Re: [JBoss-dev] several ThreadPool classes
Looks like PooledExecutor only being used in 3 or 4 places (in jms, mq, and remoting), but think is best solution for me. Jeff Haynie wrote: I thought we were using the doug lea's concurrent ThreadPool (PooledExecutor) in most places? - Original Message - From: "Tom Elrod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:04 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] several ThreadPool classes I need a thread pool and upon checking, noticed that we have several implementations through out. However none were in common (and two of them look exactly the same). Any one in particular that should be considered the "standard" thread pool? If so, any reason it is not in common? Thanks. -Tom --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Feature Requests-852106 ] Oracle Sequence Create Command (one sequence per table)
Feature Requests item #852106, was opened at 2003-12-01 15:46 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=852106&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Guillaume Compagnon (gcompagnon) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Oracle Sequence Create Command (one sequence per table) Initial Comment: Oracle Sequence Create Command (one sequence per table) As the existing OracleCreateCommand is not efficient as all: we had to use a single sequence for all tables (named SEQUENCE_TEST), we need to add another CMP Create-command for supporting a more efficient manner. Each entity will have its own sequence in order to auto- increment its primary key. The sequence will created by the post-create-table using a generic pattern : _seq. (this pattern could be modified) This feature has been fully implemented and tested with Jboss 3.2.2. Following the HOW-TO: *How to Configure the CMP Entities for using auto- increment feature based on a Oracle Sequence with XDoclet: (for those who don't use XDoclet for generating the EJBs ... please refer to the jbosscmp-jdbc.xml) *for each entities that need the auto-increment facility, add the line @jboss.persistence post-table-create="CREATE SEQUENCE %%t_seq START WITH 1 INCREMENT BY 1" into the class definition zone: for example: [...] /** * XDoclet configuration * * * The DataSource registry used by that Entity * @jboss.persistence datasource = "java:/OracleDS" * Type of Mapping used for that Bean * @jboss.persistence datasource-mapping = "Oracle9i" * * If the DB table doesn't exist, then create it using the jboss mapping rules * @jboss.persistence create-table = "true" * If that bean is undeployed, then drop the DB table * @jboss.persistence remove-table = "true" * * @jboss.tuned-updates "true" * @jboss.persistence read-only="false" * @jboss.persistence post-table-create="CREATE SEQUENCE %%t_seq START WITH 1 INCREMENT BY 1 " * * Do not implement the PK constraint in the DB table with the autogenerated PK * @jboss.persistence pk-constraint = "false" * Use a util method to get the generated PK by Oracle, unless a NullPointerException is thrown (new feature of jboss 3.2) * @jboss.entity-command name = "oracle-table- sequence" * * XDoclet configuration for ejb, documentation and tutorial are on http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/";>http://xdoclet. sourceforge.net/ [...] For declaring the class member to be the auto- increment primary key: [...] /** * @jboss.persistence auto-increment = "true" <- --- this line is optional for Oracle but required for Hypersonic or some others DBMS. * * * @ejb.persistent-field * @ejb.persistence column-name = "id" * @ejb.interface-method view-type = "both" * @ejb.pk-field * * The ID (generated by the DataStore) * @return the id * @author COMPAGNON * */ abstract public Integer getID(); [...] *Enhance Jboss CMP with that CreateCommand the Create Command should be declared inside standardjbosscmp-jdbc.xml : [..] %% t_seq [..] Some feedbacks: *there will be a Oracle warning when Jboss server starts, because it tries to create sequence twice. Nothing fatal for the good start of Jboss server, except some ugly logs onto the console. *Jboss post-create-table feature will create a sequence for association table that is absolutely unnecessary. =>these 2 dysfonctions will not appear if we decide not to use the create-table feature.(as this should be done on production stage). Guillaume Compagnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=852106&group_id=22866 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-850859 ] CMP-Engine changing primary-key field value ???
Bugs item #850859, was opened at 2003-11-28 21:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=850859&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sandro Santos Andrade (sandros) Assigned to: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky) Summary: CMP-Engine changing primary-key field value ??? Initial Comment: Hi all, I have two entities 'SystemUser' (primary key 'login') and 'Author', where author's primary-key is composed by an foreign-key to systemuser's primary-key and a string field fullName. I create in author a field that is both cmp-field and cmr-field and did all relationship configurations. All table were successfully created with primary-key and foreign-key constraints (PostgreSQL): Table "public.systemuser" Column | Type | Modifiers --+--+--- login | text | not null fullname | text | not null password | text | not null Indexes: pk_systemuser primary key btree (login) Table "public.author" Column | Type | Modifiers --+--+--- login | text | not null fullname | text | not null name | text | not null address | text | not null Indexes: pk_author primary key btree (login, fullname) Foreign Key constraints: fk_author_login FOREIGN KEY (login) REFERENCES systemuser(login) ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION But, the accessor setLogin(x), where x is the LocalInterface for systemuser with primary-key = 'sandros', in entity Author throws the following error: "Could not create entity:java.sql.SQLException: ERROR: fk_author_login referential integrity violation - key referenced from author not found in systemuser", but record 'sandros' exists in systemuser table. If I delete the constraint fk_author_login in table author, the record inserted is: login | fullname | name | address --+---++- local/SystemUser:sandros | Sandro Santos Andrade | Andrade, S. S. | UFBa That is, the systemuser's primary key (login) is being 'local/SystemUser:sandros' rather than just 'sandros' If the cmr-field login is not part of primary key the insert occurs all right. Any idea ? I'm using jboss 3.2.2rc2, jdk 1.4.2 in Debian kernel 2.4.18 and postgresql 7.3.4. Thanks in advance, Sandro -- >Comment By: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky) Date: 2003-12-01 16:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=543482 Because you declared a CMR field as a CMP field. CMR can't be CMP and CMP can't be CMR. If you have questions, please, ask them in jboss-user mailing list or forums on jboss.org -- Comment By: Sandro Santos Andrade (sandros) Date: 2003-12-01 14:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=747271 loubyansky, I have just the CMR acessors: // CMR public abstract SystemUserLocal getLogin(); public abstract void setLogin(SystemUserLocal user); but I also declared 'login' as a cmp-field in ejb-jar.xml. The code was compiled and table were created as expected. The question is: why was the prefix 'local/SystemUser:' included in foreign key ? Thanks, -- Comment By: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky) Date: 2003-11-28 22:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=543482 Each field whether it is CMP or CMR must have abstract getter and setter in the bean class. In your case, it would be like: //CMP public abstract String getLogin(); public abstract void setLogin(String user); // CMR public abstract SystemUserLocal getLogin(); public abstract void setLogin(SystemUserLocal user); Which won't be compiled. I guess, you have only the CMP getter and setter and declare it as both CMP and CMR in the ejb-jar.xml. Is it correct? -- Comment By: Sandro Santos Andrade (sandros) Date: 2003-11-28 22:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=747271 loubyansky, You are right. I have CMP and CMR fields with the same name (login). It was the way I found to insert an CMR-field in the primary key of entity 'Author'. The bean classes were successfully compiled and database tables perfectly created. In entity Author, the primary key is composed: a CMR-field (login) and a CMP-field (fullName). What do you mean for: "You can have a foreign key of a cmr field mapped to a primary key field but not cmr itself" ??? I could alter the toString method in order to supress to 'local/SystemUser:' prefix ! Sandro -- Comment By: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky) Date: 2003-11-28 21:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=543482 The result inserted is the result of EJBLocalObject.toString(). It looks like there is a CMP and a CMR fields with the same name which is impossible (
Re: [JBoss-dev] several ThreadPool classes
I thought we were using the doug lea's concurrent ThreadPool (PooledExecutor) in most places? - Original Message - From: "Tom Elrod" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 2:04 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] several ThreadPool classes > I need a thread pool and upon checking, noticed that we have several > implementations through out. However none were in common (and two of > them look exactly the same). Any one in particular that should be > considered the "standard" thread pool? If so, any reason it is not in > common? > > Thanks. > > -Tom > > > > --- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > ___ > JBoss-Development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Re: %RND_UC_CHAR[2-8], of a tiger
bagging chariot lantern merritt bowel delirious gargle lethargic mohr dryden shift lethargic barnabas end dribble actinium lesotho person notify hover metronome memoranda reuben spurt roundup suppressible Banned CD Government don't want me to sell it. See Now + vacillate chaperone philology dispute carryover muriel hegelian speck deport typesetting indistinguishable bash histochemistry feudal melissa sensor artwork besetting demean seashore frustrate foil sonoma tao osha mortgagee dragon advantageous adenine effluvium deforestation
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-850859 ] CMP-Engine changing primary-key field value ???
Bugs item #850859, was opened at 2003-11-28 17:34 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sandros You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=850859&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Sandro Santos Andrade (sandros) Assigned to: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky) Summary: CMP-Engine changing primary-key field value ??? Initial Comment: Hi all, I have two entities 'SystemUser' (primary key 'login') and 'Author', where author's primary-key is composed by an foreign-key to systemuser's primary-key and a string field fullName. I create in author a field that is both cmp-field and cmr-field and did all relationship configurations. All table were successfully created with primary-key and foreign-key constraints (PostgreSQL): Table "public.systemuser" Column | Type | Modifiers --+--+--- login | text | not null fullname | text | not null password | text | not null Indexes: pk_systemuser primary key btree (login) Table "public.author" Column | Type | Modifiers --+--+--- login | text | not null fullname | text | not null name | text | not null address | text | not null Indexes: pk_author primary key btree (login, fullname) Foreign Key constraints: fk_author_login FOREIGN KEY (login) REFERENCES systemuser(login) ON UPDATE NO ACTION ON DELETE NO ACTION But, the accessor setLogin(x), where x is the LocalInterface for systemuser with primary-key = 'sandros', in entity Author throws the following error: "Could not create entity:java.sql.SQLException: ERROR: fk_author_login referential integrity violation - key referenced from author not found in systemuser", but record 'sandros' exists in systemuser table. If I delete the constraint fk_author_login in table author, the record inserted is: login | fullname | name | address --+---++- local/SystemUser:sandros | Sandro Santos Andrade | Andrade, S. S. | UFBa That is, the systemuser's primary key (login) is being 'local/SystemUser:sandros' rather than just 'sandros' If the cmr-field login is not part of primary key the insert occurs all right. Any idea ? I'm using jboss 3.2.2rc2, jdk 1.4.2 in Debian kernel 2.4.18 and postgresql 7.3.4. Thanks in advance, Sandro -- >Comment By: Sandro Santos Andrade (sandros) Date: 2003-12-01 10:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=747271 loubyansky, I have just the CMR acessors: // CMR public abstract SystemUserLocal getLogin(); public abstract void setLogin(SystemUserLocal user); but I also declared 'login' as a cmp-field in ejb-jar.xml. The code was compiled and table were created as expected. The question is: why was the prefix 'local/SystemUser:' included in foreign key ? Thanks, -- Comment By: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky) Date: 2003-11-28 18:26 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=543482 Each field whether it is CMP or CMR must have abstract getter and setter in the bean class. In your case, it would be like: //CMP public abstract String getLogin(); public abstract void setLogin(String user); // CMR public abstract SystemUserLocal getLogin(); public abstract void setLogin(SystemUserLocal user); Which won't be compiled. I guess, you have only the CMP getter and setter and declare it as both CMP and CMR in the ejb-jar.xml. Is it correct? -- Comment By: Sandro Santos Andrade (sandros) Date: 2003-11-28 18:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=747271 loubyansky, You are right. I have CMP and CMR fields with the same name (login). It was the way I found to insert an CMR-field in the primary key of entity 'Author'. The bean classes were successfully compiled and database tables perfectly created. In entity Author, the primary key is composed: a CMR-field (login) and a CMP-field (fullName). What do you mean for: "You can have a foreign key of a cmr field mapped to a primary key field but not cmr itself" ??? I could alter the toString method in order to supress to 'local/SystemUser:' prefix ! Sandro -- Comment By: Alexey Loubyansky (loubyansky) Date: 2003-11-28 17:53 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=543482 The result inserted is the result of EJBLocalObject.toString(). It looks like there is a CMP and a CMR fields with the same name which is impossible (following the spec) because you would not be able to compile the bean class. Are you declaring a cmp-field as a cmr-field in ejb-jar.xml? You can have a foreign key of a cmr field mapped to a primary key field but not cmr itself. -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?fun
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-852016 ] JSR109: WebServiceModule object-name
Bugs item #852016, was opened at 2003-12-01 11:42 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=852016&group_id=22866 Category: JBossSOAP Group: v4.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: thomas diesler (tdiesler) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: JSR109: WebServiceModule object-name Initial Comment: uses the parent short name in its object name, this however may not be unique ObjectNameConverter.convert(BASE_WS_MODULE_NAME + ",module=" +deploymentInfo.parent.shortName); -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=852016&group_id=22866 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-852016 ] JSR109: WebServiceModule object-name
Bugs item #852016, was opened at 2003-12-01 11:42 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by tdiesler You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=852016&group_id=22866 Category: JBossSOAP Group: v4.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: thomas diesler (tdiesler) >Assigned to: thomas diesler (tdiesler) Summary: JSR109: WebServiceModule object-name Initial Comment: uses the parent short name in its object name, this however may not be unique ObjectNameConverter.convert(BASE_WS_MODULE_NAME + ",module=" +deploymentInfo.parent.shortName); -- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=852016&group_id=22866 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-848106 ] ClassCastException on SOAP calls upon redeployment
Bugs item #848106, was opened at 2003-11-24 07:55
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by stephane_nicoll
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=848106&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stephane Nicoll (stephane_nicoll)
Assigned to: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Summary: ClassCastException on SOAP calls upon redeployment
Initial Comment:
OS: Redhat linux 9
Java: SUN VM 1.4.1_02
The bug is reproductible with both JBoss 3.2.2 and
3.2.3RC1
We have an application, packaged as an EAR and
containing mainly:
- an EJB module JAR containing SessionBeans, Entity
Beans and MDB
- an WSR module JARr containing a web service
declaration
- Some librairies
The WSR module defines a web service that use a
SessionBean to process incoming SOAP calls
Eveything runs fine but when we hot-redeploy the EAR,
we have a ClassCastException and the web service does
not work anymore (we need to restart JBoss to fix this).
My guesses is that this is an Axis bug but I already
opened a bug @t apache without any feedback. We
discussed this issue in the JBoss-user mailing list see the
thread:
JBossNET hot deployment problem (ClassCastException)
This shows the classes / interfaces are OK after un
hotdeploy (see the thread for test output suggested by
Adrian)
What we have after the hot-redeploy at server side is
the following:
2003-11-24 08:40:57,873 INFO
[org.apache.axis.utils.bytecode.ParamNameExtractor]
AXIS error:java.io.IOException: Unable to load bytecode
for
class "com.kiala.kserver.driver.nodesynch.NodeSyncherLo
cal"
AxisFault
faultCode:
{http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}
Server.userException
faultSubcode:
faultString: java.lang.ClassCastException
faultActor:
faultNode:
faultDetail:
{http://xml.apache.org/axis/}stackTrace:
java.lang.ClassCastException
at
com.sun.corba.se.internal.javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObjec
t.narrow(PortableRemoteObject.java:293)
at javax.rmi.PortableRemoteObject.narrow
(PortableRemoteObject.java:134)
at
org.apache.axis.providers.java.EJBProvider.createRemote
EJB(EJBProvider.java:168)
at
org.apache.axis.providers.java.EJBProvider.makeNewServi
ceObject(EJBProvider.java:147)
at
org.apache.axis.providers.java.JavaProvider.getNewServi
ceObject(JavaProvider.java:261)
at
org.apache.axis.providers.java.JavaProvider.getServiceOb
ject(JavaProvider.java:138)
at
org.apache.axis.providers.java.JavaProvider.invoke
(JavaProvider.java:313)
at
org.apache.axis.strategies.InvocationStrategy.visit
(InvocationStrategy.java:71)
at org.apache.axis.SimpleChain.doVisiting
(SimpleChain.java:150)
at org.apache.axis.SimpleChain.invoke
(SimpleChain.java:120)
at
org.apache.axis.handlers.soap.SOAPService.invoke
(SOAPService.java:481)
at org.apache.axis.server.AxisServer.invoke
(AxisServer.java:323)
at
org.apache.axis.transport.http.AxisServlet.doPost
(AxisServlet.java:854)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service
(HttpServlet.java:760)
at
org.apache.axis.transport.http.AxisServletBase.service
(AxisServletBase.java:339)
Should you need further info, let me know.
Regards,
Stephane Nicoll
--
>Comment By: Stephane Nicoll (stephane_nicoll)
Date: 2003-12-01 08:47
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=448198
Thanks a lot, this is working as expected.
Sorry for the noise (not-a-bug)
Regards,
Stephane
--
Comment By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Date: 2003-11-24 13:45
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=175199
Our EJBprovider is derived from the axis one and ovverides
only the necessary bits with regard to container integration.
We did not override the urn shortcuts for handlerclasses
(would be an idea, maybe I will take this as a feature
request ;-), so you would have to use
in your wsdd service declaration
But the wsdl should of course be the same, if it isn´t please
let me know or file a bug!
CGJ
--
Comment By: Stephane Nicoll (stephane_nicoll)
Date: 2003-11-24 13:15
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=448198
I suspect this could be the problem :/
We didn't changed anything because our WSDL should not
change at all. We have a C++ client running on a palm and
the SOAP library is lacking of features. So if we change the
WSDL a bit (names are changing) the client could not
connect anymore.
I hope chaning the provider will note change the generation
of the WSDL
Changing to provider java:/EJB is enough?
Regards,
Stephane
--
Comment By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Date: 2003-11-24 13:06
Message:
Logged In: YES
use
Re: [JBoss-dev] Tomcat updates
Scott M Stark wrote: Its included in the release in the same manner as 3.2.3RC1, as a sar with a build file that creates a server/tomcat5 configuration that replaces the tomcat-4.1.x sar with the tc5 version. The tc5 version cannot be made the default until it at least passes the org.jboss.test.web.test.WebIntegrationUnitTestCase which it currently does not because it is making assumptions about the jsr77 object names which are not valid for wars embedded in ears. I can't see any TC 5 SAR in the release, did I miss something ? Lots of people have been asking for TC 5 in JB (either on the JB or TC lists), and it would be a pity to miss the opportunity of a simultaneous release. I think we need full d/l with TC 5, advertised as a beta. About the JSR 77 problem, it's the J2EEApplication key, right ? IMO, this is an extremely minor problem, insignificant when compared to the lack of tested clustering support (the code is there now, though). -- x Rémy Maucherat Senior Developer & Consultant JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL x --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] several ThreadPool classes
I need a thread pool and upon checking, noticed that we have several implementations through out. However none were in common (and two of them look exactly the same). Any one in particular that should be considered the "standard" thread pool? If so, any reason it is not in common? Thanks. -Tom --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
