[jira] [Closed] (STDCXX-970) Run failures and assertions in 22.locale.collate test on multiple platforms

2012-10-13 Thread Liviu Nicoara (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-970?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Liviu Nicoara closed STDCXX-970.



 Run failures and assertions in 22.locale.collate test on multiple platforms
 ---

 Key: STDCXX-970
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-970
 Project: C++ Standard Library
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: 22. Localization
Affects Versions: 4.2.1
Reporter: Eric Lemings
Assignee: Liviu Nicoara
Priority: Minor
 Fix For: 4.2.2

 Attachments: 22.locale.collate.cpp.patch

   Original Estimate: 6h
  Remaining Estimate: 6h

 The 22.locale.collate test fails to execute and/or has an exorbitant number 
 of assertions on multiple platforms and configurations as summarized below 
 (numbers are assertions):
 AIX: SEGV
 HP-UX: 2465
 Solaris: SEGV
 RH5: 13086
 WinXP: 3-154

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Closed] (STDCXX-1072) [Oracle Solaris/SPARCV8] stricter mutex alignment requirements

2012-10-13 Thread Liviu Nicoara (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-1072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Liviu Nicoara closed STDCXX-1072.
-


 [Oracle Solaris/SPARCV8] stricter mutex alignment requirements
 --

 Key: STDCXX-1072
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-1072
 Project: C++ Standard Library
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Thread Safety
Affects Versions: 4.2.1, 4.2.x, 4.3.x, 5.0.0
 Environment: Oracle Solaris on SPARC V8 (or V9 emulation?) hardware.
Reporter: Liviu Nicoara
Assignee: Liviu Nicoara
  Labels: SPARC, Solaris, V8, alignment, mutex
 Fix For: 4.2.x, 4.3.x, 5.0.0

 Attachments: after-runall.log, before-runall.log, patch.2.diff, 
 patch.diff

   Original Estimate: 4h
  Remaining Estimate: 4h

 The issue has been reported in STDCXX-1040, then STDCXX-1066. The originator 
 was apparently an improvement (as a response to CR 6296770: 
 http://tinyurl.com/8ohjsgl) shipped with KU 137111-01 
 (http://tinyurl.com/ceet6ec) which requires stricter alignment than the 
 machine word for userland mutexes. 
 Quoting here the Fujitsu patch notes (in case it goes away):
 {quote}
 {noformat}
 2) When an application using the mutex lock or rw lock in the way shown below 
 is executed. (*1, *2) ...
   *2) ... example of programming that causes the ... problem.
 In the case where the problem occurs
   
   int   *ip;
   mutex_t   *mp;
   ip = (int *) malloc(sizeof (int) + sizeof (mutex_t));
   mp = (mutex_t *) (ip + 1);
  /* The address is used with a modification */
   
 In the case where the problem does not occur -1
   
   mutex_t   mp;  /* Obtained statically */
   
 In the case where the problem does not occur -2
   
   mutex_t   *mp;
   mp = (mutex_t *) malloc(sizeof (mutex_t));
/* The address is used without any modifications */
   
 {noformat}
 {quote}

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira