[PR] Added GO_PROXY_GITHUB_USER variable for builder_release container [openwhisk-runtime-python]
spagno opened a new pull request, #160: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-python/pull/160 Hi, I noticed that builder_source uses GO_PROXY_GITHUB_USER variable for the repo and builder_release doesn't. I aligned it. regards -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Webaction runs twice within one activation, and reported as failure when it did not actually fail [openwhisk]
mretallack commented on issue #5481: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5481#issuecomment-2097889827 Thanks for the suggestion, I will retry it a few times over the next day, but this is what I see on the access log in nginx: ``` 10.0.0.65 - - [02/May/2024:10:31:17 +] [#tid_8daa7a35d7e1b39c3114d4c94d99ae12] POST /api/v1/web/dataspace/iot_package/iot_action HTTP/1.1 200 4 - AHC/2.1 172.20.41.68:8080 10.0.1.70 - - [02/May/2024:10:31:18 +] [#tid_63cd895864243ab89c8ed39fec47d83f] POST /api/v1/web/dataspace/iot_package/iot_action HTTP/1.1 200 4 - AHC/2.1 172.20.41.68:8080 ``` From reading this it looks like both are returning 200. I am wondering if AWS do something strange with there HTTP client and send multiple requests over the same connection and dont wait for a reply (only a theory) I will keep looking at the logs until somthing else comes up :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Unable to setup on mac m1 [openwhisk-deploy-kube]
mattvonrocketstein commented on issue #765: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/765#issuecomment-2097651690 It took me a long time to figure out the problem and to finally find this issue. If the problem is not fixed for 6 months, the charts in master should at least be moved to a dev branch or something. Are there other charts/values we should be looking at? If there's no currently work-around then doesn't that affect production for lots of people? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Question: How to create an action using a custom Ubuntu docker image [openwhisk]
Tim-C1 commented on issue #5478: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5478#issuecomment-2097633439 Sure! Actually this has nothing to do with openwhisk, I follow the [dockerskeleton repo](https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-docker) and do some modifications to the Dockerfile to build a custom ubuntu image, and it works. The reason why I can not run create and invoke an action is that I first run bash in the image I built then commit it, and this commit will override the default CMD specified in the Dockerfile which is used to the start actionProxy server required by Openwhisk. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
