[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-574130 ] Remote UserTransaction fails name lookup
Bugs item #574130, was opened at 2002-06-26 15:29 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=574130group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jon Swinth (jswinth) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Remote UserTransaction fails name lookup Initial Comment: When using a UserTransaction from a remote client (i.e. standalone Tomcat) in which JBoss is not on the same server results in an exception when begin() is called. This happens specifically when new InitialContext(Properties) is used to connect to the JBoss server. Traced the issue to org.jboss.tm.usertx.client.ClientUserTransaction.createSession(). In this method new InitialContext().lookup(UserTransactionSessionFactory) is called. Since there are no jndi.properties, the InitialContext defaults to 127.0.0.1 which fails. -- Comment By: Ole Husgaard (sparre) Date: 2002-11-06 07:59 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175257 This Remote UT implementation only controls transactions on a single JBoss server. It has to find that server, and that is done through jndi. The fix is simple: Create a client jndi.properties file. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=574130group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634362 ] Failure if EntityBean overrides hashCode
Bugs item #634362, was opened at 2002-11-06 11:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634362group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Michael Lipp (mlipp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Failure if EntityBean overrides hashCode Initial Comment: This is a follow on to #595738 which has not been fixed properly. The CachedConnectionManager uses an entity beans equals and hashCode method to manage EJB containers. This fails if the EJB itself overrides equals/hashCode (see #595738 for a detailed description). The proper solution to the problem are collection/map implementations that use == instead of equals and System.identityHashCode instead of hashCode. The class IdentityWrapper which now exists in 3.0.4 does not solve the problem. It still calls hashCode on the EJB and (as explained in the previous bug report) a an EJB's hashCode implementation may fail if the EJB is in the pooled state. Worse, the current implementation actually disables connection caching. As every object is wrapped with a new IdentityWrapper (key = new IdentityWrapper(rawKey)), the stack.contains(key) will *always* fail. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634362group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634362 ] Failure if EntityBean overrides hashCode
Bugs item #634362, was opened at 2002-11-06 11:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634362group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Michael Lipp (mlipp) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Failure if EntityBean overrides hashCode Initial Comment: This is a follow on to #595738 which has not been fixed properly. The CachedConnectionManager uses an entity beans equals and hashCode method to manage EJB containers. This fails if the EJB itself overrides equals/hashCode (see #595738 for a detailed description). The proper solution to the problem are collection/map implementations that use == instead of equals and System.identityHashCode instead of hashCode. The class IdentityWrapper which now exists in 3.0.4 does not solve the problem. It still calls hashCode on the EJB and (as explained in the previous bug report) a an EJB's hashCode implementation may fail if the EJB is in the pooled state. Worse, the current implementation actually disables connection caching. As every object is wrapped with a new IdentityWrapper (key = new IdentityWrapper(rawKey)), the stack.contains(key) will *always* fail. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634362group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD - testsuite problems...
Hi, Still not completing - although it seemed to have got to the stress tests today - but I did let it run for around 11 hours this time... Has anyone else run the full testsuite on HEAD recently? How long did it take - on what machine? I am using a 600mhz P3, redhat7.1 box. Thanks, Chris --- Chris Kimpton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Perhaps I spoke too soon - the testsuite does not seem to complete (or at least, I give up after 9 hours...) The last entries in the test logs are: [junit] Running org.jboss.test.invokers.test.MultiInvokersUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.392 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.ConnectionUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 7.219 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.JBossMQUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 32, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Time elapsed: 31,954.962 sec [junit] TEST org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.JBossMQUnitTestCase FAILED (timeout) [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.JBossSessionRecoverUnitTestCase The server log has been filled with this stuff: DEBUG [org.jboss.mq.sm.file.DynamicStateManager] Saving config to: /disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/output/testbuild/server/all/conf/jbossmq-state.xml 2002-11-05 00:30:34,101 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:34 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): FIND_INITIAL_MBRS 2002-11-05 00:30:34,103 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:34 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received GET_MBRS_REQ from kimptoc:34521, returning [PING: type=GET_MBRS_RSP, arg=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 00:30:34,104 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:34 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received FIND_INITAL_MBRS_RSP, rsp=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521] 2002-11-05 00:30:36,105 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:36 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): initial mbrs are [[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 00:30:36,106 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:36 GMT 2002] [INFO] MERGE2.FindSubgroups.run(): initial_mbrs=[[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 00:30:38,060 WARN [org.jboss.mq.security.SecurityManager] No SecurityMetadadata was available for JMS_TQ4 adding default security conf 2002-11-05 00:30:45,464 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:45 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): FIND_INITIAL_MBRS 2002-11-05 00:30:45,467 [ snip ] DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:50 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received GET_MBRS_REQ from kimptoc:34521, returning [PING: type=GET_MBRS_RSP, arg=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:21:50,622 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:50 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received FIND_INITAL_MBRS_RSP, rsp=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521] 2002-11-05 09:21:52,621 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:52 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): initial mbrs are [[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:21:52,622 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:52 GMT 2002] [INFO] MERGE2.FindSubgroups.run(): initial_mbrs=[[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:22:02,613 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:02 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): FIND_INITIAL_MBRS 2002-11-05 09:22:02,615 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:02 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received GET_MBRS_REQ from kimptoc:34521, returning [PING: type=GET_MBRS_RSP, arg=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:22:02,616 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:02 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received FIND_INITAL_MBRS_RSP, rsp=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521] 2002-11-05 09:22:04,615 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:04 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): initial mbrs are [[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:22:04,616 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:04 GMT 2002] [INFO] MERGE2.FindSubgroups.run(): initial_mbrs=[[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] Hope this helps, Chris = __ Do you Yahoo!? HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/ --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD - testsuite problems...
Hi Chris, I ran head tests yesterday, there are still time-outs relating to the trunk invokers, but it does complete. Windows XP 1Ghz P3 java 1.4 Mandrake 8.1 450Mhz P2 java 1.3 Have you tried a thread-dump to see whether there is a deadlock? Regards, Adrian From: Chris Kimpton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD - testsuite problems... Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 03:35:18 -0800 (PST) Hi, Still not completing - although it seemed to have got to the stress tests today - but I did let it run for around 11 hours this time... Has anyone else run the full testsuite on HEAD recently? How long did it take - on what machine? I am using a 600mhz P3, redhat7.1 box. Thanks, Chris --- Chris Kimpton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Perhaps I spoke too soon - the testsuite does not seem to complete (or at least, I give up after 9 hours...) The last entries in the test logs are: [junit] Running org.jboss.test.invokers.test.MultiInvokersUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.392 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.ConnectionUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 7.219 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.JBossMQUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 32, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Time elapsed: 31,954.962 sec [junit] TEST org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.JBossMQUnitTestCase FAILED (timeout) [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.JBossSessionRecoverUnitTestCase The server log has been filled with this stuff: DEBUG [org.jboss.mq.sm.file.DynamicStateManager] Saving config to: /disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/output/testbuild/server/all/conf/jbossmq-state.xml 2002-11-05 00:30:34,101 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:34 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): FIND_INITIAL_MBRS 2002-11-05 00:30:34,103 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:34 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received GET_MBRS_REQ from kimptoc:34521, returning [PING: type=GET_MBRS_RSP, arg=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 00:30:34,104 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:34 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received FIND_INITAL_MBRS_RSP, rsp=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521] 2002-11-05 00:30:36,105 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:36 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): initial mbrs are [[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 00:30:36,106 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:36 GMT 2002] [INFO] MERGE2.FindSubgroups.run(): initial_mbrs=[[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 00:30:38,060 WARN [org.jboss.mq.security.SecurityManager] No SecurityMetadadata was available for JMS_TQ4 adding default security conf 2002-11-05 00:30:45,464 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:45 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): FIND_INITIAL_MBRS 2002-11-05 00:30:45,467 [ snip ] DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:50 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received GET_MBRS_REQ from kimptoc:34521, returning [PING: type=GET_MBRS_RSP, arg=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:21:50,622 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:50 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received FIND_INITAL_MBRS_RSP, rsp=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521] 2002-11-05 09:21:52,621 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:52 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): initial mbrs are [[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:21:52,622 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:52 GMT 2002] [INFO] MERGE2.FindSubgroups.run(): initial_mbrs=[[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:22:02,613 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:02 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): FIND_INITIAL_MBRS 2002-11-05 09:22:02,615 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:02 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received GET_MBRS_REQ from kimptoc:34521, returning [PING: type=GET_MBRS_RSP, arg=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:22:02,616 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:02 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received FIND_INITAL_MBRS_RSP, rsp=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521] 2002-11-05 09:22:04,615 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:04 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): initial mbrs are [[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:22:04,616 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:04 GMT 2002] [INFO] MERGE2.FindSubgroups.run(): initial_mbrs=[[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] Hope this helps, Chris = __ Do you
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634286 ] Bug in the transactional locking code
Bugs item #634286, was opened at 2002-11-06 02:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634286group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ole Husgaard (sparre) Assigned to: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Summary: Bug in the transactional locking code Initial Comment: I discovered this using Branch_3_2, but I think this bug is present in all branches. With multiple clients using UserTransaction, and the queued pessimistic locking strategy, I see the following problem in the locking code: Client1: ut.begin() This calls the server, and returns the TPC for tx1 to the client. Client1: obj.invoke() This invokes a non-readonly method on an entity bean. In the server thread1 is selected for doing the work. In the bean lock, the holding transaction is set to tx1, and the holding thread is set to thread1. After doing the invocation, thread1 is put back into the RMI thread pool. Client2: ut.begin() This calls the server, and returns the TPC for tx2 to the client. Client2: obj.invoke() This invokes the same bean as Client1 just invoked. In the server thread1 is selected (reused from the RMI pool) for doing the work. When invoking the locking code, thread1 should wait until the transaction tx1 started by Client1 is committed. However, that does not happen. In org.jboss.ejb.plugins.lock.BeanLockSupport.deadlockDetection(), it is detected that the calling thread equals the holding thread, and an ApplicationDeadlockException is thrown. I'm not sure that I completely understand this locking code, so I'd rather not fix this myself. However, it looks to me like the BeanLockSupport.holdingThread instance variable should be cleared before the transaction is committed. But simply clearing holdingThread in the endInvocation() method may cause problems with reentrant calls. Best Regards, Ole Husgaard. -- Comment By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Date: 2002-11-06 10:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176497 Good catch. It's definately a bug. HOlding you up? -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634286group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD - testsuite problems...
Hi Adrian, How long did it take on your Mandrake machine? Less than 11hours, I bet. I presume I can send a kill signal (SIGHUP) to the jvm to get a thread-dump? Are you running them all at once, or individual tests? I am just running the tests target from the testsuite module. Regards, Chris --- Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Chris, I ran head tests yesterday, there are still time-outs relating to the trunk invokers, but it does complete. Windows XP 1Ghz P3 java 1.4 Mandrake 8.1 450Mhz P2 java 1.3 Have you tried a thread-dump to see whether there is a deadlock? Regards, Adrian From: Chris Kimpton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD - testsuite problems... Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 03:35:18 -0800 (PST) Hi, Still not completing - although it seemed to have got to the stress tests today - but I did let it run for around 11 hours this time... Has anyone else run the full testsuite on HEAD recently? How long did it take - on what machine? I am using a 600mhz P3, redhat7.1 box. Thanks, Chris --- Chris Kimpton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Perhaps I spoke too soon - the testsuite does not seem to complete (or at least, I give up after 9 hours...) The last entries in the test logs are: [junit] Running org.jboss.test.invokers.test.MultiInvokersUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.392 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.ConnectionUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 7.219 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.JBossMQUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 32, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Time elapsed: 31,954.962 sec [junit] TEST org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.JBossMQUnitTestCase FAILED (timeout) [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.JBossSessionRecoverUnitTestCase The server log has been filled with this stuff: DEBUG [org.jboss.mq.sm.file.DynamicStateManager] Saving config to: /disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/output/testbuild/server/all/conf/jbossmq-state.xml 2002-11-05 00:30:34,101 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:34 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): FIND_INITIAL_MBRS 2002-11-05 00:30:34,103 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:34 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received GET_MBRS_REQ from kimptoc:34521, returning [PING: type=GET_MBRS_RSP, arg=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 00:30:34,104 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:34 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received FIND_INITAL_MBRS_RSP, rsp=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521] 2002-11-05 00:30:36,105 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:36 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): initial mbrs are [[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 00:30:36,106 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:36 GMT 2002] [INFO] MERGE2.FindSubgroups.run(): initial_mbrs=[[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 00:30:38,060 WARN [org.jboss.mq.security.SecurityManager] No SecurityMetadadata was available for JMS_TQ4 adding default security conf 2002-11-05 00:30:45,464 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:45 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): FIND_INITIAL_MBRS 2002-11-05 00:30:45,467 [ snip ] DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:50 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received GET_MBRS_REQ from kimptoc:34521, returning [PING: type=GET_MBRS_RSP, arg=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:21:50,622 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:50 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received FIND_INITAL_MBRS_RSP, rsp=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521] 2002-11-05 09:21:52,621 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:52 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): initial mbrs are [[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:21:52,622 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:52 GMT 2002] [INFO] MERGE2.FindSubgroups.run(): initial_mbrs=[[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:22:02,613 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:02 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): FIND_INITIAL_MBRS 2002-11-05 09:22:02,615 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:02 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received GET_MBRS_REQ from kimptoc:34521, returning [PING: type=GET_MBRS_RSP, arg=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:22:02,616 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:02 GMT 2002] [INFO]
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-634495 ] Poor Error message in EJB deployer
Patches item #634495, was opened at 2002-11-06 15:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=634495group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Steinar Hansen (shansen5) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Poor Error message in EJB deployer Initial Comment: When deploying an EJB, I lacked a matching cmp-field in the ejb-jar.xml file for a field-name in the jbosscmp- jdbc.xml. The error message produced was: CMP field not found : fieldName= This error message doesn't tell anything about why the fieldName is not found or in which entitybean the error occurs. The DeploymentException produced is generated in org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.metadata.JDBCEntityMet aData.java. The code is: throw new DeploymentException(CMP field not found : fieldName= + fieldName); I suggest changing this to: throw new DeploymentException(CMP field not found in ejb-jar.xml: fieldName= +fieldName+ for entitybean: +entityName); -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=634495group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD - testsuite problems...
Answers in line. Regards, Adrian From: Chris Kimpton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD - testsuite problems... Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 07:41:55 -0800 (PST) Hi Adrian, How long did it take on your Mandrake machine? Less than 11hours, I bet. About 2 hours including the time-outs. That machine is seriously short of memory :-( I presume I can send a kill signal (SIGHUP) to the jvm to get a thread-dump? Yep Are you running them all at once, or individual tests? I am just running the tests target from the testsuite module. ./build.sh tests Regards, Chris --- Adrian Brock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Chris, I ran head tests yesterday, there are still time-outs relating to the trunk invokers, but it does complete. Windows XP 1Ghz P3 java 1.4 Mandrake 8.1 450Mhz P2 java 1.3 Have you tried a thread-dump to see whether there is a deadlock? Regards, Adrian From: Chris Kimpton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] HEAD - testsuite problems... Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2002 03:35:18 -0800 (PST) Hi, Still not completing - although it seemed to have got to the stress tests today - but I did let it run for around 11 hours this time... Has anyone else run the full testsuite on HEAD recently? How long did it take - on what machine? I am using a 600mhz P3, redhat7.1 box. Thanks, Chris --- Chris Kimpton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Perhaps I spoke too soon - the testsuite does not seem to complete (or at least, I give up after 9 hours...) The last entries in the test logs are: [junit] Running org.jboss.test.invokers.test.MultiInvokersUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 9.392 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.ConnectionUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 8, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 7.219 sec [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.JBossMQUnitTestCase [junit] Tests run: 32, Failures: 0, Errors: 3, Time elapsed: 31,954.962 sec [junit] TEST org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.JBossMQUnitTestCase FAILED (timeout) [junit] Running org.jboss.test.jbossmq.test.JBossSessionRecoverUnitTestCase The server log has been filled with this stuff: DEBUG [org.jboss.mq.sm.file.DynamicStateManager] Saving config to: /disk/orig/home/lubega/jbossro/jboss-all/build/output/testbuild/server/all/conf/jbossmq-state.xml 2002-11-05 00:30:34,101 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:34 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): FIND_INITIAL_MBRS 2002-11-05 00:30:34,103 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:34 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received GET_MBRS_REQ from kimptoc:34521, returning [PING: type=GET_MBRS_RSP, arg=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 00:30:34,104 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:34 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received FIND_INITAL_MBRS_RSP, rsp=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521] 2002-11-05 00:30:36,105 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:36 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): initial mbrs are [[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 00:30:36,106 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:36 GMT 2002] [INFO] MERGE2.FindSubgroups.run(): initial_mbrs=[[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 00:30:38,060 WARN [org.jboss.mq.security.SecurityManager] No SecurityMetadadata was available for JMS_TQ4 adding default security conf 2002-11-05 00:30:45,464 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 00:30:45 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): FIND_INITIAL_MBRS 2002-11-05 00:30:45,467 [ snip ] DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:50 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received GET_MBRS_REQ from kimptoc:34521, returning [PING: type=GET_MBRS_RSP, arg=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:21:50,622 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:50 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.up(): received FIND_INITAL_MBRS_RSP, rsp=[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521] 2002-11-05 09:21:52,621 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:52 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): initial mbrs are [[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:21:52,622 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:21:52 GMT 2002] [INFO] MERGE2.FindSubgroups.run(): initial_mbrs=[[own_addr=kimptoc:34521, coord_addr=kimptoc:34521]] 2002-11-05 09:22:02,613 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Tue Nov 5 09:22:02 GMT 2002] [INFO] PING.down(): FIND_INITIAL_MBRS 2002-11-05 09:22:02,615 DEBUG
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634286 ] Bug in the transactional locking code
Bugs item #634286, was opened at 2002-11-06 07:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634286group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Ole Husgaard (sparre) Assigned to: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Summary: Bug in the transactional locking code Initial Comment: I discovered this using Branch_3_2, but I think this bug is present in all branches. With multiple clients using UserTransaction, and the queued pessimistic locking strategy, I see the following problem in the locking code: Client1: ut.begin() This calls the server, and returns the TPC for tx1 to the client. Client1: obj.invoke() This invokes a non-readonly method on an entity bean. In the server thread1 is selected for doing the work. In the bean lock, the holding transaction is set to tx1, and the holding thread is set to thread1. After doing the invocation, thread1 is put back into the RMI thread pool. Client2: ut.begin() This calls the server, and returns the TPC for tx2 to the client. Client2: obj.invoke() This invokes the same bean as Client1 just invoked. In the server thread1 is selected (reused from the RMI pool) for doing the work. When invoking the locking code, thread1 should wait until the transaction tx1 started by Client1 is committed. However, that does not happen. In org.jboss.ejb.plugins.lock.BeanLockSupport.deadlockDetection(), it is detected that the calling thread equals the holding thread, and an ApplicationDeadlockException is thrown. I'm not sure that I completely understand this locking code, so I'd rather not fix this myself. However, it looks to me like the BeanLockSupport.holdingThread instance variable should be cleared before the transaction is committed. But simply clearing holdingThread in the endInvocation() method may cause problems with reentrant calls. Best Regards, Ole Husgaard. -- Comment By: Ole Husgaard (sparre) Date: 2002-11-06 17:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=175257 This doesn't hold me up. I currently do not have reentrant beans, so I simply hacked the source to clear holdingThread in endInvocation(). -- Comment By: Bill Burke (patriot1burke) Date: 2002-11-06 15:17 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=176497 Good catch. It's definately a bug. HOlding you up? -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634286group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-621664 ] test hangs with 3.0.3 but passes 3.0.2
Bugs item #621664, was opened at 2002-10-10 21:18 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=621664group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Submitted By: Joe Simone (jsimone) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: test hangs with 3.0.3 but passes 3.0.2 Initial Comment: OS: Win XP Pro, SP1 JDK 1.3.1_05 I have a test that creates sample data in my DB2 database. Using DB2 EE 7.2 with fixpack 7 applied. If I run the data creator under 3.0.2/4.0.4 then it runs to completion. If I run the data creator under 3.0.3/4.1.12 then my console client just stops midway. I'll get a WARN about timeout with STATUS_ACTIVE. How can I enable debug so I can provide more info? P.S. didn't know which component to open under so I just picked JBossTX -- Comment By: Joe Simone (jsimone) Date: 2002-11-06 13:51 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586242 Still happens with latest 3.0.4 Jboss. System just freezes. After a while I get this in the console: 12:55:25,059 INFO [Server] JBoss (MX MicroKernel) [3.0.4 Date:200211021607] Started in 0m:32s:287ms 13:11:30,237 WARN [TxCapsule] Transaction XidImpl [FormatId=257, GlobalId=BJSLAP//4359, BranchQual=] timed out. status= STATUS_ACTIVE -- Comment By: Joe Simone (jsimone) Date: 2002-10-23 09:43 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586242 can you tell me how to turn on full debug in server.log so I can see what is going on and report back. Thanks. -- Comment By: David Jencks (d_jencks) Date: 2002-10-22 11:33 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=60525 Your thread dump makes it look like db2 is hung on the fetch entity command. Can you investigate this and determine what the sql is and what db2 has to say about it? This would be consistent with a db2 process becoming unusable... -- Comment By: Joe Simone (jsimone) Date: 2002-10-22 10:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586242 Has there been any action on this problem? I have stopped using 3.0.3 and gone back to 3.0.2 since this occurred. BTW, when the server/app freezes and I close down the JBoss server, one or more of my DB2 processes are toast! This is the first time I have seen JBoss killing my database server! -- Comment By: Joe Simone (jsimone) Date: 2002-10-14 17:40 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=586242 CTRL-BREAK results in ... 17:27:35,505 INFO [Server] JBoss (MX MicroKernel) [3.0.3 Date:200209301503] Started in 0m:20s:459ms Full thread dump: SeedGenerator Thread daemon prio=2 tid=0x164b4478 nid=0x8c8 waiting on monitor [0x1753f000..0x1753fdbc] at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:415) at sun.security.provider.SeedGenerator.run (SeedGenerator.java:100) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) RMI TCP Connection(4)-192.168.2.35 daemon prio=5 tid=0x15b60eb0 nid=0x310 runnable [0x174fe000..0x174ffdbc] at COM.ibm.db2.jdbc.app.DB2PreparedStatement.SQLExecute (Native Method) at COM.ibm.db2.jdbc.app.DB2PreparedStatement.execute2 (DB2PreparedStatement.java:2065) at COM.ibm.db2.jdbc.app.DB2PreparedStatement.executeQuer y(DB2PreparedStatement.java:1596) at org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.local.LocalPreparedStatemen t.executeQuery(LocalPreparedStatement.java:289) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCLoadEntityCommand.ex ecute(JDBCLoadEntityCommand.java:122) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCLoadEntityCommand.ex ecute(JDBCLoadEntityCommand.java:62) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.cmp.jdbc.JDBCStoreManager.loadEntity (JDBCStoreManager.java:572) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.CMPPersistenceManager.loadEntity (CMPPersistenceManager.java:410) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionInte rceptor.loadEntity(CachedConnectionInterceptor.java: 353) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.invoke (EntitySynchronizationInterceptor.java:262) at org.jboss.resource.connectionmanager.CachedConnectionInte rceptor.invoke(CachedConnectionInterceptor.java:186) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityReentranceInterceptor.invoke (EntityReentranceInterceptor.java:90) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityInstanceInterceptor.invoke (EntityInstanceInterceptor.java:152) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityLockInterceptor.invoke (EntityLockInterceptor.java:107) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.EntityCreationInterceptor.invoke (EntityCreationInterceptor.java:69) at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.AbstractTxInterceptor.invokeNext (AbstractTxInterceptor.java:107) at
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634591 ] netboot failure
Bugs item #634591, was opened at 2002-11-06 19:06 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634591group_id=22866 Category: None Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: ryan sonnek (wireframe6464) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: netboot failure Initial Comment: server specs: suse linux 7.3 sun 1.3.1 jdk apache web server 2.x jboss 3.0.2 config files client specs: win2k sun 1.4.0 jdk jboss 3.0.2 netboot files. can view the files correctly through a webbrowser, but when client executes run.bat, no files are pulled down. apache's server log shows the client trying to download crimson.jar. both the server and client are unresponsive, and no error messages are thrown. run.bat -netboot http://servername -c custom -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634591group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634646 ] ejb-ql - LIKE
Bugs item #634646, was opened at 2002-11-06 15:48 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634646group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Calvin (cwu9t9) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: ejb-ql - LIKE Initial Comment: Operating System: Suse Linux 7.3 JDK: jdk1.3.1 jboss version: 3.0.4 I have a question in regards to the finders method that involves the LIKE command. In my ejb-jar.xml, i have a query as below (i.e.): query query-method method-namefindByVendor/method-name method-params method-paramjava.lang.String/method-param /method-params /query-method ejb-ql ![CDATA[SELECT OBJECT(i) FROM T_Item i WHERE i.vendor.name LIKE '%?1%']] /ejb-ql /query Assuming 2 rows of data should be returned: The above query would return nothing. However, ![CDATA[SELECT OBJECT(i) FROM T_Item i WHERE i.vendor.name LIKE '%Sony%']] works fine. I noticed from the forum of a similar question in regards to 3.0.1 that LIKE query would not work with any method parameters. Apparanlty, it didn't work for 3.0.4 as well. Is this still a bug or have I used it in a wrong way?? Thanks, -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634646group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases
What has happened to the 3.2beta release ? I have some stuff to put in - am I to late ? Jules Scott M Stark wrote: I'm planning on the following releases so time your work accordingly: 2002-10-25jboss-2.4.10 2002-10-27jboss-3.0.4 2002-11-03jboss-3.0.2beta2 2002-12-22jboss-4.0alpha Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Access Your PC Securely with GoToMyPC. Try Free Now https://www.gotomypc.com/s/OSND/DD ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Automated JBoss(Branch_3_0) Testsuite Results: 6-November-2002
Number of tests run: 989
Successful tests: 985
Errors:4
Failures: 0
[time of test: 6 November 2002 12:51 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[java.vendor: Apple Computer, Inc.]
[java.vm.version: 1.3.1_03-69]
[java.vm.name: Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM]
[java.vm.info: mixed mode]
[os.name: Mac OS X]
[os.arch: ppc]
[os.version: 10.2.1]
See http://lubega.com/testarchive/${build.uid} for details of this test.
See http://lubega.com for general test information.
NOTE: If there are any errors shown above - this mail is only highlighting
them - it is NOT indicating that they are being looked at by anyone.
Remember - if a test becomes broken after your changes - fix it or fix the test!
Oh dear - still got some errors!
Thanks for all your effort - we really do love you!
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm
Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size!
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634677 ] EJB in ja in server lib dir auto-deploys
Bugs item #634677, was opened at 2002-11-06 21:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634677group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Colin Sampaleanu (colins) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: EJB in ja in server lib dir auto-deploys Initial Comment: If a jar is added to the server lib dir (e.g. server/default/lib), to make use of some classes in that jar, and that jar also contains one or more EJBs, those EJBs are automaticallly deployed as the server is started. This is quite problematic. Even if deployment of the EJBs was desired, the auto-deployment at this time happens before some other resources have been deployed (such as datasources, etfc.) that the EJBs may need. Ideally EJBs are packaged standalone, separate from other java classes. However, it is quite legal to put them together with other code. OSUser, from OpenSymphony, for example, is packaged in this fashion. Inside the jar file is a JBoss login module, which to be available to used by JBoss requires the osuser.jar to be added to the server lib dir. Inside OSUser.jar are also some EJBs, useful in other osusr usage scenarios. Those EJBs then (erronously) automatically get deployed at server startup. This bug is somewhat similar to the (resolved) bug # 589808 (EJB Jars already deployed by MANIFEST.MF), and a resolution should be similar. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634677group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Customizing JBoss server configurations
Hi, I've created an ant script that allows easy creation of custom jboss server configurations (other then all, default and minimal). Basically, it defines a bunch of targets like jbossmq, transaction-manager and alike from which you can assemble your own unique server. I am using this script to reduce amount of resource used by jboss by removing services that are not used to my app but I can see other usages as well. Of course, this script is far from being complete but if it sounds like a good idea I can put it somewhere so people can start using/improving it. Thoughts? -- Igor Fedorenko Think smart. Think automated. Think Dynamics. www.thinkdynamics.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-634646 ] ejb-ql - LIKE
Bugs item #634646, was opened at 2002-11-06 14:48 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634646group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Calvin (cwu9t9) Assigned to: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom) Summary: ejb-ql - LIKE Initial Comment: Operating System: Suse Linux 7.3 JDK: jdk1.3.1 jboss version: 3.0.4 I have a question in regards to the finders method that involves the LIKE command. In my ejb-jar.xml, i have a query as below (i.e.): query query-method method-namefindByVendor/method-name method-params method-paramjava.lang.String/method-param /method-params /query-method ejb-ql ![CDATA[SELECT OBJECT(i) FROM T_Item i WHERE i.vendor.name LIKE '%?1%']] /ejb-ql /query Assuming 2 rows of data should be returned: The above query would return nothing. However, ![CDATA[SELECT OBJECT(i) FROM T_Item i WHERE i.vendor.name LIKE '%Sony%']] works fine. I noticed from the forum of a similar question in regards to 3.0.1 that LIKE query would not work with any method parameters. Apparanlty, it didn't work for 3.0.4 as well. Is this still a bug or have I used it in a wrong way?? Thanks, -- Comment By: Dain Sundstrom (dsundstrom) Date: 2002-11-06 17:30 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=251431 Did you even take a look at the spec? Have you read any books on EJB-QL? The spec doesn't allow parameters in the like clause, and it definately doesn't support them inside of a string literal. If you want to create this type of query you will have to use JBossQL in 3.0.4 and either preprocess the argument to include the % signs on either side, or you will have to use the concat function to build it in the JBossQL statement. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=634646group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] Customizing JBoss server configurations
Yes that is a great idea. What kind of script? sh, perl, python, java, ?? I've done the same for the CD subscription but using InstallAnywhere. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Igor Fedorenko Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 5:07 PM To: jboss-development Subject: [JBoss-dev] Customizing JBoss server configurations Hi, I've created an ant script that allows easy creation of custom jboss server configurations (other then all, default and minimal). Basically, it defines a bunch of targets like jbossmq, transaction-manager and alike from which you can assemble your own unique server. I am using this script to reduce amount of resource used by jboss by removing services that are not used to my app but I can see other usages as well. Of course, this script is far from being complete but if it sounds like a good idea I can put it somewhere so people can start using/improving it. Thoughts? -- Igor Fedorenko Think smart. Think automated. Think Dynamics. www.thinkdynamics.com --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases
Go ahead. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1:09 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases What has happened to the 3.2beta release ? I have some stuff to put in - am I to late ? Jules Scott M Stark wrote: I'm planning on the following releases so time your work accordingly: 2002-10-25jboss-2.4.10 2002-10-27jboss-3.0.4 2002-11-03jboss-3.0.2beta2 2002-12-22jboss-4.0alpha Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Access Your PC Securely with GoToMyPC. Try Free Now https://www.gotomypc.com/s/OSND/DD ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases
Scott, Can you or someone on the team tell me which version I should upgrade our product to - 3.0.x or 3.2? I'm about to move from 3.0.0 and want to make sure I'm on the right branch to make migration to 4.0 easier in the future while remaining stable for our product release that will occur by the EOY. Thanks, James -Original Message- From: Scott M Stark [mailto:scottmstark;attbi.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases Go ahead. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1:09 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases What has happened to the 3.2beta release ? I have some stuff to put in - am I to late ? Jules Scott M Stark wrote: I'm planning on the following releases so time your work accordingly: 2002-10-25jboss-2.4.10 2002-10-27jboss-3.0.4 2002-11-03jboss-3.0.2beta2 2002-12-22jboss-4.0alpha Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Access Your PC Securely with GoToMyPC. Try Free Now https://www.gotomypc.com/s/OSND/DD ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases
Personally I'd stay with 3.0.x series. New functionality will not be added to it while it will with 3.2. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of James Higginbotham Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 9:47 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases Scott, Can you or someone on the team tell me which version I should upgrade our product to - 3.0.x or 3.2? I'm about to move from 3.0.0 and want to make sure I'm on the right branch to make migration to 4.0 easier in the future while remaining stable for our product release that will occur by the EOY. Thanks, James -Original Message- From: Scott M Stark [mailto:scottmstark;attbi.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 8:17 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases Go ahead. Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC - Original Message - From: Jules Gosnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 1:09 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Upcoming releases What has happened to the 3.2beta release ? I have some stuff to put in - am I to late ? Jules Scott M Stark wrote: I'm planning on the following releases so time your work accordingly: 2002-10-25jboss-2.4.10 2002-10-27jboss-3.0.4 2002-11-03jboss-3.0.2beta2 2002-12-22jboss-4.0alpha Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Access Your PC Securely with GoToMyPC. Try Free Now https://www.gotomypc.com/s/OSND/DD ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-634830 ] Added Unicast Detector
Change Notes item #634830, was opened at 2002-11-07 01:04 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=634830group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v3.0 (Rabbit Hole) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Haynie (jhaynie) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Added Unicast Detector Initial Comment: Added a JMX Remoting unicast detector that will do unicast detection of remote connectors using 1..n of known ipaddress:ports -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=634830group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-634831 ] Added remote class loading
Change Notes item #634831, was opened at 2002-11-07 01:06 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=634831group_id=22866 Category: JBossMX Group: v3.0 (Rabbit Hole) Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Jeff Haynie (jhaynie) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Added remote class loading Initial Comment: Added ability for a connector to remotely pull down the remote class bytes if a connector doesn't have them locally for JMX Remoting. This is specific to the Connector implementation. Created a generic ClassBytesClassloader that all connectors can use for adding classbytes from remote MBeanServers. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=634831group_id=22866 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] JBoss Clustering problem
Hello, I am facing problem in JBoss Clustering.I am having Two nodes in cluster.When One node is down.Client Automatically send request to other node.But if any node is getting the exception like.. Could not create entity:org.jboss.util.NestedSQLException: No ManagedConnections Available!; - nested throwable: (javax.resource.ResourceException: No ManagedConnections Available!) at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(StreamRemoteCall.java:240) at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.executeCall(StreamRemoteCall.java:215) at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:117) at org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.server.JRMPInvoker_Stub.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.interfaces.JRMPInvokerProxy.invoke(JRMPInvokerProxy.java:128) at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invoke(InvokerInterceptor.java:108) at org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionInterceptor.java:73) at org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor.invoke(SecurityInterceptor.java:76) at org.jboss.proxy.ejb.HomeInterceptor.invoke(HomeInterceptor.java:185) at org.jboss.proxy.ClientContainer.invoke(ClientContainer.java:76) at $Proxy6.create(Unknown Source) at net4nuts.usermanagement.UserManagementServlet.processUserData(UserManagementServlet.java:330) at net4nuts.usermanagement.UserManagementServlet.authenticate(UserManagementServlet.java:175) at net4nuts.usermanagement.UserManagementServlet.doPost(UserManagementServlet.java:95) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.tomcat.core.ServletWrapper.doService(ServletWrapper.java:405) at org.apache.tomcat.core.Handler.service(Handler.java:287) at org.apache.tomcat.core.ServletWrapper.service(ServletWrapper.java:372) at org.apache.tomcat.core.ContextManager.internalService(ContextManager.java:806) at org.apache.tomcat.core.ContextManager.service(ContextManager.java:752) at org.apache.tomcat.service.connector.Ajp12ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Ajp12ConnectionHandler.java:166) at org.apache.tomcat.service.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:416) at org.apache.tomcat.util.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:501) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) Second request again goes to same nodeI mean the node which is getting exception.So please elaborate on this ASAP thanks vishal --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss Clustering problem
Only communication exceptions will cause a failover. If the client proxies know that the request was delivered, the clustering code will never failover. This is to avoid duplicate invocations and also the client proxies really have no way of knowing what you want to do with a request. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-development-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Vishal Shukla Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 1:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] JBoss Clustering problem Hello, I am facing problem in JBoss Clustering.I am having Two nodes in cluster.When One node is down.Client Automatically send request to other node.But if any node is getting the exception like.. Could not create entity:org.jboss.util.NestedSQLException: No ManagedConnections Available!; - nested throwable: (javax.resource.ResourceException: No ManagedConnections Available!) at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(Str eamRemoteCall.java:240) at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.executeCall(StreamRemoteCall.java:215) at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:117) at org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.server.JRMPInvoker_Stub.invoke(Unknown Source) at org.jboss.invocation.jrmp.interfaces.JRMPInvokerProxy.invoke(JRMPI nvokerProxy.java:128) at org.jboss.invocation.InvokerInterceptor.invoke(InvokerInterceptor. java:108) at org.jboss.proxy.TransactionInterceptor.invoke(TransactionIntercept or.java:73) at org.jboss.proxy.SecurityInterceptor.invoke(SecurityInterceptor.java:76) at org.jboss.proxy.ejb.HomeInterceptor.invoke(HomeInterceptor.java:185) at org.jboss.proxy.ClientContainer.invoke(ClientContainer.java:76) at $Proxy6.create(Unknown Source) at net4nuts.usermanagement.UserManagementServlet.processUserData(User ManagementServlet.java:330) at net4nuts.usermanagement.UserManagementServlet.authenticate(UserMan agementServlet.java:175) at net4nuts.usermanagement.UserManagementServlet.doPost(UserManagemen tServlet.java:95) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:760) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at org.apache.tomcat.core.ServletWrapper.doService(ServletWrapper.java:405) at org.apache.tomcat.core.Handler.service(Handler.java:287) at org.apache.tomcat.core.ServletWrapper.service(ServletWrapper.java:372) at org.apache.tomcat.core.ContextManager.internalService(ContextManag er.java:806) at org.apache.tomcat.core.ContextManager.service(ContextManager.java:752) at org.apache.tomcat.service.connector.Ajp12ConnectionHandler.process Connection(Ajp12ConnectionHandler.java:166) at org.apache.tomcat.service.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:416) at org.apache.tomcat.util.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:501) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:479) Second request again goes to same nodeI mean the node which is getting exception.So please elaborate on this ASAP thanks vishal --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: See the NEW Palm Tungsten T handheld. Power Color in a compact size! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?palm0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
