[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-18468) Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist Parquet relation with decimal column
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yin Huai updated SPARK-18468:
-
Component/s: (was: SQL)
Spark Core
> Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist
> Parquet relation with decimal column
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-18468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Spark Core
>Affects Versions: 2.1.0
>Reporter: Yin Huai
>Priority: Critical
>
> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.hive/HiveSparkSubmitSuite/SPARK_9757_Persist_Parquet_relation_with_decimal_column/
> Seems we failed to stop the driver
> {code}
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeoutException:
> Cannot receive any reply in 120 seconds. This timeout is controlled by
> spark.rpc.askTimeout
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout.org$apache$spark$rpc$RpcTimeout$$createRpcTimeoutException(RpcTimeout.scala:48)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:63)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:59)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.runtime.AbstractPartialFunction.apply(AbstractPartialFunction.scala:36)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.util.Failure$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Try.scala:216)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.util.Failure.recover(Try.scala:216)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors$SameThreadExecutorService.execute(MoreExecutors.java:293)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$$anon$1.execute(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:136)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Promise$class.complete(Promise.scala:55)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.complete(Promise.scala:153)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.processBatch$1(BatchingExecutor.scala:63)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(BatchingExecutor.scala:78)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BlockContext$.withBlockContext(BlockContext.scala:72)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch.run(BatchingExecutor.scala:54)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.unbatchedExecute(Future.scala:601)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$class.execute(BatchingExecutor.scala:106)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.execute(Future.scala:599)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Promise$class.tryFailure(Promise.scala:112)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - st
[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-18468) Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist Parquet relation with decimal column
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yin Huai updated SPARK-18468:
-
Description:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.hive/HiveSparkSubmitSuite/SPARK_9757_Persist_Parquet_relation_with_decimal_column/
https://spark-tests.appspot.com/builds/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71
Seems we failed to stop the driver
{code}
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeoutException:
Cannot receive any reply in 120 seconds. This timeout is controlled by
spark.rpc.askTimeout
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout.org$apache$spark$rpc$RpcTimeout$$createRpcTimeoutException(RpcTimeout.scala:48)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:63)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:59)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.runtime.AbstractPartialFunction.apply(AbstractPartialFunction.scala:36)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.util.Failure$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Try.scala:216)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.util.Failure.recover(Try.scala:216)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors$SameThreadExecutorService.execute(MoreExecutors.java:293)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$$anon$1.execute(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:136)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.Promise$class.complete(Promise.scala:55)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.complete(Promise.scala:153)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.processBatch$1(BatchingExecutor.scala:63)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(BatchingExecutor.scala:78)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.BlockContext$.withBlockContext(BlockContext.scala:72)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch.run(BatchingExecutor.scala:54)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.unbatchedExecute(Future.scala:601)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$class.execute(BatchingExecutor.scala:106)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.execute(Future.scala:599)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.Promise$class.tryFailure(Promise.scala:112)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryFailure(Promise.scala:153)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.NettyRpcEnv.org$apache$spark$rpc$netty$NettyRpcEnv$$onFailure$1(NettyRpcEnv.scala:205)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
org.apache.spark.rpc.netty.NettyRpcEnv$$anon$1.run(NettyRpcEnv.scala:239)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511)
2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr>at
java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(Futu
[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-18468) Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist Parquet relation with decimal column
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yin Huai updated SPARK-18468:
-
Target Version/s: (was: 2.1.0)
> Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist
> Parquet relation with decimal column
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-18468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Spark Core
>Affects Versions: 2.1.0
>Reporter: Yin Huai
>Priority: Critical
>
> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.hive/HiveSparkSubmitSuite/SPARK_9757_Persist_Parquet_relation_with_decimal_column/
> https://spark-tests.appspot.com/builds/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71
> Seems we failed to stop the driver
> {code}
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeoutException:
> Cannot receive any reply in 120 seconds. This timeout is controlled by
> spark.rpc.askTimeout
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout.org$apache$spark$rpc$RpcTimeout$$createRpcTimeoutException(RpcTimeout.scala:48)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:63)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:59)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.runtime.AbstractPartialFunction.apply(AbstractPartialFunction.scala:36)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.util.Failure$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Try.scala:216)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.util.Failure.recover(Try.scala:216)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors$SameThreadExecutorService.execute(MoreExecutors.java:293)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$$anon$1.execute(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:136)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Promise$class.complete(Promise.scala:55)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.complete(Promise.scala:153)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.processBatch$1(BatchingExecutor.scala:63)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(BatchingExecutor.scala:78)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BlockContext$.withBlockContext(BlockContext.scala:72)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch.run(BatchingExecutor.scala:54)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.unbatchedExecute(Future.scala:601)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$class.execute(BatchingExecutor.scala:106)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.execute(Future.scala:599)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Promise$class.t
[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-18468) Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist Parquet relation with decimal column
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcelo Vanzin updated SPARK-18468:
---
Priority: Major (was: Critical)
> Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist
> Parquet relation with decimal column
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-18468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Spark Core
>Affects Versions: 2.1.0
>Reporter: Yin Huai
>Priority: Major
>
> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.hive/HiveSparkSubmitSuite/SPARK_9757_Persist_Parquet_relation_with_decimal_column/
> https://spark-tests.appspot.com/builds/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71
> Seems we failed to stop the driver
> {code}
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeoutException:
> Cannot receive any reply in 120 seconds. This timeout is controlled by
> spark.rpc.askTimeout
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout.org$apache$spark$rpc$RpcTimeout$$createRpcTimeoutException(RpcTimeout.scala:48)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:63)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:59)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.runtime.AbstractPartialFunction.apply(AbstractPartialFunction.scala:36)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.util.Failure$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Try.scala:216)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.util.Failure.recover(Try.scala:216)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors$SameThreadExecutorService.execute(MoreExecutors.java:293)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$$anon$1.execute(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:136)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Promise$class.complete(Promise.scala:55)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.complete(Promise.scala:153)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.processBatch$1(BatchingExecutor.scala:63)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(BatchingExecutor.scala:78)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BlockContext$.withBlockContext(BlockContext.scala:72)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch.run(BatchingExecutor.scala:54)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.unbatchedExecute(Future.scala:601)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$class.execute(BatchingExecutor.scala:106)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.execute(Future.scala:599)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Promis
[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-18468) Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist Parquet relation with decimal column
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marcelo Vanzin updated SPARK-18468:
---
Component/s: (was: Spark Core)
SQL
> Flaky test: org.apache.spark.sql.hive.HiveSparkSubmitSuite.SPARK-9757 Persist
> Parquet relation with decimal column
> --
>
> Key: SPARK-18468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-18468
> Project: Spark
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
>Affects Versions: 2.1.0
>Reporter: Yin Huai
>Priority: Major
>
> https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71/testReport/junit/org.apache.spark.sql.hive/HiveSparkSubmitSuite/SPARK_9757_Persist_Parquet_relation_with_decimal_column/
> https://spark-tests.appspot.com/builds/spark-branch-2.1-test-sbt-hadoop-2.4/71
> Seems we failed to stop the driver
> {code}
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeoutException:
> Cannot receive any reply in 120 seconds. This timeout is controlled by
> spark.rpc.askTimeout
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout.org$apache$spark$rpc$RpcTimeout$$createRpcTimeoutException(RpcTimeout.scala:48)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:63)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> org.apache.spark.rpc.RpcTimeout$$anonfun$addMessageIfTimeout$1.applyOrElse(RpcTimeout.scala:59)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.runtime.AbstractPartialFunction.apply(AbstractPartialFunction.scala:36)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.util.Failure$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Try.scala:216)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:192)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.util.Failure.recover(Try.scala:216)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$recover$1.apply(Future.scala:326)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> com.google.common.util.concurrent.MoreExecutors$SameThreadExecutorService.execute(MoreExecutors.java:293)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.ExecutionContextImpl$$anon$1.execute(ExecutionContextImpl.scala:136)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Promise$class.complete(Promise.scala:55)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.complete(Promise.scala:153)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$$anonfun$map$1.apply(Future.scala:237)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:32)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.processBatch$1(BatchingExecutor.scala:63)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply$mcV$sp(BatchingExecutor.scala:78)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch$$anonfun$run$1.apply(BatchingExecutor.scala:55)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BlockContext$.withBlockContext(BlockContext.scala:72)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$Batch.run(BatchingExecutor.scala:54)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.unbatchedExecute(Future.scala:601)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.BatchingExecutor$class.execute(BatchingExecutor.scala:106)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.Future$InternalCallbackExecutor$.execute(Future.scala:599)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.executeWithValue(Promise.scala:40)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.concurrent.impl.Promise$DefaultPromise.tryComplete(Promise.scala:248)
> 2016-11-15 18:36:47.76 - stderr> at
> scala.c
