[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2017-01-11 Thread Weichen Xu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15820180#comment-15820180
 ] 

Weichen Xu commented on SPARK-10078:


As the detail problems I list above(I only list a small part problems), in my 
opinion, breeze can provide the following base class and/or abstract interface
 FirstOrderMinimizerlevel
 DiffFunction interface
 LineSearch implementation (including StrongWolfeLinsearch and 
BacktrackingLinesearch)
 DistributedVector abstract interface

BUT, the core logic of VF-LBFGS and VF-OWLQN (based on VF-LBFGS) should be 
implemented in spark mllib, for better optimization.


> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Yanbo Liang
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2017-01-11 Thread Weichen Xu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15819964#comment-15819964
 ] 

Weichen Xu commented on SPARK-10078:


[~debasish83] But when we implement VF-LBFGS/VF-OWLQN base on spark, we found 
that many optimizations need to combine spark features and the optimizer 
algorithm closely, make a abstract interface supporting distributed vector (for 
example, Vector space operator include dot, add, scale, persist/unpersist 
operators and so on...) seems not enough.
I give two simple problem to show the complexity when considering general 
interface:
1. Look this VF-OWLQN implementation based on spark: 
https://github.com/yanboliang/spark-vlbfgs/blob/master/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/VectorFreeOWLQN.scala
We know that OWLQN internal will help compute the pseudo-gradient for L1 reg, 
look the code function `calculateComponentWithL1`, here when computing 
pseudo-gradient using RDD, it also use an accumulator(only spark have) to 
calculate the adjusted fnValue, so that will the abstract interface containing 
something about `accumulator` in spark ?
2. About persist, unpersist, checkpoint problem in spark. Because of spark lazy 
computation feature, improper persist/unpersist/checkpoint order may cause 
serious problem (may cause RDD recomputation, checkpoint take no effect and so 
on), about this complexity, we can take a look into the VF-BFGS implementation 
on spark:
it use the pattern "persist current step RDDs, then unpersist previous step 
RDDs" like many other algos in spark mllib. The complexity is at, spark always 
do lazy computation, when you persist RDD, it do not persist immediately, but 
postponed to RDD.action called. If the internal code call `unpersist` too 
early, it will cause the problem that an RDD haven't been computed and haven't 
been persisted, but already been unpersisted.
This feature may be much different than other distributed platform, so that a 
general interface can really handle this problem correctly and still keep high 
efficient in the same time? 
[~sethah] Do you consider this detail problems when you designing the general 
optimizer interface ?

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Yanbo Liang
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2017-01-11 Thread Weichen Xu (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15819851#comment-15819851
 ] 

Weichen Xu commented on SPARK-10078:


[~debasish83] Can L-BFGS-B be distributed computed when scaled to billions of 
features in high efficiency ? If only the interface supporting distributed 
vector, but internal computation still use local vector and/or local matrix, 
then it seems won't make much sense...
Currently VF-LBFGS can turn LBFGS two loop recursion into distributed computing 
mode, but the L-BFGS-B seems much more complex then L-BFGS, can it also be 
computed in parallel ?

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Yanbo Liang
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2017-01-08 Thread Seth Hendrickson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=1581#comment-1581
 ] 

Seth Hendrickson commented on SPARK-10078:
--

As a part of [SPARK-17136|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17136] I 
am working on a generic optimization interface for Spark, which would allow 
users to easily plug in their own optimizers in place of built-in ones. Because 
of this, I have also been looking into how we can create an interface that 
allows optimization with both local and distributed vector types in a single 
interface. I have a branch that I have been doing some prototyping on 
[here|https://github.com/sethah/spark/tree/spark-vlbfgs]. Actually, I was able 
to get Yanbo's VLogisticRegression class working (on a very small dataset) 
using the VLBFGS optimizer in my branch, which also works with local vector 
types. Maybe you can let me know if this lines up at all with what you were 
thinking? 

Thinking about this interface without adding VL-BFGS, we can avoid any code 
duplication with Breeze to start because we can simply plug in the Breeze code 
to our abstraction (in my branch, that is what is done for LBFGS and OWLQN). 
Adding VL-BFGS is a bit trickier.

The problems I see are that we need an abstraction that will allow us to 
persist and unpersist the parameter vectors during optimization as needed. 
Adding "persist" and "unpersist" methods to a vector space, for example, seems 
a leaky abstraction. It might make sense to add this to Breeze itself if we can 
avoid leaking RDD details into the interface. However, one benefit of 
SPARK-17136 is that we could potentially eliminate our dependence on Breeze in 
the future. I think it might make sense to implement our own VL-BFGS interface, 
even if there is some duplication. Actually, I think this is part of an 
important discussion that will happen as part of the optimization interface 
design. I hope to post a detailed design document for that JIRA sometime in the 
next few days.

Finally, can you provide more detail on your proposed changes to DiffFunction? 
DiffFunction in Breeze is already abstract in it's parameter type...

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Yanbo Liang
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2017-01-08 Thread Debasish Das (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15809876#comment-15809876
 ] 

Debasish Das commented on SPARK-10078:
--

I looked into the code and I see we are replicating Breeze BFGS and OWLQN core 
logic in this PR:
https://github.com/yanboliang/spark-vlbfgs/tree/master/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim.

We can provide a DiffFunction interface that works on feature partition and add 
the VL-BFGS paper logic as a refactoring to current Breeze BFGS code...

Now DiffFunction can run with a DistributedVector or a Vector. What that helps 
with is that even with features < 100M, we can run multi-core VLBFGS with 
putting multiple partitions and a if-else switch is not necessary.

I can provide breeze interfaces based on your PR if you agree with the idea. 
BFGS and OWLQN are few variants but Breeze has several constraint solvers that 
use BFGS code...  

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Yanbo Liang
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2017-01-07 Thread Yanbo Liang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15807484#comment-15807484
 ] 

Yanbo Liang commented on SPARK-10078:
-

+1 [~sethah]

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Yanbo Liang
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2017-01-06 Thread Seth Hendrickson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15805366#comment-15805366
 ] 

Seth Hendrickson commented on SPARK-10078:
--

As a part of [SPARK-17136|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17136]. I 
am looking into a design for generic optimizer interface for Spark.ML. This 
should ideally, be abstracted such that, as Yanbo mentioned, users can switch 
between them easily. I don't think adding this to Breeze is important since we 
hope to add our own interface directly into Spark.

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Yanbo Liang
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2017-01-06 Thread Yanbo Liang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15804899#comment-15804899
 ] 

Yanbo Liang commented on SPARK-10078:
-

[~debasish83] We are aim to implement VL-BFGS as an optimizer which should be 
similar with Breeze LBFGS/OWLQN, and switching between them should be 
automatically based on the number of features. So an abstract interface between 
the algorithm and optimizer is really necessary. I have a basic implementation 
at https://github.com/yanboliang/spark-vlbfgs, please feel free to review and 
comment the code. Thanks.

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Yanbo Liang
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2017-01-06 Thread Yanbo Liang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15804882#comment-15804882
 ] 

Yanbo Liang commented on SPARK-10078:
-

[~sethah] The description is a little misleading, it means the VL-BFGS 
implementation can fit the current API. Feature partitioning (VL-BFGS) or not 
(Breeze LBFGS) will be choose automatically depends on the number of features. 
The purpose of VL-BFGS is not to replace Breeze LBFGS, but as a complementary 
method. Thanks.

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Yanbo Liang
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2017-01-02 Thread Debasish Das (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15793770#comment-15793770
 ] 

Debasish Das commented on SPARK-10078:
--

[~mengxr] [~dlwh] is it possible to implement VL-BFGS as part of breeze so that 
OWLQN, LBFGS, LBFGS-B and proximal.NonlinearMinimizer get benefited by it ? We 
can bring it the way we bring LBFGS/OWLQN right now...If it makes sense, I can 
look at the design doc and propose a breeze interface to abstract RDD details...

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Yanbo Liang
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2017-01-02 Thread Debasish Das (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15793760#comment-15793760
 ] 

Debasish Das commented on SPARK-10078:
--

Ideally feature partitioning should be automatically tuned...at 100M features 
master only processing what we do with Breeze LBFGS / OWLQN will also get 
benefitted  by VL-BFGSIdeally it should be part of breeze and a proper 
interface should be defined so that the Breeze VL-BFGS solver can be called in 
Spark ML...

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Yanbo Liang
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2017-01-02 Thread Seth Hendrickson (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15793488#comment-15793488
 ] 

Seth Hendrickson commented on SPARK-10078:
--

[~yanboliang] I was a bit confused by the following comment under new 
requirements for VL-BFGS:

"API consistency with Breeze L-BFGS so we can migrate existing code smoothly."

What existing code are we migrating, and to where/what? Are we planning to 
replace the use of the Breeze LBFGS solvers with this VL-BFGS implementation? 
If so, what about the numerous use cases that do not need to partition by 
features? Thanks!

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Yanbo Liang
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2016-08-09 Thread Yanbo Liang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15413623#comment-15413623
 ] 

Yanbo Liang commented on SPARK-10078:
-

I posted the design document which is still WIP here. Please feel free to give 
comments and feedback. Thanks.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing


> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Yanbo Liang
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).
> Design document:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1VGKxhg-D-6-vZGUAZ93l3ze2f3LBvTjfHRFVpX68kaw/edit?usp=sharing



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2016-07-14 Thread Yanbo Liang (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15376867#comment-15376867
 ] 

Yanbo Liang commented on SPARK-10078:
-

Had offline discussion with [~mengxr] and [~josephkb], I will take over this 
task. Firstly I will post my design document for review soon. This work will be 
highly inspired by https://github.com/mengxr/spark-vl-bfgs. Thanks!

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Xiangrui Meng
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2015-10-28 Thread Kotaro Tanahashi (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14978922#comment-14978922
 ] 

Kotaro Tanahashi commented on SPARK-10078:
--

When vector-free L-BFGS applies 2D partitioning to the training data, is it 
necessary to create 2D distributed version of Gradient class, such as 
LogisticGradient or HingeGradient?

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Xiangrui Meng
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-10078) Vector-free L-BFGS

2015-09-07 Thread Debasish Das (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14734130#comment-14734130
 ] 

Debasish Das commented on SPARK-10078:
--

[~mengxr] will it be Breeze LBFGS modification or part of mllib.optimization ? 
Is  someone looking into it ?

> Vector-free L-BFGS
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10078
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10078
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Xiangrui Meng
>Assignee: Xiangrui Meng
>
> This is to implement a scalable version of vector-free L-BFGS 
> (http://papers.nips.cc/paper/5333-large-scale-l-bfgs-using-mapreduce.pdf).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org