[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-32741) Check if the same ExprId refers to the unique attribute in logical plans
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17205908#comment-17205908 ] Apache Spark commented on SPARK-32741: -- User 'maropu' has created a pull request for this issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29928 > Check if the same ExprId refers to the unique attribute in logical plans > > > Key: SPARK-32741 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32741 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: SQL >Affects Versions: 3.1.0 >Reporter: Takeshi Yamamuro >Assignee: Takeshi Yamamuro >Priority: Major > Fix For: 3.1.0 > > > Some plan transformations (e.g., `RemoveNoopOperators`) implicitly assume the > same `ExprId` refers to the unique attribute. But, `RuleExecutor` does not > check this integrity between logical plan transformations. So, this ticket > targets at adding this check in `isPlanIntegral` of `Analyzer`/`Optimizer`. > This PR comes from the talk with @cloud-fan @viirya in > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29485#discussion_r475346278 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-32741) Check if the same ExprId refers to the unique attribute in logical plans
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17187200#comment-17187200 ] Apache Spark commented on SPARK-32741: -- User 'maropu' has created a pull request for this issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29585 > Check if the same ExprId refers to the unique attribute in logical plans > > > Key: SPARK-32741 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32741 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: SQL >Affects Versions: 3.1.0 >Reporter: Takeshi Yamamuro >Priority: Major > > Some plan transformations (e.g., `RemoveNoopOperators`) implicitly assume the > same `ExprId` refers to the unique attribute. But, `RuleExecutor` does not > check this integrity between logical plan transformations. So, this ticket > targets at adding this check in `isPlanIntegral` of `Analyzer`/`Optimizer`. > This PR comes from the talk with @cloud-fan @viirya in > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29485#discussion_r475346278 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-32741) Check if the same ExprId refers to the unique attribute in logical plans
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17187199#comment-17187199 ] Apache Spark commented on SPARK-32741: -- User 'maropu' has created a pull request for this issue: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29585 > Check if the same ExprId refers to the unique attribute in logical plans > > > Key: SPARK-32741 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-32741 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: SQL >Affects Versions: 3.1.0 >Reporter: Takeshi Yamamuro >Priority: Major > > Some plan transformations (e.g., `RemoveNoopOperators`) implicitly assume the > same `ExprId` refers to the unique attribute. But, `RuleExecutor` does not > check this integrity between logical plan transformations. So, this ticket > targets at adding this check in `isPlanIntegral` of `Analyzer`/`Optimizer`. > This PR comes from the talk with @cloud-fan @viirya in > https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29485#discussion_r475346278 -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org