[JBoss-dev] Re: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 2 - Build/thirdparty Issues
JBossXB is going to stay at CR3 unless WebServices request new urgent fixes. Dimitris Andreadis wrote: Various Issues -- - Breakage of jboss commons. Is this the right time, or should do for 4.0.5. Aren't we already overloaded? Who & How? - Which thirdparty libs can be removed? So far I've noticed apache-wss4j & apache-jaxme. - JBoss.Net is not even included in the docs/examples now. Should it be removed from the 4.0.x module checkout? - The following jboss lists are *NOT* final (GA). What will be updated for 4.0.4.GA? Project leads speak! -- xxx Dimitris Andreadis Core Developer JBoss Europe SàRL xxx --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] RE: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 2 - Build/thirdparty Issues
jboss.net module can't be removed due to the wonderful cvs modules behavior. I don't want a jboss-4.0.xv2 module alias definition. > > - JBoss.Net is not even included in the docs/examples now. > Should it be removed from the 4.0.x module checkout? > --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] RE: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 2 - Build/thirdparty Issues
We have to separate out jbossxb because of the jbossws dependency. This is already being integrated via a binary and that is all that needs to be done for the 4.0.4.GA release. All of the other breakup of common is a future thing. > - Breakage of jboss commons. Is this the right time, or > should do for 4.0.5. Aren't we already overloaded? Who & How? > --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] RE: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 2 - Build/thirdparty Issues
jbossws1.0 should be a final release. I think the only thing holding back jbossretro from a final release is feedback on the efficacy based on the current jbossws14 in 4.0.4CR2. > -Original Message- > From: Dimitris Andreadis > Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 3:33 AM > To: jboss-development > Cc: The Core > Subject: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 2 - Build/thirdparty Issues > Importance: High > > > Various Issues > -- > > - Breakage of jboss commons. Is this the right time, or > should do for 4.0.5. Aren't we already overloaded? Who & How? > > - Which thirdparty libs can be removed? So far I've noticed > apache-wss4j & apache-jaxme. > > - JBoss.Net is not even included in the docs/examples now. > Should it be removed from the 4.0.x module checkout? > > - The following jboss lists are *NOT* final (GA). What will > be updated for 4.0.4.GA? Project leads speak! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] RE: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 2 - Build/thirdparty Issues
Hibernate will stay at a CR; it will not go final until the EBJ3 spec is final... BTW, what is with Javassist being at the same exact version? Is that just coincidence? -Original Message- From: Dimitris Andreadis Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 5:33 AM To: jboss-development Cc: The Core Subject: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 2 - Build/thirdparty Issues Importance: High Various Issues -- - Breakage of jboss commons. Is this the right time, or should do for 4.0.5. Aren't we already overloaded? Who & How? - Which thirdparty libs can be removed? So far I've noticed apache-wss4j & apache-jaxme. - JBoss.Net is not even included in the docs/examples now. Should it be removed from the 4.0.x module checkout? - The following jboss lists are *NOT* final (GA). What will be updated for 4.0.4.GA? Project leads speak! -- xxx Dimitris Andreadis Core Developer JBoss Europe SàRL xxx --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] RE: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 2 - Build/thirdparty Issues
Coincidence. > -Original Message- > From: Steve Ebersole > Sent: 07 April, 2006 16:00 > To: Dimitris Andreadis; 'jboss-development' > Cc: The Core > Subject: RE: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 2 - Build/thirdparty Issues > > Hibernate will stay at a CR; it will not go final until the > EBJ3 spec is final... > > BTW, what is with Javassist being at the same exact version? > Is that just coincidence? > > > -Original Message- > From: Dimitris Andreadis > Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 5:33 AM > To: jboss-development > Cc: The Core > Subject: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 2 - Build/thirdparty Issues > Importance: High > > > Various Issues > -- > > - Breakage of jboss commons. Is this the right time, or > should do for 4.0.5. Aren't we already overloaded? Who & How? > > - Which thirdparty libs can be removed? So far I've noticed > apache-wss4j & apache-jaxme. > > - JBoss.Net is not even included in the docs/examples now. > Should it be removed from the 4.0.x module checkout? > > - The following jboss lists are *NOT* final (GA). What will > be updated for 4.0.4.GA? Project leads speak! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > xxx > Dimitris Andreadis > Core Developer > JBoss Europe SàRL > xxx > --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] RE: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 2 - Build/thirdparty Issues
We plan to do a final relase during the course of this week. xxx Thomas Diesler Web Service Lead JBoss Inc. xxx >-Original Message- >From: Scott M Stark >Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 20:58 >To: Dimitris Andreadis; 'jboss-development' >Cc: The Core >Subject: RE: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 2 - Build/thirdparty Issues > >jbossws1.0 should be a final release. I think the only thing >holding back jbossretro from a final release is feedback on >the efficacy based on the current jbossws14 in 4.0.4CR2. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Dimitris Andreadis >> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 3:33 AM >> To: jboss-development >> Cc: The Core >> Subject: Toward JBoss v4.0.4.GA - Part 2 - Build/thirdparty Issues >> Importance: High >> >> >> Various Issues >> -- >> >> - Breakage of jboss commons. Is this the right time, or >should do for >> 4.0.5. Aren't we already overloaded? Who & How? >> >> - Which thirdparty libs can be removed? So far I've noticed >> apache-wss4j & apache-jaxme. >> >> - JBoss.Net is not even included in the docs/examples now. >> Should it be removed from the 4.0.x module checkout? >> >> - The following jboss lists are *NOT* final (GA). What will >be updated >> for 4.0.4.GA? Project leads speak! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 ___ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
