[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-18468) Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist Parquet relation with decimal column
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yin Huai updated SPARK-18468: - Component/s: (was: SQL) Spark Core > Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist > Parquet relation with decimal column > -- > > Key: SPARK-18468 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Spark Core >Affects Versions: 2.1.0 >Reporter: Yin Huai >Priority: Critical > > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.hive/HiveSparkSubmitSuite/SPARK_9757_Persist_Parquet_relation_with_decimal_column/ > Seems we failed to stop the driver > {code} > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeoutException: > Cannot receive any reply in 120 seconds. This timeout is controlled by > spark.rpc.askTimeout > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout.org$apache$spark$rpc$RpcTimeout$$createRpcTimeoutException(RpcTimeout.scala:48) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:63) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:59) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.runtime.AbstractPartialFunction.apply(AbstractPartialFunction.scala:36) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.util.Failure$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Try.scala:216) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.util.Failure.recover(Try.scala:216) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors$SameThreadExecutorService.execute(MoreExecutors.java:293) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$$anon$1.execute(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:136) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Promise$class.complete(Promise.scala:55) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.complete(Promise.scala:153) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.processBatch$1(BatchingExecutor.scala:63) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(BatchingExecutor.scala:78) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BlockContext$.withBlockContext(BlockContext.scala:72) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch.run(BatchingExecutor.scala:54) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.unbatchedExecute(Future.scala:601) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$class.execute(BatchingExecutor.scala:106) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.execute(Future.scala:599) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Promise$class.tryFailure(Promise.scala:112) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - st
[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-18468) Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist Parquet relation with decimal column
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yin Huai updated SPARK-18468: - Description: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.hive/HiveSparkSubmitSuite/SPARK_9757_Persist_Parquet_relation_with_decimal_column/ https://spark-tests.appspot.com/builds/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71 Seems we failed to stop the driver {code} 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeoutException: Cannot receive any reply in 120 seconds. This timeout is controlled by spark.rpc.askTimeout 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout.org$apache$spark$rpc$RpcTimeout$$createRpcTimeoutException(RpcTimeout.scala:48) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:63) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:59) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.runtime.AbstractPartialFunction.apply(AbstractPartialFunction.scala:36) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.util.Failure$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Try.scala:216) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.util.Failure.recover(Try.scala:216) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors$SameThreadExecutorService.execute(MoreExecutors.java:293) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$$anon$1.execute(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:136) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.Promise$class.complete(Promise.scala:55) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.complete(Promise.scala:153) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.processBatch$1(BatchingExecutor.scala:63) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(BatchingExecutor.scala:78) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.BlockContext$.withBlockContext(BlockContext.scala:72) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch.run(BatchingExecutor.scala:54) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.unbatchedExecute(Future.scala:601) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$class.execute(BatchingExecutor.scala:106) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.execute(Future.scala:599) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.Promise$class.tryFailure(Promise.scala:112) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryFailure(Promise.scala:153) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.NettyRpcEnv.org$apache$spark$rpc$netty$NettyRpcEnv$$onFailure$1(NettyRpcEnv.scala:205) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.NettyRpcEnv$$anon$1.run(NettyRpcEnv.scala:239) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Futu
[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-18468) Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist Parquet relation with decimal column
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Yin Huai updated SPARK-18468: - Target Version/s: (was: 2.1.0) > Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist > Parquet relation with decimal column > -- > > Key: SPARK-18468 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Spark Core >Affects Versions: 2.1.0 >Reporter: Yin Huai >Priority: Critical > > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.hive/HiveSparkSubmitSuite/SPARK_9757_Persist_Parquet_relation_with_decimal_column/ > https://spark-tests.appspot.com/builds/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71 > Seems we failed to stop the driver > {code} > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeoutException: > Cannot receive any reply in 120 seconds. This timeout is controlled by > spark.rpc.askTimeout > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout.org$apache$spark$rpc$RpcTimeout$$createRpcTimeoutException(RpcTimeout.scala:48) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:63) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:59) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.runtime.AbstractPartialFunction.apply(AbstractPartialFunction.scala:36) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.util.Failure$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Try.scala:216) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.util.Failure.recover(Try.scala:216) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors$SameThreadExecutorService.execute(MoreExecutors.java:293) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$$anon$1.execute(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:136) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Promise$class.complete(Promise.scala:55) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.complete(Promise.scala:153) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.processBatch$1(BatchingExecutor.scala:63) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(BatchingExecutor.scala:78) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BlockContext$.withBlockContext(BlockContext.scala:72) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch.run(BatchingExecutor.scala:54) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.unbatchedExecute(Future.scala:601) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$class.execute(BatchingExecutor.scala:106) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.execute(Future.scala:599) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Promise$class.t
[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-18468) Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist Parquet relation with decimal column
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcelo Vanzin updated SPARK-18468: --- Priority: Major (was: Critical) > Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist > Parquet relation with decimal column > -- > > Key: SPARK-18468 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Spark Core >Affects Versions: 2.1.0 >Reporter: Yin Huai >Priority: Major > > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.hive/HiveSparkSubmitSuite/SPARK_9757_Persist_Parquet_relation_with_decimal_column/ > https://spark-tests.appspot.com/builds/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71 > Seems we failed to stop the driver > {code} > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeoutException: > Cannot receive any reply in 120 seconds. This timeout is controlled by > spark.rpc.askTimeout > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout.org$apache$spark$rpc$RpcTimeout$$createRpcTimeoutException(RpcTimeout.scala:48) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:63) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:59) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.runtime.AbstractPartialFunction.apply(AbstractPartialFunction.scala:36) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.util.Failure$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Try.scala:216) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.util.Failure.recover(Try.scala:216) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors$SameThreadExecutorService.execute(MoreExecutors.java:293) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$$anon$1.execute(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:136) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Promise$class.complete(Promise.scala:55) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.complete(Promise.scala:153) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.processBatch$1(BatchingExecutor.scala:63) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(BatchingExecutor.scala:78) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BlockContext$.withBlockContext(BlockContext.scala:72) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch.run(BatchingExecutor.scala:54) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.unbatchedExecute(Future.scala:601) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$class.execute(BatchingExecutor.scala:106) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.execute(Future.scala:599) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Promis
[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-18468) Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist Parquet relation with decimal column
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Marcelo Vanzin updated SPARK-18468: --- Component/s: (was: Spark Core) SQL > Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist > Parquet relation with decimal column > -- > > Key: SPARK-18468 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468 > Project: Spark > Issue Type: Bug > Components: SQL >Affects Versions: 2.1.0 >Reporter: Yin Huai >Priority: Major > > https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.hive/HiveSparkSubmitSuite/SPARK_9757_Persist_Parquet_relation_with_decimal_column/ > https://spark-tests.appspot.com/builds/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71 > Seems we failed to stop the driver > {code} > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeoutException: > Cannot receive any reply in 120 seconds. This timeout is controlled by > spark.rpc.askTimeout > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout.org$apache$spark$rpc$RpcTimeout$$createRpcTimeoutException(RpcTimeout.scala:48) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:63) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:59) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.runtime.AbstractPartialFunction.apply(AbstractPartialFunction.scala:36) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.util.Failure$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Try.scala:216) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.util.Failure.recover(Try.scala:216) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors$SameThreadExecutorService.execute(MoreExecutors.java:293) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$$anon$1.execute(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:136) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Promise$class.complete(Promise.scala:55) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.complete(Promise.scala:153) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.processBatch$1(BatchingExecutor.scala:63) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(BatchingExecutor.scala:78) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BlockContext$.withBlockContext(BlockContext.scala:72) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch.run(BatchingExecutor.scala:54) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.unbatchedExecute(Future.scala:601) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$class.execute(BatchingExecutor.scala:106) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.execute(Future.scala:599) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248) > 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at > scala.c