Re: [JBoss-dev] cmp with multiple datasource
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 12:49 am, Adrian Brock wrote: On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 13:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could you please give me an example or any reference where I can begin with JCA? http://java.sun.com/j2ee/connector/ The admin docs includes a simple resource adapter. Or you can look at the jboss jdbc/jms resource adapters. If you can get hold of a copy of J2EE Connector Architecture and Enterprise Application Integration by Rahul Sharma, Beth Stearns and Tony Ng it is worth a read (or two, it takes a bit of getting into). When I wrote my first JCA I found that book to be a great help. brian wallis... --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss Licencing.
On Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:21 pm, Juha Lindfors wrote: Subclasses would fall under LGPL, as far as I can tell, if they're distributed publically. What about implements EntityBean etc. Surely all my beans are not now LGPL. Or extends ServiceMBeanSupport so my mbeans are now LGPL. I hope not. I think that interpretation would severely limit the use of the JBoss. brian... --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine. WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at the same time. Free trial click here:http://www.vmware.com/wl/offer/358/0 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] RE: [JBoss-user] Re: Recent CVS removals
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 03:30 am, Juha Lindfors wrote: The benefit for design and development discussion is clear. You can very easily get the whole history of the discussion thread in front of you (or several threads). Even if the discussion occured 6 months ago and you were not there then to read through it. Just to confuse the issue :-) I've found a much more useful forum for design discussions to be a Wiki web. We have been successfully using one for nearly a year now and have the best documentation for our design work that I have ever experienced. The reason is that it is possible to re-factor the discussions, after decisions are made, into the design document without all the contradictory multithreaded discussions to confuse the reader. We use Twiki which also has version control so the original discussions are still there for historical purposes. Of course, it requires a level of trust and responsibility on the part of the contributers. As to web forums. One that allows either web or email participation would help get more people involved. To split it across two seems very wasteful to me. brian wallis... --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] Recent CVS removals
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 08:49, Bill Burke wrote: 2. More importantly, we have learned that they have forked JBoss. We also believe they are preparing to submit it, or some derivation, to the new Apache Geronimo project which would violate copyright and LGPL. Our proof? http://sourceforge.net/projects/elba I had a look (at one randomly selected file) and it is a direct copy with the line JBoss, the OpenSource EJB server removed from the top. Shit. Back to the unix wars of my youth. And that is the thing that really damaged unix and gave MS an unassailable head start. --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] July 2003 news
On Thu, 7 Aug 2003 05:15, Vladyslav Kosulin wrote: P.S. Do you know that there are java source files licensed under GPL (not LGPL) in the latest JBoss 3.2.1 and 3.2.2 distributions and even in the CVS HEAD? Are you surprised? This statement worries me. Vlad, can you name one or more specific files that are GPL rather than LGPL? If these do exist what is the plan to rectify what to me seems to be a serious problem. Something like this could prevent me from using JBoss at all. This is serious if true! brian wallis... --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa0013ave/direct;at.aspnet_072303_01/01 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 01:16, Dain Sundstrom wrote: To Brian Wallis, even if Jboss were to get certified, it would not make your J2EE compliant applications portable. Why? There are may important things considered outside the specification. For example, all database mappings for CMP are outside the spec, even using a database for CMP is outside the spec. Then you get into things like exception recovery and tuning, and you are way outside the spec. Unless you have a very simple application it will not be portable without multiple configuration files and possibly a portably a portability layer. Yeh, well. That doesn't mean it isn't possible and that it isn't a goal required by more than one organisation that allows you to use software like JBoss (and TAO, OpenORB, etc..) See Herve Tchepannou's xpetstore for a good non-trivial example of what can be done. I have been writing more (and less) portable software for about 13 years now and know what is involved. There are always difficulties. But if there are standards used and adhered to it makes it easier. Writing an app that is portable between a J2EE server and .NET would be far more difficult, or portable to ObjectSpace's voyager or to a distributed agent platform, etc. Usually you don't need to actually do it, just convince the management that you can do it (and easily, at no cost, etc.. :-) If JBoss adheres to the standards as they are and will be then I will be able to keep using it. If it doesn't then (despite what I want to do) I probably won't be given the opportunity to keep using it. Remember, the customer is always right and you can't always punish them for the arrogance (apologies to Dogbert and Scott Adams :-) --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 17:07, Bill Burke wrote: Please ignore the FUD from SUN. We have and always will strictly abide by the standards. As I expected you would. Thanks and keep up the great work! brian wallis... --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There! NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today! http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:42, Tom Elrod wrote: IMHO, I don't know that passing the certification tests now would be of much benefit to JBoss. The biggest drawback I can see is that with JBoss 4, we will be moving people away from having to deal with all the extra API non-sense that J2EE developers have to deal with today. Just write your POJOs and we'll do the rest (persistence, caching, security, remoting, etc.). If we get certified now, might be added pressure to make JBoss 4 compliant as well, which I think would divert us from our current direction. IMHO, that would be about it for anyone (like me) who is trying to use jboss as well as other appservers. I seriously hope that jboss 4 will be fully compliant with the standards or else I fear it will become marginalised and in all likely hood die off. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open! Get cracking and register here for some mind boggling fun and the chance of winning an Apple iPod: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0031en ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
