Re: Trying to use LessTif with jdk1.1.6-v2
On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, B. Craig Taverner wrote: > > You have to rebuild JDK with LessTif. Attempts to run JDK binaries linked with > > Motif against LessTif result in cores. I tried it myself. > > Is it not possible for blackdown to distribute a lesstif version of the > jdk? I for one would be interested to try it out, particularly for the > dynamic library and possible reduced memory usage. > > Cheers, Craig > I have used the blackdown jdk port (jdk1.1.5 to jdk1.1.6v2, glibc) with lesstif for a couple of months without problems, and I haven't rebuilt the jdk binaries... I just set the DYN_JAVA variable and it worked. (And it also made the swedish characters (åäö) work in ICQ for java.) //Roland Parviainen
Re: Slackware & jdk116v2
Casiraghi Luigi wrote: > I received a SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation. > > Here is my configuration: > > Linux Slackware 3.0 (kernel 2.0.0) > jdk1.1.6v2 > libc5 (I upgraded to libc to libc5.4.44 and also ld as recommended) > > ldconfig -D output > > ldconfig: version 1.9.9 > libdl.so.1 => libdl.so.1.9.9 > ld-linux.so.1 => ld-linux.so.1.9.9 There have been other complaints about these versions; I think you need to downgrade to 1.9.5 or so. > ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libmenu.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname > (libmenu.so.3.0) > ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libpanel.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname > (libpanel.so.3.0) > ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libform.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname > (libform.so.3.0) > ldconfig: warning: /lib/libncurses.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname > (libncurses.so.3.0) > I've never seen this before, but it looks like you're missing a library or two. Hope this helps. Peter Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Slackware & jdk116v2
In data 05.08 10/07/98 -0700, peter johnson ha scritto: > > >Casiraghi Luigi wrote: > >> I received a SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation. >> >> Here is my configuration: >> >> Linux Slackware 3.0 (kernel 2.0.0) >> jdk1.1.6v2 >> libc5 (I upgraded to libc to libc5.4.44 and also ld as recommended) >> >> ldconfig -D output >> >> ldconfig: version 1.9.9 >> libdl.so.1 => libdl.so.1.9.9 >> ld-linux.so.1 => ld-linux.so.1.9.9 > >There have been other complaints about these versions; I think you need to >downgrade to 1.9.5 or so. > Yes, done. And effectively the appletviewer don't crash but this is a partial solution since other people like Vliet have the problem that can't downgrade so easily on their machine because this cause other applications to break. >> ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libmenu.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname >> (libmenu.so.3.0) >> ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libpanel.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname >> (libpanel.so.3.0) >> ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib/libform.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname >> (libform.so.3.0) >> ldconfig: warning: /lib/libncurses.so.1.9.9e has inconsistent soname >> (libncurses.so.3.0) >> > >I've never seen this before, but it looks like you're missing a library or two. > The warning should be not so dangerous (or at least I hope) because I have no messages or strange behaviour. One more question: considering my actual configuration: Linux Slackware 3.0 (kernel 2.0.0) jdk1.1.6v2 libc5 (I upgraded to libc to libc5.4.44 and also ld as recommended) is it possible for me to upgrade to glibc ?? or I can't ?? Thanks in advance. Luigi Casiraghi Dufrital SPA lcasi@linux1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] EDP SEDE -- When Linux doesn't work as it is supposed to, it's a bug. According to MicroSoft(tm) NT have no bugs, it just randomly develop new features. --
Re: Trying to use LessTif with jdk1.1.6-v2
Roland Parviainen wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, B. Craig Taverner wrote: > > > > You have to rebuild JDK with LessTif. Attempts to run JDK binaries linked with > > > Motif against LessTif result in cores. I tried it myself. > > > > Is it not possible for blackdown to distribute a lesstif version of the > > jdk? I for one would be interested to try it out, particularly for the > > dynamic library and possible reduced memory usage. > > > > Cheers, Craig > > > > I have used the blackdown jdk port (jdk1.1.5 to jdk1.1.6v2, glibc) with > lesstif for a couple of months without problems, and I haven't rebuilt the > jdk binaries... I just set the DYN_JAVA variable and it worked. (And it > also made the swedish characters (åäö) work in ICQ for java.) > > //Roland Parviainen Interesting. Do you remember which version of lesstif-current you used? My tests are based on 1.18 with last change in ChanageLog done on 1998/03/24 23:00:45. cheers - Peter -- Peter Ziobrzynski, http://www.pzi.net <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: another Linux JDK?
Tom Sedge writes: > I don't think they are ready with their JDK yet - couldn't find that on > the site. I also could not find any pricing information about turboj... -- A diplomat is man who always remembers a woman's birthday but never her age. -- Robert Frost
Re: javac coredumps
On 10 Jul 1998, Albert Lai wrote: > Zhichao Hong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I download jdk1.1.6 and installed on redhat linux 5.0. When I type javac, > > it just coredumps. I didn't use tar zxvf file.gz to untar the jdk, > > instead I use gunzip < file.gz| tar -xvf - > > Is this a problem? > > The way you unpacked the package is not a problem. There are several > crash reports like yours on this list. Now, I use Red Hat 5.0 as > well, and I don't get a crash. You may like to apply all Red Hat > errata, especially those concerning the system libraries. You may > also like to try out the rpm in Red Hat contrib. > I use RH5.0 and I also found the jdk1.1.6-v2 to crash but not the jdk1.1.6-v1 which runs fine. Au revoir, A bientot. Gensky Regnus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get Cash You need Right Away!!
GET THE MONEY YOU NEED RIGHT NOW! Here's your chance to... > Eliminate Credit Card Debt! > Take advantage of LOW INTEREST RATES! > Escape from High Monthly Payments! > Get Relief and Have the Money You Need! > Cash in Your Pocket Usually within 7 to 14 days! > Make Home Improvements You've Always Wanted! > Take the Vacation You Deserve! How? Simply CLICK HERE TO VISIT OUR WEBSITE --> http://www.bighitter.holowww.com/american107.htm Would you like money for... ~ A New Car? ~ College Tuition? ~ Taxes? ~ Consolidate Your Credit Cards? ~ A Dream Vacation? ~ Home Improvements? Now It Can Be Yours! What are you waiting for? For a FREE evaluation please visit our website by... CLICKING HERE (http://www.bighitter.holowww.com/american107.htm or type or cut & paste: http://www.bighitter.holowww.com/american107.htm Especially if you're a homeowner, we can help you. Try us! i t
Your Home Town Provides Everything You Need
YOUR HOME TOWN WILL DO 100% OF THE WORK FOR YOU WE OFFER: You the chance to own your own Home Based Business. WE OFFER: To build your Home Based Business for you. WE OFFER You financial independence. WE OFFER: You life saving and life changing products. WE OFFER: You the easiest way we know to, improve your Health, your Wealth and your Happiness. For more information Call: Our toll free 24 hr message center at 888-771-9338 Our toll free 24 hr recorded message at 888-771-9340. our research showed you would be interested in this. If this is not true mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">Click Here and enter remove in the subject. Thank You. Reference # 10071098 ZG
Re: java map engines
Maybe you could check out a library called Carnac from INT http://www.int.com I don't know how far the mapping stiff goes, but I briefly saw some demos of this toolkit and one of them, displayed some maps. Cheers, Addy. | | I'm also searching for some Java based GIS tools. | | You can look at: | http://www.gislinx.com/java.html | | I still don't know which one to choose, | if you come across some good package, | please let me know. | | Thanks, | | Sze Yuen | -Original Message- | From: B. Craig Taverner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | To: Java Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Date: Thursday, July 09, 1998 2:48 PM | Subject: java map engines | | | Hi, | | Does anyone know of any java based generic map toolkits written in pure | java (so I can run on linux, solaris and win32)? Something that will | allow me to easily add a map (vector &| bitmap) into my applications with | the ability to place custom objects/components on the map. | I've not looked too closely at java2D, but have been given the impression | that it's too graphics/presentation orientated, and not nearly enough map | specific features. | | Cheers, Craig | | -- | "Basic, n.: | A programming language. Related to certain social diseases in | that those who have it will not admit it in polite company." | | == | Craig Taverner --== Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | ComOpt AB --Tel: +46-42-212580 | Michael Löfmans Gata 6 --== Fax: +46-42-210585 | SE-254 38 Helsingborg -- Cell: +46-708-212598 | Sweden --==http://www.comopt.com | == | | |
very obscure bug in JDK1.1.6
Greetings,
I have JDK1.1.6v2 (glibc) from Blackdown on a Linux (RedHat5.1) x86 computer.
When doing the Together/J 2.0 (Whiteboard Edition, see http://www.oi.com) tutorial I
find
that it is impossible to enter caps (LIKE THIS) in the source editor (Text pane).
This inability includes all shifted characters, like (, ), { and }. Object
International claims
that this bug i impossible to reproduce on a Windows JDK.
I have tried Sun's JDK1.1.6 on Solaris2.6 x86 (with the neccessary patch). Exactly
the same problem
Unfortunatly I have been unable to reproduce the error with a simple test case.
So this is more of a FYI, than a real bug report.
Best Wishes, Bengt
RE: NetBeans
> I wonder, did anyone try to run NetBeans on Linux? When I tried to > run it I got only very nice welcome screen and after this nothing > happened. If you're on 1.1.5v7 that happens almost all the time. In 1.1.6v2 it happens sometimes, but just try again and it should work. That's my experience at least. Unfortunately, NetBeans hangs "now and then" after it's up and running. and consumes A LOT of CPU. Around 40% by just sitting there doing nothing , on my P133. / Peter Schuller
JDK1.1.6-v2: appletviewer doesn't start
I've downloaded the JDK1.1.6-v2 on my Debian 2.0 and
can't get a simple applet running:
import java.applet.*;
import java.awt.*;
public class AppletTest extends Applet {
public void paint(Graphics g) {;}
}
Works fine with JDK1.1.5 (I've to resize the window to see anything,
but this bug should be fixed in 1.1.6).
With 1.1.6 the applet-window opens and I get on the xterm:
java.lang.NullPointerException
at sun.applet.AppletViewer.(AppletViewer.java:237)
at
sun.applet.StdAppletViewerFactory.createAppletViewer(AppletViewer.java:87)
at sun.applet.AppletViewer.parse(AppletViewer.java:938)
at sun.applet.AppletViewer.parse(AppletViewer.java:904)
at sun.applet.AppletViewer.main(AppletViewer.java:1081)
Exception occurred during event dispatching:
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: handleEvent
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:1817)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:939)
at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:443)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:1704)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:63)
Exception occurred during event dispatching:
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: handleEvent
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:1817)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:1704)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:63)
Exception occurred during event dispatching:
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: handleEvent
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:1817)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:939)
at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:443)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:1704)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:63)
Exception occurred during event dispatching:
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: handleEvent
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:1817)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:939)
at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:443)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:1704)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:63)
Exception occurred during event dispatching:
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: handleEvent
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:1817)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:939)
at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:443)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:1704)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:63)
and so on :-(.
I've tried to draw things in the paint-methode, no effect. And I've no
idea where to look for a bug or misconfiguration.
I've included the "ldconfi -D" on the bottom.
Please help! Thanks!
Burkhard
P.S.: With JDK1.1.5 I've had difficulties with fonts (the
special german characters), perhaps a misconfiguration of my
X. Don't know wether there's a connection.
Output of "ldconfig -D"
ldconfig: version 1.9.9
/usr/X11R6/lib/Xaw3d:
/usr/X11R6/lib:
libMesatk.so.2 => libMesatk.so.2.6
libMesaaux.so.2 => libMesaaux.so.2.6
libMesaGLw.so.2 => libMesaGLw.so.2.6
libMesaGLU.so.2 => libMesaGLU.so.2.6
libMesaGL.so.2 => libMesaGL.so.2.6
libXaw3d.so.6 => libXaw3d.so.6.1
libMagick.so.4 => libMagick.so.4.0.4
libXpm.so.4 => libXpm.so.4.10
libXm.so.1 => libXm.so.1.2.0
libMrm.so.1 => libMrm.so.1.2.0
libXtst.so.6 => libXtst.so.6.1
libXt.so.6 => libXt.so.6.0
libXp.so.6 => libXp.so.6.2
libXmu.so.6 => libXmu.so.6.0
libXi.so.6 => libXi.so.6.0
libXext.so.6 => libXext.so.6.3
libXaw.so.6 => libXaw.so.6.1
libXIE.so.6 => libXIE.so.6.0
libX11.so.6 => libX11.so.6.1
libPEX5.so.6 => libPEX5.so.6.0
libICE.so.6 => libICE.so.6.3
libforms.so.0.88 => libforms.so.0.88
libSM.so.6 => libSM.so.6.0
/usr/lib/libc5-compat:
libz.so.1 => libz.so.1.1.1
libXtst.so.6 => libXtst.so.6.1
libXt.so.6 => libXt.so.6.0
libXp.so.6 => libXp.so.6.2
libXmu.so.6 => libXmu.so.6.0
libXi.so.6 => libXi.so.6.0
libXext.so.6 => libXext.so.6.3
libXaw.so.6 => libXaw.so.6.1
libXIE.so.6 => libXIE.so.6.0
libX11.so.6 => libX11.so.6.1
libSM.so.6 => libSM.so.6.0
libPEX5.so.6 => libPEX5.so.6.0
libICE.so.6 => libICE.so.6.3
libstdc++.so.27 => libstdc++.so.27.2.1
libXpm.so.4 => libXpm.so.4.10
libg++.so.27 => libg++.so.27.2.1
/lib/libc5-compat:
/usr/lib:
libgck.so.1 => libgck.so.1.0.0
libgimpui.so.1 => libgimpui.so.1.0.0
libgimp.so.1 => libgimp.so.1.0.0
RE: NetBeans
-- | From: peter.schuller / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED] | To: java-linux / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: RE: NetBeans | Date: Friday, July 10, 1998 2:11PM | | > I wonder, did anyone try to run NetBeans on Linux? When I tried to | > run it I got only very nice welcome screen and after this nothing | > happened. | | If you're on 1.1.5v7 that happens almost all the time. In 1.1.6v2 it happens | sometimes, but just try again and it should work. That's my experience at | least. | | Unfortunately, NetBeans hangs "now and then" after it's up and running. and | consumes A LOT of CPU. Around 40% by just sitting there doing nothing , on my | P133. 40% of how much memory?
another Linux JDK?
and JIT apparently http://www.gr.opengroup.org/java/jdk/linux/ -- /** Stefan Magdalinski m 0370 67 70 58 [EMAIL PROTECTED] h 0171 580 0831 it's isness as usual...**/
RE: Slackware & jdk116v2
In data 06.58 09/07/98 -0700, John Vliet ha scritto: >In my description of the problem I mentioned that you can replace the >ld-linux.so library with an older version (1.9.5 as opposed to 1.9.9) >and the Java stuff seems to work fine. Unfortunately this causes our >dhtml server and it's database to break. Interestingly though, you can >switch to the older library, start you program, switch back to the 1.9.9 >version and all will live in harmony (that is until you exit the java >program). This is by no means a solution, but a crude work around if >you are using Java as a Server that is a critical part of your system, >it will get you running until a real soln is found. >-John > > > John, what flavour of libc are you running (libc5, glibc2.0.6, glibc2.0.7 from RH, etc)?? Luigi Luigi Casiraghi Dufrital SPA lcasi@linux1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] EDP SEDE -- When Linux doesn't work as it is supposed to, it's a bug. According to MicroSoft(tm) NT have no bugs, it just randomly develop new features. --
Re: Slackware & jdk116v2
We are using libc5. I tried Pauls advice of removing the two files libc.so.5 and libdl.so.1 from ~JAVAHOME/lib/i686/green_threads/ This seemed to fix the problem keeping the 1.9.9 version of the system ld.so library. -John Casiraghi Luigi wrote: > In data 06.58 09/07/98 -0700, John Vliet ha scritto: > >In my description of the problem I mentioned that you can replace the > >ld-linux.so library with an older version (1.9.5 as opposed to 1.9.9) > >and the Java stuff seems to work fine. Unfortunately this causes our > >dhtml server and it's database to break. Interestingly though, you can > >switch to the older library, start you program, switch back to the 1.9.9 > >version and all will live in harmony (that is until you exit the java > >program). This is by no means a solution, but a crude work around if > >you are using Java as a Server that is a critical part of your system, > >it will get you running until a real soln is found. > >-John > > > > > > > > John, what flavour of libc are you running (libc5, glibc2.0.6, glibc2.0.7 > from RH, etc)?? > > Luigi > > Luigi Casiraghi > Dufrital SPA > lcasi@linux1 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > EDP SEDE > -- > When Linux doesn't work as it is supposed to, it's a bug. According to > MicroSoft(tm) NT have no bugs, it just randomly develop new features. > --
Re: another Linux JDK?
On Fri, 10 Jul 1998, Stefan Magdalinski wrote: > and JIT apparently > > http://www.gr.opengroup.org/java/jdk/linux/ Actually, it's a bit more than a JIT: 'Turbo is a Java (TM) byte code to native code compiler. Like a JIT compiler (and unlike traditional compilers) it does not require the application source code, it compiles byte code coming from the net. Unlike a JIT compiler, it works as a compiler separate from the Java runtime and it achieves similar optimizations to traditional compilers, gaining efficiency over JIT compiled code.' TurboJ has been tested by them with the 1.1.3 Blackdown JDKs - though I'm not sure it works with the latest Steve Byrne efforts. If I can get it going I'll report back. It claims to be much faster than a traditional JIT. I don't think they are ready with their JDK yet - couldn't find that on the site. Tom. -- Lunatech Research. Where the impossible happens every day...
javac coredumps
Hi, Please help a new beginner, I download jdk1.1.6 and installed on redhat linux 5.0. When I type javac, it just coredumps. I didn't use tar zxvf file.gz to untar the jdk, instead I use gunzip < file.gz| tar -xvf - Is this a problem? My computer is Intel motherboard and Pentium 233 MHZ. Please help me on this. Thanks, Zhichao
libdl.so.1.9.9 and JDK 1.1.6v2
For everyone using libdl.so.1.9.9 and JDK 1.1.6v2. Try remove the libdl.so.1 and libc.so.5 from your $JAVA_HOME/lib/i686/green_threads/ Assuming you are using a newer libc5 like libc.so.5.4.44 of course. In any case, read the README.linux file. Cheers, Paul
OJI jdk/mozilla integration
Has somebody done some working on that? -- Time sharing: The use of many people by the computer.
Re: Trying to use LessTif with jdk1.1.6-v2
>Interesting. Do you remember which version of lesstif-current you used? My >tests >are based on 1.18 with last change in ChanageLog done on 1998/03/24 23:00:45. Since mozilla released on April 1, there were lots and lots of improvement on lesstif. You need something more up to date. Just get the latest from http://www.lesstif.org/ Cheers, Paul
Re: another Linux JDK?
> I also could not find any pricing information about turboj... US$2000 (for HP-UX -- I assume it's the same for Linux)
Extra Cash -18873
I Never Thought I'd Be the One Telling You This: I Actually Read a Piece of E-Mail & I'm Going to Europe on the Proceeds! Hello! My name is Karen. I'm a 35-year-old mom, wife, and part-time accountant. As a rule, I delete all unsolicited "junk" e-mail and use my account primarily for business. I received what I assumed was this same e-mail countless times and deleted it each time. About two months ago I received it again and, because of the catchy subject line, I finally read it. Afterwards, I thought, "OK, I give in, I'm going to try this. I can certainly afford to invest $20 and, on the other hand, there's nothing wrong with creating a little excess cash." I promptly mailed four $5 bills and, after receiving the reports, paid a friend of mine a small fee to send out some e-mail advertisements for me. After reading the reports, I also learned how easy it is to bulk e-mail for free! I was not prepared for the results. Everyday for the last six weeks, my PO box has been overflowing with $5 bills; many days the excess fills up an extra mail bin and I've had to upgrade to the corporate-size box! All the money that keeps rolling in stuns me! My husband and I have been saving for several years to make a substantial downpayment on a house. Now, not only are we purchasing a house with 40% down, we're going to Venice, Italy to celebrate! I promise you, if you follow the directions in this e-mail and be prepared to eventually set aside about an hour each day to follow up (and count your money!), you will make at least as much money as we did. You don't need to be a wiz at the computer, but I'll bet you already are. If you can open an envelope, remove the money, and send an e-mail message, then you're on your way to the bank. Take the time to read this so you'll understand how easy it is. If I can do this, so can you! GO FOR IT NOW!! The following is a copy of the e-mail I read: $ This is a LEGAL, MONEY-MAKING PHENOMENON. PRINT this letter, read the directions, THEN READ IT AGAIN!!! You are about to embark on the most profitable and unique program you may ever see. Many times over, it has demonstrated and proven its ability to generate large amounts of cash. This program is showing fantastic appeal with a huge and ever-growing on-line population desirous of additional income. This is a legitimate, LEGAL, money-making opportunity. It does not require you to come in contact with people, do any hard work, and best of all, you never have to leave the house, except to get the mail and go to the bank! This truly is that lucky break you've been waiting for! Simply follow the easy instructions in this letter, and your financial dreams will come true! When followed correctly, this electronic, multi-level marketing program works perfectly...100% EVERY TIME! Thousands of people have used this program to: - Raise capital to start their own business - Pay off debts - Buy homes, cars, etc., - Even retire! This is your chance, so don't pass it up! -- OVERVIEW OF THIS EXTRAORDINARY ELECTRONIC MULTI-LEVEL MARKETING PROGRAM -- Basically, this is what we do: We send thousands of people a product for $5.00 that costs next to nothing to produce and e-mail. As with all multi-level businesses, we build our business by recruiting new partners and selling our products. Every state in the U.S. allows you to recruit new multi- level business online (via your computer). The products in this program are a series of four business and financial reports costing $5.00 each. Each order you receive via "snail mail" will include: * $5.00 cash * The name and number of the report they are ordering * The e-mail address where you will e-mail them the report they ordered. To fill each order, you simply e-mail the product to the buyer. THAT'S IT! The $5.00 is yours! This is the EASIEST electronic multi-level marketing business anywhere! FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE LETTER AND BE PREPARED TO REAP THE STAGGERING BENEFITS! *** I N S T R U C T I O N S *** This is what you MUST do: 1. Order all 4 reports shown on the list below (you can't sell them if you don't order them). * For each report, send $5.00 CASH, the NAME & NUMBER OF THE REPORT YOU ARE ORDERING, YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS, and YOUR RETURN POSTAL ADDRESS (in case of a problem) to the person whose name appears on the list next to the report. * When you place your order, make sure you order each of the four reports. You will need all four reports so that you can save them on your computer and resell them. * Within a few days you will receive, via e-mail, each of the four reports. Save them on your computer so they will be accessibl
Re: another Linux JDK?
On Fri, 10 Jul 1998, Charles Forsythe wrote: > > I also could not find any pricing information about turboj... > > US$2000 > > (for HP-UX -- I assume it's the same for Linux) > > Apparantly you get the sales prices by asking at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED], but anyway, the Linux version costs $200 for a single host license and limited support, you can also get a trial LICENSE for two weeks.
Re: javac coredumps
Zhichao Hong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I download jdk1.1.6 and installed on redhat linux 5.0. When I type javac, > it just coredumps. I didn't use tar zxvf file.gz to untar the jdk, > instead I use gunzip < file.gz| tar -xvf - > Is this a problem? The way you unpacked the package is not a problem. There are several crash reports like yours on this list. Now, I use Red Hat 5.0 as well, and I don't get a crash. You may like to apply all Red Hat errata, especially those concerning the system libraries. You may also like to try out the rpm in Red Hat contrib. -- Albert Y.C. Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.vex.net/~trebla/
Re: another Linux JDK?
On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 01:38:30PM -0400, Charles Forsythe wrote: > > I also could not find any pricing information about turboj... > > US$2000 > > (for HP-UX -- I assume it's the same for Linux) I actually inquired about this, and this is the response I got : -- cut -- >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 10 14:05:56 1998 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: (qmail 8998 invoked from network); 10 Jul 1998 14:05:56 - Received: from postman.opengroup.org (130.105.1.152) by job.cs.brandeis.edu with SMTP; 10 Jul 1998 14:05:56 - Received: from nickel.camb.opengroup.org (nickel.camb.opengroup.org [130.105.3.67]) by postman.opengroup.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with SMTP id KAA11305; Fri, 10 Jul 1998 10:05:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 10:06:00 -0400 To: "Seth M. Landsman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Randall Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Pricing? Details? In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Status: RO Content-Length: 3217 Lines: 89 Welcome to TurboJ, If you have not yet installed TurboJ, available from the Web site at http://www.opengroup.org/openitsol/turboj/ then you must do so as the first step. When you have successfully downloaded and installed TurboJ from the Web site, you need to obtain a license key to operate. You may obtain a 2 weeks evaluation key or a permanent license key. In both cases, you must provide us with the output of the commands "uname -a" and "tj -checkLicense" It will list output such as ==>HP-UX machine B.10.20 A 9000/720 2012773985 two-user license ==>The name of this machine is: name.company.com ==>and its Internet address is: 138.83.39.223 You must e-mail this information to [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you want to acquire a product license, we will provide you with a permanent key when we have received payment, either by credit card and you may call 617-621-8943 (United States number) or fax a Purchase Order to 617-621-8696. The price list is the following: o There is no run time fee for turbo compiled applications. o Single Host License on HP-UX, unlimited number of users on one single computer No Support $1800 With limited support$2000 Linux $200 The limited support that we offer for $200 is - access to the forum of TurboJ users - work around and fixes by email and web site. o Single Host License on Linux: $200 Linux licensees can access the users forum. o We offer a bundle of 6 Host Licenses on HP-UX and limited support on HP-UX for $10,000 o Site License for $20,000 on HP-UX only Site license provide unlimited number of computers running TurboJ on one site and full support. A site license is the only way to obtain telephone support, intermediate patch releases, and automatic upgrade of future releases. o For academic and research the price list is the following: Linux single host copy $200 HP-UX single host$600 Linux Campus Wide License$5,000 HP-UX Campus Wide License$10,000 At 06:05 PM 7/9/98 -0400, you wrote: >Greets, > I'm searching through your web page on TurboJ >(http://www.camb.opengroup.org/openitsol/turboj/index.htm) and, for the >life of me, cannot find any details about licensing and pricing of this >product. > In short, my research group has a moderately large system using >Java 1.1.6, and I'd be curious to see what improvement the TurboJ system >might give the system, stability and speed-wise. Before I can even start >this process, I need exact details on pricing, support and licensing. > >Thanks, > Seth M. Landsman > Dept of COSI > Brandeis University > >-- >"It is by will alone I set my mind in motion" > > Randall S. Horn THE OPEN GROUP Voice: +1 (617) 621-7217 Financial Business Manager Fax: +1 (617) 621-0631 Eleven Cambridge Center RESEARCH E-Mail:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Cambridge, MA 02142 INSTITUTE http://www.camb.opengroup.org/RI/ === -- "It is by will alone I set my mind in motion"
RE: another Linux JDK?
> and JIT apparently (I'm assuming you're refering to TurboJ) I don't think so. I got the impression it compiles pretty much the entire code, with optimizations and such. So it's not a JIT, but more of a SCTISINLR - Slow Compiler That Increases Speed In The Long Run :) And also, it doesn't seem to be free. If I got it right, you can call them and get a key useful for evaluation, but I think you've gotta pay for it after some evaluation period. I don't know about the latter, but the download page clearly stated that you need the key. / Peter Schuller
Re: another Linux JDK?
[TurboJ price] > US$2000 For that kind of money I can just by myself a faster computer instead :) / Peter Schuller
RE: NetBeans
> 40% of how much memory? 40% CPU. Not RAM. That's according to the normal kernel calculated system load values. And, as I said, that's on a P133 with no other major CPU hog running. As for RAM it's not that bad. It's currently up to 24 megs, but that's from editing code. I imagine that if I do some debugging or running it'll increase, but I don't wanna do that, as that would invite another hang. And btw, after being up-and-running for a few hours, idle, it's stopped hogging CPU. / Peter Schuller
The OSF JDK and TurboJ ...
... are not the same thing! There is TurboJ, which appears to be a Java -> Native ahead of time compiler. There is also OSF's JDK, which is a 1.1.6 JDK with linuxthreads support. These are not the same! The JDK appears that it will be free for non-commericial use when it comes out. -Seth -- "It is by will alone I set my mind in motion"
Re: Trying to use LessTif with jdk1.1.6-v2
On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, Gernot Koller wrote: > Quoting Peter Ziobrzynski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > You have to rebuild JDK with LessTif. Attempts to run JDK binaries linked with > > Motif against LessTif result in cores. I tried it myself. > > I have good results after rebuilding. Here is my shell script to build 1.1.6v2. > > Takes many hours and at least 32Mb of RAM and 100Mb of swap: > [...] > > Distributing a JDK built for LessTif is not possible due to licensing > problems, is it ? I believe lesstif is LGPL'd so there should not be any licensing problems. - cls
Re: Trying to use LessTif with jdk1.1.6-v2
On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, B. Craig Taverner wrote: > > You have to rebuild JDK with LessTif. Attempts to run JDK binaries linked with > > Motif against LessTif result in cores. I tried it myself. > > Is it not possible for blackdown to distribute a lesstif version of the > jdk? I for one would be interested to try it out, particularly for the > dynamic library and possible reduced memory usage. It's never been formally discussed, but I believe the general consensus has been that lesstif wasn't stable enough to port the jdk with. It's bad enough trying to track down Sun's bugs without getting confused by bugs in lesstif as well. - cls
