RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBosssub-deployer in HEAD

2003-01-08 Thread Adam Heath
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Sacha Labourey wrote:

 EAR (not war though): it should deploy  thanks to the russian dolls

btw, I really like the term 'russion dolls' applied as the name of the nested
deployment feature.  It's cute.



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



RE: [Beanshell-users] Re: [JBoss-dev] ANNOUNCE: BeanShell JBosssub-deployer in HEAD

2003-01-08 Thread Adam Heath
On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Sacha Labourey wrote:


  If something like this could also be added to J2EE deployments(in META-INF
  dirs), then I'd be even more excited.

 Well, have you simply tried to put a xxx.bsh file inside your JAR, SAR or
 EAR (not war though): it should deploy  thanks to the russian dolls
 packaging feature.

Oh, hmm, forgot about that.

Yeah, that would work, but is not what I want.

I'd like a way to have some bit of code called for the start/stop/init/destroy
methods, in parallel to the ear service methods.

So, when ear.init() is called, my own code is also called.

What you suggest would be a separate deployment underneath the ear.



---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development