RE: some tools in java....
Are there any IDE with a built-in Version Control in it? Version control that can be configured in the IDE? = Kent E. -- this is a "corporate e-add" replying to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is different from replying to "Kent E. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thanks. = -Original Message- From: Dan Kegel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 11:04 PM To: Kent E Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: some tools in java Kent E wrote: > 2.) are there any alternative in using VisualSourceSafe? Bitkeeper seems excellent, but I haven't used it myself much. http://www.bitkeeper.com The Linux Kernel guys use it heavily, and so do some large companies. It's something like $1000/seat. perforce isn't quite as fancy as Bitkeeper, but it works very, very well. http://www.perforce.com And I'm not saying that just because they sent me a t-shirt :-) I've used it in two jobs now, and it is far, far superior to Visual SourceSafe. It runs on all operating systems, it can be used via the commandline, via a gui, or via the web, it's fast, and it supports atomic changesets. It's something like $500/seat. Both are free for free software projects. - Dan -- Dan Kegel http://www.kegel.com http://counter.li.org/cgi-bin/runscript/display-person.cgi?user=78045 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
drivers for smart card?
Hi to all, Are you guyz developing a smart card applications? If yes, where did you get the drivers? = Kent E. -- this is a "corporate e-add" replying to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is different from replying to "Kent E. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> thanks. =
RE: some tools in java....
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 18:40, Kent E wrote: > Are there any IDE with a built-in Version Control in it? Version control > that can be configured in the IDE? Basically ALL the IDE's have built in support for version control tools. You might want to read some of the information on the tools that have been mentioned before, or actually try them out. I think you'll find most of your answers pretty quickly that way. --Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Volano Report update
Hello all, John Neffenger wrote: > the Java platforms couldn't even make it past 500 connections, so > we've come a long way! Let me know if you see any tricks or > command-line options I missed that would be helpful. In my opinion: - you tested Blackdown-1.3.1 using green threads, but Sun JVM used native threads. In Linux this makes a huge difference in terms of thread scalability with one CPU. It should be useful to show the Linux Sun 1.3.1 JVM results with -green option. - It should be better to use Solaris 9 instead of Solaris 8, since the threading model has changed. - It could be interesting to show the results using Sparc HW, in order to see how things change from Solaris 9-x86 to Solaris9-Sparc with the 64-bit JVM. Regards, Marco Trevisan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Volano Report update
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 11:49:28AM +0200, Marco Trevisan wrote: > In my opinion: > > - you tested Blackdown-1.3.1 using green threads, but Sun JVM used > native threads. In Linux this makes a huge difference in terms of thread > scalability with one CPU. It should be useful to show the Linux Sun > 1.3.1 JVM results with -green option. Also, 2.5.x Linux has changes to their 1:1 model that greatly increases scalability for dealing with a large number of threads. bill -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
