Re: JDBC for Oracle (was: RE: Retrieving a fully qualified hostname under NT)
Urban Widmark wrote: > On Fri, 13 Nov 1998, Rudhuwan Abu Bakar wrote: > > > > > hello > > > > sorry for this. > > > > Where can I get a type 4(?) JDBC driver? I am testing an Oracle server and > > want to use a Java-based client. > > > > Thank you for your time. > > > > regards > > duan > > > > I believe Oracle includes their JDBC driver with the database, and that it > is a pure java driver. (I'm more certain of the first than the last). > > If you can't find it I'm sure you can download it from www.oracle.com > somewhere ... > > /Urban > > --- > Urban Widmark [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Svenska Test AB +46 90 71 71 23 They have both type 4 and type 2 drivers for Linux. I had some problems with the type 4 driver (they call them JDBC Thin) since it does not support LOBs (or at least I wasn't able to get them working). You can get these for Oracle 7/8 at http://www.oracle.com/products/free_software/index.html. The type 2 drivers for Linux were just released recently along with the database engine, you can get these from http://technet.oracle.com. (Warning: you need to register and this package is ~100M, I don't believe you can just download the type 2 drivers by themself.) Jason
Re: Linux + java + oracle
Just guessing here, but if you're referencing the oci8 driver from an applet,
it may have problems with the native call within Netscape. Try to change the
url to use the thin driver. This driver doesn't seem to work 100%, it doesn't
appear to support LOB's, but it should perform most normal functions.
I too have a similar setup (Linux 2.0.35, JDK 1.1.7, Oracle 8.0.5) and have
been using the oci driver within application code without a hitch. I haven't
tried any applets that make direct db calls though.
"Robert P. Biuk-Aghai" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a similar setup (Linux 2 glibc, JDK 1.1.6, Oracle 8) and for me
> it works fine, however in *applications*. I tried running the same
> stuff in an applet, and although the classes111.zip file from Oracle
> was in my browser's classpath, I would get the same or a similar
> exception as you (don't remember clearly). Don't know why. As I
> remember, I was able to run it in the appletviewer, so it might be a
> Netscape issue (was using 4.06 at the time).
>
> So if you have an application you should have no problems. Make sure
> that you load the Oracle driver using a statement like this:
>
>Class.forName("oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver");
>
> Robert.
>
> On Fri, 20 Nov 1998, Rudhuwan Abu Bakar wrote:
>
> > I am using JDBC driver to connect to Oracle 8.0.5 under linux.
> >
> > However i keep getting unknown driver.I use
> > oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver as the name of the JDBC driver?Anyone can
> > tell me if this is the correct driver.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Robert P Biuk-Aghai, University of Macau, Faculty of Science and Technology
> http://hyperg.sftw.umac.mo/robert/tel: +853-3974365fax: +853-838314
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question and the answer is no.
Re: Oracle's JDBC on Linux
Are you sure about that? I've been using the 8.1.5 thin drivers with jdk1.1.7v2 on a RedHat 5.9/6.0 system without any problems. Steve Nguyen wrote: > And it only supports JDK1.1.8 and above so you will have to use JDK1.2 with > Linux > > Steve > > - Original Message - > From: Steve Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Sandy Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 6:51 PM > Subject: Re: Oracle's JDBC on Linux > > > Upgrade to Oracle JDBC driver comes with Oracle8i. It works excellently > well > > and lightning fast. > > > > Steve Nguyen > > KBMail Software & Service Provider > > http://www.kbmail.com/ISP/index.html > > > > - Original Message - > > From: Sandy Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 1999 1:23 PM > > Subject: Oracle's JDBC on Linux > > > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > I am running RH 5.2 with JDK117_v1a, and using the Oracle JDBC drivers > for > > > talking to the > > > database. I have noticed that it takes between 4-5 secs to create a > > connection > > > to the db. And > > > when you have a connection pool with fair number of connection you can > > imagine > > > howlong startup > > > takes. > > > > > > Anyone else see this problem? > > > > > > Sandy > > > > > > j > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: netscape 4.61, Java, Redhat 6.0
I've tried the libc5 version from several sources (Netscape with libc compat libs, with 5.4.33 libc from theofilu, Mandrake RPMS, ...) and now I get tons of those pesky "subprocess diagnostics" windows that lockup Netscape. Does anyone know what causes these and how to fix it? This doesn't occur in the glibc version but I can't stand the random maxed cpu much longer. Zdenek Kabelac wrote: > > At 14:57 23/07/99 -0400, Nelson Minar wrote: > > >So basically, Netscape 4.61 is whacked for Java. On Redhat 6.0, Redhat > > >5.2, and Debian potato. Yay! > > > > Well, I'm running Netscape 4.61 on the Mandrake 6.0 release, and just can't > > seem to get Netscape to crash at all! The only thing I would say is that > > I'm running a clean OS install, with the Mandrake RPM. > > Are you running libc5 or glibc compiled version of Netscape?? > > There is no problem to have a stable version of netscape in any > distribution - you just have to use older libc5 version. > And you might try to some special libc5 libraries for improved > stability from these URLs': > > http://members.eunet.at/theofilu/netscape.html > > http://help.netscape.com/kb/client/990221-4.html > > But if you are using glibc version you simply can't have stable > netscape - because glibc version of netscape is linked against > glibc2.0 - as far as I know all the latest distributions are > running glibc2.1 and moving forward to glibc2.2. > THere are even more problems - like e.g. various parts of netscape binary > are created by quite different version of c-compiler and so on. > > -- > Given enough time and money, Microsoft will eventually "invent" Unix. >George Bonser Thomas Lakofski > No chance. They only have a finite number of monkeys. >Zdenek Kabelachttp://www.fi.muni.cz/~kabi/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
