[jira] [Comment Edited] (TS-2384) Regression in key-lookup code between 4.0.x and 4.1.x

2013-11-25 Thread Vladyslav Bachynskyi (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13831412#comment-13831412
 ] 

Vladyslav Bachynskyi edited comment on TS-2384 at 11/25/13 12:26 PM:
-

All looks good now!
Apache Traffic Server - traffic_server - 4.1.2 - (build # 102513 on Nov 25 2013 
at 13:38:53)

Thanks!


was (Author: vlad.bach):
All looks good now!
Apache Traffic Server - traffic_server - 4.1.2 - (build # 102513 on Nov 25 2013 
at 13:38:53)


 Regression in key-lookup code between 4.0.x and 4.1.x
 -

 Key: TS-2384
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2384
 Project: Traffic Server
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Cache
Reporter: Igor Galić
 Fix For: 4.2.0


 As reported on users@
 {noformat}
 ATS 4.0.1
 Volume  #1 - store='/dev/sda'
 first key   409542BD429764BEE60B0610B8924C4D
 key 6BA7E5696E9A9E7A1E05212E5264D3C4
 sync_serial 10836
 write_serial388912
 header length   2480
 fragment type   1
 No of Alternates1
 {noformat}
 {noformat}
 ATS 4.1.1
 Volume  #1 - store='/dev/sda'
 first key   409542BD429764BEE60B0610B8924C4D
 key 34CEA58AC5FBA6D240C484307DE4C315
 sync_serial 10837
 write_serial388912
 header length   2480 
 fragment type   1
 No of Alternates1
 {noformat}
 When run 4.1.1 all previously cached objects under 4.0.1 are MISS, these 
 objects  downloading from parent, and then they HIT again.
 *Note* This does not cause the cache to be reinitialized.
 It's just that the generated cache-lookup *key* is wrong in 4.1.x. This means 
 that the existing objects on the disks will stay in place, but we won't be 
 able to find them, because we are looking in the wrong place. As such we 
 simply store the object again.
 That's *almost* the same for people running with a 60 TiB cache, because 
 everything requested is also stored again,
 and after a while the old objects that have been lying around for a while 
 will be rotated out so that's bad. People with
 tiny caches or very high turn overs might even notice the downward spike in 
 304s.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)


[jira] [Commented] (TS-2384) Regression in key-lookup code between 4.0.x and 4.1.x

2013-11-25 Thread Vladyslav Bachynskyi (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13831412#comment-13831412
 ] 

Vladyslav Bachynskyi commented on TS-2384:
--

All looks good now!
Apache Traffic Server - traffic_server - 4.1.2 - (build # 102513 on Nov 25 2013 
at 13:38:53)


 Regression in key-lookup code between 4.0.x and 4.1.x
 -

 Key: TS-2384
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2384
 Project: Traffic Server
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Cache
Reporter: Igor Galić
 Fix For: 4.2.0


 As reported on users@
 {noformat}
 ATS 4.0.1
 Volume  #1 - store='/dev/sda'
 first key   409542BD429764BEE60B0610B8924C4D
 key 6BA7E5696E9A9E7A1E05212E5264D3C4
 sync_serial 10836
 write_serial388912
 header length   2480
 fragment type   1
 No of Alternates1
 {noformat}
 {noformat}
 ATS 4.1.1
 Volume  #1 - store='/dev/sda'
 first key   409542BD429764BEE60B0610B8924C4D
 key 34CEA58AC5FBA6D240C484307DE4C315
 sync_serial 10837
 write_serial388912
 header length   2480 
 fragment type   1
 No of Alternates1
 {noformat}
 When run 4.1.1 all previously cached objects under 4.0.1 are MISS, these 
 objects  downloading from parent, and then they HIT again.
 *Note* This does not cause the cache to be reinitialized.
 It's just that the generated cache-lookup *key* is wrong in 4.1.x. This means 
 that the existing objects on the disks will stay in place, but we won't be 
 able to find them, because we are looking in the wrong place. As such we 
 simply store the object again.
 That's *almost* the same for people running with a 60 TiB cache, because 
 everything requested is also stored again,
 and after a while the old objects that have been lying around for a while 
 will be rotated out so that's bad. People with
 tiny caches or very high turn overs might even notice the downward spike in 
 304s.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)


[jira] [Commented] (TS-2384) Regression in key-lookup code between 4.0.x and 4.1.x

2013-11-24 Thread Vladyslav Bachynskyi (JIRA)

[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13831241#comment-13831241
 ] 

Vladyslav Bachynskyi commented on TS-2384:
--

Sure!

 Regression in key-lookup code between 4.0.x and 4.1.x
 -

 Key: TS-2384
 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-2384
 Project: Traffic Server
  Issue Type: Bug
  Components: Cache
Reporter: Igor Galić
 Fix For: 4.2.0


 As reported on users@
 {noformat}
 ATS 4.0.1
 Volume  #1 - store='/dev/sda'
 first key   409542BD429764BEE60B0610B8924C4D
 key 6BA7E5696E9A9E7A1E05212E5264D3C4
 sync_serial 10836
 write_serial388912
 header length   2480
 fragment type   1
 No of Alternates1
 {noformat}
 {noformat}
 ATS 4.1.1
 Volume  #1 - store='/dev/sda'
 first key   409542BD429764BEE60B0610B8924C4D
 key 34CEA58AC5FBA6D240C484307DE4C315
 sync_serial 10837
 write_serial388912
 header length   2480 
 fragment type   1
 No of Alternates1
 {noformat}
 When run 4.1.1 all previously cached objects under 4.0.1 are MISS, these 
 objects  downloading from parent, and then they HIT again.
 *Note* This does not cause the cache to be reinitialized.
 It's just that the generated cache-lookup *key* is wrong in 4.1.x. This means 
 that the existing objects on the disks will stay in place, but we won't be 
 able to find them, because we are looking in the wrong place. As such we 
 simply store the object again.
 That's *almost* the same for people running with a 60 TiB cache, because 
 everything requested is also stored again,
 and after a while the old objects that have been lying around for a while 
 will be rotated out so that's bad. People with
 tiny caches or very high turn overs might even notice the downward spike in 
 304s.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)