[jira] [Comment Edited] (TS-3433) Use extra memory than expected
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14356372#comment-14356372 ] pjack edited comment on TS-3433 at 3/11/15 6:13 AM: It did not start up with 1.5G but growing over time to 1.5G. I found this issue at ATS 4.2.1 but even I upgrade to 4.2.3, I still can reproduce this issue. Do you need further information? was (Author: pjack): It did not start up with 1.5G but growing over time to 1.5G. I found this issue at ATS 4.2.1 but even I upgrade to 4.2.3, I still can reproduce this issue. > Use extra memory than expected > -- > > Key: TS-3433 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3433 > Project: Traffic Server > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Cache >Reporter: pjack > Fix For: sometime > > > the storage size is 16G, and ram_cache.size use the default value : (-1) > I expect the memory of the process should be less than 200MB, but it used > 1.5G and more until my server out of memory. > I checked the ram_cache size and I found bytes_used > total_bytes. > OS: Ubuntu 12.04 with 3.13.0-32 kernal > traffic server version: 4.2.3 > $curl http://localhost:8080/_status | grep ram > "proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.total_bytes": "13410304", > "proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.bytes_used": "133754880", > "proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.hits": "12322", > "proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.misses": "55584", > But if I setup the ram_cache.size to a fixed value, then the bytes_used will > be always smaller than total_bytes. Please let me know if it is a correct > scenario or some kind of bug? > Thanks! > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Commented] (TS-3433) Use extra memory than expected
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14356372#comment-14356372 ] pjack commented on TS-3433: --- It did not start up with 1.5G but growing over time to 1.5G. I found this issue at ATS 4.2.1 but even I upgrade to 4.2.3, I still can reproduce this issue. > Use extra memory than expected > -- > > Key: TS-3433 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3433 > Project: Traffic Server > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Cache >Reporter: pjack > Fix For: sometime > > > the storage size is 16G, and ram_cache.size use the default value : (-1) > I expect the memory of the process should be less than 200MB, but it used > 1.5G and more until my server out of memory. > I checked the ram_cache size and I found bytes_used > total_bytes. > OS: Ubuntu 12.04 with 3.13.0-32 kernal > traffic server version: 4.2.3 > $curl http://localhost:8080/_status | grep ram > "proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.total_bytes": "13410304", > "proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.bytes_used": "133754880", > "proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.hits": "12322", > "proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.misses": "55584", > But if I setup the ram_cache.size to a fixed value, then the bytes_used will > be always smaller than total_bytes. Please let me know if it is a correct > scenario or some kind of bug? > Thanks! > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
[jira] [Created] (TS-3433) Use extra memory than expected
pjack created TS-3433: - Summary: Use extra memory than expected Key: TS-3433 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3433 Project: Traffic Server Issue Type: Bug Components: Cache Reporter: pjack the storage size is 16G, and ram_cache.size use the default value : (-1) I expect the memory of the process should be less than 200MB, but it used 1.5G and more until my server out of memory. I checked the ram_cache size and I found bytes_used > total_bytes. OS: Ubuntu 12.04 with 3.13.0-32 kernal traffic server version: 4.2.3 $curl http://localhost:8080/_status | grep ram "proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.total_bytes": "13410304", "proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.bytes_used": "133754880", "proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.hits": "12322", "proxy.process.cache.ram_cache.misses": "55584", But if I setup the ram_cache.size to a fixed value, then the bytes_used will be always smaller than total_bytes. Please let me know if it is a correct scenario or some kind of bug? Thanks! -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)
