[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-789?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12486835
 ] 

Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-789:
-----------------------------------------

Alexey, the best way to start with this, and the way that will help get this 
fixed in Lucene core is to write a unit test class that does what your code 
does with MultiSearcher and BooleanQuery, and shows that the test fails when a 
custom Similarity class is used.  You can make that custom Similarity an inner 
class in your unit test class, to contain everything neatly in a single class.

Once we see the test failing we cann apply your suggested fix and see if that 
works, if your previously broken unit test now passes, and if all other unit 
tests still pass.


> Custom similarity is ignored when using MultiSearcher
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-789
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-789
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.1
>            Reporter: Alexey Lef
>
> Symptoms:
> I am using Searcher.setSimilarity() to provide a custom similarity that turns 
> off tf() factor. However, somewhere along the way the custom similarity is 
> ignored and the DefaultSimilarity is used. I am using MultiSearcher and 
> BooleanQuery.
> Problem analysis:
> The problem seems to be in MultiSearcher.createWeight(Query) method. It 
> creates an instance of CachedDfSource but does not set the similarity. As the 
> result CachedDfSource provides DefaultSimilarity to queries that use it.
> Potential solution:
> Adding the following line:
>     cacheSim.setSimilarity(getSimilarity());
> after creating an instance of CacheDfSource (line 312) seems to fix the 
> problem. However, I don't understand enough of the inner workings of this 
> class to be absolutely sure that this is the right thing to do.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to