RE: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
It is possible that the behavior has changed since ant 1.2. You might try using instead. Otherwise I don't know. I am working on some ideas for fixing all of this mess right now. The build system has grown and now there are a few more projects going on... so I have bumped up this on my priorities. --jason > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 5:39 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets? > > Well, here's the file. > > david > > On 2002.09.27 18:13:55 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > > What does the property and path definition looks like? > > > > --jason > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks > > > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:27 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available > > targets? > > > > > > I can't get this to work. I removed all the * patterns from > > > libraries.ent, > > > removed all the conditional targets Dain put in, and when I try to use > > it > > > in the jmx mini-project I get > > > > > > BUILD FAILED > > > jar:file:/usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/tools/lib/buildmagic- > > > tasks.jar!/org/jboss/tools/buildmagic/common.xml:68: > > > /usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/thirdparty/apache/axis/lib not > > > found. > > > > > > just as I did with the *.jar patterns. Any ideas? > > > > > > thanks > > > david jencks > > > > > > > > > On 2002.09.20 16:34:23 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > > > > The only bits that are not lazy are the glob specs... like *.jar, so > > > > simply listing the jars explicitly will resolve this without needing > > to > > > > check for the availability of them. > > > > > > > > --jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks > > > > > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:15 PM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available > > > > targets? > > > > > > > > > > Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx > > project > > > > > (outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly > > jmx-only > > > > and > > > > > all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that > > actually > > > > are > > > > > available. > > > > > > > > > > I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but > > > > apparently > > > > > some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is > > > > parsed. > > > > > I > > > > > thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was > > wrong. > > > > > > > > > > david jencks > > > > > > > > > > On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > > > > > > Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. > > > > > > > > > > > > --jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > > > ___ > > > > > > Jboss-development mailing list > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > > ___ > > > > > Jboss-developme
Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
Well, here's the file. david On 2002.09.27 18:13:55 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > What does the property and path definition looks like? > > --jason > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks > > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:27 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available > targets? > > > > I can't get this to work. I removed all the * patterns from > > libraries.ent, > > removed all the conditional targets Dain put in, and when I try to use > it > > in the jmx mini-project I get > > > > BUILD FAILED > > jar:file:/usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/tools/lib/buildmagic- > > tasks.jar!/org/jboss/tools/buildmagic/common.xml:68: > > /usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/thirdparty/apache/axis/lib not > > found. > > > > just as I did with the *.jar patterns. Any ideas? > > > > thanks > > david jencks > > > > > > On 2002.09.20 16:34:23 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > > > The only bits that are not lazy are the glob specs... like *.jar, so > > > simply listing the jars explicitly will resolve this without needing > to > > > check for the availability of them. > > > > > > --jason > > > > > > > > > > -Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks > > > > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:15 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available > > > targets? > > > > > > > > Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx > project > > > > (outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly > jmx-only > > > and > > > > all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that > actually > > > are > > > > available. > > > > > > > > I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but > > > apparently > > > > some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is > > > parsed. > > > > I > > > > thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was > wrong. > > > > > > > > david jencks > > > > > > > > On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > > > > > Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. > > > > > > > > > > --jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > > ___ > > > > > Jboss-development mailing list > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > ___ > > > > Jboss-development mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > ___ > > > Jboss-development mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > ___ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > libraries.ent Description: Binary data
RE: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
What does the property and path definition looks like? --jason > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 1:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets? > > I can't get this to work. I removed all the * patterns from > libraries.ent, > removed all the conditional targets Dain put in, and when I try to use it > in the jmx mini-project I get > > BUILD FAILED > jar:file:/usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/tools/lib/buildmagic- > tasks.jar!/org/jboss/tools/buildmagic/common.xml:68: > /usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/thirdparty/apache/axis/lib not > found. > > just as I did with the *.jar patterns. Any ideas? > > thanks > david jencks > > > On 2002.09.20 16:34:23 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > > The only bits that are not lazy are the glob specs... like *.jar, so > > simply listing the jars explicitly will resolve this without needing to > > check for the availability of them. > > > > --jason > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks > > > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:15 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available > > targets? > > > > > > Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx project > > > (outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly jmx-only > > and > > > all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that actually > > are > > > available. > > > > > > I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but > > apparently > > > some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is > > parsed. > > > I > > > thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was wrong. > > > > > > david jencks > > > > > > On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > > > > Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. > > > > > > > > --jason > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > > ___ > > > > Jboss-development mailing list > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > ___ > > > Jboss-development mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > > --- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > ___ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
I can't get this to work. I removed all the * patterns from libraries.ent, removed all the conditional targets Dain put in, and when I try to use it in the jmx mini-project I get BUILD FAILED jar:file:/usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/tools/lib/buildmagic-tasks.jar!/org/jboss/tools/buildmagic/common.xml:68: /usr/java/jboss/jbossmx-only/jboss-mx/thirdparty/apache/axis/lib not found. just as I did with the *.jar patterns. Any ideas? thanks david jencks On 2002.09.20 16:34:23 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > The only bits that are not lazy are the glob specs... like *.jar, so > simply listing the jars explicitly will resolve this without needing to > check for the availability of them. > > --jason > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks > > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:15 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available > targets? > > > > Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx project > > (outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly jmx-only > and > > all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that actually > are > > available. > > > > I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but > apparently > > some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is > parsed. > > I > > thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was wrong. > > > > david jencks > > > > On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > > > Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. > > > > > > --jason > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > > ___ > > > Jboss-development mailing list > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > ___ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
I did not know that. Do we care about all the library available tasks? The take no time, but print a lot of stuff during build. If we do care, do you want to make the change Jason? Otherwise, I can. -dain Jason Dillon wrote: > The only bits that are not lazy are the glob specs... like *.jar, so > simply listing the jars explicitly will resolve this without needing to > check for the availability of them. > > --jason > > > >>-Original Message- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks >>Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:15 PM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available > > targets? > >>Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx project >>(outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly jmx-only > > and > >>all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that actually > > are > >>available. >> >>I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but > > apparently > >>some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is > > parsed. > >>I >>thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was wrong. >> >>david jencks >> >>On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: >> >>>Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. >>> >>>--jason >>> >>> >>> >>>--- >>>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >>>Welcome to geek heaven. >>>http://thinkgeek.com/sf >>>___ >>>Jboss-development mailing list >>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >>> >>> >> >> >>--- >>This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >>Welcome to geek heaven. >>http://thinkgeek.com/sf >>___ >>Jboss-development mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development -- Dain Sundstrom Chief Architect JBossCMP JBoss Group, LLC --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
RE: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
The only bits that are not lazy are the glob specs... like *.jar, so simply listing the jars explicitly will resolve this without needing to check for the availability of them. --jason > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Jencks > Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 1:15 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets? > > Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx project > (outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly jmx-only and > all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that actually are > available. > > I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but apparently > some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is parsed. > I > thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was wrong. > > david jencks > > On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > > Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. > > > > --jason > > > > > > > > --- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > ___ > > Jboss-development mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
Re: [JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
Juha didn't want all of thirdparty downloaded to build the jmx project (outside of jboss). I wrote something with 2 chunks, roughly jmx-only and all. Dain generalized this to only include libraries that actually are available. I don't completely understand why this is needed either, but apparently some part of the classpath definition has to be there when it is parsed. I thought everything was lazily evaluated, but apparently I was wrong. david jencks On 2002.09.20 15:56:40 -0400 Jason Dillon wrote: > Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. > > --jason > > > > --- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > ___ > Jboss-development mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
[JBoss-dev] What is up with the library available targets?
Please explain this to me... I don't get why this is needed. --jason --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
