Which version of linux on which is JDK compiled?
What platform on which does binary distribution of JDK for linux compiled? Which version of linux kernel? As the linux patch to JDK shows us, linux JDK distinguishes whether the platform supports signal handler with three arguments or only one argument, with the macro SA_SIGINFO. The macro SA_SIGINFO is defined by including signal.h on linux 2.1.X, but isn't defined on 2.0.X. JIT compilers want to utilize second and third arguments of signal handler for checking access to null and dividing by zero. Kazuyuki SHUDO Happy Hacking! Muraoka Lab., Grad. School of Sci. & Eng., Waseda Univ. E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Address: Muraoka Lab., Waseda Univ., 3-4-1 Okubo Shinjuku Tokyo 169-8555 JAPAN TEL: +81-3-3209-5198FAX: +81-3-3209-5198
How come I get this error message?
Hi, How come I get these error messages when I run java ICQ and other java applications?: SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation stackbase=0xb270, stackpointer=0xb174 Full thread dump: "Finalizer thread" (TID:0x4064a208, sys_thread_t:0x4138ef04, state:R) prio=1 "Async Garbage Collector" (TID:0x4064a250, sys_thread_t:0x4136df04, state:R) "Idle thread" (TID:0x4064a298, sys_thread_t:0x4134cf04, state:R) prio=0 "Clock" (TID:0x4064a088, sys_thread_t:0x4132bf04, state:CW) prio=12 "main" (TID:0x4064a0b0, sys_thread_t:0x81b5670, state:R) prio=5 *current thr java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary(Runtime.java) java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java) sun.awt.motif.MToolkit.(MToolkit.java:46) java.awt.Toolkit.getDefaultToolkit(Toolkit.java:402) java.awt.Window.getToolkit(Window.java:239) Mirabilis.ICQ.ListUI.ii.ã§(^G^MWARNING: Decompiling this code may viola ^Z^L) Mirabilis.ICQ.ListUI.ii.ã¨(^G^MWARNING: Decompiling this code may viola ^Z^L) Mirabilis.ICQ.NetAware.CNetAwareApp.(^G^MWARNING: Decompiling this ^Z^L) Mirabilis.ICQ.NetAware.CNetAwareApp.main(^G^MWARNING: Decompiling this c ^Z^L) Monitor Cache Dump: java.lang.Class@1080355680/1080721984: owner "main" (0x81b5670, 1 entry) java.lang.Runtime@1080355488/1080723112: owner "main" (0x81b5670, 1 entry) Registered Monitor Dump: Thread queue lock: Name and type hash table lock: String intern lock: JNI pinning lock: JNI global reference lock: BinClass lock: Class loading lock: Java stack lock: Code rewrite lock: Heap lock: Has finalization queue lock: Finalize me queue lock: Monitor IO lock: Child death monitor: Event monitor: I/O monitor: Alarm monitor: Waiting to be notified: "Clock" (0x4132bf04) Monitor registry: owner "main" (0x81b5670, 1 entry) Thread Alarm Q: _ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: What happened to the Alpha port from Uncle George?
can anyone give him a hand with the port. H. Paul Haiduk wrote: > -- > Can you give me a URL for Uncle George or for > anyone else involved > in the Linux port to the Digital Alpha platform? > It seems that the > URL: http://www.voicenet.com/~gatgul/JDK/ is now > blocked from access. > > > H. Paul "Duke" Haiduk > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://ac1.actx.edu/~hphaiduk/ > Professor, Information Systems and Engineering > Computer Science > Amarillo College > US Postal Service Address: PO Box 447, > Amarillo, TX 79178 > FedEx, Airborne, UPS, etc: 2011 South > Washington Street > Amarillo, Texas > 79109 USA > Voice:(806) 371-5239 FAX:(806) 371-5210 > Urgent:(806) 674-7110 > > -
JIT Compiler?
Can anyone recommend a JIT to use in the following environment? Linux kernel version 2.0.27 Apache 1.3 JRun 2.1.3 JDK 1.1.6 (port by Blackdown) bc _ R O B E R T C U R T I S S Internet Programmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Success is a journey, not a destination.
Getting applets to run on Netscape 4.06
I'm running Redhat 5.1, KDE 1.0 and Netscape 4.06 with JDK1.1.6v5. I get the following error when trying to access an applet: " Warning: JIT compiler "jit" not found. Will use interpreter. Could not get localized resources: java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: native method java/util/ResourceBundle.getClassContext not found: : undefined symbol: Java_java_util_ResourceBundle_getClassContext__ ... ... Using English Language Default " What's going on? How can I fix this? Thank you, Joel Shellman TaoTree, Inc. http://www.tou.com/
Re: Which version of linux on which is JDK compiled?
On Sat, 31 Oct 1998 15:45:39 +0900, SHUDOH Kazuyuki wrote: >What platform on which does binary distribution of JDK >for linux compiled? Which version of linux kernel? Well, the 1.1.6 v5 and v5a builds for x86 systems were done on: for glibc - a RedHat 5.0 base system with current updates and the Linux 2.0.35 kernel for libc5 - a SuSE 5.2 system - it is one of my test systems - and it has Linux 2.0.33 kernel as modified by SuSE. >As the linux patch to JDK shows us, linux JDK >distinguishes whether the platform supports signal >handler with three arguments or only one argument, with >the macro SA_SIGINFO. > >The macro SA_SIGINFO is defined by including signal.h on >linux 2.1.X, but isn't defined on 2.0.X. On x86 we use the production kernels since most users will be using such kernels. Other platforms may use other kernels. Michael Sinz -- Director of Research & Development, NextBus Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.nextbus.com My place on the web ---> http://www.users.fast.net/~michael_sinz
Re: JDK for 21064?
actually a 21164a ( the "a" really counts - who wuddya thunkit ) i'm gonny try to see if i can build for all processors with 117, and see if it all will fit under 10 meg. these processors are ( 21064, 21164, and 21164a ). at the moment i am having probs with finding a home. The folks at blackdown seemed to have reneged on their offer :-( . My 250 meg web xfer/month appears to be exhausted. oh, well. gat Dave Keenan wrote: > I've seen several posts on newsgroups about the JDK > for Linux/Alpha only working on 21164 processors. > > Is a version for 21064 in the works? Or has anyone > else done a port for 21064? >
Re: Alpha port?
what is habanero??? gat > But found some problems when trying to use habanero on top of it.
Re: JDK for 21064?
Quoting Uncle George ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > actually a 21164a ( the "a" really counts - who wuddya thunkit ) > i'm gonny try to see if i can build for all processors with 117, and see > if it all will fit under 10 meg. these processors are ( 21064, 21164, > and 21164a ). > If you build one that works on the "older" alpha processors, I can offer you some ftp space. -- Paul Tomblin, [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Mary had a little key,/She kept it in escrow/And everything that Mary sent/The Feds were sure to know." - Sam Simpson on sci.crypt
Re: Alpha port?
> "Uncle" == Uncle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Uncle> what is habanero??? gat >> But found some problems when trying to use habanero on top of >> it. Its a groupware application and environment for developing groupware in java. You can find it at. http://www.ncsa.uiuc.edu/SDG/Software/Habanero/
Re: JDK for 21064?
> "Uncle" == Uncle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Uncle> actually a 21164a ( the "a" really counts - who wuddya Uncle> thunkit ) i'm gonny try to see if i can build for all Uncle> processors with 117, and see if it all will fit under 10 Uncle> meg. these processors are ( 21064, 21164, and 21164a ). Uncle> at the moment i am having probs with finding a home. The Uncle> folks at blackdown seemed to have reneged on their offer Uncle> :-( . My 250 meg web xfer/month appears to be exhausted. Uncle> oh, well. I could help a bit, I have a cable modem connection that is up all the time, downside is that my address is not static. What I could do is set up a redirect from a site where I have a fixed address, but only a small amount of space, and host a mirror of your page on my machine. I have plenty of space and bandwidth. Obviously, a better offer would be if someone could provide space with proper static IP, but if you don't get a better offer, I'm more than willing to help out.
Re: JDK for 21064?
On Sat, Oct 31, 1998 at 12:01:52PM -0500, Eric Bohm wrote: > > "Uncle" == Uncle George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Uncle> actually a 21164a ( the "a" really counts - who wuddya [Snip] > Uncle> :-( . My 250 meg web xfer/month appears to be exhausted. > Uncle> oh, well. > > I could help a bit, I have a cable modem connection that is up all the > time, downside is that my address is not static. What I could do is > set up a redirect from a site where I have a fixed address, but only a > small amount of space, and host a mirror of your page on my machine. > I have plenty of space and bandwidth. You could set up something with Dynamic DNS. Check out the URLs below for more info. http://www.ddns.org http://www.ml.org /Mike -- Michael A. Smith "The future has already arrived; it's just not evenly distributed yet." - William Gibson
Re: JDK for 21064?
On Sat, 31 Oct 1998 11:05:03 -0500, Uncle George [fwd by sbb] wrote: >[sbb: Here's what Uncle George wrote:] > >actually a 21164a ( the "a" really counts - who wuddya thunkit ) >i'm gonny try to see if i can build for all processors with 117, and see >if it all will fit under 10 meg. these processors are ( 21064, 21164, >and 21164a ). > >at the moment i am having probs with finding a home. The folks at >blackdown seemed to have reneged on their offer :-( . > >[Is it just me, or does this guy seem to be a real hard case. We've tried and >tried to bring him into the fold, and at this point I'm ready to say "let's not >try anymore. He's likely to do more damage if he joins than where he is now." >I know it's uncharitable of me, but statements like this (at least I don't >THINK we reneged on the offer, I THINK he let it fall on the floor) really piss >me off. Also, his lack of willingness to develop a unified port with us, and >other "loose cannon" behavior make me real hesitant at this point to extend any >more olive branches (and certainly not in the 1.2 space). > >What do others feel about this? -- sbb] I have asked him a number of times to join. I only got once responce back about how he could not join due to some issues with being a closed group. Given that we give out our diffs and let anyone in who has the legal access to the source, I find this difficult to understand. I don't know what to do. I still hope to find some time to finish the Alpha work but CVS is much more important and will make the work that much easier to manage. (Lots of little changes in prototypes and return types) Michael Sinz -- Director of Research & Development, NextBus Inc. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.nextbus.com My place on the web ---> http://www.users.fast.net/~michael_sinz
