[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-10186) Add support for more postgres column types

2015-10-07 Thread Reynold Xin (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Reynold Xin updated SPARK-10186:

Labels:   (was: array json postgres sql struct)

> Add support for more postgres column types
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10186
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10186
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 1.4.1
> Environment: Ubuntu on AWS
>Reporter: Simeon Simeonov
>
> The specific observations below are based on Postgres 9.4 tables accessed via 
> the postgresql-9.4-1201.jdbc41.jar driver. However, based on the behavior, I 
> would expect the problem to exists for all external SQL databases.
> - *json and jsonb columns generate {{java.sql.SQLException: Unsupported type 
> }}*. While it is reasonable to not support dynamic schema discovery of 
> JSON columns automatically (it requires two passes over the data), a better 
> behavior would be to create a String column and return the JSON.
> - *Array columns generate {{java.sql.SQLException: Unsupported type 2003}}*. 
> This is true even for simple types, e.g., {{text[]}}. A better behavior would 
> be be create an Array column. 
> - *Custom type columns are mapped to a String column.* This behavior is 
> harder to understand as the schema of a custom type is fixed and therefore 
> mappable to a Struct column. The automatic conversion to a string is also 
> inconsistent when compared to json and array column handling.
> The exceptions are thrown by 
> {{org.apache.spark.sql.jdbc.JDBCRDD$.org$apache$spark$sql$jdbc$JDBCRDD$$getCatalystType(JDBCRDD.scala:100)}}
>  so this definitely looks like a Spark SQL and not a JDBC problem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-10186) Add support for more postgres column types

2015-11-17 Thread Reynold Xin (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Reynold Xin updated SPARK-10186:

Assignee: Marius Van Niekerk

> Add support for more postgres column types
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10186
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10186
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 1.4.1
> Environment: Ubuntu on AWS
>Reporter: Simeon Simeonov
>Assignee: Marius Van Niekerk
> Fix For: 1.6.0
>
>
> The specific observations below are based on Postgres 9.4 tables accessed via 
> the postgresql-9.4-1201.jdbc41.jar driver. However, based on the behavior, I 
> would expect the problem to exists for all external SQL databases.
> - *json and jsonb columns generate {{java.sql.SQLException: Unsupported type 
> }}*. While it is reasonable to not support dynamic schema discovery of 
> JSON columns automatically (it requires two passes over the data), a better 
> behavior would be to create a String column and return the JSON.
> - *Array columns generate {{java.sql.SQLException: Unsupported type 2003}}*. 
> This is true even for simple types, e.g., {{text[]}}. A better behavior would 
> be be create an Array column. 
> - *Custom type columns are mapped to a String column.* This behavior is 
> harder to understand as the schema of a custom type is fixed and therefore 
> mappable to a Struct column. The automatic conversion to a string is also 
> inconsistent when compared to json and array column handling.
> The exceptions are thrown by 
> {{org.apache.spark.sql.jdbc.JDBCRDD$.org$apache$spark$sql$jdbc$JDBCRDD$$getCatalystType(JDBCRDD.scala:100)}}
>  so this definitely looks like a Spark SQL and not a JDBC problem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-10186) Add support for more postgres column types

2015-09-03 Thread Michael Armbrust (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Michael Armbrust updated SPARK-10186:
-
Summary: Add support for more postgres column types  (was: Inconsistent 
handling of complex column types in external databases)

> Add support for more postgres column types
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10186
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10186
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 1.4.1
> Environment: Ubuntu on AWS
>Reporter: Simeon Simeonov
>  Labels: array, json, postgres, sql, struct
>
> The specific observations below are based on Postgres 9.4 tables accessed via 
> the postgresql-9.4-1201.jdbc41.jar driver. However, based on the behavior, I 
> would expect the problem to exists for all external SQL databases.
> - *json and jsonb columns generate {{java.sql.SQLException: Unsupported type 
> }}*. While it is reasonable to not support dynamic schema discovery of 
> JSON columns automatically (it requires two passes over the data), a better 
> behavior would be to create a String column and return the JSON.
> - *Array columns generate {{java.sql.SQLException: Unsupported type 2003}}*. 
> This is true even for simple types, e.g., {{text[]}}. A better behavior would 
> be be create an Array column. 
> - *Custom type columns are mapped to a String column.* This behavior is 
> harder to understand as the schema of a custom type is fixed and therefore 
> mappable to a Struct column. The automatic conversion to a string is also 
> inconsistent when compared to json and array column handling.
> The exceptions are throw by 
> {{org.apache.spark.sql.jdbc.JDBCRDD$.org$apache$spark$sql$jdbc$JDBCRDD$$getCatalystType(JDBCRDD.scala:100)}}
>  so this definitely looks like a Spark SQL and not a JDBC problem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org



[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-10186) Add support for more postgres column types

2015-09-07 Thread Simeon Simeonov (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Simeon Simeonov updated SPARK-10186:

Description: 
The specific observations below are based on Postgres 9.4 tables accessed via 
the postgresql-9.4-1201.jdbc41.jar driver. However, based on the behavior, I 
would expect the problem to exists for all external SQL databases.

- *json and jsonb columns generate {{java.sql.SQLException: Unsupported type 
}}*. While it is reasonable to not support dynamic schema discovery of JSON 
columns automatically (it requires two passes over the data), a better behavior 
would be to create a String column and return the JSON.
- *Array columns generate {{java.sql.SQLException: Unsupported type 2003}}*. 
This is true even for simple types, e.g., {{text[]}}. A better behavior would 
be be create an Array column. 
- *Custom type columns are mapped to a String column.* This behavior is harder 
to understand as the schema of a custom type is fixed and therefore mappable to 
a Struct column. The automatic conversion to a string is also inconsistent when 
compared to json and array column handling.

The exceptions are thrown by 
{{org.apache.spark.sql.jdbc.JDBCRDD$.org$apache$spark$sql$jdbc$JDBCRDD$$getCatalystType(JDBCRDD.scala:100)}}
 so this definitely looks like a Spark SQL and not a JDBC problem.

  was:
The specific observations below are based on Postgres 9.4 tables accessed via 
the postgresql-9.4-1201.jdbc41.jar driver. However, based on the behavior, I 
would expect the problem to exists for all external SQL databases.

- *json and jsonb columns generate {{java.sql.SQLException: Unsupported type 
}}*. While it is reasonable to not support dynamic schema discovery of JSON 
columns automatically (it requires two passes over the data), a better behavior 
would be to create a String column and return the JSON.
- *Array columns generate {{java.sql.SQLException: Unsupported type 2003}}*. 
This is true even for simple types, e.g., {{text[]}}. A better behavior would 
be be create an Array column. 
- *Custom type columns are mapped to a String column.* This behavior is harder 
to understand as the schema of a custom type is fixed and therefore mappable to 
a Struct column. The automatic conversion to a string is also inconsistent when 
compared to json and array column handling.

The exceptions are throw by 
{{org.apache.spark.sql.jdbc.JDBCRDD$.org$apache$spark$sql$jdbc$JDBCRDD$$getCatalystType(JDBCRDD.scala:100)}}
 so this definitely looks like a Spark SQL and not a JDBC problem.


> Add support for more postgres column types
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-10186
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10186
> Project: Spark
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 1.4.1
> Environment: Ubuntu on AWS
>Reporter: Simeon Simeonov
>  Labels: array, json, postgres, sql, struct
>
> The specific observations below are based on Postgres 9.4 tables accessed via 
> the postgresql-9.4-1201.jdbc41.jar driver. However, based on the behavior, I 
> would expect the problem to exists for all external SQL databases.
> - *json and jsonb columns generate {{java.sql.SQLException: Unsupported type 
> }}*. While it is reasonable to not support dynamic schema discovery of 
> JSON columns automatically (it requires two passes over the data), a better 
> behavior would be to create a String column and return the JSON.
> - *Array columns generate {{java.sql.SQLException: Unsupported type 2003}}*. 
> This is true even for simple types, e.g., {{text[]}}. A better behavior would 
> be be create an Array column. 
> - *Custom type columns are mapped to a String column.* This behavior is 
> harder to understand as the schema of a custom type is fixed and therefore 
> mappable to a Struct column. The automatic conversion to a string is also 
> inconsistent when compared to json and array column handling.
> The exceptions are thrown by 
> {{org.apache.spark.sql.jdbc.JDBCRDD$.org$apache$spark$sql$jdbc$JDBCRDD$$getCatalystType(JDBCRDD.scala:100)}}
>  so this definitely looks like a Spark SQL and not a JDBC problem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@spark.apache.org