Re: Survey, what tool do you use?
Oops, add one more vi user! Actually, ViM, but any way... B-) On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Sze Yuen Wong wrote: > Thanks for all your input. > > I get 17 responses today. Here is a summary: > > Xemacs: 6 > Pico: 3 > vi: 2 > JDE: 2 > Jacob: 2 > Emacs: 2 > WipeOut: 1 > Simplicity: 1 > Cat (!?) : 1 > > I've took out jdk cause I think everyone should be using some kind of jdk. > > Thanks again. > > Sze Yuen. > > P.S. ok. So I think I should give up in finding an IDE. > -- Bill Wadley |GAT/d-(++) s++: a C UL$ P$ L+++> | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |E- W+++$ N+++ w-- O-- M-- ?V PS+ PE Y+>++ PGP+>+++ | www.wadley.org |t++ 5++ X- R+ tv b DI+++ D+ G++ e* h--- r++ y? | "The dinosaurs became extinct because they didn't have a space program" -Larry Niven -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: 2.6.2 mQCNAzQwqKwAAAEEAMBpgy5t08fiFC3vHTvyuNY5tHllyyVDWzaRi/HWa6bQGG6t t7Gqvg5oT/30V6N7PD8GOh6vplOaQGLDQ+azB6eNBz8345eoRlobSNtvcYiciZ3T EkPDGHR3DKJyqHfgNlh0IcsLMEXSjTC3LMk9+6xE/s3TJEj4VBD56glmDTzxAAUR tCNXaWxsaWFtIFIuIFdhZGxleSA8YmlsbEB3YWRsZXkub3JnPg== =mAt/ -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86
DAVID BALAZIC writes: > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386 > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386 > > but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on an SGI machine > > I have an ancient Slackware distribution on x86 machine. > I upgraded manually most of SW , so I have pretty recent everything. > Works on v2 libc5. Perhaps there's something odd with your environment? What version of libdl do you have? Steve
Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86
Michael Plump writes: > On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote: > > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386 > > > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386 > > > > SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation > > stackbase=0xb8e0, stackpointer=0xb7ec > > ... > > FWIW, I also get errors like this when trying to run ICQ. And this guy > has the same problem: > http://www.blackdown.org/cgi-bin/incoming?id=17;user=guest Hold on there -- I don't think the guy you mention has the same problem. He's using ld 1.9.9, which seems to have broken binary compatibility with earlier versions of ld (like 1.9.6). I'm pretty sure that's the cause of the problem reported by "glasner" (?) in the bug database. Steve
Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86
On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > Hold on there -- I don't think the guy you mention has the same problem. He's > using ld 1.9.9, which seems to have broken binary compatibility with earlier > versions of ld (like 1.9.6). I'm pretty sure that's the cause of the problem wait a minute... I, too, am using ld 1.9.9. Are you telling me this is a bad version? If I downgrade, that won't wreck anything else (in your opinion) will it? thanks for your help with this... I've asked here once before but no one could help, and finally it sounds like someone is pointing me in the right direction :-) I really appreciate this! Actually, I /meant/ to paste THIS URL: http://www.blackdown.org/cgi-bin/jdk/incoming?id=18;user=guest which is a guy who is DEFINITELY having the same problem (and notably, using ld.1.9.9...) so you think that is the problem? Michael Plump | Snorks make me smile, okay? eh | [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Frankly, I don't know where such independent monkey ringers come from." --Joe Dietz
Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote: > I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ? I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...) Michael Plump | Snorks make me smile, okay? eh | [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Frankly, I don't know where such independent monkey ringers come from." --Joe Dietz
Re: Survey, what tool do you use?
> > Xemacs: 6 > > Pico: 3 > > vi: 2 > > JDE: 2 > > Jacob: 2 > > Emacs: 2 > > WipeOut: 1 > > Simplicity: 1 > > Cat (!?) : 1 I see no 'joe'. Add one for me. Cheers, Craig -- Lots of folks confuse bad management with destiny. -- Frank Hubbard == Craig Taverner --== Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ComOpt AB --Tel: +46-42-212580 Michael Löfmans Gata 6 --== Fax: +46-42-210585 SE-254 38 Helsingborg -- Cell: +46-708-212598 Sweden --==http://www.comopt.com ==
Re: Survey, what tool do you use?
One more vi/Vim user! (gvim, with java/C++ syntax highlighting). Bill Wadley wrote: > > Oops, add one more vi user! Actually, ViM, but any way... > > B-) > > On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, Sze Yuen Wong wrote: > > > Thanks for all your input. > > > > I get 17 responses today. Here is a summary: > > -- ++ | David Lucas mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]| | Software Engineer | | C++,Unix,Client/Server,Zinc,Java | ++ | GPS Location: 40 deg 00' 51" N, 82 deg 38' 11" W | | IMHC: "Jesus Christ is the way, the truth, and the life." | | IMHC: "I know where I am; I know where I'm going." | ++ Notes: IMHO: in my humble opinion IMHC: in my humble conviction PGP Key Block: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] All trademarks above are those of their respective owners.
RE: Commercial JAVA IDE that runs in Linux
On 18-Jun-98 Peter Schuller wrote: > Hi! > > Does anyone know a good commercial Java IDE that runs in Linux? > Prefarably > written in Java. > > All the supposedly good ones, like JBuilder and Visul Cafe, are for > Windoze > only... Theres a RAID tool called "Simplicity for java". You can download it from http://www.datarepresentation.com. There you can download a demo Version. Maby that's what youre looking for. Jens --- Jens Link [EMAIL PROTECTED] FAX: 089-66617-31040and soon: http://
Re: Survey, what tool do you use?
> > > No nedit users? Yup, me. Vin
Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86
Michael Plump writes: > On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote: > > > I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ? > > I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed > the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...) Your errors are different -- there have been reports of people having a completely working environment with 1.9.8 (as I recall) and things failing immediately with 1.9.9. JDK is starting for you? Do simple AWT apps work? Steve
Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86
DAVID BALAZIC writes: > Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > >DAVID BALAZIC writes: > > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386 > > > > > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386 > > > > > > but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on an SGI machine > > > > > > I have an ancient Slackware distribution on x86 machine. > > > I upgraded manually most of SW , so I have pretty recent everything. > > > > > > >Works on v2 libc5. Perhaps there's something odd with your environment? > > Is that jdk 1.1.6v2 ? Avaliable where ? I announced this less than a week ago, but here goes again: www.blackdown.org/~sbb/1.1.6/v2-test As you've discovered, it's more likely that your problems stem from ld 1.9.9. I really, honestly believe a version incompatibility has been introduced in 1.9.9, and this causes lots of problems for software that does a lot of dynamic linking. One other thing I'd suggest trying: go back to 1.9.9. Move the libc and libdl that are in the green_threads directory to someplace else, or just change their names so that they won't be found (the net effect being that you are using your local libc and libdl versions). Does this work? Steve
Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > Your errors are different -- there have been reports of people having a > completely working environment with 1.9.8 (as I recall) and things failing > immediately with 1.9.9. JDK is starting for you? Do simple AWT apps work? ehhh there was one file I forgot to link to the old version. Once I _fully_ downgraded to 1.9.6, it worked fine. Thanks :-) Michael Plump | Snorks make me smile, okay? eh | [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Frankly, I don't know where such independent monkey ringers come from." --Joe Dietz
Re: Survey, what tool do you use?
Peter Schuller wrote: > > > What development tool do you use to help on daily coding? > > IDE, simple class browser, or just an editor. > > I use XEmacs for all my coding - it's great. The only thing I want now is > something that'll save me from managing makefile (I'm working on such an app > myself). Alternatively, I might, and that's a big MIGHT, get a commercial IDE, > if there is one that runs on Linux, and that I find worth paying for. Try out my JarMakefileGenerator utility; it's in the pack of reuseables at http://tumu.home.mindspring.com/java/jcon/. It's still in the stage of "real useful to me, might need to be generalized to be useful to you" but it does automate compilation of large source trees with lots of packages, and controls dependencies between packages too. I've been using it every day here at work (I hack Java full-time :-) for months now and find it a big time-saver for complex builds (my tree is 315 .java files strong at the moment). Anyway, it's LGPLed so if it's close to what you need you can make it fit (and send me the diffs if you like). -- Paul Reavis [EMAIL PROTECTED] Design Lead Partner Software, Inc.http://www.partnersoft.com
Re: Installation problem
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I read the FAQ but still could not find a solution. I downloaded a copy of jdk-sbb-1.1.6-2.1.1glibc.i386.rpm from http://anna.inf.u-szeged.hu/java/java-rpm.html. But when i installed this RPM version, "libXm.so.1 is needed" poped up. My machine is installed with Metro Link Motif 2.1. (so I only have libXm.so.2). Does this version of JDK have to work with Motif 1.x? All my installation are done under the X. Does this cause any problem? Feng, The RPM archive is possibly the source of this confusion. To fool rpm, you can either create a symlink from libXm.so.X to libXm.so.2, i.e. type $ ls /usr/X11R6/lib/libXm.* # <--- Find your .so first! $ cd /usr/X11R6/lib; ln -s libXm.so.2.1 libXm.so.2 # <--- You saw .so.2.1 before running rpm(8), or run rpm with the --nodeps flag. See the rpm(8) manual page for more information. In general, using the --nodeps flag is a little risky if you don't know what you're doing, but SBB works hard to remove the dependencies RPM tries to worry about at the source. As far as I remember, the current SBB i386 JDKs are statically linked to NC Laboratories' SWiM Motif 2.1 (as far as I know). Unless you run it with DYN_JAVA set, you get what SBB compiled into it. Steve
Re: 116v2-glibc problems
Works for me on RedHat 4.2 libc. Are sure you have that native library in your LD_LIBRARY_PATH? BTW, as far as I understand, 116v2 is a libc only port and was not tested with glibc. --- Igor Slepchin Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: > > After trying out the 116v2-glibc there seems to be two issues: > > - you can't load a native library if it is outside of > $JDK_HOME/lib/i586/green_threads, > > - loading a native library with the jni interface gives a segfault > (worked with 115v7-glibc) > > System: Debian-2.0 (unstable 'slink' ditro) > > -- > Louis-David Mitterrand > http://www.aparima.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: jdk1.1.6-v2test keyPressed event
Juergen Sonnauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, users of the jdk1.1.6 v2-test libc5! > > Please, can someone test the following code that listens to key-pressed > events. > Try the keys TAB and ENTER and look at the key char value: > > java.awt.event.KeyEvent[KEY_PRESSED,keyCode=9,Tab] on label0 > KeyChar=65289 > java.awt.event.KeyEvent[KEY_PRESSED,keyCode=10,Enter] on label0 > KeyChar=65293 > > ^ > wrong! This is not linux specific, JDK-1.1.6 on Sparc Solaris returns the same values. Juergen -- Juergen Kreileder, Universitaet Dortmund, Lehrstuhl Informatik V Baroper Strasse 301, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany Phone: ++49 231/755-5806, Fax: ++49 231/755-5802
Re: Java Web Server: can't find javac?!?
Richard Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi - > > Thank you very much to the two kind souls who replied to my query on getting > the Java Web Server going. > > I have another question though. When I try to access a .jhtml file, I get > the following error: > > Error getting compiled page > > javac was not found in > /usr/lib/jdk-1.1.5/bin/../bin/i586/green_threads/javac > > Now, in actual fact javac *is* at that path. Furthermore, if as root I cd > to and type "javac", all is well. However, if I type > "/usr/lib/jdk-1.1.5/bin/../bin/i586/green_threads/javac", bash says "No such > file or directory". It should rather say something like that: $ /public/languages/JDK-1.1.6v2/bin/i686/green_threads/javac /public/languages/JDK-1.1.6v2/bin/i686/green_threads/java: error in loading shar ed libraries libjava.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory That's because LD_LIBRARY_PATH doesn't include the directory that contains libjava.so. Setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the job of /public/languages/JDK-1.1.6v2/bin/javac (actually .java_wrapper). So javac should be invoked through ...JDK-1.1.6v2/bin/javac and through ...JDK-1.1.6v2/bin/i686/green_threads/javac. (Note: There should be no need to set LD_LIBRARY_PATH manually). > Could this be part of the problem? The > /pagecompile directory does contain the appropriate .java files > for the scripts I was trying to access (e.g. credit_card.jhtml). Page compilation works for me. I start the jws with: export JAVA_HOME=/public/languages/JDK-1.1.6v2 JavaWebServer-1.1.1/bin/http -nojre and jws has no problems to invoke javac. Jürgen -- Juergen Kreileder, Universitaet Dortmund, Lehrstuhl Informatik V Baroper Strasse 301, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany Phone: ++49 231/755-5806, Fax: ++49 231/755-5802
Re: 116v2-glibc problems
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: > After trying out the 116v2-glibc there seems to be two issues: > > - you can't load a native library if it is outside of > $JDK_HOME/lib/i586/green_threads, It works fine for me. Make sure that the directory containing your native libraries is in LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I've attached the jni dmeo program that I used to test. - cls jni demo
Re: Installation problem
On Fri, 19 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I downloaded the JDK1.1.6v1(glibc) and installed on my Red Hat Linux 5.0. > But when I try to compile the "HelloWorld " program: > ls -l /lib/libc.so.* gives me > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root > 13 Jan 20 10:39 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.0.5.so* You'll need to upgrade to redhat's glibc-2.0.7-7 (or greater) release. Or you can copy the libraries from $JAVA_HOME/lib/i586/green_threads/ into a tmp directory (preferably on the root partition and not /tmp), add this directory to the beginning of /etc/ld.so.conf and run ldconfig. This "should" work as well. - cls
glibc v2-test ready
The jdk1.1.6 v2-test1 files are available at http://www.seawood.org/java/. It does not fix the InetAddr.getLocalHost() problem as that problem seems to be a general glibc problem. See http://www-gnats.gnu.org:8080/cgi-bin/wwwgnats.pl/full/667 for details. As a workaround for that problem, either 1) remove the local machine entry from /etc/hosts or 2) force lookups to use dns by swapping the position of dns & files on the host line of /etc/nsswitch.conf - cls
Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86
Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : >Michael Plump writes: > > On Thu, 18 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote: > > > > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386 > > > > > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386 > > > > > > SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation > > > stackbase=0xb8e0, stackpointer=0xb7ec > > > ... > > > > FWIW, I also get errors like this when trying to run ICQ. And this guy > > has the same problem: > > http://www.blackdown.org/cgi-bin/incoming?id=17;user=guest > >Hold on there -- I don't think the guy you mention has the same problem. He's >using ld 1.9.9, which seems to have broken binary compatibility with earlier >versions of ld (like 1.9.6). I'm pretty sure that's the cause of the problem >reported by "glasner" (?) in the bug database. I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ? -- David Balazic , student E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | living in sLOVEnija home page: http://surf.to/stein Computer: Amiga 1200 + Quantum LPS-340AT --
glibc v2-test 1.1 ready
No sooner than I sent out the first notice than I received a message from one of the libc maintainers. There was indeed a bug in the getlocalhost code wrt glibc. The fixed version is at http://www.seawood.org/java/getlocalhost2.c for the curious. The new tarballs are at http://www.seawood.org/java/jdk1.1.6v2-test1.1/ - cls
jdk 1.1.6 v2 test1 rpm
hi, I'm just uploading Steve's jdk port 1.1.6 v2 test1 to redhat's incoming. I'm change the name of the jdk rpms to be able to keep both port in redhat's contrib area. new rpms are Steve Byrne's port jdk-sbb-1.1.6-2.1glibc.i386.rpm jdk-sbb-1.1.6-2.1glibc.src.rpm Sergej Nikitin's port jdk-sn-1.1.6-1.1glibc.i386.rpm jdk-sn-1.1.6-1.1glibc.src.rpm more information on : http://anna.inf.u-szeged.hu/java/java-rpm.html -- Levente -- E-Mail: Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Homepage: http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/~lfarkas/ PGP public key & Geek Code: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86
>On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, DAVID BALAZIC wrote: > >> I also have ld.so 1.9.9 , does that matter ? > >I downgraded to ld.so.1.9.6 and got the exact same errors (I even diffed >the two error files, and they were EXACTLY the same...) Reverting to ld 1.9.5 fixes the problems ! Details : jdk 1.1.6v1 libc5 x86 + libc 5.4.44 + ld.so 1.9.9 -> segfault same with ld.so 1.9.5 -> ok -- David Balazic , student E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | living in sLOVEnija home page: http://surf.to/stein Computer: Amiga 1200 + Quantum LPS-340AT --
Re: Possible bug in Linux JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 x86
Steve Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : >DAVID BALAZIC writes: > > This might be a bug in JDK 1.1.6 v1 libc5 i386 > > > > I crashes similarily with jdk 1.1.5 v7 libc5 i386 > > > > but not on JDK 1.1.3 v 3.0.1 for IRIX on an SGI machine > > > > I have an ancient Slackware distribution on x86 machine. > > I upgraded manually most of SW , so I have pretty recent everything. > > > >Works on v2 libc5. Perhaps there's something odd with your environment? Is that jdk 1.1.6v2 ? Avaliable where ? >What version of libdl do you have? v 1.9.9 ( i discovered that it works with 1.9.5 ! ) -- David Balazic , student E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | living in sLOVEnija home page: http://surf.to/stein Computer: Amiga 1200 + Quantum LPS-340AT --
Re: Survey, what tool do you use?
No nedit users? Jim. At 11:49 PM 6/18/98 -0400, you wrote: >Thanks for all your input. > >I get 17 responses today. Here is a summary: > >Xemacs: 6 >Pico: 3 >vi: 2 >JDE: 2 >Jacob: 2 >Emacs: 2 >WipeOut: 1 >Simplicity: 1 >Cat (!?) : 1 > >I've took out jdk cause I think everyone should be using some kind of jdk. > >Thanks again. > >Sze Yuen. > >P.S. ok. So I think I should give up in finding an IDE. > >
116v2-glibc problems
After trying out the 116v2-glibc there seems to be two issues: - you can't load a native library if it is outside of $JDK_HOME/lib/i586/green_threads, - loading a native library with the jni interface gives a segfault (worked with 115v7-glibc) System: Debian-2.0 (unstable 'slink' ditro) -- Louis-David Mitterrand http://www.aparima.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Installation problem
Hello.
I downloaded the JDK1.1.6v1(glibc) and installed on my Red Hat Linux 5.0.
But when I try to compile the "HelloWorld " program:
javac HelloWorldApp.java
class HelloWorldApp {
public static void main(String[] args) {
System.out.println("Hello World!"); //Display the string.
}
}
"Segement fault" appears. If I try to run the byte code
javac HelloWorldApp (which is downloaded from the web).
The following err message pops up.
SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
Full thread dump:
Monitor Cache Dump:
Registered Monitor Dump:
Monitor IO lock:
Child death monitor:
Event monitor:
I/O monitor:
Alarm monitor:
Monitor registry:
Thread Alarm Q:
Abort
What is the reason for this? Your help is greatly appreciated.
I am running Pentium 200 MMX with 32 MB. The OS is red hat 5.0.
ls -l /lib/libc.so.* gives me
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root
13 Jan 20 10:39 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.0.5.so*
ls /lib/libc.so.* gives me
/lib/libc.so.6@
ls -l /lib/libdl.so.* gives me
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Jan 20 10:45 /lib/libdl.so.1 ->
libdl.so.1.9.5*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5412 Oct 21 1997 /lib/libdl.so.1.9.5*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 Jan 20 10:39 /lib/libdl.so.2 ->
libdl-2.0.5.so*
jdk1.1.6-v2test keyPressed event
Hi, users of the jdk1.1.6 v2-test libc5!
Please, can someone test the following code that listens to key-pressed
events.
Try the keys TAB and ENTER and look at the key char value:
java.awt.event.KeyEvent[KEY_PRESSED,keyCode=9,Tab] on label0
KeyChar=65289
java.awt.event.KeyEvent[KEY_PRESSED,keyCode=10,Enter] on label0
KeyChar=65293
^
wrong!
-snip---KeyPrint.java
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
public class KeyPrint {
Frame f;
Label l;
class MyWindowAdapter extends WindowAdapter {
public void windowClosing(WindowEvent e) {
System.exit(0);
}
}
class MyKeyAdapter extends KeyAdapter {
public void keyPressed (KeyEvent e) {
int kco = e.getKeyCode();
int mods = e.getModifiers();
int kch = e.getKeyChar();
l.setText(e+" KeyChar="+kch);
}
}
public KeyPrint() {
f = new Frame("KeyPrint");
l = new Label();
l.addKeyListener(new MyKeyAdapter());
f.addWindowListener(new MyWindowAdapter());
f.add("Center", l);
f.setSize(600, 60);
f.setVisible(true);
}
public static void main ( String[] args ) {
KeyPrint kp = new KeyPrint();
}
}
-snip---KeyPrint.java
Enjoy,
Juergen
Where is the java-linux list
There is no java-linux.org domain. I've tried [EMAIL PROTECTED], and [EMAIL PROTECTED], but neither address exists, (let alone has a java-linux list). I am having a crash on startup problem. Here is my ldconfig -D. This machine was upgraded from RedHat 4, to 5 include patches. We have not installed 5.1 yet. I have no LD_LIBRARY_PATH set. ldconfig: warning: /usr/local/lib/libc-2.0.6.so has inconsistent soname (libc.so.6) ldconfig: warning: /usr/local/lib/libdb-2.0.6.so has inconsistent soname (libdb.so.2) ldconfig: warning: /usr/local/lib/libBrokenLocale-2.0.6.so has inconsistent soname (libBrokenLocale.so.1) ldconfig: warning: /usr/local/lib/libm-2.0.6.so has inconsistent soname (libm.so.6) ldconfig: warning: /usr/local/lib/libutil-2.0.6.so has inconsistent soname (libutil.so.1) ldconfig: warning: /usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libform.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname (libform.so.3.0) ldconfig: warning: /usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libmenu.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname (libmenu.so.3.0) ldconfig: warning: /usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libncurses.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname (libncurses.so.3.0) ldconfig: warning: /usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libpanel.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname (libpanel.so.3.0) ldconfig: warning: /usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libvga.so has inconsistent soname (libvga.so.1) ldconfig: warning: /usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libvgagl.so has inconsistent soname (libvgagl.so.1) ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libnewt.so.0.21 has inconsistent soname (libnewt.so.0.20) ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libform.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname (libform.so.3.0) ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libmenu.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname (libmenu.so.3.0) ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libncurses.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname (libncurses.so.3.0) ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libpanel.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname (libpanel.so.3.0) ldconfig: warning: /lib/ld-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (ld-linux.so.2) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libBrokenLocale-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libBrokenLocale.so.1) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libc-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libc.so.6) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libcrypt-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libcrypt.so.1) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libdb-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libdb.so.2) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libdl-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libdl.so.2) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libm-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libm.so.6) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libnsl-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libnsl.so.1) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libnss_db-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libnss_db.so.1) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libnss_dns-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libnss_dns.so.1) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libutil-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libutil.so.1) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libnss_compat-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libnss_compat.so.1) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libnss_nis-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libnss_nis.so.1) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libnss_files-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libnss_files.so.1) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libpthread-0.6.so has inconsistent soname (libpthread.so.0) ldconfig: warning: /lib/libresolv-2.0.5.so has inconsistent soname (libresolv.so.2) ldconfig: version 970402 /usr/X11R6/lib: libXp.so.6 => libXp.so.6.2 libXext.so.6 => libXext.so.6.3 libXtst.so.6 => libXtst.so.6.1 libXt.so.6 => libXt.so.6.0 libXmu.so.6 => libXmu.so.6.0 libXi.so.6 => libXi.so.6.0 libMagick.so.3.9 => libMagick.so.3.9.1 libXaw.so.6 => libXaw.so.6.1 libXpm.so.4 => libXpm.so.4.10 libXIE.so.6 => libXIE.so.6.0 libX11.so.6 => libX11.so.6.1 libSM.so.6 => libSM.so.6.0 libPEX5.so.6 => libPEX5.so.6.0 libICE.so.6 => libICE.so.6.3 libXaw3d.so.6 => libXaw3d.so.6.1 /usr/local/lib: libutil.so.1 => libutil-2.0.6.so libm.so.6 => libm-2.0.6.so libBrokenLocale.so.1 => libBrokenLocale-2.0.6.so libdb.so.2 => libdb-2.0.6.so libc.so.6 => libc-2.0.6.so libMrm.so.1 => libMrm.so.1.2.0 libMrm.so.0 => libMrm.so.0.82 libXm.so.0 => libXm.so.0.82 libXm.so.1 => libXm.so.1.2.0 liba2ps.so.0 => liba2ps.so.0.0.0 /usr/i486-linuxaout/lib: libvga.so.1 => libvga.so.1.2.7 libtk.so.3 => libtk.so.3.1.1 libtcl.so.3 => libtcl.so.3.1 libm.so.4 => libm.so.4.6.27 libdb.so.1 => libdb.so.1.85.1 libcurses.so.0 => libcurses.so.0.1.2 libc.so.4 => libc.so.4.7.2 libXt.so.6 => libXt.so.6.0 libXt.so.3 => libXt.so.3.1.0 libXpm.so.4 => libXpm.so.4.2 libXaw.so.6 => libXaw.so.6.0 libXaw.so.3 => libXaw.so.3.1.0 libXIE.so.6 => libXIE.so.6.0 libX11.so.6 => libX11.so.6.0 libX11.so.3 => libX11.so.3.1.0 /usr/openwin/lib: libxview.so.3 => libxview.so.3.2.2 libolgx.so.3 => libolgx.so.3.2.2 /usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib: libvgagl.so.1 => libvgagl.so.1.2.11 libvga.so.1 =>
v2 being released
I was waiting on the release to verify whether the reported FreeBuilder was something systemic, or was local to a particular environment. I was able to run FreeBuilder quite well using v2 (and it's pretty fast, too!). I've started the process of getting the 1.1.6v2 files to be sent to the mirrors so if you can wait for a version to show up on the mirrors, please do so to save loading the blackdown system. If you absolutely *must* have v2 now (and why did you wait until now when I posted the test version almost a week ago???), you can get it from www.blackdown.org/~sbb/1.1.6/v2 (the v2-test directory was renamed to v2). Steve
