De: Andrew Robinson
Enviado: terça-feira, 2 de junho de 2020 01:45
Para: Antonio Scuri; r...@gnu.org
Cc: IUP discussion list.
Assunto: Re: [Iup-users] IUP License Questions
>I see only one download for IUP, not many. The GPL license appears to say that
>ALL code linked with GPL source >(that would mean all the GPL static
>libraries), must also be disclosed under a GPL license. By providing GPL
>static >libraries in a single IUP package instead of having the users download
>it separately (which is what "split" would >actually mean), it seems to me
>that it might a violation of the GPL license.
>But I'm not a lawyer or the author of GPL, so maybe someone else can tell us
>if this is legit? Maybe someone like >Richard Stallman, which Google lists as
>the author of GPL?
Resume:
1. FGTL (LGPL), legal use with DLL or STATIC
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ftgl/
2. Freetype (BSD), legal use with DLL or STATIC
https://sourceforge.net/projects/freetype/
3. Zlib (BSD), legal use with DLL or STATIC
https://zlib.net/zlib_license.html
4. Scintilla (BSD), legal use with DLL or STATIC
https://www.scintilla.org/License.txt
5. Math Graphics Library (MIT), legal use with DLL or STATIC
http://glm.g-truc.net/copying.txt
6. WinDrawLib (BSD), legal use with DLL or STATIC
https://github.com/mity/windrawlib
Conclusion, who use IUP library, it is perfectly legal and can be used with
commercial software.
This answer your question?
regards,
Ranier Vilela
___
Iup-users mailing list
Iup-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iup-users
