[JBoss-dev] RE: Improving the JBAS JIRA handling process

2006-04-17 Thread Dimitris Andreadis

This is the beginning of the discussion!

So if anyone wants to propose what component/leads need
add/remove/change?

  I completely agree with all of those.  Have you started 
 the discussion on the components leads yet?  If not, let's 
 get that discussion started.  I think that is the first thing 
 that needs to get straightened out.  After that, we can start 
 to put some processes in place to make things smoother.  Some 
 components are also in transistion, such as transactions and 
 JMS.  So, we need to have an understanding that the 
 components leads in JBoss AS 5 will be different then they 
 are in JBoss AS 4.0.x or 3.2.x.
 
 Andy


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] RE: Improving the JBAS JIRA handling process

2006-04-17 Thread Adrian Brock
JCA == Weston Price

On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 09:55 -0500, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
 This is the beginning of the discussion!
 
 So if anyone wants to propose what component/leads need
 add/remove/change?
 
   I completely agree with all of those.  Have you started 
  the discussion on the components leads yet?  If not, let's 
  get that discussion started.  I think that is the first thing 
  that needs to get straightened out.  After that, we can start 
  to put some processes in place to make things smoother.  Some 
  components are also in transistion, such as transactions and 
  JMS.  So, we need to have an understanding that the 
  components leads in JBoss AS 5 will be different then they 
  are in JBoss AS 4.0.x or 3.2.x.
  
  Andy
-- 

Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss Inc.




---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=110944bid=241720dat=121642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] RE: Improving the JBAS JIRA handling process

2006-04-17 Thread Dimitris Andreadis

Some possibilities also:

Could be changed:
Build System == Ruel Loehr
Clustering == Brian Stansberry
JBossCache == Manik Surtani
IIOP = Franscisco Reverbel

Could be added:
ClassLoaders = Scott Stark
EJB3 = Bill Burke
EJB Timers == Dimitris Andreadis

Scott owns also the following components, one or more could be
off-loaded, maybe?
Installer == ?
Test Suite == ?
EJB == ?
Naming == ?
Logging = ?

Do we need also separate components for aop integration, the 2 consoles
and stuff in common  varia (or use other?)

How we deal with other ?

 -Original Message-
 From: Adrian Brock 
 Sent: 17 April, 2006 17:58
 To: Dimitris Andreadis
 Cc: Andy Miller; Scott M Stark; Ivelin Ivanov; jboss-development
 Subject: RE: Improving the JBAS JIRA handling process
 
 JCA == Weston Price
 
 On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 09:55 -0500, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
  This is the beginning of the discussion!
  
  So if anyone wants to propose what component/leads need 
  add/remove/change?
  
I completely agree with all of those.  Have you started the 
   discussion on the components leads yet?  If not, let's get that 
   discussion started.  I think that is the first thing that 
 needs to 
   get straightened out.  After that, we can start to put some 
   processes in place to make things smoother.  Some components are 
   also in transistion, such as transactions and JMS.  So, 
 we need to 
   have an understanding that the components leads in JBoss 
 AS 5 will 
   be different then they are in JBoss AS 4.0.x or 3.2.x.
   
   Andy
 --
 
 Adrian Brock
 Chief Scientist
 JBoss Inc.
 
 
 


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


[JBoss-dev] RE: Improving the JBAS JIRA handling process

2006-04-17 Thread Scott M Stark
The main issue for improving progress is a more uniform application of
resources. If every lead is responsible for getting 1-2 production
release issues resolved per week, we would have a better progression to
a release as well as better understanding of what issues should be
delayed due to needing to be broken up better, reduced in priority, etc.

 -Original Message-
 From: Andy Miller 
 Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 7:25 AM
 To: Dimitris Andreadis; Adrian Brock; Scott M Stark; Ivelin Ivanov
 Cc: jboss-development
 Subject: RE: Improving the JBAS JIRA handling process
 
 Dimitris,
 
  I completely agree with all of those.  Have you started 
 the discussion on the components leads yet?  If not, let's 
 get that discussion started.  I think that is the first thing 
 that needs to get straightened out.  After that, we can start 
 to put some processes in place to make things smoother.  Some 
 components are also in transistion, such as transactions and 
 JMS.  So, we need to have an understanding that the 
 components leads in JBoss AS 5 will be different then they 
 are in JBoss AS 4.0.x or 3.2.x.
 
 Andy
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Dimitris Andreadis
 Sent: Mon 4/17/2006 4:41 AM
 To: Andy Miller; Adrian Brock; Scott M Stark; Ivelin Ivanov
 Cc: jboss-development
 Subject: Improving the JBAS JIRA handling process
  
 
 Some of the problems we have now with our JIRA case handling are:
 
 - entered cases often have no component assigned, thus nobody 
 looks at them
 - cases with a component are not qualified at all; we have 
 cases that date back to the sourceforge days
 - cases having more than one assigned components may cause 
 confusion as to who's handling them
 
 In addition, the current break-out of the server subsystems 
 into component (shown in the bottom) maybe a bit outdated.
 
 I believe we need to 
 
 A) clarify/document the JIRA case handling process
 B) revise/validate/update the component list and the leads
 C) throw in ideas for improving our case handling to make it 
 more effective and timely.
 
 Your input is welcome
 
 Thanks
 /Dimitris
 
 
 Build System (Lead: Scott M Stark)
 Clustering (Lead: Scott M Stark)
 CMP service (Lead: Alexey Loubyansky)
 Deployment Service (Lead: Dimitris Andreadis) Documentation 
 (Lead: Norman Richards) EJBs (Lead: Scott M Stark) Hibernate 
 service (Lead: Steve Ebersole) IIOP service (Lead: Dimitris 
 Andreadis) Installer (Lead: Scott M Stark) JAXR service 
 (Lead: Anil Saldhana) JBoss Cache service (Lead: Bela Ban) 
 JCA service (Lead: Adrian Brock) JGroups service (Lead: Bela 
 Ban) JMS service (Lead: Adrian Brock) JMX (Lead: Scott M 
 Stark) Logging (Lead: Scott M Stark) Management Service 
 (Lead: Dimitris Andreadis) MicroContainer bus (Lead: Adrian 
 Brock) Naming (Lead: Scott M Stark) Other Remoting (Lead: Tom 
 Elrod) Security (Lead: Scott M Stark) System Service (Lead: 
 Dimitris Andreadis) Test Suite (Lead: Scott M Stark) 
 Transaction Manager service (Lead: Adrian Brock) Web (Tomcat) 
 service (Lead: Remy Maucherat) Web Services service (Lead: 
 Thomas Diesler) XML Service (Lead: Alexey Loubyansky) 
 


---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development


RE: [JBoss-dev] RE: Improving the JBAS JIRA handling process

2006-04-17 Thread Brian Stansberry
I don't know what Manik thinks about this, but since JBossCache is a
separate project, I'm inclined to have it removed it from the AS
component list. Discourage people reporting issues against the wrong
project.  If they have issues with JBC integration in the AS, the
Clustering component should suffice.

I realize this may not be doable given the history of JIRAs from when
JBC was an AS component.  If not doable, no big deal; I don't think many
issues get raised against the component.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Some possibilities also:
 
 Could be changed:
 Build System == Ruel Loehr
 Clustering == Brian Stansberry
 JBossCache == Manik Surtani
 IIOP = Franscisco Reverbel
 
 Could be added:
 ClassLoaders = Scott Stark
 EJB3 = Bill Burke
 EJB Timers == Dimitris Andreadis
 
 Scott owns also the following components, one or more could be
 off-loaded, maybe? Installer == ?
 Test Suite == ?
 EJB == ?
 Naming == ?
 Logging = ?
 
 Do we need also separate components for aop integration, the
 2 consoles and stuff in common  varia (or use other?)
 
 How we deal with other ?
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Adrian Brock
 Sent: 17 April, 2006 17:58
 To: Dimitris Andreadis
 Cc: Andy Miller; Scott M Stark; Ivelin Ivanov; jboss-development
 Subject: RE: Improving the JBAS JIRA handling process
 
 JCA == Weston Price
 
 On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 09:55 -0500, Dimitris Andreadis wrote:
 This is the beginning of the discussion!
 
 So if anyone wants to propose what component/leads need
 add/remove/change? 
 
  I completely agree with all of those.  Have you started the
 discussion on the components leads yet?  If not, let's get that
 discussion started.  I think that is the first thing that needs to
 get straightened out.  After that, we can start to put some
 processes in place to make things smoother.  Some components are
 also in transistion, such as transactions and JMS.  So, we need to
 have an understanding that the components leads in JBoss AS 5 will
 be different then they are in JBoss AS 4.0.x or 3.2.x.
 
 Andy
 --
 
 Adrian Brock
 Chief Scientist
 JBoss Inc.
 
 
 
 
 
 ---
 This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking
 scripting language that extends applications into web and
 mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime
 developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
 http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=kkid0944bid$1720dat1642
 ___
 JBoss-Development mailing list
 JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0944bid$1720dat1642
___
JBoss-Development mailing list
JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development