Re: [I] Scalable Deployment of OpenWhisk 2.0.0 [openwhisk]
bdoyle0182 commented on issue #5510: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5510#issuecomment-2356474466 > 3. But when I ran benchmarking for another action B after A, the warm containers were not used. Even though both A and B use same runtimes, same amount of memory and same requirements for pip. > > So I think the warm containers not being used amongst different actions is what's causing my workflows to not scale. I saw invoker tags based scheduling in the docs and that is some temporary fix for my use case, that is in 2.0.0 and not 1.0.0. > > But bigger concern is my limited understanding of warm containers reuse amongst different actions. Where do I get more information about this? Is this the intentional way warm containers reuse is supposed to run? You're experiencing the hot spotting / container swapping problem of the best effort 1.0.0 scheduling algorithm. If you're container pool is full and no functions exist for Action B, you need to evict an Action A in order to cold start an Action B. But also want to clarify that you shouldn't expect containers to get reused for multiple actions. Once a container is bound to an action, it can only run executions of that action even if it's using the same runtime and memory profile; there are many reasons for this but most importantly is security and data isolation. You will find that performance should be significantly better on Openwhisk 2.0 with the new scheduler for the traffic pattern you're trying to test. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Scalable Deployment of OpenWhisk 2.0.0 [openwhisk]
singhsegv commented on issue #5510: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5510#issuecomment-2356404420 Hey @style95 thank for taking this up **How did you deploy OpenWhisk-2.0.0? Are you able to invoke an action?** I haven't deployed this till now. I've been working with OpenWhisk 1.0.0 which is the one that comes with https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube repository. I've raised an issue there to understand how to get OpenWhisk 2.0.0 up and running with k8s where you gave some pointers https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/781#issuecomment-2316569110 . I'll be working on getting this up in the meantime. So this question is something that is part of my doubts. As in, if I want to deploy OpenWhisk 2.0.0 in a multi node setting in a scalable manner, how should I go about it? Is ansible a way for that, or is there some way to user kubernetes for this? --- **What is your concurrency limit and userMemory assigned to invokers?** My action concurrency limits are 1 and there are 3 invokers each with ~2m of memory. After checking in grafana dashboard this seems to be fine since each invoker showed 40 pods of 512mb memory each at peak. --- Some more updates from the benchmarking I did in the meantime: 1. Instead of benchmarking the scale of workflows, I went back to load testing 1 action at a time. I had a graph processing workflow in which let's say there were 2 actions A and B. 2. Benchmarking A with multiple RPS made it scale well. I tried with 1/4/8/16 RPS for 5 minutes each and it reused warm containers and got stable soon. 3. But when I ran benchmarking for another action B after A, the warm containers were not used. Even though both A and B use same runtimes, same amount of memory and same requirements for pip. So I think the warm containers not being used amongst different actions is what's causing my workflows to not scale. I saw invoker tags based scheduling in the docs and that is some temporary fix for my use case, that is in 2.0.0 and not 1.0.0. But bigger concern is my limited understanding of warm containers reuse amongst different actions. Where do I get more information about this? Is this the intentional way warm containers reuse is supposed to run? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] M1 mac compatibility [openwhisk]
dgrove-oss commented on PR #5511: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5511#issuecomment-2356265132 > One concern is we don't have any CI pipelines for the m1 Mac. It seems the M1 runner is available for all plans. It would be great if we set up one pipeline. > > [actions/runner-images#9254](https://github.com/actions/runner-images/issues/9254) My suggestion would be that we go after enabling one of the CI pipelines for both x86_64 and arm in a separate PR. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] M1 mac compatibility [openwhisk]
style95 commented on PR #5511: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5511#issuecomment-2354904956 One concern is we don't have any CI pipelines for the m1 Mac. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] M1 mac compatibility [openwhisk]
style95 commented on code in PR #5511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5511#discussion_r1762535924
##
ansible/group_vars/all:
##
@@ -464,7 +466,7 @@ zeroDowntimeDeployment:
enabled: "{{ zerodowntime_deployment_switch | default(false) }}"
etcd:
- version: "{{ etcd_version | default('v3.4.33') }}"
+ version: "{{ etcd_version | default('3.5') }}"
Review Comment:
etcd supports multiarch since 3.5 version.
https://hub.docker.com/r/bitnami/etcd/
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/edd6cced-e73c-405e-8799-cf757c4748e6";>
##
ansible/roles/zookeeper/tasks/deploy.yml:
##
@@ -17,10 +17,20 @@
---
# This role will install Kafka with Zookeeper in group 'kafka' in the
environment inventory
+- name: set zookeeper image
+ set_fact:
+zookeeper_image: "{{ zookeeper.image.arm64 }}"
+ when: ansible_facts['os_family'] == "Darwin" and
ansible_facts['architecture'] == "arm64"
Review Comment:
Selectively use the arm64 zookeeper image according to the os and
architecture.
##
ansible/roles/invoker/tasks/deploy.yml:
##
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
when: environmentInformation.type == "docker-machine"
- name: "determine docker root dir"
- shell: echo -e "GET http:/v1.24/info HTTP/1.0\r\n" | nc -U
/var/run/docker.sock | grep "{"
Review Comment:
It doesn't work with the recent version of docker for mac.
##
ansible/group_vars/all:
##
@@ -186,7 +186,9 @@ kafka_connect_string: "{% set ret = [] %}\
kafka_protocol_for_setup: "{{ kafka_protocol | default('PLAINTEXT') }}"
zookeeper:
- version: 3.4
+ image:
+amd64: zookeeper:3.4
+arm64: arm64v8/zookeeper:3.4
Review Comment:
I added another zookeeper image for arm64
##
common/scala/build.gradle:
##
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@ plugins {
}
ext.dockerImageName = 'scala'
+if(System.getProperty("os.arch").toLowerCase(Locale.ENGLISH).startsWith("aarch"))
{
Review Comment:
If the architecture of OS is m1 Mac, it uses the Dockerfile with the `.arm`
suffix.
##
common/scala/Dockerfile.arm:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+# this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+# The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+# (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+# the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#
+# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+# limitations under the License.
+#
+# if you change version of openjsk, also update tools/github/setup.sh to
download the corresponding jdk
+FROM arm64v8/eclipse-temurin:21.0.4_7-jdk-alpine
Review Comment:
Only the base image is changed.
##
tools/ow-utils/Dockerfile.arm:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+# contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+# this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+# The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+# (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+# the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+#
+# http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+#
+# Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+# distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+# WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+# See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+# limitations under the License.
+#
+
+FROM arm64v8/eclipse-temurin:8u422-b05-jdk-noble
Review Comment:
I only changed the base image from `adoptopenjdk/openjdk8:jdk8u262-b10` to
`arm64v8/eclipse-temurin:8u422-b05-jdk-noble`.
I used it as the current image is deprecated.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2f629baa-7438-4f43-ae55-f984b7027483";>
https://hub.docker.com/_/adoptopenjdk
##
core/scheduler/build.gradle:
##
@@ -52,6 +52,16 @@ buildscript {
}
}
+protobuf {
+protoc {
+if (osdetector.os == "osx") {
+artifact = 'com.google.protobuf:protoc:3.4.0:osx-x86_64'
Review Comment:
IIRC, we cant' upgrade the protoc version for now because some libraries are
dependent on this version.
And protoc-3.4.0 does not support arm architecture yet, so I chose this way.
This also requires rosetta installed.
https://github.com/grpc/grpc-java/issues/7690#issuecomment-760332746
--
This
[PR] M1 mac compatibility [openwhisk]
style95 opened a new pull request, #5511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5511
This is a very first step to make OW compatible with M1 Mac.
## Description
There could be many ways but I chose to minimize changes. I decided to have
another Dockerfile for the M1 Mac. It will be selectively used according to the
OS and its architecture.
I could build and deploy OW on M1 Mac and run an action.
(Though I had to install rosetta because openwhisk-cli is also not being
built for M1 mac.)
```bash
$ wsk action invoke noop -i -r
{}
```
## Related issue and scope
- [x] I opened an issue to propose and discuss this change
(https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5503)
## My changes affect the following components
- [ ] API
- [ ] Controller
- [ ] Message Bus (e.g., Kafka)
- [ ] Loadbalancer
- [ ] Scheduler
- [ ] Invoker
- [ ] Intrinsic actions (e.g., sequences, conductors)
- [ ] Data stores (e.g., CouchDB)
- [ ] Tests
- [x] Deployment
- [ ] CLI
- [x] General tooling
- [ ] Documentation
## Types of changes
- [ ] Bug fix (generally a non-breaking change which closes an issue).
- [x] Enhancement or new feature (adds new functionality).
- [ ] Breaking change (a bug fix or enhancement which changes existing
behavior).
## Checklist:
- [x] I signed an [Apache
CLA](https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
- [x] I reviewed the [style
guides](https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#coding-standards)
and followed the recommendations (Travis CI will check :).
- [ ] I added tests to cover my changes.
- [ ] My changes require further changes to the documentation.
- [ ] I updated the documentation where necessary.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] prepare for 1.20.0 release [openwhisk-runtime-java]
dgrove-oss merged PR #168: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-java/pull/168 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] prepare for 1.20.0 release [openwhisk-runtime-python]
dgrove-oss merged PR #165: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-python/pull/165 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] prepare for 1.21.0 release [openwhisk-runtime-php]
dgrove-oss merged PR #145: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-php/pull/145 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] prepare for 1.19.0 release [openwhisk-runtime-swift]
dgrove-oss merged PR #167: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-swift/pull/167 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] release openwhisk-runtime-dotnet 1.18.0 [openwhisk-website]
rabbah merged PR #522: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-website/pull/522 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] release config for runtime-dotnet-1.18.0 [openwhisk-release]
rabbah merged PR #433: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/433 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Scalable Deployment of OpenWhisk 2.0.0 [openwhisk]
style95 commented on issue #5510: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5510#issuecomment-2352006434 @singhsegv I just want to ask you a couple of questions first. How did you deploy OpenWhisk-2.0.0? Are you able to invoke an action? What is your concurrency limit and userMemory assigned to invokers? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Bump gradle-scalafmt version [openwhisk]
Suraez commented on issue #5504: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5504#issuecomment-2350718617 i got another issue now, when i made the changes stated in the above pull request ``` * What went wrong: A problem occurred configuring project ':core:standalone'. > Could not resolve all artifacts for configuration ':core:standalone:classpath'. > Could not find org.ajoberstar.grgit:grgit-core:3.0.0. Searched in the following locations: - https://plugins.gradle.org/m2/org/ajoberstar/grgit/grgit-core/3.0.0/grgit-core-3.0.0.pom Required by: project :core:standalone > com.gorylenko.gradle-git-properties:com.gorylenko.gradle-git-properties.gradle.plugin:2.0.0 > gradle.plugin.com.gorylenko.gradle-git-properties:gradle-git-properties:2.0.0 ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] release openwhisk-runtime-dotnet 1.18.0 [openwhisk-website]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #522: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-website/pull/522 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] release config for runtime-dotnet-1.18.0 [openwhisk-release]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #433: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/433 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[I] Scalable Deployment of OpenWhisk 2.0.0 [openwhisk]
singhsegv opened a new issue, #5510: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5510 I am very confused about how the OpenWhisk 2.0.0 is meant to be deployed for a scalable bechmarking setting. Need some help from the maintainers to understand what am I missing since I've spent a large amount of time now and still missing some key pieces. ### Context We are using OpenWhisk for a research project where workflows (sequential as well as fork/join) are to be deployed and benchmarked at 1/4/8 RPS etc for long period of times. This is to compare private cloud FaaS vs public cloud FaaS. ### Current Infrastructure Setting We have a in-house cluster with around 10 VMs running on different nodes, 50 vCPUs and around 200Gb of memory. Since I am new to this, I've initially followed https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube to deploy it and along with OpenWhisk Composer, was able to get the workflows running with a lot of small fixes and changes. ### Problems with Current Infrastructure 1. I am not able to scale it properly. Running even 1 RPS for 5-10 minutes leads to a lot of random errors like "failed to get binary" and some other errors too that don't occur when running a workflow once manually. 2. Even when I reduce the benchmarking time to 10-20s, the inter-action comm time is coming out to be around 1.5-2 minutes. Grafana shows around 2 minutes going in the `/init` and I am unable to debug why that is happening. ### Main Doubts about scaling 1. Since that openwhisk-deploy-kube take a very old version of OpenWhisk, so I thought running the latest version of it without k8s and on a single machine might give some benefits. But what I've understood now is the standalone mode is not supposed to be scalable since the controller is responsible for a lot of things in v1.0.0 and haven't checked that in 2.0.0. 2. Since, deploy-kube doesn't support the latest version of OpenWhisk due to major changes in scheduler, how is OpenWhisk supposed to be deployed for a scalable infrastructure? Is there some documentation that I've missed? 3. Also in 1.0.0, the results that I've got, is there something that I am missing? Why aren't the workflows scaling? How to go about debugging the delay? Or is purely that more infra needs to be added? @style95 @dgrove-oss Since you people have been active in the community and have answered some of my previous queries too, any help on this will be very appreciated. We are planning to go all in with OpenWhisk for our research and planning to contribute some good changes back to the community relating to FaaS at edge and improving the communication times in FaaS. But since none of us have infrastructure as our strong suite, getting over these initial hiccups is a becoming a blocker for us. So looking forward to some help, thanks :). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update gradle to 6.9.3 [openwhisk-runtime-php]
rabbah merged PR #144: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-php/pull/144 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] upgrade gradle to 6.9.3 [openwhisk-runtime-java]
rabbah merged PR #167: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-java/pull/167 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] upgrade gradle to 6.9.3 [openwhisk-runtime-python]
rabbah merged PR #164: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-python/pull/164 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] upgrade to gradle 6.9.3 [openwhisk-runtime-swift]
rabbah merged PR #166: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-swift/pull/166 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] openwhisk-cli Build failed [openwhisk-cli]
heywoodlh commented on issue #522: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-cli/issues/522#issuecomment-2344817807 > wski18n/i18n.go:98:16: undefined: Asset I ran into this as well, fixed with the following command: ``` go-bindata -pkg wski18n -o wski18n/i18n_resources.go wski18n/resources ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] added to nixpkgs [openwhisk-cli]
heywoodlh closed issue #524: added to nixpkgs URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-cli/issues/524 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] upgrade to gradle 6.9.3 [openwhisk-runtime-swift]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #166: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-swift/pull/166 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] all is ok, but install-packages is init..... [openwhisk-deploy-kube]
Suraez commented on issue #732: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/732#issuecomment-2336913710 when try to hit the command `wsk action list` or `wsk -i action list`, i got these errors:  please help me find the issue, i have been stuck at this issue for more than a week , i tried all ubuntu versions (20.04, 22.04, 24.04) with all python versions (3.8, 3.9, 3.10) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] all is ok, but install-packages is init..... [openwhisk-deploy-kube]
Suraez commented on issue #732: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/732#issuecomment-2336911159 all pods seem to be fine except the ones that are highlighted below as they are having 0/1 ready state i checked their logs but none of them makes sense to me, if you could provide any guidance, that would be great  `owdev-gen-certs-scmqt ` logs: ``` Error from server (NotFound): secrets "owdev-nginx" not found generating new owdev-nginx secret generating server certificate request Can't load /root/.rnd into RNG 139671000441280:error:2406F079:random number generator:RAND_load_file:Cannot open file:../crypto/rand/randfile.c:88:Filename=/root/.rnd generating self-signed password-less server certificate Signature ok subject=C = US, ST = NY, L = Yorktown, O = OpenWhisk, CN = *.localhost Getting Private key generate keystore secret/owdev-nginx created ``` `owdev-init-couchdb-r8zdg ` logs: ``` Cloning into '/openwhisk'... /openwhisk / Note: checking out 'ef725a653ab112391f79c274d8e3dcfb915d59a3'. You are in 'detached HEAD' state. You can look around, make experimental changes and commit them, and you can discard any commits you make in this state without impacting any branches by performing another checkout. If you want to create a new branch to retain commits you create, you may do so (now or later) by using -b with the checkout command again. Example: git checkout -b HEAD is now at ef725a65 Prevent cycle in the QueueManager (#5332) / /openwhisk/ansible / [WARNING]: Unable to parse /openwhisk/ansible/environments/local as an inventory source [WARNING]: No inventory was parsed, only implicit localhost is available [WARNING]: provided hosts list is empty, only localhost is available. Note that the implicit localhost does not match 'all' PLAY [localhost] *** [WARNING]: While constructing a mapping from /openwhisk/ansible/group_vars/all, line 494, column 3, found a duplicate dict key (dataManagementService). Using last defined value only. TASK [Gathering Facts] * Monday 09 September 2024 00:10:18 + (0:00:00.067) 0:00:00.067 ** ok: [localhost] TASK [gen hosts if 'local' env is used] Monday 09 September 2024 00:10:18 + (0:00:00.796) 0:00:00.864 ** changed: [localhost -> localhost] TASK [find the ip of docker-machine] *** Monday 09 September 2024 00:10:19 + (0:00:00.501) 0:00:01.365 ** skipping: [localhost] TASK [get the docker-machine ip] *** Monday 09 September 2024 00:10:19 + (0:00:00.028) 0:00:01.394 ** skipping: [localhost] TASK [gen hosts for docker-machine] Monday 09 September 2024 00:10:19 + (0:00:00.042) 0:00:01.436 ** skipping: [localhost] TASK [gen hosts for Jenkins] *** Monday 09 September 2024 00:10:19 + (0:00:00.053) 0:00:01.490 ** skipping: [localhost] TASK [check if db_local.ini exists?] *** Monday 09 September 2024 00:10:19 + (0:00:00.073) 0:00:01.563 ** ok: [localhost] TASK [prepare db_local.ini] Monday 09 September 2024 00:10:19 + (0:00:00.174) 0:00:01.738 ** changed: [localhost -> localhost] TASK [gen untrusted server certificate for host] *** Monday 09 September 2024 00:10:20 + (0:00:00.290) 0:00:02.028 ** changed: [localhost -> localhost] TASK [gen untrusted client certificate for host] *** Monday 09 September 2024 00:10:20 + (0:00:00.409) 0:00:02.437 ** changed: [localhost -> localhost] TASK [clean up old kafka keystore] * Monday 09 September 2024 00:10:21 + (0:00:00.669) 0:00:03.107 ** skipping: [localhost] TASK [ensure kafka files directory exists] * Monday 09 September 2024 00:10:21 + (0:00:00.030) 0:00:03.137 ** skipping: [localhost] TASK [generate kafka certificates] * Monday 09 September 2024 00:10:21 + (0:00:00.036) 0:00:03.174 ** skipping: [localhost] TASK [ensure controller files directory exists] *
Re: [I] Bump gradle-scalafmt version [openwhisk]
Suraez commented on issue #5504: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5504#issuecomment-2336847981 i am having the same issue -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] prepare for 1.18.0 release [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet]
rabbah merged PR #84: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/84 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] all is ok, but install-packages is init..... [openwhisk-deploy-kube]
rabbah commented on issue #732: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/732#issuecomment-2335459745 check which pods did not come up and why. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] September 2024 runtime wave release configs [openwhisk-release]
rabbah merged PR #432: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/432 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update downloads for runtime-go, runtime-docker, runtime-nodejs releases [openwhisk-website]
rabbah merged PR #521: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-website/pull/521 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Fix packages-public view function [openwhisk]
rabbah commented on PR #5508: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5508#issuecomment-2335437684 Thanks @dorbae for the fix -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update go proxy to 1.23@1.25.0 [openwhisk-runtime-swift]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #165: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-swift/pull/165 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update go proxy to 1.23@1.25.0 [openwhisk-runtime-rust]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #50: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-rust/pull/50 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update go proxy to 1.23@1.25.0 [openwhisk-runtime-php]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #143: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-php/pull/143 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] update go proxy to 1.23@1.25.0 [openwhisk-runtime-rust]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #50: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-rust/pull/50 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] config for runtime-go 1.25 [openwhisk-release]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #432: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-release/pull/432 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] all is ok, but install-packages is init..... [openwhisk-deploy-kube]
Suraez commented on issue #732: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/732#issuecomment-2325295851 Hi, I am having the same issue, did you find any solution? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] prepare for 1.16.0 release [openwhisk-runtime-docker]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #105: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-docker/pull/105 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] prep for 1.23.0 release [openwhisk-runtime-nodejs]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #254: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/254 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Remove dependency on 3rd party JSON library from next version of runtime [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet]
dgrove-oss commented on issue #51: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/51#issuecomment-2322148175 Closing as this issue was about dotnet 3.1 which is EOL. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Remove dependency on 3rd party JSON library from next version of runtime [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet]
dgrove-oss closed issue #51: Remove dependency on 3rd party JSON library from next version of runtime URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/51 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] improve cold start times [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet]
dgrove-oss closed issue #34: improve cold start times URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/34 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] improve cold start times [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet]
dgrove-oss commented on issue #34: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/34#issuecomment-2322147324 Closing as this issue was about dotnet 3.1 which is EOL. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Action cannot load Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstraction [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet]
dgrove-oss closed issue #39: Action cannot load Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstraction URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/39 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Action cannot load Microsoft.Extensions.DependencyInjection.Abstraction [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet]
dgrove-oss commented on issue #39: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/issues/39#issuecomment-2322146239 Closing as this issue was about dotnet 3.1 which is EOL. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Drop support for dotnet3.1 (EOL) [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet]
dgrove-oss merged PR #83: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/83 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Drop support for dotnet3.1 (EOL) [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet]
dgrove-oss commented on PR #83: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/83#issuecomment-2321542039 LTS for 3.1 ended at the end of 2022, so its time to drop from the action. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] Drop support for dotnet3.1 (EOL) [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #83: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/83 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] prep for 1.23.0 release [openwhisk-runtime-nodejs]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #254: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/254 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Add release notes for 1.25.0 [openwhisk-runtime-go]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #204: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-go/pull/204 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Make a 2.0.0 release of Helm Chart (to match OpenWhisk 2.0.0 release) [openwhisk-deploy-kube]
style95 commented on issue #781: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/781#issuecomment-2316569110 @singhsegv I believe this is because the scheduler is now enabled by default in the core project. https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/common/scala/src/main/resources/reference.conf#L21C1-L32C2 And I see it is not aligned with openwhisk-deploy-kube where the scheduler is disabled by default. https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/blob/master/helm/openwhisk/values.yaml#L275 Since you just updated the images, the ShardingPoolBalancer would be enabled and no etcd configuration would exist in the helm chart while as you can see in the log, the `FPCPoolBalancer` is enabled in the image. I think you have two options. 1. Enable the scheduler and add ETCD-related configurations. I think you need to update the helm chart too and enable [this configuration](https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/blob/master/helm/openwhisk/values.yaml#L275). 2. Disable the scheduler and change the underlying implementations to the ShardingPoolBalancer family. This is trickier as you need to update the helm chart for this way manually. The main thing is to change all the relevant SPI implementation. ``` LoadBalancerProvider = org.apache.openwhisk.core.loadBalancer.FPCPoolBalancer EntitlementSpiProvider = org.apache.openwhisk.core.entitlement.FPCEntitlementProvider InvokerProvider = org.apache.openwhisk.core.invoker.FPCInvokerReactive InvokerServerProvider = org.apache.openwhisk.core.invoker.FPCInvokerServer ``` https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/common/scala/src/main/resources/reference.conf#L26C3-L30 I think they should be changed like below. ``` LoadBalancerProvider = org.apache.openwhisk.core.loadBalancer.ShardingContainerPoolBalancer EntitlementSpiProvider = org.apache.openwhisk.core.entitlement.LocalEntitlementProvider InvokerProvider = org.apache.openwhisk.core.invoker.InvokerReactive InvokerServerProvider = org.apache.openwhisk.core.invoker.DefaultInvokerServer ``` Since you cannot change the reference.conf file as it resides in the image. You need to configure them via helm chart. I see currently the helm chart is defined with the assumption that ShardingPoolBalancer is enabled by default but it is actually not. https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/blob/master/helm/openwhisk/templates/invoker-pod.yaml#L149 So you need to configure implementation in a way like the below. This is supposed to be updated in the openwhisk-deploy-kube but I couldn't work on it yet. ``` - name: "CONFIG_whisk_spi_InvokerProvider" value: "org.apache.openwhisk.core.invoker.InvokerReactive" ``` Since I haven't tried this yet as well, not one hundred percent sure but it should be ideally addressed in this way. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] Add release notes for 1.25.0 [openwhisk-runtime-go]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #204: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-go/pull/204 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Make a 2.0.0 release of Helm Chart (to match OpenWhisk 2.0.0 release) [openwhisk-deploy-kube]
dgrove-oss commented on issue #781: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/781#issuecomment-2316535345 @style95 -- maybe you have some suggestions? Core openwhisk's inability to build on arm64 has really limited my ability to do anything with the core project or open whisk-deploy-kube for the last couple of years. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update openwhisk-client-js version in test files [openwhisk-runtime-nodejs]
dgrove-oss commented on PR #253: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/253#issuecomment-2316528122 Remembered (again...) that this test case intentionally uses an old openwhisk version as a simple way to verify that user-provided packages will override those built into the action docker file. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update openwhisk-client-js version in test files [openwhisk-runtime-nodejs]
dgrove-oss closed pull request #253: update openwhisk-client-js version in test files URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/253 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[I] Defaulted container "install-packages" out of: install-packages, wait-for-healthy-invoker (init) [openwhisk-deploy-kube]
Suraez opened a new issue, #787: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/787 Hi, all of the pods related to the openwhisk deployment seems to be working except the followings as their READY status is 0/1: ``` 1. owdev-gen-certs-mcjbh 2. owdev-init-couchdb-jj2zm 3. owdev-install-packages-4mhfv ```  _the pod `owdev-tests-package-checker` is generated after I ran `helm test owdev -n openwhisk` so that's not the problem._ the logs of the above listed containers are: owdev-gen-certs-mcjbh  owdev-init-couchdb-jj2zm  owdev-install-packages-4mhfv  Now, from the above pods, the pod related to generating SSL certificate i.e. `owdev-gen-certs-mcjbh` is having error while generating random number generator, but then again it says "Signature Ok" and "secret/owdev-nginx created" so i think this pod is fine. In case of pod related to installing packages i.e. owdev-install-packages-4mhfv , i don't know what's going on in there whereas couchDB pod i.e. owdev-init-couchdb-jj2zm has been initialized successfully. However, all of these pods have 0/1 in READY column. I do not really understand, why? if somebody could help me get these pods in ready state with 1/1 in READY column so that I can deploy and invoke functions, that would be very helpful. Thank you. Dependencies: Go version: 1.23.0 Docker version: 26.1.4 kubectl version: 1.30.1 helm version: 3.15.4 PS: I tried restarting these pods by deleting them. But no luck :( -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] KafkaProducerConnector producer.send() future call taking too much time [openwhisk]
style95 commented on issue #5506: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5506#issuecomment-2311134111 @abdulmonum Are you using the kafka trigger to invoke your action? Basically, your assumption is correct. If pods are already created and your action only takes 0.02 seconds, it should be fine. What is the batch size of your kafka producer and what is the user memory configured for the invoker? Do you have any suspicious logs on the consumer side as well? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] KafkaProducerConnector producer.send() future call taking too much time [openwhisk]
abdulmonum commented on issue #5506: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5506#issuecomment-2310711363 @style95 I see these logs periodically in the kafka-event-provider pod and I am not sure if this is related: [2024-08-25T19:45:40.323Z] [INFO] [??] [kafkatriggers] [canary] I found a canary. The last one was 60.168319 seconds ago. [2024-08-25T19:46:40.503Z] [INFO] [??] [kafkatriggers] [canary] I found a canary. The last one was 60.178885 seconds ago. [2024-08-25T19:47:40.649Z] [INFO] [??] [kafkatriggers] [canary] I found a canary. The last one was 60.1465 seconds ago. [2024-08-25T19:48:40.824Z] [INFO] [??] [kafkatriggers] [canary] I found a canary. The last one was 60.173952 seconds ago. [2024-08-25T19:49:40.829Z] [ERROR] [??] [kafkatriggers] [canary] Exception caught from changes feed. Restarting changes feed... [2024-08-25T19:49:40.829Z] [ERROR] [??] [kafkatriggers] HTTPConnectionPool(host='owdev-couchdb.openwhisk.svc.cluster.local', port=5984): Read timed out. [2024-08-25T19:49:40.829Z] [INFO] [??] [kafkatriggers] Shutting down existing DB client [2024-08-25T19:49:40.830Z] [INFO] [??] [kafkatriggers] Resetting dropped connection: owdev-couchdb.openwhisk.svc.cluster.local [2024-08-25T19:49:40.840Z] [INFO] [??] [kafkatriggers] Starting changes feed [2024-08-25T19:49:40.843Z] [INFO] [??] [kafkatriggers] Starting new HTTP connection (1): owdev-couchdb.openwhisk.svc.cluster.local [2024-08-25T19:49:40.872Z] [INFO] [??] [kafkatriggers] Database exists - connecting to it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] KafkaProducerConnector producer.send() future call taking too much time [openwhisk]
abdulmonum commented on issue #5506: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5506#issuecomment-2310705982 I have one node for the invoker. No prewarmed containers (like in ow terminology) but I force 60 cold starts to create 60 containers (for the same action) and once they are up and running, I invoke a workload (the same action) with a fixed arrival rate of 100 rps. A request takes around ~ 0.02 seconds. So in principle, there should be 2 containers busy at all times which is also the case. However, between this workload, there are periodic bursts of 40-60+ jobs getting queued at the KafkaProducerConnector producer.send() future call which all of them then go to the invoker and then if around 60+ jobs were queued get scheduled, it then induces a cold start. I am not sure why there would be a backpressure from the invoker when there are no no cold starts happening? And how would a backpressure from the invoker introduce pressure on kafka from not being to send the acknowledgment to the controller that it has produced the message? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] update openwhisk-client-js version in test files [openwhisk-runtime-nodejs]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #253: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/253 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump express from 4.17.3 to 4.19.2 in /core/nodejsActionBase [openwhisk-runtime-nodejs]
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #250: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/250#issuecomment-2310210538 OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor version, let me know by commenting `@dependabot ignore this major version` or `@dependabot ignore this minor version`. If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll resolve any conflicts on it. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Bump express from 4.17.3 to 4.19.2 in /core/nodejsActionBase [openwhisk-runtime-nodejs]
dgrove-oss closed pull request #250: Bump express from 4.17.3 to 4.19.2 in /core/nodejsActionBase URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/250 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Make a 2.0.0 release of Helm Chart (to match OpenWhisk 2.0.0 release) [openwhisk-deploy-kube]
singhsegv commented on issue #781: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-deploy-kube/issues/781#issuecomment-2309881408 Hey @dgrove-oss I've been using OpenWhisk on k8s for a research project and wanted to test how the performance differs with the latest version of invoker/controller/etc. I'd love to pick this up if someone can point me to the right direction and help to understand what all needs to be changed. Currently just changing the docker image tags to latest one end up with these error: ``` Exception in thread "main" pureconfig.error.ConfigReaderException: Cannot convert configuration to a org.apache.openwhisk.core.etcd.EtcdConfig. Failures are: at 'whisk': - Key not found: 'etcd'. at pureconfig.package$.getResultOrThrow(package.scala:139) at pureconfig.package$.loadConfigOrThrow(package.scala:161) at org.apache.openwhisk.core.loadBalancer.FPCPoolBalancer$.instance(FPCPoolBalancer.scala:721) at org.apache.openwhisk.core.controller.Controller.(Controller.scala:119) at org.apache.openwhisk.core.controller.Controller$.start(Controller.scala:338) at org.apache.openwhisk.core.controller.Controller$.main(Controller.scala:291) at org.apache.openwhisk.core.controller.Controller.main(Controller.scala) ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Update express from 4.17.3 to 4.19.2 [openwhisk-runtime-nodejs]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #252: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/252 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] KafkaProducerConnector producer.send() future call taking too much time [openwhisk]
style95 commented on issue #5506: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5506#issuecomment-2309083511 @abdulmonum How many nodes do you have for the invoker? And how many prewarmed containers do you have? The issue might be due to a limited number of invokers or slow container (pod) creation, which can cause backpressure. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] Update express from 4.17.3 to 4.19.2 [openwhisk-runtime-nodejs]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #252: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/252 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Docs update needed: ACTION.md [openwhisk-runtime-go]
Luke-Roy-IBM closed issue #178: Docs update needed: ACTION.md URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-go/issues/178 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] missed doc update for array results [openwhisk-runtime-go]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #203: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-go/pull/203 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] Docs update needed: ACTION.md [openwhisk-runtime-go]
Luke-Roy-IBM closed issue #178: Docs update needed: ACTION.md URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-go/issues/178 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break [openwhisk-runtime-nodejs]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #251: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/251 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] missed doc update for array results [openwhisk-runtime-go]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #203: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-go/pull/203 Fixes #178. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] KafkaProducerConnector producer.send() future call taking too much time [openwhisk]
abdulmonum commented on issue #5506: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5506#issuecomment-2307271864 My bad, the offset is 524 and the partition was 0 as seen from the log message. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Drop support for golang 1.20 [openwhisk-runtime-go]
dgrove-oss merged PR #202: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-go/pull/202 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet]
dgrove-oss merged PR #82: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/82 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] upgrade scalafmt plugin version to fix build [openwhisk-runtime-docker]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #104: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-docker/pull/104 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break [openwhisk-runtime-python]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #162: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-python/pull/162 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break [openwhisk-runtime-ruby]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #85: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-ruby/pull/85 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update gradle plugin version to fix build [openwhisk-runtime-rust]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #49: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-rust/pull/49 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break [openwhisk-runtime-swift]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #164: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-swift/pull/164 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [I] KafkaProducerConnector producer.send() future call taking too much time [openwhisk]
style95 commented on issue #5506: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5506#issuecomment-2305962768 There is only one consumer for the topic, why do you have so many partitions? While one consumer can receive messages from multiple partitions, it is not good for performance as far as I know. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[I] KafkaProducerConnector producer.send() future call taking too much time [openwhisk]
abdulmonum opened a new issue, #5506:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/issues/5506
-->
## Environment details:
* I am using k8s setup on openwhisk-deploy-kube, with action limits
increased to 9 .
* One node hosts OW core components, the other node hosts the invoker
* Using the old scheduler, using a client generating request rate of around
100 rps, function take 0.02 seconds to complete ( all invoked with blocking
calls)
* There are already 60 warm containers up and running before generating
100rps workload
* one controller and one invoker node both with 1024 Jvm heap
I found that requests formed a short queue when the controller schedules
activation and posts the topic for invoker to consume
Here is an example log for a tid:
[2024-08-17T19:12:51.632Z] [INFO] [#tid_cbDR904isIhkDhBksSNU4GiocWngMPD1]
[ActionsApi] [marker:controller_blockingActivation_start:104]
[2024-08-17T19:12:51.632Z] [INFO] [#tid_cbDR904isIhkDhBksSNU4GiocWngMPD1]
[ActionsApi] action activation id: d3b7ed1f632b4bd1b7ed1f632b4bd101
[marker:controller_loadbalancer_start:104]
[2024-08-17T19:12:51.632Z] [INFO] [#tid_cbDR904isIhkDhBksSNU4GiocWngMPD1]
[ShardingContainerPoolBalancer] scheduled activation
d3b7ed1f632b4bd1b7ed1f632b4bd101, action 'guest/aes@0.0.1' (managed), ns
'guest', mem limit 256 MB (std), time limit 6 ms (std) to
invoker0/owdev-invoker-0
[2024-08-17T19:12:51.632Z] [INFO] [#tid_cbDR904isIhkDhBksSNU4GiocWngMPD1]
[ShardingContainerPoolBalancer] posting topic 'invoker0' with activation id
'd3b7ed1f632b4bd1b7ed1f632b4bd101' [marker:controller_kafka_start:104]
[2024-08-17T19:12:51.666Z] [DEBUG] [#tid_cbDR904isIhkDhBksSNU4GiocWngMPD1]
[KafkaProducerConnector] sent message: invoker0[0][524]
[2024-08-17T19:12:51.666Z] [INFO] [#tid_cbDR904isIhkDhBksSNU4GiocWngMPD1]
[ShardingContainerPoolBalancer] posted to invoker0[0][524]
[marker:controller_kafka_finish:122:18]
[2024-08-17T19:12:51.666Z] [INFO] [#tid_cbDR904isIhkDhBksSNU4GiocWngMPD1]
[ActionsApi] [marker:controller_loadbalancer_finish:122:18]
The time between sent [ShardingContainerPoolBalancer] posting topic
'invoker0' and [KafkaProducerConnector] sent message: invoker0[0][524] is more
than 30ms (there are cases when its more) and this results in many requests
forming a queue here and subsequently a burst of jobs scheduled to invoker.
Upon inspecting source code in KafkaProducerConnector:
Future {
blocking {
try {
producer.send(record, new Callback {
override def onCompletion(metadata: RecordMetadata, exception:
Exception): Unit = {
if (exception == null)
produced.trySuccess(ResultMetadata(metadata.topic(),
metadata.partition(), metadata.offset()))
else produced.tryFailure(exception)
}
})
} catch {
case e: Throwable =>
produced.tryFailure(e)
}
}
}
produced.future.andThen {
case Success(status) =>
logging.debug(this, s"sent message:
${status.topic}[${status.partition}][${status.offset}]")
sentCounter.next()
case Failure(t) =>
logging.error(this, s"sending message on topic '$topic' failed:
${t.getMessage}")
Produced.future sucess is taking time. Upon checking logs more i found that
messages invoker0[0][519-523] are sent in the meantime after the
producer.send() with parititon 524 of and then finally invoker0[0][524] is
sent. Why is the call and how can I increase performance here so that the short
queue that forms does not happen because of the slow return of the future?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break [openwhisk-runtime-swift]
dgrove-oss closed pull request #164: update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-swift/pull/164 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update gradle plugin version to fix build [openwhisk-runtime-rust]
dgrove-oss closed pull request #49: update gradle plugin version to fix build URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-rust/pull/49 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet]
dgrove-oss closed pull request #82: update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/82 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break [openwhisk-runtime-nodejs]
dgrove-oss closed pull request #251: update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/251 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break [openwhisk-runtime-swift]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #164: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-swift/pull/164 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] update gradle plugin version to fix build [openwhisk-runtime-rust]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #49: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-rust/pull/49 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break [openwhisk-runtime-python]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #162: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-python/pull/162 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break [openwhisk-runtime-nodejs]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #251: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-nodejs/pull/251 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] update scalafmt plugin version to fix build break [openwhisk-runtime-dotnet]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #82: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-dotnet/pull/82 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] Drop support for golang 1.20 [openwhisk-runtime-go]
dgrove-oss opened a new pull request, #202: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-go/pull/202 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Use ibm-semeru-runtimes:open-8u422-b05-jdk-focal (vulnerability fixes). [openwhisk-runtime-java]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #164: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-java/pull/164 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Add support for golang 1.23 [openwhisk-runtime-go]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #201: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-go/pull/201 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Update gradle-scalafmt to 1.5.1 to fix build. [openwhisk-runtime-java]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #165: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-java/pull/165 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Fix missing cz.alenkacz:gradle-scalafmt build error. [openwhisk]
Luke-Roy-IBM merged PR #5505: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5505 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Fix missing cz.alenkacz:gradle-scalafmt build error. [openwhisk]
falkzoll commented on PR #5505: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5505#issuecomment-2302184585 Some more changes are required, I will update this PR as soon as I have a fix for this. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
[PR] Fix missing cz.alenkacz:gradle-scalafmt build error. [openwhisk]
falkzoll opened a new pull request, #5505: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5505 Fix missing cz.alenkacz:gradle-scalafmt build error. ## Description Move gradle scalafmt plugin from using legacy gradle import to dsl import. This should automatically adjust when the gradle plugin repository is moved. The legacy approach was a fixed location and failed when it is moved for some reason. ## Related issue and scope - [ ] I opened an issue to propose and discuss this change (#) ## My changes affect the following components - [ ] API - [ ] Controller - [ ] Message Bus (e.g., Kafka) - [ ] Loadbalancer - [ ] Scheduler - [ ] Invoker - [ ] Intrinsic actions (e.g., sequences, conductors) - [ ] Data stores (e.g., CouchDB) - [ ] Tests - [ ] Deployment - [ ] CLI - [X] General tooling - [ ] Documentation ## Types of changes - [X] Bug fix (generally a non-breaking change which closes an issue). - [ ] Enhancement or new feature (adds new functionality). - [ ] Breaking change (a bug fix or enhancement which changes existing behavior). ## Checklist: - [X] I signed an [Apache CLA](https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md). - [X] I reviewed the [style guides](https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#coding-standards) and followed the recommendations (Travis CI will check :). - [ ] I added tests to cover my changes. - [ ] My changes require further changes to the documentation. - [ ] I updated the documentation where necessary. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Add support for golang 1.23 [openwhisk-runtime-go]
dgrove-oss commented on PR #201: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-go/pull/201#issuecomment-2298913645 We may have to fix the build problem in core openwhisk (pulling obsolete scalafmt) before we can get a passing CI and be able to merge. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Add support for golang 1.23 [openwhisk-runtime-go]
dgrove-oss commented on code in PR #201: URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk-runtime-go/pull/201#discussion_r1723345401 ## .gitignore: ## @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ actionloop/proxy golang1.20/proxy golang1.21/proxy golang1.22/proxy +golang1.22/proxy Review Comment: ```suggestion golang1.23/proxy ``` -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@openwhisk.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
