[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-33131) Fix grouping sets with having clause can not resolve qualified col name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17215714#comment-17215714
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-33131:
--
User 'ulysses-you' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30077
> Fix grouping sets with having clause can not resolve qualified col name
> ---
>
> Key: SPARK-33131
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33131
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>Reporter: ulysses you
>Assignee: ulysses you
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.1.0
>
>
> Grouping sets construct new aggregate lost the qualified name of grouping
> expression. Here is a example:
> {code:java}
> -- Works resolved by ResolveReferences
> select c1 from values (1) as t1(c1) group by grouping sets(t1.c1) having c1 =
> 1
> -- Works because of the extra expression c1
> select c1 as c2 from values (1) as t1(c1) group by grouping sets(t1.c1)
> having t1.c1 = 1
> -- Failed
> select c1 from values (1) as t1(c1) group by grouping sets(t1.c1) having
> t1.c1 = 1{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-33131) Fix grouping sets with having clause can not resolve qualified col name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17215709#comment-17215709
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-33131:
--
User 'ulysses-you' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30075
> Fix grouping sets with having clause can not resolve qualified col name
> ---
>
> Key: SPARK-33131
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33131
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>Reporter: ulysses you
>Assignee: ulysses you
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.1.0
>
>
> Grouping sets construct new aggregate lost the qualified name of grouping
> expression. Here is a example:
> {code:java}
> -- Works resolved by ResolveReferences
> select c1 from values (1) as t1(c1) group by grouping sets(t1.c1) having c1 =
> 1
> -- Works because of the extra expression c1
> select c1 as c2 from values (1) as t1(c1) group by grouping sets(t1.c1)
> having t1.c1 = 1
> -- Failed
> select c1 from values (1) as t1(c1) group by grouping sets(t1.c1) having
> t1.c1 = 1{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-33131) Fix grouping sets with having clause can not resolve qualified col name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17213068#comment-17213068
]
Apache Spark commented on SPARK-33131:
--
User 'ulysses-you' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/30029
> Fix grouping sets with having clause can not resolve qualified col name
> ---
>
> Key: SPARK-33131
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-33131
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 3.1.0
>Reporter: ulysses you
>Priority: Minor
>
> The method `ResolveAggregateFunctions.resolveFilterCondInAggregate` aims to
> do the two things
> 1. resolve the expression in having.
> 2. push the having extra agg expression to `Aggregate`
> However we only care about 2 now. If having clause resolution is successful
> but not exists extra agg expression, we will ignore the resolution. Here is a
> example:
> {code:java}
> -- Works resolved by ResolveReferences
> select c1 from values (1) as t1(c1) group by grouping sets(t1.c1) having c1 =
> 1
> -- Works because of the extra expression c1
> select c1 as c2 from values (1) as t1(c1) group by grouping sets(t1.c1)
> having t1.c1 = 1
> -- Failed
> select c1 from values (1) as t1(c1) group by grouping sets(t1.c1) having
> t1.c1 = 1{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org
