[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-2377) Create a Python API for Spark Streaming

2014-09-15 Thread Jyotiska NK (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14134210#comment-14134210
 ] 

Jyotiska NK edited comment on SPARK-2377 at 9/15/14 6:00 PM:
-

I have been watching the work going on PR #11 for a while. Is there any way to 
contribute to this?


was (Author: jyotiska):
I have been watching the work going on PR #11. Is there any way to contribute 
to this?

 Create a Python API for Spark Streaming
 ---

 Key: SPARK-2377
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2377
 Project: Spark
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: PySpark, Streaming
Reporter: Nicholas Chammas
Assignee: Kenichi Takagiwa

 [Spark 
 Streaming|http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/streaming-programming-guide.html]
  currently offers APIs in Scala and Java. It would be great feature add to 
 have a Python API as well.
 This is probably a large task that will span many issues if undertaken. This 
 ticket should provide some place to track overall progress towards an initial 
 Python API for Spark Streaming.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-2377) Create a Python API for Spark Streaming

2014-09-15 Thread Jyotiska NK (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14134210#comment-14134210
 ] 

Jyotiska NK commented on SPARK-2377:


I have been watching the work going on PR #11. Is there any way to contribute 
to this?

 Create a Python API for Spark Streaming
 ---

 Key: SPARK-2377
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-2377
 Project: Spark
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: PySpark, Streaming
Reporter: Nicholas Chammas
Assignee: Kenichi Takagiwa

 [Spark 
 Streaming|http://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/streaming-programming-guide.html]
  currently offers APIs in Scala and Java. It would be great feature add to 
 have a Python API as well.
 This is probably a large task that will span many issues if undertaken. This 
 ticket should provide some place to track overall progress towards an initial 
 Python API for Spark Streaming.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-1087) Separate file for traceback and callsite related functions

2014-09-07 Thread Jyotiska NK (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14124999#comment-14124999
 ] 

Jyotiska NK commented on SPARK-1087:


We initially thought this would be a good feature to add going forward. But 
after the PR was merged, it was abandoned. Also, PR 581 was created in the 
incubator github repo. In the new one, it was PR #34. If it is a relevant 
feature, I can submit a PR for this.

 Separate file for traceback and callsite related functions
 --

 Key: SPARK-1087
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1087
 Project: Spark
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: PySpark
Reporter: Jyotiska NK

 Right now, _extract_concise_traceback() is written inside rdd.py which 
 provides the callsite information. But for 
 [SPARK-972](https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-972) in PR #581, 
 we used the function from context.py. Also some issues were faced regarding 
 the return string format. 
 It would be a good idea to move the the traceback function from rdd and 
 create a separate file for future developments. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-1087) Separate file for traceback and callsite related functions

2014-09-07 Thread Jyotiska NK (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14124999#comment-14124999
 ] 

Jyotiska NK edited comment on SPARK-1087 at 9/7/14 6:32 PM:


We initially thought this would be a good feature to add going forward. But 
after the PR was merged, it was abandoned. Also, PR 581 was created in the 
incubator github repo. In the new one, it was [PR 
#34](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34). If it is a relevant feature, I 
can submit a PR for this.


was (Author: jyotiska):
We initially thought this would be a good feature to add going forward. But 
after the PR was merged, it was abandoned. Also, PR 581 was created in the 
incubator github repo. In the new one, it was PR #34. If it is a relevant 
feature, I can submit a PR for this.

 Separate file for traceback and callsite related functions
 --

 Key: SPARK-1087
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1087
 Project: Spark
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: PySpark
Reporter: Jyotiska NK

 Right now, _extract_concise_traceback() is written inside rdd.py which 
 provides the callsite information. But for 
 [SPARK-972](https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-972) in PR #581, 
 we used the function from context.py. Also some issues were faced regarding 
 the return string format. 
 It would be a good idea to move the the traceback function from rdd and 
 create a separate file for future developments. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Comment Edited] (SPARK-1087) Separate file for traceback and callsite related functions

2014-09-07 Thread Jyotiska NK (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14124999#comment-14124999
 ] 

Jyotiska NK edited comment on SPARK-1087 at 9/7/14 6:33 PM:


We initially thought this would be a good feature to add going forward. But 
after the PR was merged, it was abandoned. Also, PR 581 was created in the 
incubator github repo. In the new one, it was [PR 
#34|https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34]. If it is a relevant feature, I 
can submit a PR for this.


was (Author: jyotiska):
We initially thought this would be a good feature to add going forward. But 
after the PR was merged, it was abandoned. Also, PR 581 was created in the 
incubator github repo. In the new one, it was [PR 
#34](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/34). If it is a relevant feature, I 
can submit a PR for this.

 Separate file for traceback and callsite related functions
 --

 Key: SPARK-1087
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1087
 Project: Spark
  Issue Type: New Feature
  Components: PySpark
Reporter: Jyotiska NK

 Right now, _extract_concise_traceback() is written inside rdd.py which 
 provides the callsite information. But for 
 [SPARK-972](https://spark-project.atlassian.net/browse/SPARK-972) in PR #581, 
 we used the function from context.py. Also some issues were faced regarding 
 the return string format. 
 It would be a good idea to move the the traceback function from rdd and 
 create a separate file for future developments. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org