[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-9961) ML prediction abstractions should have defaultEvaluator fields

2015-09-04 Thread Joseph K. Bradley (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14731838#comment-14731838
 ] 

Joseph K. Bradley commented on SPARK-9961:
--

By "evaluator," I mean the Evaluator types in spark.ml.evaluation, which can be 
used for model selection.

> ML prediction abstractions should have defaultEvaluator fields
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-9961
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9961
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
>
> Predictor and PredictionModel should have abstract defaultEvaluator methods 
> which return Evaluators.  Subclasses like Regressor, Classifier, etc. should 
> all provide natural evaluators, set to use the correct input columns and 
> metrics.  Concrete classes may later be modified to 
> The initial implementation should be marked as DeveloperApi since we may need 
> to change the defaults later on.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-9961) ML prediction abstractions should have defaultEvaluator fields

2015-09-04 Thread George Dittmar (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14731810#comment-14731810
 ] 

George Dittmar commented on SPARK-9961:
---

Can you expand on what you mean by Evaluator? Just looking for something to 
eval how good predictions are? 

> ML prediction abstractions should have defaultEvaluator fields
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-9961
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9961
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
>
> Predictor and PredictionModel should have abstract defaultEvaluator methods 
> which return Evaluators.  Subclasses like Regressor, Classifier, etc. should 
> all provide natural evaluators, set to use the correct input columns and 
> metrics.  Concrete classes may later be modified to 
> The initial implementation should be marked as DeveloperApi since we may need 
> to change the defaults later on.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Commented] (SPARK-9961) ML prediction abstractions should have defaultEvaluator fields

2015-08-14 Thread Apache Spark (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14696640#comment-14696640
 ] 

Apache Spark commented on SPARK-9961:
-

User 'mengxr' has created a pull request for this issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8190

> ML prediction abstractions should have defaultEvaluator fields
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-9961
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-9961
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: ML
>Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
>
> Predictor and PredictionModel should have abstract defaultEvaluator methods 
> which return Evaluators.  Subclasses like Regressor, Classifier, etc. should 
> all provide natural evaluators, set to use the correct input columns and 
> metrics.  Concrete classes may later be modified to 
> The initial implementation should be marked as DeveloperApi since we may need 
> to change the defaults later on.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org