[jira] [Commented] (TS-984) LogFile::roll crash at Machine::instance
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13142565#comment-13142565 ] Alan M. Carroll commented on TS-984: Problem identified and fixed. LogFile::roll crash at Machine::instance Key: TS-984 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-984 Project: Traffic Server Issue Type: Bug Components: Logging Affects Versions: 3.1.0 Reporter: Zhao Yongming Assignee: Alan M. Carroll Labels: crash Fix For: 3.1.1 Attachments: ts-984.diff this is a strange error when I testing the current trunk with logging colation server enabled: {code} [Oct 16 01:24:48.643] Server {0x2b4967f51760} WARNING: File /var/log/trafficserver/ex_squid.log will be rolled because a LogObject with different format is requesting the same filename FATAL: Machine.cc:37: failed assert `_instance || !Machine instance accessed before initialization` /usr/bin/traffic_server - STACK TRACE: /usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.so.3(ink_fatal_va+0xc5)[0x2b49651a5109] /usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.so.3(ink_fatal+0xa3)[0x2b49651a51bb] /usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.so.3(_ink_assert+0xc2)[0x2b49651a3aee] /usr/bin/traffic_server(Machine::instance()+0x24)[0x634a04] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogFile::roll(long, long)+0x230)[0x5f8138] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogObjectManager::_solve_filename_conflicts(LogObject*, int)+0x489)[0x603263] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogObjectManager::_manage_object(LogObject*, bool, int)+0x126)[0x6029ea] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogObjectManager::manage_object(LogObject*, int)+0x2d)[0x5e9e27] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogConfig::read_xml_log_config(int)+0x3189)[0x5f28c9] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogConfig::setup_log_objects()+0x229)[0x5edd63] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogConfig::init(LogConfig*)+0x254)[0x5ec3ea] /usr/bin/traffic_server(Log::init(int)+0x30c)[0x5e8134] /usr/bin/traffic_server(main+0xb6a)[0x5161a4] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x2b49673b4ebd] /usr/bin/traffic_server[0x4cc789] {code} there is two problem here: 1, why the machine is not initialized? 2, what does WARNING: File /var/log/trafficserver/ex_squid.log will be rolled because a LogObject with different format is requesting the same filename mean? is that harm? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (TS-984) LogFile::roll crash at Machine::instance
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13140665#comment-13140665 ] Alan M. Carroll commented on TS-984: After testing by submitter and no reports of problems, I am comitting this patch. LogFile::roll crash at Machine::instance Key: TS-984 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-984 Project: Traffic Server Issue Type: Bug Components: Logging Affects Versions: 3.1.0 Reporter: Zhao Yongming Assignee: Alan M. Carroll Labels: crash Fix For: 3.1.1 Attachments: ts-984.diff this is a strange error when I testing the current trunk with logging colation server enabled: {code} [Oct 16 01:24:48.643] Server {0x2b4967f51760} WARNING: File /var/log/trafficserver/ex_squid.log will be rolled because a LogObject with different format is requesting the same filename FATAL: Machine.cc:37: failed assert `_instance || !Machine instance accessed before initialization` /usr/bin/traffic_server - STACK TRACE: /usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.so.3(ink_fatal_va+0xc5)[0x2b49651a5109] /usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.so.3(ink_fatal+0xa3)[0x2b49651a51bb] /usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.so.3(_ink_assert+0xc2)[0x2b49651a3aee] /usr/bin/traffic_server(Machine::instance()+0x24)[0x634a04] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogFile::roll(long, long)+0x230)[0x5f8138] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogObjectManager::_solve_filename_conflicts(LogObject*, int)+0x489)[0x603263] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogObjectManager::_manage_object(LogObject*, bool, int)+0x126)[0x6029ea] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogObjectManager::manage_object(LogObject*, int)+0x2d)[0x5e9e27] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogConfig::read_xml_log_config(int)+0x3189)[0x5f28c9] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogConfig::setup_log_objects()+0x229)[0x5edd63] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogConfig::init(LogConfig*)+0x254)[0x5ec3ea] /usr/bin/traffic_server(Log::init(int)+0x30c)[0x5e8134] /usr/bin/traffic_server(main+0xb6a)[0x5161a4] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x2b49673b4ebd] /usr/bin/traffic_server[0x4cc789] {code} there is two problem here: 1, why the machine is not initialized? 2, what does WARNING: File /var/log/trafficserver/ex_squid.log will be rolled because a LogObject with different format is requesting the same filename mean? is that harm? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (TS-984) LogFile::roll crash at Machine::instance
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13128420#comment-13128420 ] Zhao Yongming commented on TS-984: -- in the #2: what I have done is that we I have both the logging colation clients and server have the same logging format name defined in logs_xml.config, but I make some change in the server, so the difine is not the same in the Format: {code} zymtest1 trafficserver # cat logs_xml.config | grep combined Format = combined [%cqtn] %chi %phi 81 %ttms \%{Referer}cqh\ \%cqtx\ %pssc %cqhl %psql %psct %crc \%{User-Agent}cqh\ %cquuc %cquup / zymtest1 trafficserver # ssh 10.62.163.237 grep combined /etc/trafficserver/logs_xml.config Format = combined [%cqtn] %chi %phi 81 %ttms \%{Referer}cqh\ \%cqtx\ %pssc %cqhl %psql %psct %crc \%{User-Agent}cqh\ / {code} that is the most stupid settings in the world, but you can not stop me doing that. :D LogFile::roll crash at Machine::instance Key: TS-984 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-984 Project: Traffic Server Issue Type: Bug Components: Logging Affects Versions: 3.1.0 Reporter: Zhao Yongming Assignee: Alan M. Carroll Labels: crash Fix For: 3.1.1 this is a strange error when I testing the current trunk with logging colation server enabled: {code} [Oct 16 01:24:48.643] Server {0x2b4967f51760} WARNING: File /var/log/trafficserver/ex_squid.log will be rolled because a LogObject with different format is requesting the same filename FATAL: Machine.cc:37: failed assert `_instance || !Machine instance accessed before initialization` /usr/bin/traffic_server - STACK TRACE: /usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.so.3(ink_fatal_va+0xc5)[0x2b49651a5109] /usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.so.3(ink_fatal+0xa3)[0x2b49651a51bb] /usr/lib64/trafficserver/libtsutil.so.3(_ink_assert+0xc2)[0x2b49651a3aee] /usr/bin/traffic_server(Machine::instance()+0x24)[0x634a04] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogFile::roll(long, long)+0x230)[0x5f8138] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogObjectManager::_solve_filename_conflicts(LogObject*, int)+0x489)[0x603263] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogObjectManager::_manage_object(LogObject*, bool, int)+0x126)[0x6029ea] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogObjectManager::manage_object(LogObject*, int)+0x2d)[0x5e9e27] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogConfig::read_xml_log_config(int)+0x3189)[0x5f28c9] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogConfig::setup_log_objects()+0x229)[0x5edd63] /usr/bin/traffic_server(LogConfig::init(LogConfig*)+0x254)[0x5ec3ea] /usr/bin/traffic_server(Log::init(int)+0x30c)[0x5e8134] /usr/bin/traffic_server(main+0xb6a)[0x5161a4] /lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x2b49673b4ebd] /usr/bin/traffic_server[0x4cc789] {code} there is two problem here: 1, why the machine is not initialized? 2, what does WARNING: File /var/log/trafficserver/ex_squid.log will be rolled because a LogObject with different format is requesting the same filename mean? is that harm? -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira