Re: [JBoss-dev] Re: default web server
We will continue to use Jetty no matter. Our experience has been much better with Jetty than Tomcat. On Thursday, June 26, 2003, at 06:30 PM, Greg Wilkins wrote: Scott M Stark wrote: Simply because Tomcat is the defacto standard and the default choice for most of our users and I'm not happy with the level of integration we currently offer. For those of you who are using Jetty and are happy with that choice, I just want to assure you that regardless of what decisions the JBoss Group make, that Jetty in JBoss will continue to be supported by a strong open source community sponsored by Mort Bay and commercial support will be available for it from the core developers network. So we are continuing to develop and support the jetty sar for JBoss and hopefully it will continue to live in the JBoss project (although we may want to review the duplicate source tree issue). The intent will be to keep the web container services totally pluggable so that you can simple drop in the web sar of *your* choice. regards -- /** * Greg Wilkins * Partner * Core Developers Network **/ There's a difference between knowing the path and walking the path - morpheus --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers Consultants: Become An INetU Hosting Partner. Refer Dedicated Servers. We Manage Them. You Get 10% Monthly Commission! INetU Dedicated Managed Hosting http://www.inetu.net/partner/index.php ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] One thing I like about the Apache thing
Amen. Having jsp pages just recompile with a browser reload would save an huge amount of development time... admit the nightmare of scalability with PN there is one thing that caught my eye. I really had forgotten how nice it is to edit a webpage and see it picked up live by the webserver. It sounds like nothing but we really lost something with this stupid EAR/WAR packaging nightmare. We already support exploded deployment. Is there a way we can do partial redeployment of at least the static pages in JBoss? So we can edit the page quick without having to redeploy the full site? If I am lost and it is already done let me know and I will be quiet. marcf xx Marc Fleury, Ph.D. President, Founder JBoss Group, LLC xx --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] ONJAVA-- JBOSS: SUN NEEDS US
check it out... http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2002/03/20/jboss_interview.html he he he marcf bang! bang! bang! That was an inspired interview. You stated Jboss's position very well and it encourages me to move more and more development to Jboss. I would think Sun would read it, and realize that if they hold on too tight, .net is going to hurt them and once again the Microsoft marketing machine will inflict pain upon them with a lesser product. Certifying Jboss is the right thing for Sun to want to happen. Keep it up! Frank Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
