[jira] [Updated] (TS-153) "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts

2015-03-20 Thread Bryan Call (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bryan Call updated TS-153:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 6.0.0)
   5.3.0

> "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts
> -
>
> Key: TS-153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153
> Project: Traffic Server
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Core
>Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>Assignee: Bryan Call
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: A
> Fix For: 5.3.0
>
> Attachments: ts153.diff
>
>
> (This is from a Y! Bugzilla ticket 1821593, adding it here. . Originally 
> posted by Leif Hedstrom on 2008-03-19):
> Currently you have to set static keep-alive idle timeouts in TS, e.g.
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_in INT 8
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_out INT 30
> even with epoll() in 1.17.x, this is difficult to configure, and put an 
> appropriate timeout. The key here is that the
> settings above need to assure that you stay below the max configured number 
> of connections, e.g.:
> CONFIG proxy.config.net.connections_throttle INT 75000
> I'm suggesting that we add one (or two) new configuration options, and 
> appropriate TS code support, to instead of
> specifying timeouts, we specify connection limits for idle KA connections. 
> For example:
> CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_max_idle_connections_in INT 5
> CONFIG proxy.config.http_keep_alive_max_idle_connections_out INT 5000
> (one still has to be careful to leave head-room for active connections here, 
> in the example above, 2 connections
> could be active, which is a lot of traffic).
> These would override the idle timeouts, so one could use the max_idle 
> connections for incoming (client) connections,
> and the idle timeouts for outgoing (origin) connections for instance.
> The benefit here is that it makes configuration not only easier, but also a 
> lot safer for many applications.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (TS-153) "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts

2014-11-20 Thread Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Leif Hedstrom updated TS-153:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 5.2.0)
   5.3.0

> "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts
> -
>
> Key: TS-153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153
> Project: Traffic Server
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Core
>Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>Assignee: Bryan Call
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: A
> Fix For: 5.3.0
>
> Attachments: ts153.diff
>
>
> (This is from a Y! Bugzilla ticket 1821593, adding it here. . Originally 
> posted by Leif Hedstrom on 2008-03-19):
> Currently you have to set static keep-alive idle timeouts in TS, e.g.
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_in INT 8
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_out INT 30
> even with epoll() in 1.17.x, this is difficult to configure, and put an 
> appropriate timeout. The key here is that the
> settings above need to assure that you stay below the max configured number 
> of connections, e.g.:
> CONFIG proxy.config.net.connections_throttle INT 75000
> I'm suggesting that we add one (or two) new configuration options, and 
> appropriate TS code support, to instead of
> specifying timeouts, we specify connection limits for idle KA connections. 
> For example:
> CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_max_idle_connections_in INT 5
> CONFIG proxy.config.http_keep_alive_max_idle_connections_out INT 5000
> (one still has to be careful to leave head-room for active connections here, 
> in the example above, 2 connections
> could be active, which is a lot of traffic).
> These would override the idle timeouts, so one could use the max_idle 
> connections for incoming (client) connections,
> and the idle timeouts for outgoing (origin) connections for instance.
> The benefit here is that it makes configuration not only easier, but also a 
> lot safer for many applications.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)


[jira] [Updated] (TS-153) "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts

2014-08-18 Thread Bryan Call (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bryan Call updated TS-153:
--

Fix Version/s: (was: 5.1.0)
   5.2.0

> "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts
> -
>
> Key: TS-153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153
> Project: Traffic Server
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Core
>Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>Assignee: Bryan Call
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: A
> Fix For: 5.2.0
>
> Attachments: ts153.diff
>
>
> (This is from a Y! Bugzilla ticket 1821593, adding it here. . Originally 
> posted by Leif Hedstrom on 2008-03-19):
> Currently you have to set static keep-alive idle timeouts in TS, e.g.
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_in INT 8
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_out INT 30
> even with epoll() in 1.17.x, this is difficult to configure, and put an 
> appropriate timeout. The key here is that the
> settings above need to assure that you stay below the max configured number 
> of connections, e.g.:
> CONFIG proxy.config.net.connections_throttle INT 75000
> I'm suggesting that we add one (or two) new configuration options, and 
> appropriate TS code support, to instead of
> specifying timeouts, we specify connection limits for idle KA connections. 
> For example:
> CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_max_idle_connections_in INT 5
> CONFIG proxy.config.http_keep_alive_max_idle_connections_out INT 5000
> (one still has to be careful to leave head-room for active connections here, 
> in the example above, 2 connections
> could be active, which is a lot of traffic).
> These would override the idle timeouts, so one could use the max_idle 
> connections for incoming (client) connections,
> and the idle timeouts for outgoing (origin) connections for instance.
> The benefit here is that it makes configuration not only easier, but also a 
> lot safer for many applications.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)


[jira] [Updated] (TS-153) "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts

2014-05-19 Thread Bryan Call (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bryan Call updated TS-153:
--

Fix Version/s: (was: 5.0.0)
   5.1.0

> "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts
> -
>
> Key: TS-153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153
> Project: Traffic Server
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Core
>Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>Assignee: Bryan Call
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: A
> Fix For: 5.1.0
>
> Attachments: ts153.diff
>
>
> (This is from a Y! Bugzilla ticket 1821593, adding it here. . Originally 
> posted by Leif Hedstrom on 2008-03-19):
> Currently you have to set static keep-alive idle timeouts in TS, e.g.
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_in INT 8
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_out INT 30
> even with epoll() in 1.17.x, this is difficult to configure, and put an 
> appropriate timeout. The key here is that the
> settings above need to assure that you stay below the max configured number 
> of connections, e.g.:
> CONFIG proxy.config.net.connections_throttle INT 75000
> I'm suggesting that we add one (or two) new configuration options, and 
> appropriate TS code support, to instead of
> specifying timeouts, we specify connection limits for idle KA connections. 
> For example:
> CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_max_idle_connections_in INT 5
> CONFIG proxy.config.http_keep_alive_max_idle_connections_out INT 5000
> (one still has to be careful to leave head-room for active connections here, 
> in the example above, 2 connections
> could be active, which is a lot of traffic).
> These would override the idle timeouts, so one could use the max_idle 
> connections for incoming (client) connections,
> and the idle timeouts for outgoing (origin) connections for instance.
> The benefit here is that it makes configuration not only easier, but also a 
> lot safer for many applications.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)


[jira] [Updated] (TS-153) "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts

2013-11-07 Thread Bryan Call (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Bryan Call updated TS-153:
--

Attachment: ts153.diff

> "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts
> -
>
> Key: TS-153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153
> Project: Traffic Server
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Core
>Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>Assignee: Bryan Call
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: A
> Fix For: 4.2.0
>
> Attachments: ts153.diff
>
>
> (This is from a Y! Bugzilla ticket 1821593, adding it here. . Originally 
> posted by Leif Hedstrom on 2008-03-19):
> Currently you have to set static keep-alive idle timeouts in TS, e.g.
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_in INT 8
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_out INT 30
> even with epoll() in 1.17.x, this is difficult to configure, and put an 
> appropriate timeout. The key here is that the
> settings above need to assure that you stay below the max configured number 
> of connections, e.g.:
> CONFIG proxy.config.net.connections_throttle INT 75000
> I'm suggesting that we add one (or two) new configuration options, and 
> appropriate TS code support, to instead of
> specifying timeouts, we specify connection limits for idle KA connections. 
> For example:
> CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_max_idle_connections_in INT 5
> CONFIG proxy.config.http_keep_alive_max_idle_connections_out INT 5000
> (one still has to be careful to leave head-room for active connections here, 
> in the example above, 2 connections
> could be active, which is a lot of traffic).
> These would override the idle timeouts, so one could use the max_idle 
> connections for incoming (client) connections,
> and the idle timeouts for outgoing (origin) connections for instance.
> The benefit here is that it makes configuration not only easier, but also a 
> lot safer for many applications.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)


[jira] [Updated] (TS-153) "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts

2013-11-05 Thread Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Leif Hedstrom updated TS-153:
-

Fix Version/s: (was: 6.0.0)
   4.2.0

> "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts
> -
>
> Key: TS-153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153
> Project: Traffic Server
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Core
>Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: A
> Fix For: 4.2.0
>
>
> (This is from a Y! Bugzilla ticket 1821593, adding it here. . Originally 
> posted by Leif Hedstrom on 2008-03-19):
> Currently you have to set static keep-alive idle timeouts in TS, e.g.
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_in INT 8
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_out INT 30
> even with epoll() in 1.17.x, this is difficult to configure, and put an 
> appropriate timeout. The key here is that the
> settings above need to assure that you stay below the max configured number 
> of connections, e.g.:
> CONFIG proxy.config.net.connections_throttle INT 75000
> I'm suggesting that we add one (or two) new configuration options, and 
> appropriate TS code support, to instead of
> specifying timeouts, we specify connection limits for idle KA connections. 
> For example:
> CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_max_idle_connections_in INT 5
> CONFIG proxy.config.http_keep_alive_max_idle_connections_out INT 5000
> (one still has to be careful to leave head-room for active connections here, 
> in the example above, 2 connections
> could be active, which is a lot of traffic).
> These would override the idle timeouts, so one could use the max_idle 
> connections for incoming (client) connections,
> and the idle timeouts for outgoing (origin) connections for instance.
> The benefit here is that it makes configuration not only easier, but also a 
> lot safer for many applications.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)


[jira] [Updated] (TS-153) "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts

2013-05-03 Thread Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Leif Hedstrom updated TS-153:
-

Labels: A  (was: )

> "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts
> -
>
> Key: TS-153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153
> Project: Traffic Server
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Core
>Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>Priority: Minor
>  Labels: A
> Fix For: 3.5.0
>
>
> (This is from a Y! Bugzilla ticket 1821593, adding it here. . Originally 
> posted by Leif Hedstrom on 2008-03-19):
> Currently you have to set static keep-alive idle timeouts in TS, e.g.
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_in INT 8
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_out INT 30
> even with epoll() in 1.17.x, this is difficult to configure, and put an 
> appropriate timeout. The key here is that the
> settings above need to assure that you stay below the max configured number 
> of connections, e.g.:
> CONFIG proxy.config.net.connections_throttle INT 75000
> I'm suggesting that we add one (or two) new configuration options, and 
> appropriate TS code support, to instead of
> specifying timeouts, we specify connection limits for idle KA connections. 
> For example:
> CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_max_idle_connections_in INT 5
> CONFIG proxy.config.http_keep_alive_max_idle_connections_out INT 5000
> (one still has to be careful to leave head-room for active connections here, 
> in the example above, 2 connections
> could be active, which is a lot of traffic).
> These would override the idle timeouts, so one could use the max_idle 
> connections for incoming (client) connections,
> and the idle timeouts for outgoing (origin) connections for instance.
> The benefit here is that it makes configuration not only easier, but also a 
> lot safer for many applications.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Updated] (TS-153) "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts

2013-03-18 Thread Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Leif Hedstrom updated TS-153:
-

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.3.3)
   3.5.0

> "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts
> -
>
> Key: TS-153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153
> Project: Traffic Server
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Core
>Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.5.0
>
>
> (This is from a Y! Bugzilla ticket 1821593, adding it here. . Originally 
> posted by Leif Hedstrom on 2008-03-19):
> Currently you have to set static keep-alive idle timeouts in TS, e.g.
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_in INT 8
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_out INT 30
> even with epoll() in 1.17.x, this is difficult to configure, and put an 
> appropriate timeout. The key here is that the
> settings above need to assure that you stay below the max configured number 
> of connections, e.g.:
> CONFIG proxy.config.net.connections_throttle INT 75000
> I'm suggesting that we add one (or two) new configuration options, and 
> appropriate TS code support, to instead of
> specifying timeouts, we specify connection limits for idle KA connections. 
> For example:
> CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_max_idle_connections_in INT 5
> CONFIG proxy.config.http_keep_alive_max_idle_connections_out INT 5000
> (one still has to be careful to leave head-room for active connections here, 
> in the example above, 2 connections
> could be active, which is a lot of traffic).
> These would override the idle timeouts, so one could use the max_idle 
> connections for incoming (client) connections,
> and the idle timeouts for outgoing (origin) connections for instance.
> The benefit here is that it makes configuration not only easier, but also a 
> lot safer for many applications.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


[jira] [Updated] (TS-153) "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts

2011-10-04 Thread Leif Hedstrom (Updated) (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Leif Hedstrom updated TS-153:
-

Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1.2)
   3.2.0

> "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts
> -
>
> Key: TS-153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153
> Project: Traffic Server
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Core
>Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 3.2.0
>
>
> (This is from a Y! Bugzilla ticket 1821593, adding it here. . Originally 
> posted by Leif Hedstrom on 2008-03-19):
> Currently you have to set static keep-alive idle timeouts in TS, e.g.
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_in INT 8
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_out INT 30
> even with epoll() in 1.17.x, this is difficult to configure, and put an 
> appropriate timeout. The key here is that the
> settings above need to assure that you stay below the max configured number 
> of connections, e.g.:
> CONFIG proxy.config.net.connections_throttle INT 75000
> I'm suggesting that we add one (or two) new configuration options, and 
> appropriate TS code support, to instead of
> specifying timeouts, we specify connection limits for idle KA connections. 
> For example:
> CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_max_idle_connections_in INT 5
> CONFIG proxy.config.http_keep_alive_max_idle_connections_out INT 5000
> (one still has to be careful to leave head-room for active connections here, 
> in the example above, 2 connections
> could be active, which is a lot of traffic).
> These would override the idle timeouts, so one could use the max_idle 
> connections for incoming (client) connections,
> and the idle timeouts for outgoing (origin) connections for instance.
> The benefit here is that it makes configuration not only easier, but also a 
> lot safer for many applications.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira




[jira] Updated: (TS-153) "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts

2010-06-30 Thread Leif Hedstrom (JIRA)

 [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Leif Hedstrom updated TS-153:
-

Fix Version/s: 2.3.0

> "Dynamic" keep-alive timeouts
> -
>
> Key: TS-153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-153
> Project: Traffic Server
>  Issue Type: New Feature
>  Components: Core
>Reporter: Leif Hedstrom
>Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.3.0
>
>
> (This is from a Y! Bugzilla ticket 1821593, adding it here. . Originally 
> posted by Leif Hedstrom on 2008-03-19):
> Currently you have to set static keep-alive idle timeouts in TS, e.g.
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_in INT 8
>CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_no_activity_timeout_out INT 30
> even with epoll() in 1.17.x, this is difficult to configure, and put an 
> appropriate timeout. The key here is that the
> settings above need to assure that you stay below the max configured number 
> of connections, e.g.:
> CONFIG proxy.config.net.connections_throttle INT 75000
> I'm suggesting that we add one (or two) new configuration options, and 
> appropriate TS code support, to instead of
> specifying timeouts, we specify connection limits for idle KA connections. 
> For example:
> CONFIG proxy.config.http.keep_alive_max_idle_connections_in INT 5
> CONFIG proxy.config.http_keep_alive_max_idle_connections_out INT 5000
> (one still has to be careful to leave head-room for active connections here, 
> in the example above, 2 connections
> could be active, which is a lot of traffic).
> These would override the idle timeouts, so one could use the max_idle 
> connections for incoming (client) connections,
> and the idle timeouts for outgoing (origin) connections for instance.
> The benefit here is that it makes configuration not only easier, but also a 
> lot safer for many applications.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.