcGFjaGUvb3BlbndoaXNrL2NvcmUvbG9hZEJhbGFuY2VyL1NoYXJkaW5nQ29udGFpbmVyUG9vbEJhbGFuY2VyLnNjYWxh) | `88.7% <ø> (ø)` | :arrow_up: | | ... and [83 more](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736/diff?src=pr=tree-more) | | -- [Continue to review full report at Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=continue). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=footer). Last update [0f8ee7d...140aa24](https://codecov.io/gh/apache/openwhisk/pull/4736?src=pr=lastupdated). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments).
[GitHub] [openwhisk] markusthoemmes closed pull request #4734: Update gradle wrapper to 6.0.1.
markusthoemmes closed pull request #4734: Update gradle wrapper to 6.0.1. URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4734 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk] markusthoemmes commented on issue #4734: Update gradle wrapper to 6.0.1.
markusthoemmes commented on issue #4734: Update gradle wrapper to 6.0.1. URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/4734#issuecomment-559032082 Gonna close this for now, might revisit at a later stage. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services
[GitHub] [openwhisk-wskdeploy] alvarolopez commented on issue #1057: Support Description field in corresponding entities
alvarolopez commented on issue #1057: Support Description field in corresponding entities URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-wskdeploy/pull/1057#issuecomment-558993968 @mrutkows I forgot to reply to you: we're fine with not storing the description at server-side, but having it as part of the schema so that every action can include a description. Many thanks. This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services