[jira] [Assigned] (RATIS-249) Create separated LICENSE AND NOTICE files for binary and source releases
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-249?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sandeep Nemuri reassigned RATIS-249:
Assignee: Sandeep Nemuri
> Create separated LICENSE AND NOTICE files for binary and source releases
>
>
> Key: RATIS-249
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-249
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Elek, Marton
>Assignee: Sandeep Nemuri
>Priority: Blocker
>
> Thanks to [~jmclean] who reported this problem during the 0.2.0 rc1 vote.
> From the mail:
> {quote}It likely that your convenience binary will need a different LICENSE
> and NOTICE{quote}
> From the [licensing
> howto|https://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#binary]:
> {quote}As a result, the LICENSE and NOTICE files for a binary distribution
> may well differ from those in the source distribution it was built from.
> In any case, the principle remains the same: LICENSE and NOTICE must exactly
> represent the contents of the distribution they reside in.
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (RATIS-248) Fix BSD licensing issue related to crc32 code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16504923#comment-16504923
]
Sandeep Nemuri commented on RATIS-248:
--
[~elek], Looks like even hadoop common has the same files with same license,
Could you please guide me on whats needs to be added?
{code:java}
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/util/PureJavaCrc32C.java
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/util/bulk_crc32.c
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/util/bulk_crc32_x86.c
{code}
> Fix BSD licensing issue related to crc32 code
> -
>
> Key: RATIS-248
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-248
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Elek, Marton
>Assignee: Sandeep Nemuri
>Priority: Blocker
>
> Thanks to [~jmclean], how reported this issue during the ratis 0.2.0 rc1 vote.
> {quote}- LICENSE is missing a BSD license
> LICENSE is missing BSD license for these files [2][3][4]. Note that a
> condition of the BSD license is to include it’s text, the text is missing
> form the headers and not included in LICENSE.
> 2.
> /ratis-incubator-0.2.0/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/util/PureJavaCrc32C.java
> 3.
> /ratis-incubator-0.2.0/ratis-common/src/main/native/src/org/apache/ratis/util/bulk_crc32.c
> 4.
> /ratis-incubator-0.2.0/ratis-common/src/main/native/src/org/apache/ratis/util/bulk_crc32_x86.c
> From what I can see for the source release LICENSE should be boiler place and
> include the BSD license mentioned above and nothing else, NOTICE should be
> boilerplate and a few lines long{quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Assigned] (RATIS-248) Fix BSD licensing issue related to crc32 code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sandeep Nemuri reassigned RATIS-248:
Assignee: Sandeep Nemuri
> Fix BSD licensing issue related to crc32 code
> -
>
> Key: RATIS-248
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-248
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Elek, Marton
>Assignee: Sandeep Nemuri
>Priority: Blocker
>
> Thanks to [~jmclean], how reported this issue during the ratis 0.2.0 rc1 vote.
> {quote}- LICENSE is missing a BSD license
> LICENSE is missing BSD license for these files [2][3][4]. Note that a
> condition of the BSD license is to include it’s text, the text is missing
> form the headers and not included in LICENSE.
> 2.
> /ratis-incubator-0.2.0/ratis-common/src/main/java/org/apache/ratis/util/PureJavaCrc32C.java
> 3.
> /ratis-incubator-0.2.0/ratis-common/src/main/native/src/org/apache/ratis/util/bulk_crc32.c
> 4.
> /ratis-incubator-0.2.0/ratis-common/src/main/native/src/org/apache/ratis/util/bulk_crc32_x86.c
> From what I can see for the source release LICENSE should be boiler place and
> include the BSD license mentioned above and nothing else, NOTICE should be
> boilerplate and a few lines long{quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (RATIS-250) Use the LICENSE and NOTICE files in the source tree without the extensions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16504759#comment-16504759
]
Elek, Marton commented on RATIS-250:
Thank you very much. I tested the v2 and works well for me.
I am committing it to the trunk now.
Thank you very much for your contribution.
RATIS-248 and RATIS-249 are both licensing issues and block our release. I
would be happy to give more details if you are interested about fixing them.
> Use the LICENSE and NOTICE files in the source tree without the extensions
> --
>
> Key: RATIS-250
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-250
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Elek, Marton
>Assignee: Sandeep Nemuri
>Priority: Minor
> Labels: newbie
> Attachments: RATIS-250.001.patch, RATIS-250.002.patch
>
>
> From [https://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#license-file-name]
>
> {quote}Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and
> NOTICE.txt?[¶|https://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#license-file-name]
> This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be called LICENSE
> and NOTICE
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (RATIS-250) Use the LICENSE and NOTICE files in the source tree without the extensions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16504413#comment-16504413
]
Hadoop QA commented on RATIS-250:
-
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
12s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 2s{color}
| {color:red} RATIS-250 does not apply to master. Rebase required? Wrong
Branch? See https://yetus.apache.org/documentation/0.5.0/precommit-patchnames
for help. {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Client=17.05.0-ce Server=17.05.0-ce Image:yetus/ratis:date2018-06-07
|
| JIRA Issue | RATIS-250 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12925916/RATIS-250.001.patch |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-RATIS-Build/232/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.5.0 http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Use the LICENSE and NOTICE files in the source tree without the extensions
> --
>
> Key: RATIS-250
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-250
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Elek, Marton
>Assignee: Sandeep Nemuri
>Priority: Minor
> Labels: newbie
> Attachments: RATIS-250.001.patch, RATIS-250.002.patch
>
>
> From [https://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#license-file-name]
>
> {quote}Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and
> NOTICE.txt?[¶|https://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#license-file-name]
> This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be called LICENSE
> and NOTICE
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Commented] (RATIS-250) Use the LICENSE and NOTICE files in the source tree without the extensions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16504414#comment-16504414
]
Sandeep Nemuri commented on RATIS-250:
--
Good catch [~elek], [^RATIS-250.002.patch] includes fix to update the xml's.
> Use the LICENSE and NOTICE files in the source tree without the extensions
> --
>
> Key: RATIS-250
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-250
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Elek, Marton
>Assignee: Sandeep Nemuri
>Priority: Minor
> Labels: newbie
> Attachments: RATIS-250.001.patch, RATIS-250.002.patch
>
>
> From [https://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#license-file-name]
>
> {quote}Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and
> NOTICE.txt?[¶|https://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#license-file-name]
> This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be called LICENSE
> and NOTICE
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
[jira] [Updated] (RATIS-250) Use the LICENSE and NOTICE files in the source tree without the extensions
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sandeep Nemuri updated RATIS-250:
-
Attachment: RATIS-250.002.patch
> Use the LICENSE and NOTICE files in the source tree without the extensions
> --
>
> Key: RATIS-250
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-250
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Bug
>Reporter: Elek, Marton
>Assignee: Sandeep Nemuri
>Priority: Minor
> Labels: newbie
> Attachments: RATIS-250.001.patch, RATIS-250.002.patch
>
>
> From [https://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#license-file-name]
>
> {quote}Can the LICENSE and NOTICE files be called LICENSE.txt and
> NOTICE.txt?[¶|https://www.apache.org/dev/apply-license.html#license-file-name]
> This is permitted. However the preference is that the files be called LICENSE
> and NOTICE
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
