[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time
Hi! Thanks for tip about "transient log". That was the problem in JbossCache 1.1 I won't check CVS version for now. I'll wait till 2.0. And btw, when will it be? ~end of november? Rgrds, Tomasz View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3855184#3855184 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3855184 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time
Tomasz, I have tried your test case, it has worked in the latest jboss-head tree. Would you mind to try it out since I have made many enhancement, specially in TreeCacheAop part. You can test drive it and give me feedback as well. :-) BTW, you will need to make log transient so it is not put in the cache. Thanks, -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3855066#3855066 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3855066 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time
"bwang00" wrote : Can you create a JUnit test case and submit it here or email me ([EMAIL PROTECTED])? I'll take a look. | | Thanks, | | -Ben Ok. Prepared sources and sent to you. When you'll find the_thing, let us know and show where the problem lies. Thanks, Tomasz Nazar View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3854980#3854980 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3854980 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time
Can you create a JUnit test case and submit it here or email me ([EMAIL PROTECTED])? I'll take a look. Thanks, -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3854905#3854905 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3854905 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time
"bwang00" wrote : For setter method, you can't ovelroad it like: | | void setName(String name); | void setName(Object obj); | | This will be fixed in the upcoming 1.2 release in November. In addition, the collection classes api will be enhanced as well. | | -Ben Sorry, but had to let you know.. I have two classes. None of them overloads any method. One implements interface. Every getter/settter exists for every private field (except static ones). Still have: "IAE: get/set types differ" when putting object to cache.. :( JBossCache 1.1 :( I have sth like this: Root: | List _children; | addChild(Child); | findChild(String name); | | ChildImpl implements Child | | | Child | getName() | ... | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3854804#3854804 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3854804 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time
Hi, I believe I have the same stack overflow problem. Slight differences are that I am just using a putObject to insert the object that contains my Collection (in my case an ArrayList). The putObject operation seems to work fine and the result of printDetails look as I would expect them to. The stack overflow (same as listed in a previous post) problem occurs when accessing the get method for the object's ArrayList. Other non Collection based get's from the same object do work. This only seems to be a problem when accessing the cache from within JBossAS. Other applications, running outside of the container, can access the object's ArrayList without a problem. Not sure this helps. I'm still struggling to to work out what I am doing wrong. Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3854272#3854272 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3854272 --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time
Just the get/set methods can't be overloaded now. Constructor should be ok. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852370#3852370 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3852370 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time
"bwang00" wrote : For setter method, you can't ovelroad it like: | | void setName(String name); | void setName(Object obj); | | This will be fixed in the upcoming 1.2 release in November. In addition, the collection classes api will be enhanced as well. | | -Ben OK, thanks for info. I'm curiuos.. does this overloading also includes constructors and/or methods with different arguments number? Regards, Tomasz View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852324#3852324 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3852324 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time
Ben, thanks for your replies.
I managed to work around my problem with the overloaded method by not preparing the
class that was causing the problem (it's just a value in a Map, and I'll just pretend
it's immutable whilst I'm testing!).
So, I did manage to get my CounterLicense put into the cache, and it gets replicated
OK, but changes the a Map object my class holds don't seem to be getting replicated -
when I call a buisiness method on the CounterLicense class it does a put on the Map.
Whilst the in-memory representation of Map on the server it was created contains the
additional entry, I don't see it when I "printDetails" on the TreeCacheAop MBean on
either of the servers I have clustered.
In the tutorial it mentions that you have to get the collection from the cache in
order to get the dynamic proxy that has replaced the Map. So when I'm putting my
CounterLicense into the cache I tried overriding it's reference to the Map with what I
get from the cache:
| treeCache.putObject(new Fqn("/licenses/lic123"), license);
| license.setPropertyMap((Map)treeCache.getObject(new
Fqn("/licenses/lic123/properties")));
|
but this causes a (not very useful) stack overflow:
| ...
| at javassist.ClassPool.toClass(ClassPool.java:713)
| at org.jboss.aop.deployment.JBossClassPool.toClass(JBossClassPool.java:50)
| at javassist.ClassPool.toClass(ClassPool.java:713)
| at org.jboss.aop.deployment.JBossClassPool.toClass(JBossClassPool.java:50)
|
| at
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.AbstractTxInterceptor.invokeNext(AbstractTxInterceptor.java:207)
| at
org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.runWithTransactions(TxInterceptorCMT.java:316)
| at org.jboss.ejb.plugins.TxInterceptorCMT.invoke(TxInterceptorCMT.java:149)
|
So I'm assuming that wasn't the right thing to do!
However, looking at printDetails in the JMX console, I'm not sure whether it's a proxy
that's bound into the cache in place of the Map:
/licenses
| /lic123
| jboss:internal:class: class com.ingenta.ics.license.CounterLicense
| AOPInstance: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| ... (other fields)...
|
| /properties
| jboss:internal:class: class java.util.HashMap
|
My environment is JBoss-4.0.0 using the included jboss-aop and jboss-cache versions,
but with an upgraded version of javassist.jar.
Is this something that would be addressed by the upcoming Collection enhancements in
the 1.2 release?
Regards,
-Andrew
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852234#3852234
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3852234
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time
For setter method, you can't ovelroad it like: void setName(String name); void setName(Object obj); This will be fixed in the upcoming 1.2 release in November. In addition, the collection classes api will be enhanced as well. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852220#3852220 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3852220 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time
Hello, I have the same problem with the difference that: -JbossCache 1.1 -standalone without anything else (JBossAS..) -adviced all the classes' fields with 'prepare' tag -have two different applications: Forum and Bank -both uses collections but Bank uses map.values() and a map where values consists of other collections (Lists) -Forum applications works OK *-Bank throws exception when putting into tree : "..IllegalArgumentException: get/set types differ" Any suggestions? Is the problem related to lack of support for these collections' methods? Could you be more specific about "overloading a call to a method", please? Best regards, Tomasz View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852196#3852196 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3852196 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time
Andrew, To asnwer your questions. 1) The exception you reported looks like a bug to me. I will fix it soon. 2) To get around that, you can't overload the method call now. 3) In jboss-aop.xml, you will need to prepare all of classes with field interception. That's the most important part. Thanks, -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852132#3852132 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3852132 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] [JBossCache] - Re: Problems with using TreeCacheAop for the first time
Here's an update. I ran AopC over my classes using the same jboss-aop.xml and it aspectized them. When I added the same objects to the TreeCacheAop it now appears to be trying to create a tree of the objects that compose my CounterLicense, but it fails with this error: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: get/set types differ | at org.jboss.cache.aop.CachedAttribute.setType(CachedAttribute.java:41) | at org.jboss.cache.aop.CachedType.analyze(CachedType.java:163) | at org.jboss.cache.aop.CachedType.(CachedType.java:55) | I've not confirmed this with a debugger, but from reading the CachedType code I'm fairly sure that this is because one of the component object has an overloaded set method (e.g. setValue(Object) and setValue(String)), and the second method with the same attribute name causes this error. Is there any way to work around this (other than changing the classes)? Does the TreeCacheAop only detect changes via get/set methods or does it examine modifications to fields directly? If so, can I configure the prepare such that it ignores the methods on only considers the fields? Or am I just talking garbage? -Andrew View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3852117#3852117 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3852117 --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl ___ JBoss-Development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
