[GitHub] [openwhisk] msciabarra commented on pull request #5361: GitHub action
msciabarra commented on PR #5361: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5361#issuecomment-1347870420 Now I have unit, multiruntime and standalone test passing and system only failing one test -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [openwhisk] msciabarra commented on pull request #5361: GitHub action
msciabarra commented on PR #5361: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5361#issuecomment-1347200248 I fixed the error in the aws storage renaming a secret to AWS_BUCKET, and the error in system forcing a corresponding java version. I had to "slightly" update the version of openj9 used to use one that can be actually downloaded (11.0.8 -> 11.0.12) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [openwhisk-runtime-docker] dgrove-oss closed pull request #96: Icontrol 1
dgrove-oss closed pull request #96: Icontrol 1 URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-docker/pull/96 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [openwhisk] msciabarra commented on a diff in pull request #5361: GitHub action
msciabarra commented on code in PR #5361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5361#discussion_r1046228883
##
ansible/group_vars/all:
##
@@ -551,5 +551,3 @@ scheduler:
throttlingFraction: "{{ scheduler_queue_throttlingFraction | default(0.9)
}}"
durationBufferSize: "{{ scheduler_queue_durationBufferSize | default(10)
}}"
deployment_ignore_error: "{{ scheduler_deployment_ignore_error |
default('False') }}"
- dataManagementService:
Review Comment:
Yes. It gives a duplicate warning.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [openwhisk] bdoyle0182 commented on a diff in pull request #5361: GitHub action
bdoyle0182 commented on code in PR #5361:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5361#discussion_r1046227267
##
ansible/group_vars/all:
##
@@ -551,5 +551,3 @@ scheduler:
throttlingFraction: "{{ scheduler_queue_throttlingFraction | default(0.9)
}}"
durationBufferSize: "{{ scheduler_queue_durationBufferSize | default(10)
}}"
deployment_ignore_error: "{{ scheduler_deployment_ignore_error |
default('False') }}"
- dataManagementService:
Review Comment:
is this intended to be removed?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [openwhisk] msciabarra commented on pull request #5361: GitHub action
msciabarra commented on PR #5361: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5361#issuecomment-1346157570 The workflow does not run and it is not visibile until it is available on the default branch so it shoud be merged. However currently the do not run unless you trigger them manually or push a tag. So we can test them merging and triggering manually. Or you can merge them in a fork as I am doing here (https://github.com/msciabarra/openwhisk/) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[GitHub] [openwhisk] style95 commented on pull request #5361: GitHub action
style95 commented on PR #5361: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5361#issuecomment-1346147920 How can we test this change? It seems the GitHub workflow is not running on this repo. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
